|
|
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Response from "NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire" Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 2:11:39 PM Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jeff Steinmetz (jeffmsteinmetz@yahoo.com) on Friday, August 30, 2019 at 14:17:07 through the IP 148.184.182.44 using the form at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/decommissioning/neima-local-comm-advisory-board-questionnaire.html and resulted in this email to neima108.resource@nrc.gov | | Response from "NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire" Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 2:11:39 PM Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jeff Steinmetz (jeffmsteinmetz@yahoo.com) on Friday, August 30, 2019 at 14:17:07 through the IP 148.184.182.44 using the form at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/decommissioning/neima-local-comm-advisory-board-questionnaire.html and resulted in this email to neima108.resource@nrc.gov related-site: San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant cab-question1: For Southern California Edison (SCE) to control all the narrative/discussion concerning San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant. |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| related-site: San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant cab-question1: For Southern California Edison (SCE) to control all the narrative/discussion concerning San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant. | |
| cab-question2: The local Cab was established after the plant closed in June of 2013. The charter was written by SCE solely for the benefit of SCE, and the control of all the information dispersed to the public. This link will provide the charter that has no date. | | cab-question2: The local Cab was established after the plant closed in June of 2013. The charter was written by SCE solely for the benefit of SCE, and the control of all the information dispersed to the public. This link will provide the charter that has no date. |
| https://www.songscommunity.com/internal_redirect/cms.ipressroom.com. | | https://www.songscommunity.com/internal_redirect/cms.ipressroom.com. |
Latest revision as of 05:57, 31 January 2020
|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24017A2432024-01-15015 January 2024
LTR-24-0008 Paul Blanch, E-mails Request for Formal Response to Requests for Meeting to Discuss Safety Issues with NRC Staff
ML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022
NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022
(SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt
ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022
Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362
ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022
Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event
ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022
S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving SNF at San Onfre
ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021
NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021
NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021
NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning
ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021
March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition
ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021
Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI
ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021
Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006
ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information
ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020
E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS
ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020
LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O
ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020
Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362)
ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020
Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition
ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020
Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators
ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020
4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020
Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003)
ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020
ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020
ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020
OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS
ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020
ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020
Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail
ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019
ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019
2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail
ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019
2.206 Petition Status Notification Email
ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019
ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019
Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail
ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019
ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019
ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019
ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019
Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre
ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS
ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz
ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019
Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry
ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters
ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019
Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS
ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions
ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019
Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS
ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019
Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010
ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019
Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019
SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson
ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019
10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019
Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register
ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019
LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre
2024-01-15
[Table view] |
Text
From: Jeff Steinmetz To: NEIMA108 Resource
Subject:
Response from "NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire" Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 2:11:39 PM Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jeff Steinmetz (jeffmsteinmetz@yahoo.com) on Friday, August 30, 2019 at 14:17:07 through the IP 148.184.182.44 using the form at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/decommissioning/neima-local-comm-advisory-board-questionnaire.html and resulted in this email to neima108.resource@nrc.gov related-site: San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant cab-question1: For Southern California Edison (SCE) to control all the narrative/discussion concerning San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant.
cab-question2: The local Cab was established after the plant closed in June of 2013. The charter was written by SCE solely for the benefit of SCE, and the control of all the information dispersed to the public. This link will provide the charter that has no date.
https://www.songscommunity.com/internal_redirect/cms.ipressroom.com.
s3.amazonaws.com/339/files/20195/SONGS_Decommissioning_CEP_Charter.p df cab-question3: The CEP panel meets quarterly.
cab-question4: The members of the panel are chosen by SCE and they are only members that agree with SCE or say nothing in the meetings. Many of them are politicians. The panel members that disagreed with SCE were removed from the panel by SCE. The panel is completely controlled by SCE.
cab-question5: The selection process for the board/panel is will they ask hard questions of SCE information? If they will they will not be selected.
The public has no say in who can be on the panel.
cab-question6: "Each member of the CEP will serve a two-year renewable term (following the initial staggering of terms). The inaugural panel shall have staggered terms as assigned by the SONGS Co-owners. Membership on the panel shall be renewable at the discretion of the SONGS Co-owners."
cab-question7: NO. SCE appointed Chairperson David Vicktor controls the meetings to the benefit of SCE.
cab-question8: SCE makes a video of the meetings and post it on line. However SCE makes that video un-available for download should anyone want to use part of what was discussed in the meeting. I think they do live stream the meetings.
cab-question9: SCE is the sponsor. SCE provides facility rental, PA and video services. They do not provide transcript services.
cab-question10: SCE controls the agenda completely. They discuss what they want to discuss and it does not matter what the public wants to discuss.
Members of the public have 3 minutes to talk and that is it. Most of the time our questions are not responded to. If and when questions are responded to they are not responded to with the whole truth.
cab-question11: They have no say what so ever. The board is only a sounding board and the utility does what ever they want.
cab-question12: The NRC is a captured regulatory agency and does the bidding of the utilities. SCE is no exception on this. The NRC has set in on multiple meetings and acts as deference council for SCE.
cab-question13: We get out 3 minutes and that is all.
cab-question14: They screw up all the time and say things they did not intend or things that are not in compliance with their license. informed members of the public then use this information against them. Other than that they are completely useless and i would not bother to attend.
cab-question15: It is controlled by SCE for the benefit of SCE ONLY!
cab-question16: The San Onofre CEP panel should be dissolved and a state panel like at Diablo Canyon should be created. No political appointees and the panel should include local activist.
nocab-question1: Concerning San Onofre I don't know if the state ever considered it for San Onofre. However, they did create a panel for the Diablo Cayon.
nocab-question2:
nocab-question3:
nocab-question4:
nocab-question5:
