ML15324A003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15324A003
| number = ML15324A003
| issue date = 11/19/2015
| issue date = 11/19/2015
| title = Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
| author name = Watford M
| author name = Watford M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Watford, Margaret Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:18 PM To: 'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com' Cc: 'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'; 'Carl.stephenso n@aps.com'; 'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                             Watford, Margaret Sent:                             Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:18 PM To:                               'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com' Cc:                               'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'; 'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'; 'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
By letter dated October 22, 2015, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear  
By letter dated October 22, 2015, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Margaret M. Watford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1


Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance revi ew of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2506 Mail Envelope Properties     (6c0a14053f724d13bd0b4d76f9daa4ab)
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that
 
impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
Margaret M. Watford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2506   Mail Envelope Properties   (6c0a14053f724d13bd0b4d76f9daa4ab)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806) Sent Date:   11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Received Date: 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM From:   Watford, Margaret Created By:   Margaret.Watford@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'" <Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com>
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
Tracking Status: None "'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'" <Carl.stephenson@aps.com> Tracking Status: None "'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'" <Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com> Tracking Status: None
Sent Date:             11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Received Date:         11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM From:                   Watford, Margaret Created By:             Margaret.Watford@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'" <Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com> Tracking Status: None  
"'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'" <Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com>
 
Tracking Status: None
Post Office:   HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1655     11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM
"'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'" <Carl.stephenson@aps.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'" <Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'" <Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         1655                   11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Options Priority:                      Standard Return Notification:            No Reply Requested:                No Sensitivity:                    Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:


Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                             Watford, Margaret Sent:                             Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:18 PM To:                               'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com' Cc:                               'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'; 'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'; 'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Watford, Margaret Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:18 PM To: 'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com' Cc: 'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'; 'Carl.stephenso n@aps.com'; 'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
By letter dated October 22, 2015, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear  
By letter dated October 22, 2015, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Margaret M. Watford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1


Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance revi ew of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2506 Mail Envelope Properties     (6c0a14053f724d13bd0b4d76f9daa4ab)
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that
 
impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
Margaret M. Watford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2506   Mail Envelope Properties   (6c0a14053f724d13bd0b4d76f9daa4ab)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806) Sent Date:   11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Received Date: 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM From:   Watford, Margaret Created By:   Margaret.Watford@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'" <Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com>
Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
Tracking Status: None "'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'" <Carl.stephenson@aps.com> Tracking Status: None "'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'" <Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com> Tracking Status: None
Sent Date:             11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Received Date:         11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM From:                   Watford, Margaret Created By:             Margaret.Watford@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'" <Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com> Tracking Status: None  
"'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'" <Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com>
 
Tracking Status: None
Post Office:   HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1655     11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM
"'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'" <Carl.stephenson@aps.com>
 
Tracking Status: None
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
"'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'" <Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'" <Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         1655                   11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 21:06, 4 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)
ML15324A003
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 11/19/2015
From: Watford M
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Weber T
Arizona Public Service Co
References
MF6806
Download: ML15324A003 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Watford, Margaret Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:18 PM To: 'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com' Cc: 'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'; 'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'; 'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)

By letter dated October 22, 2015, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Margaret M. Watford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2506 Mail Envelope Properties (6c0a14053f724d13bd0b4d76f9daa4ab)

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)

Sent Date: 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Received Date: 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM From: Watford, Margaret Created By: Margaret.Watford@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'" <Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'" <Carl.stephenson@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'" <Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'" <Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1655 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Watford, Margaret Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:18 PM To: 'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com' Cc: 'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'; 'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'; 'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)

By letter dated October 22, 2015, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Margaret M. Watford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2506 Mail Envelope Properties (6c0a14053f724d13bd0b4d76f9daa4ab)

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request 54 (MF6806)

Sent Date: 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Received Date: 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM From: Watford, Margaret Created By: Margaret.Watford@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com'" <Michael.Dilorenzo@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Carl.stephenson@aps.com'" <Carl.stephenson@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com'" <Delbert.Elkinton@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'" <Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1655 11/19/2015 5:18:27 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: