ML15282A474: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/24/2015
| issue date = 08/24/2015
| title = 2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
| title = 2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
| author name = Beilby M E
| author name = Beilby M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES ES-403 Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
 
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.
ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                             Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:  fetcm i                  Date of Exam:   8~8//s  Exam Level:     RO C0'sRO               D Item Description                                              Initials a           b       c
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
{'I' {>I)       7"' I~
Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.
: 2.       Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~            r' rJPr
' --*.
: 3.       Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~              ..,. lli~
: d. NRC Supervisor
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
(*) /J17!JtiA  
                                                                                ~"              7' tVA-
*n _/£3 -.. .Pi/ {/ ..... (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
: 5.       All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                                                       f1f
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u}
                                                                                                /       NA.
1). Exam Level: Item Description
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of             ~f              ~I ~
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature                                           Date
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
: a. Grader                         tni Ke Oo"''ti It"'   A.;z                          ~ ;, LLf>:'
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)           .,...,. 8et!a:T'$       ~                              '/'11-5
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)         Mic£1Q£) r t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;- '
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1  
                                        - - *?~                    ~'2(1 thh~
/ly6--b. Form ES-403-1 RO DsRo Initials a b c 7" I /H{d{
                                                        *n _/£3 '~ -.
7"' NPt f'f / tntq .f 'r rJp,. r rJf\ I fl1ti3 Date q{t/15 I FaciliTy Reviewer(*)
                                                        *.       ~/
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(")
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)             /J17!JtiA
If! I tiul el t f5J 'e fb{ir.
{/
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)
                                                        .Pi/
th//J/' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
(*)       The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES ES-403 Facility:
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
 
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.
ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                   Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i                   Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level:   RO DsRo            ~
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
Item Description                                       Initials a        b        c
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.
{'A~      7" /H{d{
' --*.
I
: d. NRC Supervisor
: 2.       Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                                       (1\~        7"'    NPt
(*) /J17!JtiA  
: 3.       Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)                       f'f                tntq
*n _/£3 -.. .Pi/ {/ ..... (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
                                                                                        /
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u}
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,
1). Exam Level: Item Description
                                                                                ~
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail             .f          'r      rJp,.
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
: 5.       All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
                                                                              ~{l are justified
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
                                                                            ~          r      rJf\
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1  
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~          I    fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature                                   Date
/ly6--b. Form ES-403-1 RO DsRo Initials a b c 7" I /H{d{
: a. Grader                       tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6--                   q{t/15
7"' NPt f'f / tntq .f 'r rJp,. r rJf\ I fl1ti3 Date q{t/15 I FaciliTy Reviewer(*)
: b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*)         ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.:                            ~L~:r' I
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(")
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(")       If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~&#xa3;11;;              9!4;~
If! I tiul el t f5J 'e fb{ir.
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)         /It@~ /J&#xa3;n~ th//J/'
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)
(*)     The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
th//J/' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
 
2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES
 
ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                             Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:  fetcm i                  Date of Exam:   8~8//s  Exam Level:     RO C0'sRO               D Item Description                                              Initials a           b       c
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
{'I' {>I)       7"' I~
: 2.       Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~            r' rJPr
: 3.       Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~              ..,. lli~
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
                                                                                ~"              7' tVA-
: 5.       All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                                                       f1f
                                                                                                /       NA.
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of             ~f              ~I ~
questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature                                           Date
: a. Grader                         tni Ke Oo"''ti It"'   A.;z                          ~ ;, LLf>:'
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)           .,...,. 8et!a:T'$       ~                              '/'11-5
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)         Mic&#xa3;1Q&#xa3;) r t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;- '
                                        - - *?~                    ~'2(1 thh~
                                                        *n _/&#xa3;3 '~ -.
                                                        *.       ~/
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)             /J17!JtiA
{/
                                                        .Pi/
(*)       The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
 
ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                   Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i                   Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level:   RO DsRo            ~
Item Description                                       Initials a        b        c
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
{'A~      7" /H{d{
I
: 2.       Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                                       (1\~        7"'    NPt
: 3.       Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)                       f'f                tntq
                                                                                        /
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,
                                                                                ~
as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail             .f          'r      rJp,.
: 5.       All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
                                                                              ~{l are justified
                                                                            ~          r      rJf\
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~          I    fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature                                   Date
: a. Grader                       tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6--                   q{t/15
: b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*)         ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.:                            ~L~:r' I
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(")       If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~&#xa3;11;;              9!4;~
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)         /It@~ /J&#xa3;n~ th//J/'
(*)     The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Latest revision as of 09:31, 5 February 2020

2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
ML15282A474
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/2015
From: Beilby M
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Detroit Edison, Co
Shared Package
ML15268A032 List:
References
Download: ML15282A474 (3)
v • d • e


Text

2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: fetcm i Date of Exam: 8~8//s Exam Level: RO C0'sRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'I' {>I) 7"' I~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~ r' rJPr
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~ ..,. lli~
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

~" 7' tVA-

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f

/ NA.

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~f ~I ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' A.;z ~ ;, LLf>:'
b. Facility Reviewer(*) .,...,. 8et!a:T'$ ~ '/'11-5
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) Mic£1Q£) r t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;- '

- - *?~ ~'2(1 thh~

  • n _/£3 '~ -.
  • . ~/
d. NRC Supervisor (*) /J17!JtiA

{/

.Pi/

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level: RO DsRo ~

Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'A~ 7" /H{d{

I

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (1\~ 7"' NPt
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) f'f tntq

/

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail .f 'r rJp,.

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

~{l are justified

~ r rJf\

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~ I fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6-- q{t/15
b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*) ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.: ~L~:r' I
c. NRC Chief Examiner(") If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~£11;; 9!4;~
d. NRC Supervisor(*) /It@~ /J£n~ th//J/'

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: fetcm i Date of Exam: 8~8//s Exam Level: RO C0'sRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'I' {>I) 7"' I~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~ r' rJPr
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~ ..,. lli~
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

~" 7' tVA-

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f

/ NA.

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~f ~I ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' A.;z ~ ;, LLf>:'
b. Facility Reviewer(*) .,...,. 8et!a:T'$ ~ '/'11-5
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) Mic£1Q£) r t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;- '

- - *?~ ~'2(1 thh~

  • n _/£3 '~ -.
  • . ~/
d. NRC Supervisor (*) /J17!JtiA

{/

.Pi/

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level: RO DsRo ~

Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'A~ 7" /H{d{

I

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (1\~ 7"' NPt
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) f'f tntq

/

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail .f 'r rJp,.

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

~{l are justified

~ r rJf\

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~ I fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6-- q{t/15
b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*) ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.: ~L~:r' I
c. NRC Chief Examiner(") If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~£11;; 9!4;~
d. NRC Supervisor(*) /It@~ /J£n~ th//J/'

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15282A474&oldid=2446754"