ML19120A391: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19120A391
| number = ML19120A391
| issue date = 04/22/2019
| issue date = 04/22/2019
| title = 2019/04/22 Turkey Point 3&4 - SLR - (External) Follow Up from Turkey Point Meeting
| title = SLR - (External) Follow Up from Turkey Point Meeting
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC
| author affiliation = NRC
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_____________ Briana A. Grange Conservation Biologist Division of Materials and License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1042 briana.grange@nrc.gov
{{#Wiki_filter:TurkeyPoint34SLRNPEm Resource From:                                Grange, Briana Sent:                                Monday, April 22, 2019 9:57 AM To:                                  Nester, Lindsay Cc:                                  Eldridge, Jodie; Eaton, Kristin


NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be disclosed to third parties.
==Subject:==
RE: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow up from Turkey Point meeting
: Lindsay, Thank you for the updated list. To answer your previous questionfrom NRCs perspective, I see no objection to including numbers 2 and 4 below as terms and conditions of the biological opinion. I would like to propose that we shorten the time frame for the collective meetings identified in the conservation measures. I think that we discussed this on Friday, and an every other year (i.e., 2-year) time frame was mentioned (if I am remembering accurately!).
Briana Briana A. Grange Conservation Biologist Division of Materials and License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1042 briana.grange@nrc.gov From: Nester, Lindsay [mailto:lindsay_nester@fws.gov]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 9:48 AM To: Grange, Briana Cc: Eldridge, Jodie ; Eaton, Kristin


NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) an d may be disclosed to third parties.}}
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow up from Turkey Point meeting I'm glad you clarified Briana. I must have shifted them around from the this list you have. I have the same number 2, but my number 4 is Continue to conduct employee training for eastern indigo snake awareness and posts educational signs around the plant. Here's my current list:
: 1. Continue salinity and temperature monitoring program within Turkey Point and in Biscayne Bay
: 2. Continue crocodile nest and hatchling monitoring at Turkey Point for the life of the license.
Every five years, FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers will meet to discuss the monitoring methods and the need for continuation.
: 3. Continue the crocodile health and condition surveys for the life of this renewed facility operating license unless otherwise agreed upon by FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers. Every five years, FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers will meet to discuss the monitoring methods and the need for continuation.
: 4. Continue to conduct employee training for eastern indigo snake awareness and posts educational signs around the plant
: 5. Crocodile data will follow the standard approved management method. Data will be keep in the approved format.
: 6. Continue following the Habitat Management Plan and the Nutrient Management Plan 1
: 7. Continue to follow the most current version of FPLs Crocodile Management Plan On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:43 AM Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov> wrote:
Lindsay, Thanks for the update. Can you make sure that I am looking at the correct conservation measures. The list you sent out initially was bulleted, so bullets 2 and 4 would be:
Conservation Measure 2 Continue crocodile nest and hatchling monitoring at Turkey Point and in Biscayne Bay for the life of the license. Every five years, FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers will meet to discuss the monitoring methods and the need for continuation.
Conservation Measure 4 Crocodile data will follow the standard approved management method. Data will be keep in the approved format.
Is that correct? Thanks!
Briana From: Nester, Lindsay [mailto:lindsay_nester@fws.gov]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 9:29 AM To: Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>; Eldridge, Jodie <Jodie.Eldridge@nexteraenergy.com>; Eaton, Kristin
<Kristin.Eaton@fpl.com>
 
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Follow up from Turkey Point meeting Good morning all, 2
 
I talked to Jose about the questions we had for him. He says that number 2 and 4 from my list of conservation measures could be terms and conditions as long as NRC is ok with that. What do you think Briana? I also asked him about crocodile injury take and he wants to think about it some more. I'll get back to you on that one.
Lindsay Nester Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32962 772-469-4226 NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be disclosed to third parties.
Lindsay Nester Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32962 772-469-4226 NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be disclosed to third parties.
3
 
Hearing Identifier:      TurkeyPoint34_SLR_NonPublic Email Number:            613 Mail Envelope Properties      (MN2PR09MB3517093FE6EB86AC5144DBA2F4220)
 
==Subject:==
RE: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow up from Turkey Point meeting Sent Date:                4/22/2019 9:56:36 AM Received Date:            4/22/2019 9:56:41 AM From:                    Grange, Briana Created By:              Briana.Grange@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Eldridge, Jodie" <Jodie.Eldridge@nexteraenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Eaton, Kristin" <Kristin.Eaton@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None "Nester, Lindsay" <lindsay_nester@fws.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:              MN2PR09MB3517.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files                            Size                  Date & Time MESSAGE                          4678                  4/22/2019 9:56:41 AM Options Priority:                        Standard Return Notification:              No Reply Requested:                  No Sensitivity:                      Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 09:36, 2 February 2020

SLR - (External) Follow Up from Turkey Point Meeting
ML19120A391
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/22/2019
From:
NRC
To:
References
Download: ML19120A391 (4)


Text

TurkeyPoint34SLRNPEm Resource From: Grange, Briana Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 9:57 AM To: Nester, Lindsay Cc: Eldridge, Jodie; Eaton, Kristin

Subject:

RE: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow up from Turkey Point meeting

Lindsay, Thank you for the updated list. To answer your previous questionfrom NRCs perspective, I see no objection to including numbers 2 and 4 below as terms and conditions of the biological opinion. I would like to propose that we shorten the time frame for the collective meetings identified in the conservation measures. I think that we discussed this on Friday, and an every other year (i.e., 2-year) time frame was mentioned (if I am remembering accurately!).

Briana Briana A. Grange Conservation Biologist Division of Materials and License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1042 briana.grange@nrc.gov From: Nester, Lindsay [1]

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 9:48 AM To: Grange, Briana Cc: Eldridge, Jodie ; Eaton, Kristin

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow up from Turkey Point meeting I'm glad you clarified Briana. I must have shifted them around from the this list you have. I have the same number 2, but my number 4 is Continue to conduct employee training for eastern indigo snake awareness and posts educational signs around the plant. Here's my current list:

1. Continue salinity and temperature monitoring program within Turkey Point and in Biscayne Bay
2. Continue crocodile nest and hatchling monitoring at Turkey Point for the life of the license.

Every five years, FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers will meet to discuss the monitoring methods and the need for continuation.

3. Continue the crocodile health and condition surveys for the life of this renewed facility operating license unless otherwise agreed upon by FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers. Every five years, FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers will meet to discuss the monitoring methods and the need for continuation.
4. Continue to conduct employee training for eastern indigo snake awareness and posts educational signs around the plant
5. Crocodile data will follow the standard approved management method. Data will be keep in the approved format.
6. Continue following the Habitat Management Plan and the Nutrient Management Plan 1
7. Continue to follow the most current version of FPLs Crocodile Management Plan On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:43 AM Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov> wrote:

Lindsay, Thanks for the update. Can you make sure that I am looking at the correct conservation measures. The list you sent out initially was bulleted, so bullets 2 and 4 would be:

Conservation Measure 2 Continue crocodile nest and hatchling monitoring at Turkey Point and in Biscayne Bay for the life of the license. Every five years, FPL, the Service, the NRC, and any relevant researchers will meet to discuss the monitoring methods and the need for continuation.

Conservation Measure 4 Crocodile data will follow the standard approved management method. Data will be keep in the approved format.

Is that correct? Thanks!

Briana From: Nester, Lindsay [2]

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 9:29 AM To: Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>; Eldridge, Jodie <Jodie.Eldridge@nexteraenergy.com>; Eaton, Kristin

<Kristin.Eaton@fpl.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] Follow up from Turkey Point meeting Good morning all, 2

I talked to Jose about the questions we had for him. He says that number 2 and 4 from my list of conservation measures could be terms and conditions as long as NRC is ok with that. What do you think Briana? I also asked him about crocodile injury take and he wants to think about it some more. I'll get back to you on that one.

Lindsay Nester Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32962 772-469-4226 NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be disclosed to third parties.

Lindsay Nester Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32962 772-469-4226 NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be disclosed to third parties.

3

Hearing Identifier: TurkeyPoint34_SLR_NonPublic Email Number: 613 Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB3517093FE6EB86AC5144DBA2F4220)

Subject:

RE: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow up from Turkey Point meeting Sent Date: 4/22/2019 9:56:36 AM Received Date: 4/22/2019 9:56:41 AM From: Grange, Briana Created By: Briana.Grange@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Eldridge, Jodie" <Jodie.Eldridge@nexteraenergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Eaton, Kristin" <Kristin.Eaton@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Nester, Lindsay" <lindsay_nester@fws.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: MN2PR09MB3517.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4678 4/22/2019 9:56:41 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: