ML20067E389: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:%
o                                              .    .
kyg                          g    es  m P w M an vwwt a nw ou January 29, 1991 rm v sw uthe% W krveGsn                                                                sa'." m LN U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:    Document Control Desk Washington, DC        20555 Rcferencas      Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. I Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Main reedwater Piping Evaluation Gentlemen:
This letter forwards an evaluation of main feedwater piping misalignment and . steam generator nozzle cracking at Beaver Valley Tswer Station Unit 1.              The report documents findings resulting from inspections        conducted    during      the seventh refueling outage and subsequent monitoring of the "A" steam generator feedwater line after the refueling outage.
The following paragraphs summarize the licensing issues raised by                          i the report,        actions taken to date and planned actions.
Linenpinn Issues
: 1.      Based    on    recorded    displacement      data    and    subsequent correlative analysis it was determined that two (2) monoball supports    (R3 and R4) were potentially providing unanticipated restraint to the loop "A" feedwater piping.
The Engineering evaluation concluded that the postulation of binding monoball supports could cause monoball structural
                . frame components to exceed upset limits (per the design basis ANSI B31.1 -        1967) during an Operational Basis Earthquake.
However,          the supports do meet the one time                loading requirements of ASME III Appendix F.
Application of ASME III Appendix F is considered reasonabic for operation until        the next refueling outage since it is based on sound engineering principles and material behavior, and has been utilized in the design of several nuclear facilities.
: 2.      Under the assumed conditions of global thermal stratification and locked monoballs, pipe support SH-6 exceeds acceptance criteria    for  evaluation of local piping stresses due to integral    welded  attachments.      However,  the pipe support was found to be acceptable based on the criteria of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N318-3.                  This code case is identified in Regulatory Guide 1.84 as acceptable to the NRC staff.
Ij(
9102140245 910129 DR    ADOCK0500ggg4 f)f)/
: i.                                                                                                                                                              i Page 2 Licensina Issues (Continuedl The code case provides relief from conservative. stress indices and limits provided certain geometric limitations are satisfied.
: 3.                          Design      basis pipe rupture critoria are exceeded under                                                        ;
presumed          conditions of global thermal stratification (a condition outside the BVPS-1 design basis). However,                                                  it has boon determined that the main feedwater piping does. meet the    pipo rupture criteria contained in NRC Mechanical Engineering Branch Technical Position 3-1.
Aptions Taken To Date Administrativo. controls have been implemented (for operation until    the        next refueling outage) to require the plant to be shutdown          after any seismic event exceeding 25 percent of the operational Basis Earthquake.                            Seismic activity at higher levels could result- in loop A feodwater-piping supports exceeding their upset allowable limits.                                                                            .
An evaluation of all other monoball piping supports has been initiated to determine                        if  similar concerns exist in other piping systems.                      So far, three monoball supports have been identified on the main steam lines and are being evaluated.
Other systems will be reviewed to identify any additional monoball supports.                      Purther corrective actions will be                                        ,
initiated if additiona? concerns are identified.
The' organization which provided the monoball design has boon notified of the potential binding.                          It was recommended that
                                          - the. potential. effects of this issue on-other clients be                                                            !
evaluated.
Elanned Actionn                                                                                                                                  .
: 1.                          At -the      next. refueling outage, monoball piping supports of concern      (R3, and R4)              will-be repaired, modiflod or replaced to address deficiencies.                            This is an expeditious approach.
since inspection and verification that the monoballs are
                                            . functioning correctly- is a complex process. Testinglof the supports cannot be accomplished during plant operation, and removal .of the supports would have to- occur- during an outage.
Monoball support R11 on Loop C will also be repaired, modified or replaced since it is of the same design as R3 and R4, and the piping system it supports is susceptible to the offects of global thermal stratification.
      .e---- - -
                ,_,..-.,,,.,-,-.,,-,,,,..w---      ,  _m_ -,-y    -,e, , - - - ~ *
                                                                                      ,    ,-        ,                    ,,          , ,_-.w -
                                                                                                                                                  ,..-,,,<.-,,y
 
o s.
se Page 3 Planned Actions (continued)
These    corrective actions will ensure that the main feedwater piping    and supports operate within the design basis (ANSI B31.1-1967) criterih even considering the effects of global thermal stratification.
: 2.        Spring      hanger pipe support SH-6 was determined to be acceptable based on the criteria of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N 318-3. It is hereby requested that the NRC approve the use of ASME Ccde Case N 318-3 to support operation-      following    the    next      refueling outage. In accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.84,                Revision 26, the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report will be revised to identify:
(1)  the method of lug attachment,                                      '
(2)  the piping system involved,          and (3)  the location in the system where
                                  -the case is to be applied.
: 3.        Additional instrumentation will be installed (on loops A and C)- at the next refueling outage to confirm and better define the    _
global    thermal stratification profiles assumed in analyses.        Additional information gathered through this instrumentation        program    will    better define the global thermal      stratification      phenomenon        in main  feed water piping.      This additional information will also aid in determining the generic implications of this phenomenon for the industry.
It  is    hereby requested that the NRC approve the use of pipe rupture    criteria cortained in Branch Technical Position MED 3-1      to support operation following the next refueling outage.      The Updated Final Safety Evaluation Report will be revised      to  .
identify-  the piping systems where Branch-Technical Position MEB 3-1 is applied.
Sincere];,
                                                                              /    L:  ,
                                                                          . D. Sieber-Vice President Nuclear Group cc: Mr. J. Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. T. T. Martin, NRC Region I Administrator Mr. A. W. DeAgazio, Project Manager Mr.      R. Saunders (VEPCO) i
        ,    ,      - - , .}}

Latest revision as of 19:08, 28 August 2020

Forwards Evaluation of Main Feedwater Piping Misalignment & Steam Generator Nozzle Cracking Final Rept.Rept Documents Findings Resulting from Insps Conducted During Seventh Refueling Outage
ML20067E389
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/29/1991
From: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20067E390 List:
References
NUDOCS 9102140245
Download: ML20067E389 (3)


Text

%

o . .

kyg g es m P w M an vwwt a nw ou January 29, 1991 rm v sw uthe% W krveGsn sa'." m LN U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Rcferencas Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. I Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Main reedwater Piping Evaluation Gentlemen:

This letter forwards an evaluation of main feedwater piping misalignment and . steam generator nozzle cracking at Beaver Valley Tswer Station Unit 1. The report documents findings resulting from inspections conducted during the seventh refueling outage and subsequent monitoring of the "A" steam generator feedwater line after the refueling outage.

The following paragraphs summarize the licensing issues raised by i the report, actions taken to date and planned actions.

Linenpinn Issues

1. Based on recorded displacement data and subsequent correlative analysis it was determined that two (2) monoball supports (R3 and R4) were potentially providing unanticipated restraint to the loop "A" feedwater piping.

The Engineering evaluation concluded that the postulation of binding monoball supports could cause monoball structural

. frame components to exceed upset limits (per the design basis ANSI B31.1 - 1967) during an Operational Basis Earthquake.

However, the supports do meet the one time loading requirements of ASME III Appendix F.

Application of ASME III Appendix F is considered reasonabic for operation until the next refueling outage since it is based on sound engineering principles and material behavior, and has been utilized in the design of several nuclear facilities.

2. Under the assumed conditions of global thermal stratification and locked monoballs, pipe support SH-6 exceeds acceptance criteria for evaluation of local piping stresses due to integral welded attachments. However, the pipe support was found to be acceptable based on the criteria of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N318-3. This code case is identified in Regulatory Guide 1.84 as acceptable to the NRC staff.

Ij(

9102140245 910129 DR ADOCK0500ggg4 f)f)/

i. i Page 2 Licensina Issues (Continuedl The code case provides relief from conservative. stress indices and limits provided certain geometric limitations are satisfied.
3. Design basis pipe rupture critoria are exceeded under  ;

presumed conditions of global thermal stratification (a condition outside the BVPS-1 design basis). However, it has boon determined that the main feedwater piping does. meet the pipo rupture criteria contained in NRC Mechanical Engineering Branch Technical Position 3-1.

Aptions Taken To Date Administrativo. controls have been implemented (for operation until the next refueling outage) to require the plant to be shutdown after any seismic event exceeding 25 percent of the operational Basis Earthquake. Seismic activity at higher levels could result- in loop A feodwater-piping supports exceeding their upset allowable limits. .

An evaluation of all other monoball piping supports has been initiated to determine if similar concerns exist in other piping systems. So far, three monoball supports have been identified on the main steam lines and are being evaluated.

Other systems will be reviewed to identify any additional monoball supports. Purther corrective actions will be ,

initiated if additiona? concerns are identified.

The' organization which provided the monoball design has boon notified of the potential binding. It was recommended that

- the. potential. effects of this issue on-other clients be  !

evaluated.

Elanned Actionn .

1. At -the next. refueling outage, monoball piping supports of concern (R3, and R4) will-be repaired, modiflod or replaced to address deficiencies. This is an expeditious approach.

since inspection and verification that the monoballs are

. functioning correctly- is a complex process. Testinglof the supports cannot be accomplished during plant operation, and removal .of the supports would have to- occur- during an outage.

Monoball support R11 on Loop C will also be repaired, modified or replaced since it is of the same design as R3 and R4, and the piping system it supports is susceptible to the offects of global thermal stratification.

.e---- - -

,_,..-.,,,.,-,-.,,-,,,,..w--- , _m_ -,-y -,e, , - - - ~ *

, ,- , ,, , ,_-.w -

,..-,,,<.-,,y

o s.

se Page 3 Planned Actions (continued)

These corrective actions will ensure that the main feedwater piping and supports operate within the design basis (ANSI B31.1-1967) criterih even considering the effects of global thermal stratification.

2. Spring hanger pipe support SH-6 was determined to be acceptable based on the criteria of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N 318-3. It is hereby requested that the NRC approve the use of ASME Ccde Case N 318-3 to support operation- following the next refueling outage. In accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 26, the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report will be revised to identify:

(1) the method of lug attachment, '

(2) the piping system involved, and (3) the location in the system where

-the case is to be applied.

3. Additional instrumentation will be installed (on loops A and C)- at the next refueling outage to confirm and better define the _

global thermal stratification profiles assumed in analyses. Additional information gathered through this instrumentation program will better define the global thermal stratification phenomenon in main feed water piping. This additional information will also aid in determining the generic implications of this phenomenon for the industry.

It is hereby requested that the NRC approve the use of pipe rupture criteria cortained in Branch Technical Position MED 3-1 to support operation following the next refueling outage. The Updated Final Safety Evaluation Report will be revised to .

identify- the piping systems where Branch-Technical Position MEB 3-1 is applied.

Sincere];,

/ L: ,

. D. Sieber-Vice President Nuclear Group cc: Mr. J. Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. T. T. Martin, NRC Region I Administrator Mr. A. W. DeAgazio, Project Manager Mr. R. Saunders (VEPCO) i

, , - - , .