ML18121A032: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18121A032 | | number = ML18121A032 | ||
| issue date = 04/30/2018 | | issue date = 04/30/2018 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review Results - South Texas Project Technical Specification Change for Standby Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirements Acceptance Criteria (L-2018-LLA-0078) | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results - South Texas Project Technical Specification Change for Standby Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirements Acceptance Criteria (L-2018-LLA-0078) | ||
| author name = Regner L | | author name = Regner L | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
By letter dated March 27, 2018, STPNOC submitted a license amendment request for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request to revise certain minimum voltage and frequency acceptance criteria for steady-state standby diesel generator surveillance testing. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | By letter dated March 27, 2018, STPNOC submitted a license amendment request for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request to revise certain minimum voltage and frequency acceptance criteria for steady-state standby diesel generator surveillance testing. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::200 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. | If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
By letter dated March 27, 2018, STPNOC submitted a license amendment request for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request to revise certain minimum voltage and frequency acceptance criteria for steady-state standby diesel generator surveillance testing. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | By letter dated March 27, 2018, STPNOC submitted a license amendment request for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request to revise certain minimum voltage and frequency acceptance criteria for steady-state standby diesel generator surveillance testing. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::200 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. | If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 7 March 2020
ML18121A032 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | South Texas ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/30/2018 |
From: | Lisa Regner Plant Licensing Branch IV |
To: | Richards D, Sterling L South Texas |
References | |
L-2018-LLA-0078 | |
Download: ML18121A032 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 4:08 PM To: Drew Richards (amrichards@STPEGS.COM); Lance Sterling (lsterling@stpegs.com)
Cc: Regner, Lisa
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results: STP TS 3.8.1.1 SR Acceptance Criteria (L-2018-LLA-2078)
By letter dated March 27, 2018, STPNOC submitted a license amendment request for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request to revise certain minimum voltage and frequency acceptance criteria for steady-state standby diesel generator surveillance testing. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours8.333 days <br />1.19 weeks <br />0.274 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.
Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.gov 301-415-1906 OWFN 9D14 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 322 Mail Envelope Properties (SN6PR09MB2720676CFE5924AF3AE693BEE5820)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results: STP TS 3.8.1.1 SR Acceptance Criteria (L-2018-LLA-2078)
Sent Date: 4/30/2018 4:07:58 PM Received Date: 4/30/2018 4:07:58 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Drew Richards (amrichards@STPEGS.COM)" <amrichards@STPEGS.COM>
Tracking Status: None "Lance Sterling (lsterling@stpegs.com)" <lsterling@stpegs.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: SN6PR09MB2720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2956 4/30/2018 4:07:58 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 4:08 PM To: Drew Richards (amrichards@STPEGS.COM); Lance Sterling (lsterling@stpegs.com)
Cc: Regner, Lisa
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results: STP TS 3.8.1.1 SR Acceptance Criteria (L-2018-LLA-2078)
By letter dated March 27, 2018, STPNOC submitted a license amendment request for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request to revise certain minimum voltage and frequency acceptance criteria for steady-state standby diesel generator surveillance testing. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours8.333 days <br />1.19 weeks <br />0.274 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.
Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.gov 301-415-1906 OWFN 9D14 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 322 Mail Envelope Properties (SN6PR09MB2720676CFE5924AF3AE693BEE5820)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results: STP TS 3.8.1.1 SR Acceptance Criteria (L-2018-LLA-2078)
Sent Date: 4/30/2018 4:07:58 PM Received Date: 4/30/2018 4:07:58 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Drew Richards (amrichards@STPEGS.COM)" <amrichards@STPEGS.COM>
Tracking Status: None "Lance Sterling (lsterling@stpegs.com)" <lsterling@stpegs.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: SN6PR09MB2720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2956 4/30/2018 4:07:58 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: