ML17194A850

2017 Fermi Ile Outline Es 201-2

ML17194A850
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	04/03/2017
From:	NRC/RGN-III
To:	Detroit Edison, Co
Shared Package
ML17061A779	List: ML17194A737 ML17194A754 ML17194A759 ML17194A766 ML17194A850 ML17194B083 NRC-16-0068, 2017 Fermi Ile Outline Submittal Ltr
References
Download: ML17194A850 (1)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Examination: 312012017 lnitials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES'401N ç+9 W

'N R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared n accordance with I

Section D.'1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all llA categories are appropriately sampled. n 4p v{d, T

T E c. Assess whether the outline evolutions or .\ {to üqt N

d. Assesswhetherthe ns for deselected or K/A statements are riate, n út, f,ltw

2. a. Usng Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of norml evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s transients

@ ûqø I

M b. Assess whether there are e nough scenario sets (a nd spa res) to test the p rojected num ber a nd U mtx of appl icants n accordance with the expected crew compos ition nd rotation schedule L wthout comp rom ising exam i nteg rlty and en SU re that each appl icant can be tested us ing at A least one new or significantly modified scenano, that no scena nos are du p licated from the audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be on n* çf $.tb T

o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in D te' {f nh 3, Verify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301'2:

)

(t ifre outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within ihe limits specified on the form L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) )

K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form \tfr4 (Sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on s\

T the form.

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the crteria specifed on Form ES-30'1-'1 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specifed on the form o

U at least one task is new or significa ntly modified S\P { $\op G no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough different outlnes to test the projected number and mix of and ensure that no items are du ons nt $ { ll\ctf)

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the riate exam sections. rP út $@

(t E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 ts tP' $rD $\@

N  ?$f\q E

c. Ensure that KA ratin for at least 2.5. $\D 0J!

R d. Check for duplication and exam sections n,t aú> $.qf' A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of cove ns ^û tnø

f. Assess whether the exam fits the a level or n g ncdb Printed re Date

a. Author ill sltL

b. Facility Reviewer (-) ,, I t/ry.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) tU t //b

d. NRC Supervisor  ?/e/r¿ R0 Note: # lndepe ndent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required

- Not applicable for N RC-prepa red examination outlines.

• tÅ):ff rrrie, c.*¿;+ tect ahen quai (c\blt 'nçq