ML20009A438: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:..
7/9/8I                              e O              A.
                                                                                                                          // \
g                        v' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                DW .            \
b_
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                        _                            j" q.-
f,G s>9'- '          [.
BEFORE THE COMMISSION                                                  e~
fy      k. .
                                                                                                                            'M
                                                                                                        /
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND                        )                                        d GAS COMPANY and                                )
                                                                        )    Docket No. 50                95 SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE ll(o)K
                                                                        )
AUTHORITY                                      )                <
4 //
(Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station,                            '[,[/
Unit 1)                                        )              ?
                                                                                    \S          JQ 10198k "$
Y:y , &l%%
e, SCE&G'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME                                            g W!y y            V By ".  . .        Petition for Rehearing" served by mail on July 6, 1981, Central Electric Power Cooperative seeks re-consideration of the Commission's order issued June 26, 1981 and served June 29, 1981.                The thrust of that order was to deny Central Electric Power Cooperative's petition for a finding of significant changes, in accordance with subsection 105c.2 of the Atomic Energy Act, and for initiation of operating license antitrust review in the captioned matter.
On July 8, 1981 we received the Ccmmission's issuance l                    entitled " Schedule for Response to Central Electric Power Co-operative's Petition for Reconsideration" which apparently was served by mail on July 7, 1981.                The thrust of the July 7th l                    Commission issuance is apparently to reduce the time SCE&G would l
!                                                                                                                              C 8107130086 810709                                                                    j
,      PDR ADOCK 03000395                                                                        p#[
M                    PDR                                                                      \
 
                                                          - - ~
;                                                                                                                                normally have for reply pursuant to 10 C.F.R. SS2.771 and 2.710 from July 21, 1981 to July 17, 1981 and to extend the time for response for the NRC Staff from July 20, 1981 to July 31, 1981, while providing the opportunity to the Department of Justice to i
I respond by July 24, 1981.
The undersigned, who is the principal counsel for SCE&G
!                                              in the captioned matter, is and will be engaged as the principal attorney in trial of the operating license health and safety proceeding involving the same application before an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in Columbia, South Carolina.      Two sessions of hearings in that proceeding have already been held June 22 - June 27 and June 30 - July 2, and hearings are scheduled to resume on Monday, July 13th and to continue for at least one week or until July 24th, or later, as ordered by the Licensing Board.      There is presently no other outside attorney familiar with the anti-trust matter.      The only Company attorney familiar with the antitrust matter is SCE&G's General Counsel whose other duties and commitments do not permit devotion of the time necessary to
]                                            preparing a response herein by July 17.h.
1 In the circumstances, SCE&G respectfully requests that the time for SCE&G's response be extended to at least July 31, 1981~1/ and 1/  Scheduling information provided by the Licensing Board in the health and safety proceeding in a conference call some time ago indicates that no hearing can be held in the operating license matter (assuming there is some need not now foreseen to continue that proceeding after July 24) during the week of July 27, 1981.
Assuming the continued correctness of the premise that no hearing will be scheduled for the week of July 27, a July 31, 1981 response date will afford five working days for the preparation (continued on page 3) l
    . - - . _ . _ . _ ~ . . , _ - - ~ ~ . _ . _ -                    ~.__,,_ ._ ._              -
 
and that the response dates for the Department of Justice and the NRC Staff be adjusted correspondingly at the intervals provided by the Commission's July 7, 1981 schedule.                                                                  Counsel for the NRC Staff, for the Department of Justice and for the Authority have authorized us to state that they have no objection to the requested schedule set forth below.                                                                  (We would have no objection to an order which set the same response date for the Public Service Authority as for SCE&G.)                                                                Counsel for Central indicates that, under his reading (with which we differ) of the NRC Rules of Practice as to the time available for filing his petition, he had only two working days in which to file and 1
will not consent to the requested extension.                                                                  However, he l
requested that we report that he would not object to a sub-stantial extension of our reply schedule if Central were permitted several weeks to perfect and refile its petition for recon-i        sideration, the other parties being afforded corresponding reply i
time. Since we would have read 10 C.F.R.                                                                SS2.771 and 2.710 as
:        affording Central a total of fifteen days from June 29, 1981 to file, and would not have objected to a reasonable extension of 1/ (Continued from page 2) of a response -- more if the hearings are concluded f            earlier, as SCE&G will urge. The undersigned believes that five days is the absolute minimum period required by considerations of professional obligations. No other party is aggrieved by the extension of time sought herein.
                      . _ . , _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - - ~ _ - _
 
1 a
4_
4 I
time beyond that for filing a petition for reconsideration in the first instance, and since we cannot reply on the schedule i
I                        set, we interpose no objection to the rather unusual procedure i
of " starting over" on the reconsideration matter.
Respectfully submitted,
                                                          .'S'i%ecv Joseph B. Knotts Jr.
Counsel for South Carolina Date:  July 9, 1981              Electric & Gas Company JBK/pv l
i i
l          -m 1
1 I
I i
i i
1
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of:
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS                                          )
COMPANY and                                                        )
                                                                                )
SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE                                          )                              Docket No. 50-395A AUTHORITY                                                          )
                                                                                )
(Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, )
Unit 1)                                                            )
f                                                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE l
,                      I hereby certify that copies of "SCE&G's Request for i
Extension of Time" in the above captioned matter, were served upon the following persons by deposit in the United States mail, i
first class postage prepaid this 9th day of July, 1981.
1 Chairman Paladino                                                  Samuel J. Chilk Office of the Commission                                          Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory                                            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                              Commission Washington, D.C.                                20555              Washington, D.C.                              20555
)        Commissioner Gil,insky                                            Docketing and Service Section
.        Office of the Commission                                          Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory                                            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis'sion                                                              Commission Washington, D.C.                                20555              Washington, D.C.                              20555 I        Commissioner Bradford                                              Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Commission                                                    Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory                                            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                              Commission Washington, D.C.                                20555              Washington, D.C.                              20555 Commissioner Ahearne                                              Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Commission                                                    Board i        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory                                            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                                Commission Washington, D.C.                                20555              Washington, D.C.                              20555
 
Jerome Saltzman, Chief                  George H. Fischer, Esq.
Utility Finance Branch                  Vice President and Group U.S. Nuclear Regulatory                    Executive - Legal Affairs Commission                            South Carolina Electric &
Washington, D.C.          20555          Gas Company P.O. Box 764 Hugh P. Morrison, Jr., Esq.              Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Charles S. Leeper, Esq.
Michael Rand McQuinn                    Robert Medvocky, Esq.
Cahill, Gordon & Reindel                Reid & Priest 1990 K Street, N.W., Suite 650          1111 19th Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C.          20006        Washington, D.C. 20006 W.C. Mescher                            Edward C. Roberts, Esq.
President                                General Counsel C.H. McGlothlin, Jr., Esq.              South Carolina Electric &
South Carolina Public                      Gas Company Service Authority                    P.O. Box 764 223 N. Live Oak Drive                    Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Moncks Corner, South Carolina 29461 Joseph Rutberg, Esq.
P.T. Allen                              Fredric D. Chanania, Esq.
Executive Vice President                Office of Executive Legal and General Manager                    Director Central Electric Power                  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cooperative, Inc.                      Commission P.O. Box 1455                            Washington, D.C. 20555 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 John C. Ruoff C. Pinckney Roberts, Esq.              Post Office Box 96
,                          Dial, Jennings, Windham,                Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 i
Thomas & Roberts P.O. Box 1792                            Leonard Bickwit, Esq.
i                          Columbia, South Carolina 29202          General Counsel l                                                                  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Robert Fabrikant, Esq.                      Commission Janet R. Urban, Esq.                    Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division P.O. Box 14141 Washington, D.C.          20044 Wallace E. Brand, Esq.
Edward E. Hall, Esq.                        -s, I                          Brand & Hall                                    '
1523 L Street, N.W., Suite 200            '
Qph/j_/
Washington, D.C.          20005              (5/
Joseph B. Knot'ts, Jr.
?                                                                    ')
      - - . - . . - - . -        - . . - . , . . , -}}

Latest revision as of 12:16, 17 February 2020

Request for Extension of Time Until at Least 810731 for Util Reply to Petition for Reconsideration.Other Response Dates Should Be Adjusted Accordingly.W/Certificate of Service
ML20009A438
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/09/1981
From: Knotts J
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, DEBEVOISE & LIBERMAN, SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO., SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY (SANTEE COOPE
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8107130086
Download: ML20009A438 (6)


Text

..

7/9/8I e O A.

// \

g v' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DW . \

b_

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION _ j" q.-

f,G s>9'- ' [.

BEFORE THE COMMISSION e~

fy k. .

'M

/

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND ) d GAS COMPANY and )

) Docket No. 50 95 SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE ll(o)K

)

AUTHORITY ) <

4 //

(Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, '[,[/

Unit 1) )  ?

\S JQ 10198k "$

Y:y , &l%%

e, SCE&G'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME g W!y y V By ". . . Petition for Rehearing" served by mail on July 6, 1981, Central Electric Power Cooperative seeks re-consideration of the Commission's order issued June 26, 1981 and served June 29, 1981. The thrust of that order was to deny Central Electric Power Cooperative's petition for a finding of significant changes, in accordance with subsection 105c.2 of the Atomic Energy Act, and for initiation of operating license antitrust review in the captioned matter.

On July 8, 1981 we received the Ccmmission's issuance l entitled " Schedule for Response to Central Electric Power Co-operative's Petition for Reconsideration" which apparently was served by mail on July 7, 1981. The thrust of the July 7th l Commission issuance is apparently to reduce the time SCE&G would l

! C 8107130086 810709 j

, PDR ADOCK 03000395 p#[

M PDR \

- - ~

normally have for reply pursuant to 10 C.F.R. SS2.771 and 2.710 from July 21, 1981 to July 17, 1981 and to extend the time for response for the NRC Staff from July 20, 1981 to July 31, 1981, while providing the opportunity to the Department of Justice to i

I respond by July 24, 1981.

The undersigned, who is the principal counsel for SCE&G

! in the captioned matter, is and will be engaged as the principal attorney in trial of the operating license health and safety proceeding involving the same application before an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in Columbia, South Carolina. Two sessions of hearings in that proceeding have already been held June 22 - June 27 and June 30 - July 2, and hearings are scheduled to resume on Monday, July 13th and to continue for at least one week or until July 24th, or later, as ordered by the Licensing Board. There is presently no other outside attorney familiar with the anti-trust matter. The only Company attorney familiar with the antitrust matter is SCE&G's General Counsel whose other duties and commitments do not permit devotion of the time necessary to

] preparing a response herein by July 17.h.

1 In the circumstances, SCE&G respectfully requests that the time for SCE&G's response be extended to at least July 31, 1981~1/ and 1/ Scheduling information provided by the Licensing Board in the health and safety proceeding in a conference call some time ago indicates that no hearing can be held in the operating license matter (assuming there is some need not now foreseen to continue that proceeding after July 24) during the week of July 27, 1981.

Assuming the continued correctness of the premise that no hearing will be scheduled for the week of July 27, a July 31, 1981 response date will afford five working days for the preparation (continued on page 3) l

. - - . _ . _ . _ ~ . . , _ - - ~ ~ . _ . _ - ~.__,,_ ._ ._ -

and that the response dates for the Department of Justice and the NRC Staff be adjusted correspondingly at the intervals provided by the Commission's July 7, 1981 schedule. Counsel for the NRC Staff, for the Department of Justice and for the Authority have authorized us to state that they have no objection to the requested schedule set forth below. (We would have no objection to an order which set the same response date for the Public Service Authority as for SCE&G.) Counsel for Central indicates that, under his reading (with which we differ) of the NRC Rules of Practice as to the time available for filing his petition, he had only two working days in which to file and 1

will not consent to the requested extension. However, he l

requested that we report that he would not object to a sub-stantial extension of our reply schedule if Central were permitted several weeks to perfect and refile its petition for recon-i sideration, the other parties being afforded corresponding reply i

time. Since we would have read 10 C.F.R. SS2.771 and 2.710 as

affording Central a total of fifteen days from June 29, 1981 to file, and would not have objected to a reasonable extension of 1/ (Continued from page 2) of a response -- more if the hearings are concluded f earlier, as SCE&G will urge. The undersigned believes that five days is the absolute minimum period required by considerations of professional obligations. No other party is aggrieved by the extension of time sought herein.

. _ . , _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - - ~ _ - _

1 a

4_

4 I

time beyond that for filing a petition for reconsideration in the first instance, and since we cannot reply on the schedule i

I set, we interpose no objection to the rather unusual procedure i

of " starting over" on the reconsideration matter.

Respectfully submitted,

.'S'i%ecv Joseph B. Knotts Jr.

Counsel for South Carolina Date: July 9, 1981 Electric & Gas Company JBK/pv l

i i

l -m 1

1 I

I i

i i

1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of:

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS )

COMPANY and )

)

SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE ) Docket No. 50-395A AUTHORITY )

)

(Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, )

Unit 1) )

f CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE l

, I hereby certify that copies of "SCE&G's Request for i

Extension of Time" in the above captioned matter, were served upon the following persons by deposit in the United States mail, i

first class postage prepaid this 9th day of July, 1981.

1 Chairman Paladino Samuel J. Chilk Office of the Commission Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555

) Commissioner Gil,insky Docketing and Service Section

. Office of the Commission Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis'sion Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 I Commissioner Bradford Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Commission Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Commissioner Ahearne Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Commission Board i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555

Jerome Saltzman, Chief George H. Fischer, Esq.

Utility Finance Branch Vice President and Group U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Executive - Legal Affairs Commission South Carolina Electric &

Washington, D.C. 20555 Gas Company P.O. Box 764 Hugh P. Morrison, Jr., Esq. Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Charles S. Leeper, Esq.

Michael Rand McQuinn Robert Medvocky, Esq.

Cahill, Gordon & Reindel Reid & Priest 1990 K Street, N.W., Suite 650 1111 19th Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20006 Washington, D.C. 20006 W.C. Mescher Edward C. Roberts, Esq.

President General Counsel C.H. McGlothlin, Jr., Esq. South Carolina Electric &

South Carolina Public Gas Company Service Authority P.O. Box 764 223 N. Live Oak Drive Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Moncks Corner, South Carolina 29461 Joseph Rutberg, Esq.

P.T. Allen Fredric D. Chanania, Esq.

Executive Vice President Office of Executive Legal and General Manager Director Central Electric Power U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cooperative, Inc. Commission P.O. Box 1455 Washington, D.C. 20555 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 John C. Ruoff C. Pinckney Roberts, Esq. Post Office Box 96

, Dial, Jennings, Windham, Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 i

Thomas & Roberts P.O. Box 1792 Leonard Bickwit, Esq.

i Columbia, South Carolina 29202 General Counsel l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Robert Fabrikant, Esq. Commission Janet R. Urban, Esq. Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division P.O. Box 14141 Washington, D.C. 20044 Wallace E. Brand, Esq.

Edward E. Hall, Esq. -s, I Brand & Hall '

1523 L Street, N.W., Suite 200 '

Qph/j_/

Washington, D.C. 20005 (5/

Joseph B. Knot'ts, Jr.

? ')

- - . - . . - - . - - . . - . , . . , -