ML093270191: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML093270191
| number = ML093270191
| issue date = 11/18/2009
| issue date = 11/18/2009
| title = 3 Initial Exam 2009-301 Final Administrative Documents
| title = Initial Exam 2009-301 Final Administrative Documents
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DNMS
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DNMS
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Fonn ES-201-1 8/31-Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201, Rev. 9E                         Examination Preparation Checklist                                     Form ES-201-1 Fonn 8/31-Facility:               Crystal River 2009-301                                         Date of Examination:         9/18/2009 Facility Examinations Developed by:
Crystal River 2009-301 Date of Examination:
Written 1         I Operating Test Chief Target TflSk Description (Reference)
9/18/2009 Examinations Developed by: Facility Written 1 Operating Test Target Chief Date
TilSk                                                                  Examiner's Date*                                          ..
* TilSk Description (Reference)
i                                                                      Initials
Examiner's  
  -180       l.
.. Initials i -180 1. Examination administration date confmned (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 3/26/2009  
: 1. Examination administration date confmned     confIrmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)                         3/26/2009
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e) 05/04/2009  
  -120       2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d;     (C.1.d; C.2.e)                             05/04/2009
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 3/26/2009  
  -120       3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)                                 3/26/2009
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 05/04/2009  
  -120       4.             notifIcation letter sent (C.2.d)
[-90] [5. Reference material due (C. I.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] NIA {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 06/17/2009 applicable (C.l.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 6/23/2009 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 07/22/2009 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) '. , '; -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C. 1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 07/31/2009  
Corporate notification                                                                            05/04/2009
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. I.!; C.2.i; ES-202) 08/10/2009  
[-90]       [5. Reference material due (C.   (C.1.e;  I.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]                                       NIA
-14 1l. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 08/10/2009 (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 08/10/2009  
{-75 }
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 8117/2009 (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confmn qualifications 1 eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 8/1712009 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 8/17/2009 (C.3.k) -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 8117/2009 NRC examiners (C.3.i)
{-75}       6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's,    ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as           06/17/2009 (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) applicable (C.l.e
* Target dates are generally based on fitcility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.  
{-70}       {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility                             6/23/2009 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 8/31-Facility:
{-45}       8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4,                         07/22/2009 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l.e,        (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)                     ,
Crystal River 2009-301 Date of Examination:
                                                ,:.~.: ~.
9/18/2009 Examinations Developed by: Facility Written I Operating Test Target Chief Date
                                                    \.~ ..  '. ,
* TflSk Description (Reference)
    -30       9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.             1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
Examiner's Initials -180 l. Examination administration date confIrmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 3/26/2009
(C.1.l;                        07/31/2009 07/3112009
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 05/04/2009
    -14       10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. 1.1;          I.!; C.2.i; ES-202)   08/10/2009 08110/2009
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 3/26/2009
    -14       11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 1l.                                                                                                    08/10/2009 (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-120 4. Corporate notifIcation letter sent (C.2.d) 05/04/2009
    -14       12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j;     (C.1.j; C.2.f C.2.fand and h; C.3.g)               08/10/2009
[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] NIA {-75 } 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 06/17/2009 applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 6/23/2009 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 07/22/2009 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) , .. -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 07/3112009
    -7       13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor                                 811712009 8117/2009 (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. 1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) 08110/2009
    -7       14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confmn       confIrm qualifIcations 1I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent qualifications                                                                                      8/17/2009 8/1712009 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 08/10/2009 (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.fand h; C.3.g) 08/10/2009
    -7             Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 811712009 (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confIrm qualifIcations I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 8/17/2009 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 8/17/2009 (C.3.k) -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 8/17/2009 NRC examiners (C.3.i)
: 15. Proctoring/written                                                                                  8/17/2009 (C.3.k)
* Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identifIed in the corporate notifIcation letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
    -7       16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to                           8117/2009 8/17/2009 NRC examiners (C.3.i)
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. 
* facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date Target dates are generally based on fitcility-prepared identifIed in the corporate notification identified                    notifIcation letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
,( ". C l ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Fonn ES-201-2 Facility:
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/21/09 Item l. W R I T T E N 2. S I M U L A T o R 3. W / T 4. G E N E R A L a. Author a. b. c. d. a. b. c. a. b. c. a. b. c. d. e. f. Task Description VerifY that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 ofES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
Using Form ES-301-5, verifY that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. VerifY that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 : (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO) Alan Kennedy b. Facility Reviewer
(*) Floyd Lawrence 11Uf" c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRC Supervisor I C./ Initials a b* # AK 4-1 14 AK AK AK AK l{ u AK AK AK AK AK AK AK AK (fl. AK AK Iff AK Date 06110109 06/11109 Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of 1 F:\NRC -2009\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist)
NRC 2009 Rev O.docx ES-201 f ( ( ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Crystal River Unit #3 I Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21109 Item 1. W R I T T E N 2. S I M U L A T o R 3. W I T 4. G E N E R A L a. Author a. b. c. d. a. b. c. Task Description Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.I of ES-40 I and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks b. c. a. b. c. d. e. f. distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonn (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit teste s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonn (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Fonn ES-301-1: (I) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO) Alan Kennedy b. Facility Reviewer (*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRC Supervisor Initials a b* .c# AK .4-/ IJ AK 4J P AK 4{ <] AK 41 t AK f{ AK If( M , i AK /,i It r" i
* a ,,1 AK 1t t AK 41 $ AK 41 If AK .&#xa3; AK .41; "! AK :1I AK If AK /ff I AK /fl Date 06110109 06111/09 I DO/Z!;' /t) 1 Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of I F:\NRC -2009\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist)
NRC 2009 Rev O.docx ES-201 CRY 5TftL 1l.{lA;iC.
-3 ZOO<t-30l ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE 1. Alan Kennedy RE(2) Instructor 1 Facility Author\ 01/29/09 2. TRue. J)UDIfI'r Sr14UL.IH",,/t
'1./10/01 . ----------------
: 3. L,
: 4. (]cotlbe,
: 5.
fL Cr.f'b l"r '5 liN C-I /II Ii,o[ re ,L. c OJ ..
"" ,
* all . '0 J:IJ / .$( /l/vc, &/'5 /M5'?l< , S r IJ<:.; r Of; (4/ ) fA.. 6. Floyd [r,..vJt&. (l 6-:c-r a9 tf/n/q
'b''''f-'1a
: 8. Gdd*e NOTES: .Jt C6J.>([/lrJ
"",at... t;{tlli'1 ir 'fL! IO/'/tn 1( lOrda') 200Cf-30l ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201.-3
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY
* ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21109 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE 1.
: 2. /1. Lee L>L S/"" 0"v f f'r f oi/. 71o'J 3. &.Mt s RV ' J/23/r!L 4. I?oberf ;(3cL/N 5.t:("nesT,i.c-E2-
-,rgJ../fJ ,'-, v' __
: 6.
{!"N'b &#xa3;:'2.0., :b Cft-z.li 7/tcli1lltJ #7
* 8./frdi&#xa3;
/'/"r/' #:Lot NOTES: -r C---__ IL.:. "ir ew t i V \ A
; I q !;;"fi! C/f-/O -1( q ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.
: 2. l< d::-O1e.J&A..
3.:JR R %fe.=\ JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY
-::>\.. * .:'\ \.A
<;;Jv f1 v 0'''''" DATE DATE NOTE
'i .'Uo-6l tr "( " __ 4. /VJAf VA-! =':.& ' 5e:::t' $ 6.
K?Il . I
: 7. (,.JJ t r Q""'-A-s::lA-/"f 5 ----.* ""'P=V'1 --J tJUI1 tJ /' ft1I ey
/0 t; ."'" , 6' fr j 8.
"*
VI'A-dN' 0/.sojOlJ 7{
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME 1.
.,
-------------
-----'O...FJ--rr----it-+---
----2. tleL vYle-lb S:Jv N
....
3.JR R
___ O_\_/'v'-______
------:;,-:--:r---r--r-
: 4. fJAak (JAW .5 iL{;, 7/'6 5*1,'4 t4. Cf$
: 6.
K?J.l
: 7. !'v. I t I Qw.. A-Krt.k!S /6fS I . -, -_D
: 8. JOUI/I V
>;1} /00 NOTES: "*
y,'4 07.kJ/oq 1f; ?}I.xIb'j 


ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
ES-201                               Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                      Fonn Form ES-201-2
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
,(  Facility: Crystal River Unit #3                                     I Date of Exam:                      08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 08/31109        09/21109 f".                                                                                                                                     Initials Item                                                      Task Description a      b*          #
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
                                                                                                                                                      .c#
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
l.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 1.       a.      Verify VerifY that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.                        AK    .4-/
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
4-1    IJ 14 P
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY
W R
: 1. 2oAlA-r..,{j' (l!tilt..
I
.5h:tJ MCtf/('ifP'
: b.      Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-40 I and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
''tIICt-t:.-t-vI
ofES-401 D.I AK      4J      .~
: 2.
T        c.      Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics                      AK      4{        <]
fJ4st\g= "Tc Gf( 5 leI
T E
: 3.
N 2.
J. HOd}? 1l&#xa3; OJ>eOtliav l1P1tttljRr .
S I
SrvT-{
M U
I tAlc /D 6, e-J Hc/(j'L---
d.
C{JO / D 7, V. Lle'-'-6/(':(IJ , .. de", c.-fvr 8,ljr, q V\ "Dg, ... V\ 11\ ... v I V\ -\-ev NOTES: (l) b:> t.lF' 9. a. << ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
a.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
b.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal Using Form ES-301-5, verifY evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or AK AK AK 41 f{
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
l{
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. 8.l)Y " &\ V\ "De\.'" '" IA", v NOTES: (0 to 0lF' qa.?
If(
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s} of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
                                                                                                                                          , i tM  u significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and L                that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
A T
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC 1e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator ill acceptable if the individual does not select the training or provide direct or indirect feedback}.
o R
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
c.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
a.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s} of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
Verify VerifY that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-301-2:
(2) DATfO A I . , 69 o 9ccj' 2. 3.Sa.trff-.. k-5(.0 Xk\s-kv-c.Ao("" 4. Aitu\ S4t; Ik
AK  r"
: 5. 5tf\d (;..J-O(r 9f.b "J.hr.J-l'l4( Jcr je7V"" ' 6. _ f/3!}m2 ..:<ids >ss gblI.fl 1/ fi-n l, Iii f\ 4 ..... 7fZ1lQllJ.
                                                                                                                                            /,i
tp 7.
                                                                                                                                          ,,1i    It*a 1t t (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form fonn          AK
Lend ( But H, s .. ---... -.. _----..-------ft-
: 3.               (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit teste  s) testes)
.. --fT------=-...:.....;;....
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonn form W                (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
VNt
41 $
-('t:1/'b1/u, ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I/      b.     Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form Fonn ES-301-1:
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
ES-301-1 :
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC .(e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator acceptable if the individual does not select the training or provide direct or indirect feedback).
C
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
(      T                (I) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (1)
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified AK If (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
: c.     Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 3to JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY S 'It a . ..:;r SIGNATURE (1) ______ ________________________________
AK    41
Ai..  
                                                                                                                                        ~JJ
'lk 4. ;;>'C-Vt{
: a.     Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the
: 5. 2"+
: 4.               appropriate exam sections.
(;,.}-"lr ,
AK    .&#xa3; G        b.     Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate                                  AK  .41;        "!  ~
0; 01 
E N
: c.     Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5                AK    :1I (fl.           ~
E        d.     Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.                                                     AK    If      ,~
                                                                                                                                                        .~
R
                                                                                                                                          /ff
: e.                                                                                                                 AK    Iff I
A                Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
L        f.      Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO)                                         AK  /fl Date Alan Kennedy                                                                                  06110109
: a. Author
: b. Facility Reviewer (*)                 Floyd Lawrence        11Uf"~                                                                  06111/09 06/11109
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)                                                                                                         06/Z~/ad1 I
: d. NRC Supervisor                                                                                                                  DO/Z!;' /t) 1 I C./
l( Note:                 # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of 1I          F:\NRC - 2009\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist) NRC 2009 Rev O.docx                  ES-201


ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
CRY5TftL 1l.{lA;iC. -3            200Cf-30l ZOO<t-30l ES-201                                                         Examination Security Agreement                                             Form ES-201-3 ES-201.-3
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
: 1.       Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., 9cting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or
: 2.       Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
* provide direct or indirect feedback).
                                                                                                                          ~
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
PRINTED NAME               JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY                                             DATE              NAT  RE(2)
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.  
: 1. Alan Kennedy                  Instructor 1 Facility Author\                                        01/29/09      ~
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
: 2. TRue. J)UDIfI'r            Sr14UL.IH",,/t      G~tr~N.tGA                                      '1./10/01      .
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1 tjt1/c. &tl.f8'il . ef3Lk, /, '"
        ~'l L, K05~
e-* 3.L.JlOQ
3.
'1*,3*9 ........ ItC>&#xa5;YrlA" , 4. SfCIl/'en 6tlil. gO. .4 9-./ ... 2 ! 5. 'B.L1,SJ/ber
: 4. (]cotlbe, ;t1.I'7~1f(
: 6. ':S t t-'76Y1t1 ql f/1./ "'1=, _ 7 1';\'1\othy M. },AQ.{'01;"'<bj
                                      '5 n~*'1 Vl~ liN C-I /II Ii,o[
\\\Uc. Ops q{iO{O'# . . I I 4' ,. I I It 8.
                                      .$( /l/vc,    &/'5   /M5'?l<
I-/u.&c&#xa3;ff..
re
sg., r;..r k,{M-SAG-6R-
                                                                                    ~ ,L. c L~,
_ NOTES: i I;Pr
                                                                                    ~.I a l l .
-( 1/u/o1 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
OJ..:-IO~()9
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
                                                                                                                              '0 J:IJ /
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., ?cting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or
: 5. ~"'-cr fL Cr.f'b l"r            Sr IJ<:.; r Of;        (4/ ) fA..
* provide direct or indirect feedback).
: 6. Floyd    [r,..vJt&. (l      5"uPV~ 6-:c-r                             4~ ~ a9                    tf/n/q T~~r- 'b''''f-'1a 7.~~~ ~,,~~~<"""'\                                    b&...-~
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
: 8. Gdd*e ~ --,-t!a5~------
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
NOTES:
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
.Jt b;.s(~.s$(6    tm~~1 (tY:"'t'\5flV~+'1)           C6J.>([/lrJ "",at... t;{tlli'1 ir eO\>-~~~~ (~A 'fL! c~ ~ IO/'/tn 1(  lOrda')
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1. /0, /(G,f:1U 8&#xa3;{
i,A 01--$
2_
&
.,,, ... , 4. SfC{llte(l 6t-rb /2..0 ...d 9-.l-2 __
: 5. 'j).L1,SJ/6e,
: 6. l t-'76N\ q( f/ i
: 7.
M.
\\\uc Syeou\ q {iol D<'1+----+-_-R-I--+'--I--+-___&#xa5;_
: 8. Joo->A-n+A10 6t+1 r:-r NOTES: it (!tft-J iP I <JV\
-< 1/25/01 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and .authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth oPEtrator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1.
;Ie YI ft c ,..J SRoD,r-<3L+ L 9-/7-o i 2. _________________________________________
_ 3. _________________________________________
_ 4. _________________________________________
_ 5. __________________________________________
_ 6. _______________________________________
_ 7. ___________________________________________
_ 8. _____________
_ NOTES: ------------'k (?v\.. IDhh 7t\
.-ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and ,authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not.select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.&Jt.J.tHJ KeTlfl2,-J JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE
____
.. = __ L"""'"----9 0 1---------+--
: 2. ____________________________________________________
_ 3. ____________________________________________________
_ 4. ____________________________________________________
_ 5. ____________________________________________________
_ 6. ____________________________________________________
_ 7. ____________________________________________________
_ 8. :-:::-:::-=-
__________________________________________________
_ NOTES: ) tAA-ID/'h 7t\ lo/,1c1 
.-, ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. Alan Kennedy Instructor
/ Facility Author\' 01/29/09 ___ _ 2.
J)UOlllt S rI4UL1f relit GAl"..];' ,vGGt? zj 10/0 '1
: 3. L K(JSt:
1i,rJC'-Ir//i,f i\
OMO-Oq ___ _ 4 t11.f'1:,,#!
S( AI..-<-0/:5 /1<i5;r,<
0/2 vJ02 __ 5. ,JPI"'.cv
!Z Crt'b S r )Jv r Of; (v) (A. lit{ Y If 7/rf/ __ 6. [toyd (l 'Sul!Vv 6:r::T' 8. Gdd-e NOTES: '-,t,(D..
_ r!n!tt __ <\ '-=d 7&#xa3; '7Y
"*
C6].)([/l1J tAJ;-{.k 6]t(U7 lief<. ()OJ378f&
Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. Alan Kennedy _..:..;In..:.;s::,.:-.t,-,,ru,,,,c,,,,to,,,,,r...:..I...:..F.,.o:a:..;:,:c.:.:.:ilic:Jty,,,,,A,-=ut,,,,,h,,;;:.o.:..-r\'-.-, ____
__ 01/29/09 ____________
_ 2.
J)UDIII;-
10/0_' _________ _ 3. f?eg;z 'f L f( () 5 <)
!iN (-/ N' Ii /&#xa3; rZ
___________
_ 4. (J&,1Ibf-;t1.11711( .$( /live.. cyS /M57i< '5/'0"-,--------
: 5.
t2 C',r.,r b {f'r
-""7'7ri-A---L...-.---
y If 71v.:::.-tf11--
________ _ 6. [(oy)
'Sul!v. 61:7"' 1/17/'1 _______ _ 7 4v" Y'"""-+.
__
-\-'t--___ _ 8. Gdci-e ___
___ -L--'f -;;... ? NOTES: '* b t I ([YA-f\\ Sf! +..,)
I'A-' ak cfJ talZ , lief<. 00)3781&
ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3 1. Pre*Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY J;l SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1.
WJ\) k'4Jb ----2. fj, LI 'afza S/';?1,
+ thUoi ----3. Maw sRo sb/cq ----l 4. 2be-rf '20LI-v &11; H1I1 be:",
fJG/Z "..;:g).)
fJ siZe/til ----
Le e..-___ Clue.'? ;J..Oft,I<.yOq r 1 ----6. C-N" &#xa3;".7.0 * , 7:ltVtMJtJ; t&tM b'we-r
--... A:'''''''
#/1"'/ -Yo/'ot __ NOTES: ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 


Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
                                                                                    /~"
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
ES-201                                                      Examination Security Agreement                                               Form ES-201-3
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
: 1.       Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21109 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
: 2.       Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.  
PRINTED NAME               JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY                                                                           DATE NOTE
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
: 1. Am.~S'D~                          ~                                                                                                  ~,,_
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.
: 2. /1. Lee L>L                      S/"" 0"vff'r f                                                                                        oi/.71o'J
: 2. l(c.L JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE DATE N (J1;<JYI,n-p:
: 3. &.Mt /3~                          s RV '                                                                                                J/23/r!L
: 3. ___ _ 4. ___ _ 5. ___ _ 6. ___ _ 7. ___ _ 8. __ ____ _ NOTES: -----------
* 4. I?oberf ;(3cL/N 5.t:("nesT,i.c-        E2-
----Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
                                      ~A1I1 1e(/e:.I-D~ -,rgJ../fJ C/f-/O                            ~
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
                                                                            ~                              ,'-,
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
                                                                                                        ;l.OI4~cr~ ~r01 v'              __
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
g/l.;4tVLHA./M/JJ~                                                ~.                                               :b  ~
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.  
6.
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.
7/tcli1lltJ tJ.~ ~ b'~-r ~ #7 8./frdi&#xa3; NOTES:
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.  
L~ -r
: 2. ?( c.-L JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY
{!"N'b
'5,\" \ LA. t..6c;:JL SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE DATE
                                      &#xa3;~~V/~.H/            /'/"r/'       ~~          ~
-------------------------
                                                                                                          &#xa3;:'2.0
_--=S"--'.....:N:.....;f1'--'-.---..J(}1L.:...L-"D"-'",c........,...-ff-y-'---_
                                                                                                          #:Lot
.;-6-*1-------
                                                                                                                              ~
___ _ 3. _______________________________________________________________________
C - - - _ _IL.:.
_ 4. _________________________________________________________________________________
Cft-z.li "ir ew t i e~ tl~ V \          A  ~nt.Q ; I ~ q!;;"fi! o~
_ 5. ________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                  -1( q/:J-~/aq
_ 6. ______________________________________________________________________________
_ 7. _________________________________________________________________________
_ 8. _________________________________________________________________________________
_ NOTES:


", f'" ""( ;:,,:piA'" UI',,": ' --ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.
ES-201                                                                  Examination Security Agreement                                                                  Form ES-201-3
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
: 1.        Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (
: 2.        Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME              JOB TITLE 1      / RESPONSIBILITY                                                        DATE ~ DATE DATE                                        DATE NOTE NOTE
: 1.  ~"<
    ~'< lJ\~~
            ~~~\...'&A              -s,,\~"\
                                      -::>\..            ~~'i::..lL
                                                    \..A.~~~
                                              *.:'\ \.A tr "(    "
                                                                                                                          'S"1~o9
                                                                                                                          'S+1..~()9                                      'i ~L
* references and tools, including associated procedures
* references and tools, including associated procedures
* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by  by the facility licensee
* operationally important specific performance criteria that include: -detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature  
* operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
-system response and other examiner cues -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant  
                      -     detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature AK    FL
-criteria for successful completion of the task -identification of critical steps and their associated peiformance standards
                      -     system response and other examiner cues
-restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable  
(                      -
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.  
statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task
: 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
                      -                                                               performance standards identification of critical steps and their associated peiformance                                     ,
Initials A S* 'Jf AK FL \ AK FL AK FL '<I AK FL \ AK FL -----AK FL , AK FL ----
                      -     restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
AK FL Date a. Author Printed AAA&#xa3; Alan Kennedy I fftivJ.
: b.           Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
...... / 07/20109 b. Facility Reviewer(*)
AK    FL r~
Flovd Lawrence /}. NRC Chief Examiner (#) c. d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:
: 3. Simulator Criteria                                                 --      --        II--n II--~
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:
AK     FL   Iffif
Crystal River Unit 3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 Operating Test No: 1 Initials 1. General Criteria A 8* a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with AK FL sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
:~
: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered AK FL during this examination.
Printed P'ol"    Na~~ignature~ AAA&#xa3; Migoat~                      "d                       Date
: c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) AK FL "'I d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within AK FL acceptable limits. e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent AK FL applicants at the designated license level. 2. Walk-Through Criteria ------a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
: a. Author                                Alan Kennedy Kennedv              I fftivJ. ~,ur.uv...... /
* initial conditions
                                                                                      ~        ()NlA/I.   /
* initiating cues
07/20109
* references and tools, including associated procedures
                                                                        ~~/
* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)                 Floyd Lawrence Flovd                      '"f'r':Tr.
* operationally important specific performance criteria that include: AK FL -detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
r~A
-system response and other examiner cues ( -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
                                                                                                ~,,*                  07/20/09
-criteria for successful completion of the task -identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards , -restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
                                          ~..Atf)
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through r outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance AK FL criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.  
                                                                                                    /
: 3. Simulator Criteria ----II--n The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with AK FL Iffif Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
P'ol" "d Date a. Author Alan Kennedv ()NlA/I. / 07/20109 b. Facility Reviewer(*)
                                          /}.
Floyd Lawrence 07/20/09 '"f'r':Tr.
kJ LA:s-cA k)L5!",j/t'ljlht~                                CE/25/ltrfi
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
: d. NRC Supervisor                    L')JJ..jU1UJ.... -r. 'W'tD)!J.P.I.,Ali./]'(nUII4... Jn~--
kJ LA:s-cA k)L5!",j/t  
                                                                    ~
/ CE/25/ltrfi  
                                                                                                      ~,
: c.  
                                                                                                                ... oifz r..{"a.,
')JJ..j )!J.P.I., /]'(n .
I
...
( ./
* d. NRC Supervisor L U1UJ.... -r. 'W'tD Ali. UII4.. o if z r..{ "a., I ( ./ , NOTE:
NOTE:
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. (
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:
                #   Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/21109 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test Number: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES  
(
: 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3. Each event description consists of:
 
ES-301, Rev. 9                       Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist                                                             Form ES-301-4 Facility:         Crystal River Unit #3                         Date of Exam:                                       08/31109 thru 09/21109 Scenario Numbers:             1/2/3/4                           Operating Test Number:                                               1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a    b* c#
: 1.       The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
AK          Ii; FL-.l::
FL
: 2.       The scenarios consist mostly of related events.                                                                                     AK    FL  I)fi)
                                                                                                                                                              ,}fit f--
: 3.       Each event description consists of:
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
                                                                                                                                                              ~
                                                                                                                                                              .1]
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event                                                                   AK      FL
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
* the event termination point (if applicable)  
* tennination point (if applicable) the event termination 4.
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.  
5.
: 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.  
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
: 7. Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Pllysics and thermodynamics.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
The events are valid with regard to physics         thennodynamics.
Cues are given. 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. 9. The scenarios have been validated.
AK AK FL FL
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while runnin.e; the planned scenarios.
                                                                                                                                                          &#xa3;:Jf I3n Jj~a-
: 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
: 6.       Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 ofES-301.  
AK    FL I~V I~~
: 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).  
: 7.       If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
: 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).  
Iftime Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.                                     N/A    N/A      1k fl/Ir
: 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
                                                                                                                                                            ,if Cues are given.                                                                                                                                         A.
Target Quantitative Attributes Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) I I 2 I 3 I 4 , , , Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 , 8 , 8 , 7 1. : , , , , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) , , , , , , , , , 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 , 2 , 2 3 , , , , , Major transients (1-2) I , 1 , 1 , 1 4. , , , , , , 2 , 1 , 2 , 2 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) , , , , , , , , 6. EOP requiring substantive actions 1 , 1 , 0 , I , , , , , , Critical tasks (2-3) 3 , 2 , 3 , 3 7. , , , , , , H:\NRC -2009IPost Prep Week\FORMS\Form ES-301-4 (Scenario Quality Checklist)
                                                                                                                                                                  ;1:/,
NRC 2009 FINAL.docx Initials a b* c# AK FL Ii; AK FL I)fi) f--AK FL AK FL I3n AK FL AK FL N/A N/A 1k A. AK FL N AK FL if AK FL r 1\ AK FL fl, AK FL 1\ AK FL ---------ES-301 ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:
: 8.       The simulator modeling is not altered.                                                                                             AK      FL      N
Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/21109 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test Number: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
: 9.       The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfonnance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to performance                                                                                                                        AK      FL fidelity)s ensure that functional fidelity                       running the planned scenarios.
: 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3. Each event description consists of:
is maintained while runnin.e;
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
: 10.       Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 ofES-301.
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
AK      FL Iir
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
                                                                                                                                                            ~1,    ,',
* the event tennination point (if applicable)
1\
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 5. The events are valid with regard to Pllysics and thennodynamics.
11.
: 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
12.
: 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form fonn along with the simulator scenarios).
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
(submit the form Fonn ES-301-6 Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events AK AK FL FL t7i
Cues are given. 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. 9. The scenarios have been validated.
                                                                                                                                                          .~ fl, I~V
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfonnance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity)s maintained while running the planned scenarios.
                                                                                                                                                                  ~
: 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
Fonn ES-301-5 (submit the form specified on Form                            fonn with the simulator scenarios).                                                                       1\
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 ofES-301.
: 13.       The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.                                       AK      FL  ~
: 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Fonn ES-301-6 (submit the fonn along with the simulator scenarios).
Target Quantitative Attributes                                     Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)
: 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Fonn ES-301-5 (submit the fonn with the simulator scenarios).  
I I I I 2
: 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
3 4
Target Quantitative Attributes Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) I I 2 I 3 I 4 , , , 7 , 8 , 8 7 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) : * , * , 2 , 2
: 1.        Total malfunctions (5-8)                                               7     : 8                ** ,,         8             7
* 2 . 2 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) * * * * : 3. Abnonnal events (2-4) 2 2
: 2.        Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)                                     2
* 2 : 3
                                                                                        ,             2      ,         2 2
* Major transients (1-2) 1
Abnonnal events (2-4)
* 1 , 1 , 1 4. : , , * , 2
Abnormal                                                              2           ,,       2         *,,,     2     ,:
* 1
: 3
* 2 2 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) , , , * , 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1
: 3.                                                                                                              *,
* 1
I1      **,,,:      1        ,,       1
* 0 , 1 * . ,
                                                                                                                                ,      1
* Critical tasks (2-3) 3 2
: 4.        Major transients (1-2) 2      *,,,,       1
* 3 3 7. , , H:\NRC -2009\Post Prep WeekIFORMSIForm ES-301-4 (Scenario Quality Checklist)
                                                                                                              **,,       2       ,,,   2
NRC 2009 FINAL.docx Initials a b* c# AK FL-.l:: AK FL ,}fit AK FL .1] AK FL &#xa3; AK FL :Jf a-AK FL N/A N/A fl/Ir ;1:/, AK FL N AK FL , AK FL Ii 1, ,', AK FL t AK FL 7i 1\ AK FL ---------ES-301 ES*301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES*301*5 Facility:
: 5.       EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios
: 6.       EOP contin~encies              substantive actions (~2) contingencies requiring substantive            (0-2)            1
-CREW 1
                                                                                              *,,,,   1            **, 0 I1
* 2 SRO*I, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P T P R I U E RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 0 NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I
: 7.        Critical tasks (2-3)                                                   3               ,   2           * , 3               3 2009\Post Prep Week\FORMS\Form H:\NRC - 2009IPost      WeekIFORMSIForm ES-301-4 (Scenario Quality Checklist) NRC 2009 FINAL.docx                                             ES-301
* IIC 2/5/8 3/9 2/6/9 9 4 4 2 SRO-U 19 0 MAJ 7 5 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3/6 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 4 1 1 1 1 0 SRO-I IIC 3/4/6 2/3/6
 
* 2/6/9 17181 18/9 14 4 4 2 9 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 5 7 3 2 2 1 TS 1/2 1/5 4 0 2 2 RO RX 3 1 1 1 0
ES*301 ES-301                                      Transient and Event Checklist                                        ES*301*5 Form ES-301-5 IFacility: Crystal River #3                                08/31109 thru 09/21/09 Date of Exam: 08/31/09          09/21109                Operating Test No.: 1 A        E                                Scenarios - CREW 1 *- 2 SRO*I,    SRO-I, 1 RO P        V              1                  2                      3                  4           T      M P        E                                                                                          0      I L        N          CREW                CREW                  CREW                CREW          T      N I        T        POSITION            POSITION              POSITION              POSITION        A I
* NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3/51 1/4/6 5/6/8 11 4 4 2 0 8 1718 SRO-U MAJ 7 5 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I 0 IIC 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
M C                  S      A      B    S    A        B      S      A      B      S    A      B    L      U A        T        R      T      0    R    T        0      R      T      0      R      T    0            M(*)
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
N        Y        0      C      P    0    C        P      0      C      P      0      C    P R      I  U T        P E
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
RO          RX          1                                                                                1  1    1    0 0D          NOR        4                                                                            4     2  1    1    1 SRO-I IIC      2/5/8                                                                        2/6/9 3/9                              9  4    4    2 19
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.  
                          /9 SRO-U MAJ          7                                                5                          7    3  2    2    1 0D          TS        3/6                                                                                 2  0    2    2 RX                  1                                                                          1  1    1    0 RO NOR                                                                          4                  1  1    1    1 0D SRO-I        IIC                                                3/4/6 2/6/9                                                    2/3/6 17181
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical.
                                                                  /7/8/
both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements speCified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility:
18/9
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/21109 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios  
                                                                                        /8/9 14  4    4    2 9
-CREW 1 -2 SRO-I, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C M S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 D NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I
SRO-U MAJ                7                                  5                    7                3  2    2    1 0D                                                                1/2                  1/5 TS                                                                                            4  0    2    2 RO          RX                                                                                3            1  1  1    0 NOR                      4                                                                    1  1  1    1 SRO-I        IIC                      3/51 3/5/                                      1/4/6        5/6/8        11  4    4    2 0D SRO-U 8                                        1718
* IIC 2/5/8 3/9 2/6/9 9 4 4 2 SRO-U /9 D MAJ 7 5 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3/6 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 4 1 1 1 1 D SRO-I IIC 3/4/6 2/3/6
                                                                                  /7/8 MAJ                      7                                          5           7            3  2    2    1 0D        TS                                                                                              0  0  2    2 RO          RX                                                                                                  1    1  0 0D SRO-I NOR                                                                                                1    1  1 0D SRO-U IIC                                                                                                4  4    2 MAJ                                                                                                2  2    1 0D        TS                                                                                                  0  2    2 Instructions:
* 2/6/9 /7/8/ /8/9 14 4 4 2 9 SRO-U D MAJ 7 5 7 3 2 2 1 TS 1/2 1/5 4 0 2 2 RO RX 3 1 1 1 0
: 1.       Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
* NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3/5/ 1/4/6 5/6/8 11 4 4 2 D 8 /7/8 SRO-U MAJ 7 5 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:  
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
: 2.       Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
: 3.                  practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those Whenever practical.
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.  
that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements speCified specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
 
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility:
ES-301                                      Transient and Event Checklist                              Form ES-301-5 I Facility: Crystal River #3              Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09                  Operating Test No.: 1 A
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios  
A          E                                Scenarios - CREW 2 - 2 SRO-I, 1 RO P          V              1                   2                   3                 4             T      M P          E                                                                                        0      I L          N            CREW                CREW                  CREW              CREW            T      N I          T        POSITION            POSITION            POSITION          POSITION          A I
-CREW 2 -2 SRO-I, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I
M C                    S      A    B      S    A      B      S    A      B    S    A      B    L      U A
* IIC 2/S/8 1/2/41 3/9 10 4 4 2 19 8 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 6 S 3 2 2 1 TS 3/6 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 0 1 1 1 0 SRO-I I/C 3/4/S 3/4/6
A           T        R      T    0      R    T      0      R    T      0    R    T      0            M(*)
* 2/6/9 1718 17/81 14 4 4 2 9 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 6 S 3 2 2 1 TS 1/2 1/2 4 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0
N           Y Y        0      C    P    0    C      P      0      C      P    0    C      P R    I  U T          P E
* NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 0 I/C 3/S1 3/S1 1/4/6 11 4 4 2 SRO-U 8 7 17/8 0 MAJ 7 6 S 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I 0 I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:  
RO          RX          1                                                                              1    1   1   0 D
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
0            NOR          4                                                                              1    1    1  1 SRO-I IIC      2/S/8 2/5/8                            1/2/41 1/2/4/
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
3/9                              10    4    4  2 19
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.  
                          /9                                8 SRO-U MAJ          7                                6            5 S                                3    2    2  1 D
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:
0                      3/6                                                                              2    0    2 TS                                                                                                        2 RX                  1                                                                        1  1    1   0 RO NOR                                                                                          0    1    1  1 D
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios
0 SRO-I        IIC I/C                                                 3/4/6 3/4/S 3/4/5 2/6/9                            17/81
-CREW 2 -2 SRO-I, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I
                                                                  /7/8/                                    14  4    4  2 1718
* IIC 2/5/8 1/2/4/ 3/9 10 4 4 2 /9 8 SRO-U D MAJ 7 6 5 3 2 2 1 TS 3/6 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 0 1 1 1 D SRO-I IIC 3/4/5 3/4/6
                                              /7/8 9
* 2/6/9 /7/8 /7/8/ 14 4 4 2 9 SRO-U D MAJ 7 6 5 3 2 2 1 TS 1/2 1/2 4 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0
SRO-U MAJ                7            6                    5 S                                      3    2    2  1 D
* NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 3/5/ 3/5/ 1/4/6 11 4 4 2 SRO-U 8 7 /7/8 D MAJ 7 6 5 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
0           TS                              1/2                  1/2                                    4    0   2  2 RO           RX                                                                                           0    1   1   0 NOR                       4                                                                   1    1   1   1 SRO-I 0
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
D SRO-U IIC I/C                      3/S1 3/5/
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
8 3/S1 3/5/
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
7 1/4/6 17/8
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
                                                                                /7/8 11  4   4   2 D
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility:
0           MAJ                       7           6                            5 S                        3   2   2   1 TS                                                                                           0  0   2   2 RO          RX                                                                                                 1   1   0 D
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09 Operating Test No.: 1 I A E Scenarios
0 SRO-I NOR                                                                                               1   1   1 D
-CREW 3 -2 SRO-I, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C M S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P T P R I U E RO RX 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I
0 SRO-U IIC I/C                                                                                                4   4   2 MAJ                                                                                               2   2   1 D
* I/C 2/5/8 1/2141 5/618 11 4 4 2 SRO-U 19 8 0 MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3/6 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3/4/5 2/3/6
0            TS                                                                                                 0  2   2 Instructions:
* 2/6/9 1718 18/9 13 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 1/2 1/5 4 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0
: 1.        Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
* NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3/51 3/51 2/6/9 9 4 4 2 0 8 7 SRO-U MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I 0 IIC 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC)
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
(l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IICI/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IICI/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
: 2.       Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d)
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.  
D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:
: 3.       Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios
 
-CREW 3 -2 SRO-I, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C M S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 1 3 2 1 1 0 D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I
ES-301                                     Transient and Event Checklist                                 Form ES-301-5 IFacility: Crystal River #3 Facility: Crystal River #3               Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09                    Operating Test No.: 1 I
* IIC 2/5/8 1/2/4/ 5/6/8 11 4 4 2 SRO-U /9 8 D MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3/6 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3/4/5 2/3/6
A           E                               Scenarios - CREW 3 - 2 SRO-I, 1 RO P           V             1                   2                   3                   4           T       M P           E                                                                                       0       I L           N           CREW                 CREW               CREW                 CREW           T       N I         T         POSITION             POSITION             POSITION             POSITION         A I
* 2/6/9 /7/8 /8/9 13 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1/2 1/5 4 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0
M C                   S     A     B       S   A     B       S     A     B     S     A     B     L     U A           T       R     T     0       R   T     0       R     T     0     R     T   0             M(*)
* NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I IIC 3/5/ 3/5/ 2/6/9 9 4 4 2 D 8 7 SRO-U MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I D IIC 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
N           Y       0     C     P     0     C     P       0     C     P     0     C     P R     I U T           P E
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
RO           RX           1                                                                   3          2    1   1   0 0
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
D           NOR         4                                                                                 1  1   1   1 SRO-I I/C IIC       2/5/8                           1/2141 1/2/4/
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
5/618 5/6/8        11  4   4   2 19
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
                          /9                                8 SRO-U MAJ         7                               6                                  7           3   2   2   1 0
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/18/09 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios
D TS         3/6                                                                               2   0   2   2 RO RX                 1                                                                         1   1   1   0 0
-CREW 4 -1 SRO-I, 1 SRO-U, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 0 1 1 0 D NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO-I
D            NOR                                                                       4                 1   1   1   1 SRO-I                                     3/4/5                                    2/3/6 IIC 2/6/9                                                                       13  4    4  2 1718
* I/C 3/4/5 3/9 7 4 4 2 1718 SRO-U D MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 1/2 2 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 RO NOR 0 1 1 1 D I/C 3/4/6 SRO-I 1/2/41 D 8 17181 10 4 4 2 SRO-U 9
                                            /7/8                                     18/9
* MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 1/2 2 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0 10-1 NOR 0 1 1 1 D I/C 3/51 1/4/6 8 4 4 2 SRO-U 7 17/8 D MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I D I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
                                                                                      /8/9 SRO-U       MAJ               7             6                                        7                 3   2   2   1 D
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
0            TS                             1/2                                       1/5                 4   0   2   2 RO           RX                                                                                           0    1   1   0 NOR                       4                                                            4     2    1   1   1 SRO-I       I/C IIC                     3/51 3/5/         3/51 3/5/
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
2/6/9    9  4   4   2 0
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
D SRO-U 8          7 MAJ                       7           6                                                7     3   2   2   1 0
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility:
D           TS                                                                                           0   0   2   2 RO           RX                                                                                                 1   1   0 0D SRO-I NOR                                                                                               1   1   1 0D SRO-U IIC                                                                                               4   4   2 MAJ                                                                                               2   2   1 0
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/18/09 Operating Test No.: 1 I A E Scenarios
D           TS                                                                                                 0   2   2 Instructions:
-CREW 4 -1 SRO-I, 1 SRO-U, 1 RO P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P T P R I U E RO RX 0 1 1 0 D NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO-I
: 1.       Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
* I/C 3/4/5 3/9 7 4 4 2 1718 SRO-U D MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 1/2 2 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 RO NOR 0 1 1 1 D IIC 3/4/6 SRO-I 1/2/41 D 8 17181 10 4 4 2 SRO-U 9
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C)
* MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 1/2 2 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0 10-1 NOR 0 1 1 1 D IIC 3/51 1/4/6 8 4 4 2 SRO-U 7 17/8 D MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I D I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
(IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.
: 2.       Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
: 3.       Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
 
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301                                     Transient and Event Checklist                               Form ES-301-5 IFacility: Crystal River #3
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:
~er#3                                    Date of Exam: 08/31/09 08/31109 thru 09/18/09                 Operating Test No.: 1 I
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam:08/31 109 thru 09/21/09 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO
A A            E                       Scenarios - CREW 4 - 1 SRO-I, 1 SRO-U, 1 RO P           V             1                   2                   3                 4             T       M P           E                                                                                       0       I L           N           CREW                 CREW                 CREW             CREW             T       N I           T       POSITION             POSITION             POSITION           POSITION           A I
* RO D RO D SRO-I D SRO-I
M C                   S     A     B     S     A     B       S     A     B     S     A       B     L       U A
* SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U
A            T     R       T     0     R     T     0       R     T     0     R     T       0             M(*)
* Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 Interpret/Diagnose 2/3/5/ 112/3/ 113/4/
N           Y       0       C     P     0     C     P       0     C     P     0     C       P R     I U T           P E
2/3/4/5 2/3/5/6 112/3/4/ 112/3/4/ 2/3/4/5 2/3/5/6 112/3/4 112/3/4 6/7/8/ 4/5/6/ 5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /7/8/9 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8/ /6/7/8/ /7/8/9 /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ Events and Conditions 9 7/8 8/9 9 9 9 8 8/9 Comply With and 1/2/3/ 112/5 113/4/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/5/ 113/4/5/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/5 113/4/5 4/5/6/ 6/7/8 5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
RO           RX                                                                                           0    1   1 0 D            NOR                                                                                          0   1   1 1 SRO-I I/C                          3/4/5 3/9                               7    4   4   2 1718 SRO-U MAJ                             6                           5                                2    2   2   1 D                                          1/2 TS                                                                                           2   0   2   2 RX                                                                                           0    1   1   0 RO           NOR                                                                                         0   1   1   1 D
6/7/8 6/7/8/9 /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
SRO-I       I/C IIC                                                3/4/6 1/2/41 17181                                  10    4    4   2 D                                                        8 9
/6/7/8 /6/7/8/ Use Procedures (1) 7/8/9 8/9 9 8/9 9 8/9 9 Operate Control 112/3/ 112/3/ 113/4/
SRO-U MAJ                                         6       5                                      2    2   2   1 TS                                                   1/2                                     2   0   2   2 RO           RX                                                                                           0   1   1   0 NOR                                                                                         0    1   1   1 10-1 D
2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4/ 113/4/5/
SRO-U I/C IIC                                  3/51 7
2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4 113/4/5 5/6/7/ 4/5/6/ 5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
1/4/6 17/8                        8    4   4   2 D            MAJ                                  6                           5                        2    2   2   1 TS                                                                                           0   0   2   2 RO           RX                                                                                                 1   1   0 D
5/6/7/8 6/7/8/9 /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /6/7/8/
SRO-I NOR                                                                                               1   1   1 D
Boards (2) 8/9 7/8 8/9/ 9 8/9 9 8/9 8 9 Communicate 112/3/ 112/3/
SRO-U I/C                                                                                               4   4   2 MAJ                                                                                               2   2   1 D            TS                                                                                                 0   2   2 Instructions:
112/3/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4/ 112/3/4/ 112/3/4 112/3/4 112/3/4 112/3/4 and Interact 4/5/6/ 4/5/6/ 4/5/6/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/
: 1.       Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
/5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ 7/8/9 7/8 7/8/9 9 8/9 9 8/9 8/9 8 8/9 Demonstrate 112/3/5 112/3/4/ 113/4/5/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/5 112/3/4 113/4/5 Supervisory Ability (3) /6/7/8/ 5/6/7/8 7/8/9 /6/7/8/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C)
/7/8/9 9 9 9 8 Comply With and 3/6 112 112 115 3/6 112 112 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:
(IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/CIIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
: 2.       Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
: 3.       Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
 
ES-301                                     Competencies Checklist                                    Form ES-301-6 Facility: Crystal River #3                   Exam:08/31 109 thru 09/21/09 Date of Exam:08/31/09                                       Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO
* RO D                      RO SRO-I D
D Competencies SRO-I SRO-U SCENARIO D
D SRO-I SRO-U SCENARIO D                    SRO-U SCENARIO 1      2      3      4        1      2          3        4        1       2       3       4 Interpret/Diagnose            2/3/5/  112/3/  1/3/4/
113/4/ 2/3/4/5 2/3/5/6 112/3/4/  112/3/4/  2/3/4/5 2/3/5/6  112/3/4  1/2/3/4 112/3/4 2/3/4/5 6/7/8/  4/5/6/  5/6/7/ /6/7/8/  /7/8/9 5/6/7/8  5/6/7/8/  /6/7/8/  /7/8/9  /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /6/7/8/
Events and Conditions            9    7/8      8/9    9                          9        9                8      8/9      9 Comply With and                112/3/
1/2/3/  112/5  113/4/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/5/  113/4/5/  2/3/4/5 112/3/4  112/3/5  113/4/5 2/3/4/5 4/5/6/  6/7/8  5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/  6/7/8    6/7/8/9  /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/  /6/7/8  /6/7/8/ /6/7/8/
Use Procedures (1)             7/8/9            8/9    9      8/9                        9      8/9                9      9 Operate Control                112/3/  112/3/  113/4/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4/  113/4/5/  2/3/4/5 112/3/4  112/3/4  113/4/5 2/3/4/5 5/6/7/  4/5/6/  5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ 5/6/7/8    6/7/8/9  /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/  /5/6/7/  /6/7/8/ /6/7/8/
Boards (2)                      8/9    7/8    8/9/     9      8/9                        9      8/9      8        9      9 Communicate                    1/2/3/
112/3/  1/2/3/
112/3/  1/2/3/
112/3/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4/  112/3/4/  112/3/4 112/3/4  1/2/3/4 112/3/4  112/3/4 112/3/4 4/5/6/  4/5/6/  4/5/6/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ 5/6/7/8  5/6/7/8/  /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/  /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/
and Interact                    7/8/9  7/8    7/8/9    9      8/9                9      8/9     8/9       8      8/9    8/9 Demonstrate                                                  1/2/3/5 112/3/5 112/3/4/
1/2/3/4/  113/4/5/
1/3/4/5/ 2/3/4/5 1/2/3/5 112/3/5  112/3/4  113/4/5 2/3/4/5
                                                              /6/7/8/ 5/6/7/8    7/8/9  /6/7/8/ /6/7/8/  /5/6/7/  /7/8/9 /6/718/
                                                                                                                            /6/7/8/
Supervisory Ability (3)                                          9                          9        9        8              9 Comply With and                                                  3/6    112      112 1/2      115      3/6      112      112    1/5 115 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)     Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)     Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)     Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
4 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 112/3/4 /5/6/7/ 8/9 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 115 6/9/20095:36 AM Form ES-30l-6 H:\NRC -2009\Post Prep Week\FORMS\Form ES-301-6 (Competencies Checklist)
6/9/20095:36 AM                                                                                            Form ES-301-6 ES-30l-6 H:\NRC - 2009\Post Prep Week\FORMS\Form ES-301-6 (Competencies Checklist) NRC 2009 FINAL.docx
NRC 2009 FINAL.docx ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:
 
Crystal River #3 Date of Exam:08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO
FIIJAL ES-401                        R 0 - PWR Examination Outline -
* RO D RO D SRO-I D SRO-I
RO                                                        (Sept, 2009)             Form ES-401-2 Facility:             Crystal River Unit #3                                   Date of Exam:                     September, 2009 RO KIA Category Points                                              SRO-Only Points Tier          Group K K K K K K A A A A G                                            TOTAL            A2              G*           TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
* SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U
* I.
* Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 Interpret/Diagnose 2/3/5/ 112/3/ 1/3/4/ 2/3/4/5 2/3/5/6 112/3/4/ 112/3/4/
1         3    2     4                      3     3               3       18                                              6 Emergency
2/3/4/5 2/3/5/6 112/3/4 1/2/3/4 Events and Conditions 6/7/8/ 4/5/6/ 5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /7/8/9 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8/ /6/7/8/ /7/8/9 /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ 9 7/8 8/9 9 9 9 8 8/9 Comply With and 112/3/ 112/5 113/4/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/5/ 113/4/5/ 2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/5 113/4/5 Use Procedures (1) 4/5/6/ 6/7/8 5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
& Abnonnal Abnormal          2          2      1    1      N/A          1     2      N/A      2         9                                              4 Plant Evolutions      Tier 5    3    5                    4      5                5       27                                            10 Totals 1          2     3    3     3   3     2    2     3     2    2   3       28                                              5 2.
6/7/8 6/7/8/9 /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
Plant            2          2    0      1    1    1    1    1    1    0    1    1        10                                              3 Systems Tier 4     3   4    4    4     3    3    4    2    3    4        38                                              8 Totals
/6/7/8 /6/7/8/ 7/8/9 8/9 9 8/9 9 8/9 9 Operate Control 112/3/ 112/3/ 113/4/
: 3. Generic Knowledge and                      1          2          3          4                       1      2      3      4 Abilities Categories                                                                    10                                              7 3          2          3          2 Note:      I.        Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KJ A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each KJ A category shall not be less than two).
2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4/ 113/4/5/
: 2.        The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SROconly SRO-only exam must total 25 points.
2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4 113/4/5 5/6/7/ 4/5/6/ 5/6/7/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ 5/6/7/8 6/7/8/9 /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ /6/7/8/
: 3.        Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline D.I.b of ES-40 I for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KJ A statements.
Boards (2) 8/9 7/8 8/9/ 9 8/9 9 8/9 8 9 Communicate 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/ 1/2/3/
should be added. Refer to Section D.l.b
2/3/4/5 112/3/4 112/3/4/ 112/3/4/ 112/3/4 112/3/4 1/2/3/4 112/3/4 and Interact 4/5/6/ 4/5/6/ 4/5/6/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
: 4.        Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8/ /5/6/7/ /5/6/7/
: 5.                                                      KJ As having an importance rating (IR) of Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KJAs                                        2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the of2.5 RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
/5/6/7/ /5/6/7/ 7/8/9 7/8 7/8/9 9 8/9 9 8/9 8/9 8 8/9 Demonstrate 1/2/3/5 1/2/3/4/ 1/3/4/5/
: 6.        Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and KJ A categories.
2/3/4/5 1/2/3/5 112/3/4 113/4/5 Supervisory Ability (3) /6/7/8/ 5/6/7/8 7/8/9 /6/7/8/ /6/7/8/ /5/6/7/
7*
/7/8/9 9 9 9 8 Comply With and 3/6 112 1/2 115 3/6 112 112 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:
7.*                      (0) KJAs in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KJA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to The generic (G) of ES-401 for the applicable KJAs.
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
the applicable evolution or system. Refer to section d.l.b ofES-401
4 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 2/3/4/5 /6/7/8/ 9 112/3/4 /5/6/7/ 8/9 2/3/4/5 /6/718/ 9 1/5 6/9/20095:36 AM Form ES-301-6 H:\NRC -2009\Post Prep Week\FORMS\Form ES-301-6 (Competencies Checklist)
: 8.                                            KJ A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the On the following pages, enter the KIA applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G*  0* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.
NRC 2009 FINAL.docx FIIJAL ES-401 RO -PWR Examination Outline -(Sept, 2009) Form ES-401-2 Facility:
: 9.        For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the KJ A catalog, and enter the KJ A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#)
Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 2009 RO KIA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G TOTAL A2 G* TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to KJAs that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.
* 1 3 2 4 3 3 3 18 6 I. Emergency 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 9 4 & Abnonnal N/A N/A Plant Evolutions Tier 5 3 5 4 5 5 27 10 Totals 1 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 28 5 2. Plant 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 3 Systems Tier Totals 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 2 3 4 38 8 3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Abilities Categories 3 2 3 2 Note: I. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KJ A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each KJ A category shall not be less than two). 2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.
on Fonn Page 1 of 140:\Crystal 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 II\FINAL\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx                                      ES-40 ES-4011
The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SROconly exam must total 25 points. 3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l.b of ES-40 I for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KJ A statements.  
 
: 4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.  
I ES-401                                                        RO                                    Form ES-401-2 II ES-401                                PWR Examination Outline                                                  Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I                  KKK K K K A >.",'              A' Safety Function                  1 1 2  2 3   3 1 ;2 G                    KIA Topic(s)                  IR  #
: 5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KJAs having an importance rating (IR) of2.5 or higher shall be selected.
007EA2.02 - Ability to determine or 007 (BW/E02 & EI0) EIO) interpret the following as they apply to a Reactor Trip - Stabilization
Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
- Recovery - 1 X              reactor trip: Proper actions to be taken if 4.3  1 the automatic safety functions have not taken place 00SAG2.1.23 - Ability to perform OOS Pressurizer Vapor Space                                                specific system and integrated plant Accident 1 3 X      procedures during all modes of plant 4.3 1 operation.
: 6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and KJ A categories.
009EK2.03 - Knowledge of the 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3              X                                  interrelations between the small break      3.0  1 LOCA and the S/Gs.
7.* The generic (G) KJAs in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KJA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to section d.l.b ofES-401 for the applicable KJAs. 8. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category.
011EK3.07 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3                      X                            to the Large Break LOCA: Stopping          3.5 1 HPI bypass flow (recirdlow OK per GL) 015/017  AKl.05 - Knowledge of the 015/017AK1.05 operational implications of the following i                concepts as they apply to RCP 015117 RCP Malfunctions 14        X                      I**.*
Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams. 9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the KJ A catalog, and enter the KJ A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Fonn ES-401-3.
malfunction (Loss ofRC Flow): Effects      2.7 1 of unbalanced RCS flow on in-core average temperature, core imbalance, and quadrant power tilt.
Limit SRO selections to KJAs that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43. Page 1 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ES-401 R 0 -PWR Examination Outline -(Sept, 2009) Form ES-401-2 Facility:
022AKl.03 - Knowledge of the 022AK1.03 operational implications of the following 022 Loss ofRx Coolant Makeup 1 2 X                                        concepts as they apply to Loss of          3.0  1 Reactor Coolant Makeup: Relationship between makeup flow and PZR level 025AA2.01 - Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to 025 Loss ofRHR System 1    144                                X          the Loss of Decay Heat Removal              2.7  1 System: Proper amperage of running LPI/decay heat removal/RHR removallRHR pump(s)
Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 2009 RO KIA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G TOTAL A2 G* TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
Page 2 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL 2009-301 \FINAL - WRITIEN WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx                                  ES-40 1
* 1 3 2 4 I. 3 3 3 18 6 Emergency 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 9 4 & Abnormal N/A N/A Plant Evolutions Tier 5 3 5 4 5 5 27 10 Totals 1 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 28 5 2. Plant 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 3 Systems Tier Totals 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 2 3 4 38 8 3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Abilities Categories 3 2 3 2 Note: I. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KJ A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each KJ A category shall not be less than two). 2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.
 
The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. 3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.I.b of ES-40 I for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KJ A statements.
I ES-401                                                                                RO                                                    Form ES-401-2 ES-401                                    PWR Examination Outline                                                                                      Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 111I Group 1 A~G
: 4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
                                                                                          ',\."
: 5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KJ As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.
E/APE # I Name I                    K K    KK    K K      A        '1                                                             KIA Topic(s)                  IR  #
Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
Safety Function                      1   2     3       1           2                                 ...
: 6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and KJ A categories.
                                                                                  .... I I                 .*..*.
7* The generic (0) KJAs in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KJA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to section d.l.b of ES-401 for the applicable KJAs. 8. On the following pages, enter the KJ A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category.
026AK3.02 - Knowledge of the reasons
Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or 0* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams. 9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the KJ A catalog, and enter the KJ A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3.
                                                                        '{i           Ii                        for the following responses as they apply to the Loss of Nuclear Services 1 Decay 026 Loss of Component                                        I ...** 1< *. . . .*
Limit SRO selections to KJAs that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43. Page 1 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions
Cooling Water 1  188 X
-Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I Safety Function 007 (BW/E02 & EIO) Reactor Trip -Stabilization
:.,'" I                                             Heat  Closed Cycle Cooling: The             3.6 1 automatic actions (alignments) within
-Recovery -1 OOS Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident 1 3 KKK A 123 1 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 X 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 X 015117 RCP Malfunctions 14 X 022 Loss ofRx Coolant Makeup 1 2 025 Loss ofRHR System 1 4 X KIA Topic(s) 007EA2.02
                                                              ~jf:I,.,>. *..
-Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a reactor trip: Proper actions to be taken if the automatic safety functions have not taken place 00SAG2.1.23
the SWS 1 DCS resulting from the
-Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation.
                                                                                        <                        actuation  of the ESF AS
009EK2.03
                                                              ,i~          "'1:*                                  027AK3.04 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 027 PZR Pressure Control X          ../                        ........................* to the PZR Pressure Control 2.8 1 System Malfunction 1 3                                                                                            Malfunctions: Why, if  ifPZR PZR level is lost 1<li                                                  and then restored, that pressure recovers
-Knowledge of the IR 4.3 4.3 interrelations between the small break 3.0 LOCA and the S/Gs. 011EK3.07
                                                                              .I.i much more slowly.
-Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to the Large Break LOCA: Stopping 3.5 HPI bypass flow (recirdlow OK per GL) 015/017AK1.05
-Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to RCP malfunction (Loss ofRC Flow): Effects 2.7 of unbalanced RCS flow on in-core average temperature, core imbalance, and quadrant power tilt. 022AK1.03
-Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Loss of 3.0 Reactor Coolant Makeup: Relationship between makeup flow and PZR level 025AA2.01
-Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Loss of Decay Heat Removal System: Proper amperage of running LPI/decay heat removal/RHR pump(s) 2.7 Page 2 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL
-WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 # 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions
-Tier 1 I Group 1 ... E/APE # I Name I K K K A A' >.",' G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ;2 007 (BW/E02 & EI0) 007EA2.02
-Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a Reactor Trip -Stabilization X reactor trip: Proper actions to be taken if 4.3 1 -Recovery -1 the automatic safety functions have not taken place 00SAG2.1.23
-Ability to perform OOS Pressurizer Vapor Space X specific system and integrated plant 4.3 1 Accident 1 3 procedures during all modes of plant operation.
009EK2.03
-Knowledge of the 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 X interrelations between the small break 3.0 1 LOCA and the S/Gs. 011EK3.07
-Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 X to the Large Break LOCA: Stopping 3.5 1 HPI bypass flow (recirdlow OK per GL) 015/017 AKl.05 -Knowledge of the ;, operational implications of the following i concepts as they apply to RCP 015117 RCP Malfunctions 14 X I**.* malfunction (Loss ofRC Flow): Effects 2.7 1 of unbalanced RCS flow on in-core average temperature, core imbalance, and quadrant power tilt. 022AKl.03
-Knowledge of the 022 Loss ofRx Coolant operational implications of the following Makeup 1 2 X concepts as they apply to Loss of 3.0 1 Reactor Coolant Makeup: Relationship between makeup flow and PZR level 025AA2.01
-Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to 025 Loss ofRHR System 14 X the Loss of Decay Heat Removal 2.7 1 System: Proper amperage of running LPI/decay heat removallRHR pump(s) Page 2 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions
-Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ..... . , I .*..*. 026AK3.02
-Knowledge of the reasons .... I '{i Ii for the following responses as they apply 026 Loss of Component I ...** 1< *.......*
to the Loss of Nuclear Services 1 Decay Cooling Water 18 X :.,'" I Heat Closed Cycle Cooling: The 3.6 1 I *. automatic actions (alignments) within the SWS 1 DCS resulting from the ,.,> ..... actuation of the ESF AS 027AK3.04
-Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 027 PZR Pressure Control X ../ ........................*
to the PZR Pressure Control 2.8 1 System Malfunction 1 3 1<li Malfunctions:
Why, ifPZR level is lost and then restored, that pressure recovers .I.i much more slowly.
I,************
I,************
029EAI.12
li"~>                                                029EAI.12 029EA1.l2 - Ability to operate and 029 ATWS 11                                              X                                                        monitor the following as they apply to an  4.1 1 rH';:; 1,'124                                        ATWS: Reactor trip breakers I~> ~~~
-Ability to operate and 1,'1 2 4 029 ATWS 11 X rH';:; monitor the following as they apply to an 4.1 1 ATWS: Reactor trip breakers I;} i'" ** 038EG2.1.28
I;}              i'"
-Knowledge of the 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 1 3 purpose and function of major system 4.1 1 li'--components and controls . 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line ..... '.', .. '\ Rupture -Excessive Heat ...... !/ ..* i Transfer 14 I i. j **.... , .............
* 038EG2.1.28 - Knowledge of the 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 13                                                                                      X                purpose and function of major system        4.1 1 13                                                                              li'--                                        controls .
****************
components and controls.
,../ 054AAl.Ol
040 (BW/E05) Steam Line                                                                          '.',..'\
-Ability to operate and lor ...... 054 Loss of Main Feedwater I *.**.**.........*.*.*.***
Rupture - Excessive Heat
>.,. monitor the following as they apply to X the Loss of Main Feedwater (MFW): 4.5 1 14 ii/; EFW controls, including the use of ".< .... , alternate EFW sources it;' ( **** } i' ** .. !.>: 055EK3.02
                                                                            ......      !/ ..* i Transfer 14                                                  I i.                      j * . . ,. . . . . . .
-Knowledge of the reasons .'.<,':' for the following responses as they apply 055 Station Blackout 16 X to the Station Blackout:
                                                                                        ,../
Actions 4.3 1 ........*.
                                                                              ......                              054AAl.Ol - Ability to operate and lor 054AA1.Ol I*.* .* . . . . .*.*.*.*
;; contained in EOP for loss of offsite and ..... .. 0';*'< onsite power . .........
* monitor the following as they apply to 054 Loss of Main Feedwater X                                    >.,.                the Loss of Main Feedwater (MFW):          4.5 1 14 t;~" . . ,
h;\;
ii/;        >        EFW controls, including the use of alternate EFW sources
056AAl.05
                                                                                            * * } i'*
-Ability to operate and 1 or 056 Loss of Off site
it;'..; !.>:( .'.<,':'                              055EK3.02 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 055 Station Blackout 16 16                      X
                                                              ........*.  ;; 0';*'<          ~;,:;~              to the Station Blackout: Actions contained in EOP for loss of offsite and 4.3 1 onsite power power..
l~;~c\;
056AAl.05 - Ability to operate and 1  lor or 056 Loss of Offsite Power 1 h;\;                                                monitor the following as they apply to 6
X                                                        the Loss of Offsite Power: Initiation      3.8 1
                                                              ..*.****.      '. .*" r                              (manual) of safety injection process Page 3 of 140:\Crystal          Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam 140:\Cl)1stai River Examinations\Initiai Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx                                                  ES-40 1
 
I ES-401                                                                RO                                          Form ES-401-2 I ES-401                                  PWR Examination Outline                                                              Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I                  KK    K K    K K      A . iA:** cA , <(jj:
Safety Function                    1    2    3      1 2      2*....1i'6,j  .
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LaD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable).
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD)
(LaD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
Line 1,153: Line 1,493:
* The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
* The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
* The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
* The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
* One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
* One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
: 4.     Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
* The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
* The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
* The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.  
* The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
: 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).  
: 5.     Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
: 6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
: 6.                                                                                                                                         (E)ditori~1 Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
: 7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws LOD
: 7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
: 6. 7. (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Instructions
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                             7.
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q=       SRO U/EI                       Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S H     2                         X     X                               X     B   U 002A2.02 May not meet KIA. (Question meets the*   the second portion, but can be written to meet both) 01fi6 01176 What is the impact on the RCS of lowering RCS Pressure? You are testing the impact of a component that will wi" affect RCS Pressure.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable).
Borderline SRO. Distractor C may also be considered correct as written. Nothing in the stem makes a failed number 1 seal on 1B plausible.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
NEW Understand Issues will continue to work.
* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
8/5/2009 eR3 - Replaced question.
* The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
H     2                                                                       X   U 005A2.01 Appears to meet KIA. Not SRO only.
* The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
02fi7 02177                                                                                          This question can be answered using systems knowledge, and procedure entry requirements.
* The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
* One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
* The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
* The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
: 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
: 6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?  
: 7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X B U 002A2.02 May not meet KIA. (Question meets the* 01fi6 second portion, but can be written to meet both) What is the impact on the RCS of lowering RCS Pressure?
You are testing the impact of a component that will affect RCS Pressure.
Borderline SRO. Distractor C may also be considered correct as written. Nothing in the stem makes a failed number 1 seal on 1 B plausible.
NEW Understand Issues will continue to work. 8/5/2009 eR3 -Replaced question.
H 2 X U 005A2.01 Appears to meet KIA. Not SRO only. 02fi7 This question can be answered using systems knowledge, and procedure entry requirements.
The only item in this question that would indicate upcoming pump damage is pump cavitation.
The only item in this question that would indicate upcoming pump damage is pump cavitation.
NEW Continue to work CR3 -Replaced question.  
NEW Continue to work CR3 - Replaced question.
-1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X B U 002A2.02 May not meet KIA. (Question meets the 01176 second portion, but can be written to meet both) What is the impact on the RCS of lowering RCS Pressure?
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws             4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                             7.
You are testing the impact of a component that wi" affect RCS Pressure.
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F           Parlia I Job- Minutia #1 Back-Credo Partia                            Q=     SRO UlEi                        Explanation Focus               Dis!.
Borderline SRO. Distractor C may also be considered correct as written. Nothing in the stem makes a failed number 1 seal on 1 B plausible.
Dist.           Link         units ward KIA   Only S F    2                                                                         X   S 012G2.2.12 Question appears to match KIA.
NEW Understand Issues will continue to work. 8/5/2009 eR3 -Replaced question.
03na 03/78                                                                                            Question may not be SRO only. This appears to be a precaution/limitation in the surveillance procedure. Who performs the procedure? If this procedure is performed by an RO then this is RO knowledge. Will discuss.
H 2 X U 005A2.01 Appears to meet KIA. Not SRO only. 02177 This question can be answered using systems knowledge, and procedure entry requirements.
NEW Procedure not performed by RO Sat eR3 - No change.
The only item in this question that would indicate upcoming pump damage is pump cavitation.
CR3 S
NEW Continue to work CR3 -Replaced question.
4/79  H    2    X                                                                         E 014G2.1.27 Question kind of matches KIA.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X S 012G2.2.12 Question appears to match KIA. 03/78 Question may not be SRO only. This appears to be a precaution/limitation in the surveillance procedure.
Appears to be SRO only. Why do you state in the distractors "for SDM SOM purposes," the basis document discusses control rod operability as a function of being able to insert into the core. By this definition the rod is operable lAW TS 3.1.4.
Who performs the procedure?
Some enhancements in the structure of the question are needed.
If this procedure is performed by an RO then this is RO knowledge.
MOD 2006 Oconee NRC Exam (need to see the original question or this will be treated as a bank question)
Will discuss. NEW Procedure not performed by RO Sat S CR3 -No change. 4/79 H 2 X E 014G2.1.27 Question kind of matches KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Why do you state in the distractors "for SDM purposes," the basis document discusses control rod operability as a function of being able to insert into the core. By this definition the rod is operable lAW TS 3.1.4. Some enhancements in the structure of the question are needed. MOD 2006 Oconee NRC Exam (need to see the original question or this will be treated as a bank question)
Made several changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/5/2009.
Made several changes to stem and all distractors.
S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
SAT 8/5/2009.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws            4. Job Content Flaws    s. Other    6.                         7.
S CR3 -Modified as discussed.  
0#  LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 8ack-   0=    SRO  U/EI                    Explanation Focus                Dist.          Link link          units ward KIA    Only  S H     2   X                          X                                             E 022AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Parlia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X S 012G2.2.12 Question appears to match KIA. 03na Question may not be SRO only. This appears to be a precaution/limitation in the surveillance procedure.
5/80                                                                                          What in the conditions of the stem allows the operator to determine that a small PZR steam space leak is not occurring? What is incorrect about going through the first steps of AP 520?
Who performs the procedure?
NEW Changes to stem (event! appropriate path) SAT 8/5/2009 CR3- Modified as discussed.
If this procedure is performed by an RO then this is RO knowledge.
5S H    2    X X                    X                                              X    U 027AGG2.4.9 Kind of matches KIA. As written, 6/81                                                                                          not SRO only. Distractors A and C are not plausible (535 degrees is not even close to PTS concerns). Ask what action is required, not what action you would direct the RO to take. If A and C are not plausible, then the question can be answered using systems knowledge, therefore not SRO only. Made changes to stem to make a and C more plausible. SRO only.
Will discuss. NEW Procedure not performed by RO Sat S eR3 -No change. 4/79 H 2 X E 014G2.1.27 Question kind of matches KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Why do you state in the distractors "for SOM purposes," the basis document discusses control rod operability as a function of being able to insert into the core. By this definition the rod is operable lAW TS 3.1.4. Some enhancements in the structure of the question are needed. MOD 2006 Oconee NRC Exam (need to see the original question or this will be treated as a bank question)
NEW SAT 8/6/2009 S
Made several changes to stem and all distractors.
CR3 - No change.
SAT 8/5/2009.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws     5. Other   6.                           7.
S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1     Back- Q=     SRO U/EI u/EI                      Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only S 7/82  H    2   X                                                                         E 034A2.01 Question appears to match Kf    KIA.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E 022AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 5/80 What in the conditions of the stem allows the operator to determine that a small PZR steam space leak is not occurring?
A.
What is incorrect about going through the first steps of AP 520? NEW Changes to stem (event! appropriate path) SAT 8/5/2009 5 CR3-Modified as discussed. H 2 X X X U 027AGG2.4.9 Kind of matches KIA. As written, 6/81 not SRO only. Distractors A and C are not plausible (535 degrees is not even close to PTS concerns).
Appears to be SRO only. Stem focus needs to be improved. Which ONE of the following choices "Correctly" completes the .... Is the Iodine removal factor a common term at CR-3?
Ask what action is required, not what action you would direct the RO to take. If A and C are not plausible, then the question can be answered using systems knowledge, therefore not SRO only. Made changes to stem to make a and C more plausible.
NEW Made changes to stem and distractors.
SRO only. NEW SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E 022AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 5/80 What in the conditions of the stem allows the operator to determine that a small PZR steam space leak is not occurring?
SAT. 8/6/2009 eR3 - Modified as discussed.
What is incorrect about going through the first steps of AP 520? NEW Changes to stem (event! appropriate path) SAT 8/5/2009 S CR3-Modified as discussed.
S 8/83  H     2                                                                             S 039G2.4.20 Question appears to match the KIA.
H 2 X X X U 027AGG2.4.9 Kind of matches KIA. As written, 6/81 not SRO only. Distractors A and C are not plausible (535 degrees is not even close to PTS concerns).
Appears to be SRO only.
Ask what action is required, not what action you would direct the RO to take. If A and C are not plausible, then the question can be answered using systems knowledge, therefore not SRO only. Made changes to stem to make a and C more plausible.
NEW S
SRO only. NEW SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -No change.
eR3 - No change.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO u/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 7/82 H 2 X E 034A2.01 Question appears to match Kf A. Appears to be SRO only. Stem focus needs to be improved.
H    2                                                                              S 056AG2.4.45 Question appears to match the 9/84                                                                                            KIA. Appears to be SRO Only.
Which ONE of the following choices "Correctly" completes the .... Is the Iodine removal factor a common term at CR-3? NEW Made changes to stem and distractors.
NEW S
SAT. 8/6/2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
eR3 - No change.
8/83 H 2 S 039G2.4.20 Question appears to match the KIA. Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 056AG2.4.45 Question appears to match the 9/84 KIA. Appears to be SRO Only. NEW S eR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 7/82 H 2 X E 034A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Stem focus needs to be improved.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other  6.                          7.
Which ONE of the following choices "Correctly" completes the .... Is the Iodine removal factor a common term at CR-3? NEW Made changes to stem and distractors.
Q#  LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 8ack-    Q=    SRO  U/EI u/E1                    Explanation Focus                Dis!.
SAT. 8/6/2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
Dist.         Link          units ward KIA    Only  S H    3                                                                      X    U 057AA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA. Question does not appear to be SRO 10/85                                                                                          only. Although the step is in the middle of the procedure, the applicant need only know which fFW EFW pump valves could be controlled to determine that the #1 EFW pump should' be started.
8/83 H 2 S 039G2.4.20 Question appears to match the KIA. Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 056AG2.4.45 Question appears to match the 9/84 KIA. Appears to be SRO Only. NEW S eR3 -No change. 
NEW Changed the stem. All distractors, Moved picture. SAT. 8/6/2009 S    CR3 - Modified as discussed.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO u/E1 Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 3 X U 057 AA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA. Question does not appear to be SRO 10/85 only. Although the step is in the middle of the procedure, the applicant need only know which fFW pump valves could be controlled to determine that the #1 EFW pump should' be started. NEW Changed the stem. All distractors, Moved picture. SAT. 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed. F 2 S 061 AA2.06 Question appears to match the K/ A. 11/86 Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 -No change. H 2 B E 062A2.01 Question appears to match K/ A. 12/87 Borderline SRO will Discuss. Otherwise sat. NEW Added fOP* 14 enclosure
F    2                                                                                061AA2.06 S 061  AA2.06 Question appears to match the K/ KIA.
: 7. SAT. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
A.
--1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S H 3 X U 057 AA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA. Question does not appear to be SRO 10/85 only. Although the step is in the middle of the procedure, the applicant need only know which EFW pump valves could be controlled to determine that the #1 EFW pump should' be started. NEW Changed the stem. All distractors, Moved picture. SAT. 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
11/86                                                                                          Appears to be SRO only.
F 2 S 061AA2.06 Question appears to match the KIA. 11/86 Appears to be SRO only. NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 B E 062A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 12/87 Borderline SRO will Discuss. Otherwise sat. NEW Added EOP-14 enclosure
NEW S
: 7. SAT. S CR3 -Modified as discussed. 
CR3 - No change.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation i Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 065AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. 13/88 Does not appear to be SRO only. Typically when to trip the reactor on loss of Instrument air is an RO knowledge item. NEW Gerry to select new KIA. NEW KA -058AA2.03 CR3 -Wrote new question.
eR3 H    2                                                                      B    E 062A2.01 Question appears to match K/   A.
H 2 X E 069AG2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. 14/89 Appears to be SRO only. The way the question is written, it appears that the plant is in mode 4, and it is okay to continue to heat up ( and stay in mode 4). The question should be is the plant allowed to change modes. What reference is to be provided to the applicant?
KIA.
Second part of question needs some work. NEW Changed stem and distractors.
12/87                                                                                          Borderline SRO will Discuss. Otherwise sat.
SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
NEW Added fOP*
----1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 065AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. 13/88 Does not appear to be SRO only. Typically when to trip the reactor on loss of Instrument air is an RO knowledge item. NEW Gerry to select new KIA. NEW KA -058AA2.03 CR3 -Wrote new question.
EOP- 14 enclosure 7. SAT.
H 2 X E 069AG2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. 14/89 Appears to be SRO only. The way the question is written, it appears that the plant is in mode 4, and it is okay to continue to heat up ( and stay in mode 4). The question should be is the plant allowed to change modes. What reference is to be provided to the applicant?
S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
Second part of question needs some work. NEW Changed stem and distractors.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                           7.
SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed. 
0#
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 076A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. With 15/90 an operability assessment of the UHS, the question appears to be SRO only. The operability determination needs to be more pronounced. (the UHS is operablel inoperable).
Q#  LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back-8ack- 0=
BANK Changed stem and distractors SAT 4/06/2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
Q=    SRO utE!
H 2 X X U 077 AG2.2. 12 Question kind of matches K/ A. 16/91 This question is based on the precautions and limitations of SPs. Who normally performs these SPs? If these are performed by an RO, then the RO is also responsible for the P and L's, and this is not an SRO level question.
U/EI                      Explanation                  i Focus                Dist.       Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S H    2                                                                         X    U 065AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA.
13/88                                                                                            Does not appear to be SRO only. Typically when to trip the reactor on loss of Instrument air is an RO knowledge item.
NEW Gerry to select new KIA.
NEW KA - 058AA2.03 CR3 - Wrote new question.
H     2   X                                                                         E 069AG2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA.
Appears to be SRO only. The way the question 14/89 is written, it appears that the plant is in mode 4, and it is okay to continue to heat up ( and stay in mode 4). The question should be is the plant allowed to change modes. What reference is to be provided to the applicant? Second part of question needs some work.
NEW Changed stem and distractors. SAT 8/6/2009 S
CR3 - Modified as discussed.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws            4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                           7.
Q#  LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1      Back- Q=    SAO SRO utE!
U/E!                      Explanation Focus                Dist.         Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S H    2                                                                              E 076A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. With 15/90                                                                                            an operability assessment of the UHS, the question appears to be SRO only. The operability determination needs to be more pronounced. (the UHS is operable/
operablel inoperable).
BANK Changed stem and distractors SAT 4/06/2009 eR3 - Modified as discussed.
CR3 S
H    2    X                                                                    X X            AG2.2.12 U 077AG2.2. 12 Question kind of matches KIA.K/A.
16/91                                                                                             This question is based on the precautions and limitations of SPs. Who normally performs these SPs? If these are performed by an RO, then the RO is also responsible for the P and L's, and this is not an SRO level question.
What is the difference between an EGDG and an ES DG. Are we talking about the same diesel in this question?
What is the difference between an EGDG and an ES DG. Are we talking about the same diesel in this question?
Did not find in SP-354A the step that directs the CRS to have the operator perform SP907 A enclosure  
Did not find in SP-354A the step that directs the CRS to have the operator perform SP907A enclosure 2. Not sure that there is a correct answer for the question as written.
: 2. Not sure that there is a correct answer for the question as written. NEW Made some changes to stem. Will have another examiner look at. CR3 -No change yet. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO U/E! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 076A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. With 15/90 an operability assessment of the UHS, the question appears to be SRO only. The operability determination needs to be more pronounced. (the UHS is operable/
NEW Made some changes to stem. Will havE      have another examiner look at.
inoperable).
CR3 - No change yet.
BANK Changed stem and distractors SAT 4/06/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                               7.
H 2 X X U 077 AG2.2.12 Question kind of matches KIA. 16/91 This question is based on the precautions and limitations of SPs. Who normally performs these SPs? If these are performed by an RO, then the RO is also responsible for the P and L's, and this is not an SRO level question.
Q#   LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 Back-   Q=     SRO  u/E1 utE!                           Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only   S H     2                               X X                                        X X    U BW/A03AG2.4.6 Question appears to match 17/92                                                                                              KIA. Not sure this is SRO only. This appears to be a question on EOP/AOP procedure usage that may be both RO and SRO knowledge. I found no material that supports answer D  0 as the only correct answer, in fact answer B 8 could also be correct, if the SRO determined that he did not have an operator available to perform the ARP. Need to tighten up the question.
What is the difference between an EGDG and an ES DG. Are we talking about the same diesel in this question?
ARP, MOD Need a copy of the original question to verify that this is a modified question.
Did not find in SP-354A the step that directs the CRS to have the operator perform SP907 A enclosure
Made changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/07/2009.
: 2. Not sure that there is a correct answer for the question as written. NEW Made some changes to stem. Will havE another examiner look at. CR3 -No change yet.
S eR3 - Modified as discussed.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW/A03AG2.4.6 Question appears to match 17/92 KIA. Not sure this is SRO only. This appears to be a question on EOP/AOP procedure usage that may be both RO and SRO knowledge.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other  6.                             7.
I found no material that supports answer D as the only correct answer, in fact answer B could also be correct, if the SRO determined that he did not have an operator available to perform the ARP, Need to tighten up the question.
Q#   LOK   LOD (F/H)
MOD Need a copy of the original question to verify that this is a modified question.
(FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1#/ Back- Q=     SAO SRO U/EI                        Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S H     2                                                               X       X   U BW   IE09EA2.2 Question does not meet the KIA.
Made changes to stem and all distractors.
BW/E09EA2.2 18/93                                                                                          The KIA asks for the Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Natural Circulation Cooldown): Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments.
SAT 8/07/2009.
The question as written lists the procedure flowpath from the point of entry into the EOPs until the final procedure selection is made. No limitations are being tested.
S eR3 -Modified as discussed.  
This procedure flowpath can be determined from procedure entry requirements, therefore it is not SRO only.
------1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO u/E1 Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW/A03AG2.4.6 Question appears to match 17/92 KIA. Not sure this is SRO only. This appears to be a question on EOP/AOP procedure usage that may be both RO and SRO knowledge.
Rewrite using limits for cooldown.
I found no material that supports answer 0 as the only correct answer, in fact answer 8 could also be correct, if the SRO determined that he did not have an operator available to perform the ARP. Need to tighten up the question.
eR3 - Wrote new question.
MOD Need a copy of the original question to verify that this is a modified question.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
Made changes to stem and all distractors.
0#
SAT 8/07/2009.
Q#   LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back-   0=
S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
Q=     SRO UlEi U/EI                      Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S F    2                         X                                                 U G2.1.5 (Question in exam submittal has KIA as 19/94                                                                                          2.1.15, but the ES 401-3 has the KIA listed as 2.1.5. Question appears to match KIA 2.1.5.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW IE09EA2.2 Question does not meet the KIA. 18/93 The KIA asks for the Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Natural Circulation Cooldown):
Distractors A and B are essentially stating the same thing, if one is incorrect both are, and if one is correct, then both would be correct.
Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments.
Therefore, distractors A and B are not plausible.
The question as written lists the procedure flowpath from the point of entry into the EOPs until the final procedure selection is made. No limitations are being tested. This procedure flowpath can be determined from procedure entry requirements, therefore it is not SRO only. Rewrite using limits for cooldown.
Replace distractors A and B.
eR3 -Wrote new question.
BANK Changed A and B distractors and moved order of distractors. SAT. Sn12009.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW/E09EA2.2 Question does not meet the KIA. 18/93 The KIA asks for the Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Natural Circulation Cooldown):
S CR3 - Modified as discussed.                     I H    2                                                                       B    E G2.1.S Question appears to match KIA. Not 20/95 Sure if it is SRO only. Could the answer be determined using only systems knowledge?
Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments.
Will discuss.
The question as written lists the procedure flowpath from the point of entry into the EOPs until the final procedure selection is made. No limitations are being tested. This procedure flowpath can be determined from procedure entry requirements, therefore it is not SRO only. Rewrite using limits for cooldown.
NEW Made changes to stem and discussed why question was SRO only. SAT Snl2009 S eR3 - Modified as discussed.
eR3 -Wrote new question. 
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws            4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other    6.                              7.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U G2.1.5 (Question in exam submittal has KIA as 19/94 2.1.15, but the ES 401-3 has the KIA listed as 2.1.5. Question appears to match KIA 2.1.5. Distractors A and B are essentially stating the same thing, if one is incorrect both are, and if one is correct, then both would be correct. Therefore, distractors A and B are not plausible.
Q#   LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 Back-    Q=    SRO    utE!
Replace distractors A and B. BANK Changed A and B distractors and moved order of distractors.
U/EI                         Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only   S H     2                               X                                               E G2.2.37 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT. Sn12009. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
21/96                                                                                            Appears to be SRO only based on the basis documents required. Need to ensure that all other distractors are truly incorrect.
I , H 2 B E G2.1.S Question appears to match KIA. Not 20/95 Sure if it is SRO only. Could the answer be determined using only systems knowledge?
BANK Added lAW TS SAT an12009.
Will discuss. NEW Made changes to stem and discussed why question was SRO only. SAT Snl2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
5S eR3 - Modified as discussed.
-1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U G2.1.5 (Question in exam submittal has KIA as 19/94 2.1.15, but the ES 401-3 has the KIA listed as 2.1.5. Question appears to match KIA 2.1.5. Distractors A and B are essentially stating the same thing, if one is incorrect both are, and if one is correct, then both would be correct. Therefore, distractors A and B are not plausible.
F    2                                                                                S G2.2.43 Question appears to match the KIA.
Replace distractors A and B. BANK Changed A and B distractors and moved order of distractors.
22/97                                                                                            Appears to be SRO only. As written the question is a little. confusing, may want to consider changing the format.
SAT. Sn12009. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
NEW 5S eR3 - No change.
H 2 B E G2.1.S Question appears to match KIA. Not 20/95 Sure if it is SRO only. Could the answer be determined using only systems knowledge?
: 1.       2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
Will discuss. NEW Made changes to stem and discussed why question was SRO only. SAT Snl2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed. 
Q#   LOK     LOD (F/H)   (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 8ack-   Q=     SRO  UlEI U/EI                     Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S F        2                         X X                                             X X    U G2.3.15 Questions appears to match KIA. Not 23/98                                                                                            sure it is SRO only. It appears that you are testing the purposes of the radiation monitors.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E G2.2.37 Question appears to match KIA. 21/96 Appears to be SRO only based on the basis documents required.
This is an RO knowledge item. Distractors B and D are not plausible. Why would anyone use the fuel building radiation monitor to determine anything on a Large Break LOCA? It also appears that mechanical damage is only used for the spent fuel pool.
Need to ensure that all other distractors are truly incorrect.
NEW CR3 - Wrote new question.
BANK Added lAW TS SAT an12009. 5 eR3 -Modified as discussed.
F        2                                                                      X X    U G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA.
F 2 S G2.2.43 Question appears to match the KIA. 22/97 Appears to be SRO only. As written the question is a little. confusing, may want to consider changing the format. NEW 5 eR3 -No change. ------1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E G2.2.37 Question appears to match KIA. 21/96 Appears to be SRO only based on the basis documents required.
U 24/99                                                                                             This question appears to be just the definition of a classification. Could be considered GET knowledge. Does not appear to be SRO knowledge.
Need to ensure that all other distractors are truly incorrect.
BANK Added lAW TS SAT an12009. S eR3 -Modified as discussed. F 2 S G2.2.43 Question appears to match the KIA. 22/97 Appears to be SRO only. As written the question is a little. confusing, may want to consider changing the format. NEW S eR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X X U G2.3.15 Questions appears to match KIA. Not 23/98 sure it is SRO only. It appears that you are testing the purposes of the radiation monitors.
This is an RO knowledge item. Distractors B and D are not plausible.
Why would anyone use the fuel building radiation monitor to determine anything on a Large Break LOCA? It also appears that mechanical damage is only used for the spent fuel pool. NEW CR3 -Wrote new question.
F 2 X U G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA. 24/99 This question appears to be just the definition of a classification.
Could be considered GET knowledge.
Does not appear to be SRO knowledge.
BANK (got second opinion from an additional examiner).
BANK (got second opinion from an additional examiner).
Rewrite an 12009 CR3 -Replaced question. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X X U G2.3.15 Questions appears to match KIA. Not 23/98 sure it is SRO only. It appears that you are testing the purposes of the radiation monitors.
an12009 Rewrite anl2009 CR3 - Replaced question.
This is an RO knowledge item. Distractors B and D are not plausible.
: 1.     2.         3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws                         5. Other   6.                                                   7.
Why would anyone use the fuel building radiation monitor to determine anything on a Large Break LOCA? It also appears that mechanical damage is only used for the spent fuel pool. NEW CR3 -Wrote new question.
Q#   LOK     LaD LOD (F/H)   (1-5) Stem Cues       T/F   Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back-                         Q=     SAO SRO  U/EJ UlEI                                       Explanation Focus                 Dist.         Link                 units ward               KIA   Only   S H       2             X X                                                                                X X   E G2.4.3 Question appears to match KIA. May not 25/100                                                                                                                     be SRO. Why do you give the details of EOP-03 step 3.14. This is cuing. Question is very similar to #64 on the RO Exam.
F 2 X U G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA. 24/99 This question appears to be just the definition of a classification.
NEW Upon further review, question is SRO only. Removed teaching from the stem.
Could be considered GET knowledge.
Question SAT 8/4/2009.
Does not appear to be SRO knowledge.
eR3 - Modified as discussed.
BANK (got second opinion from an additional examiner).
I S
Rewrite anl2009 CR3 -Replaced question.
5 Sats, nUnsats,
-------------------
              >2'Unsats, and 8 Enhancements g
---------------------------
 
-------1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E G2.4.3 Question appears to match KIA. May not 25/100 be SRO. Why do you give the details of EOP-03 step 3.14. This is cuing. Question is very similar to #64 on the RO Exam. NEW Upon further review, question is SRO only. Removed teaching from the stem. Question SAT 8/4/2009.
ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301                       ROWritten Examination Review Worksheet FINAL                                 Form ES-401-9 Q#
S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
1.
I ----------------------------
LOK I 2.
----------
2.,
5 Sats, >2'Unsats, and 8 Enhancements g 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EJ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E G2.4.3 Question appears to match KIA. May not 25/100 be SRO. Why do you give the details of EOP-03 step 3.14. This is cuing. Question is very similar to #64 on the RO Exam. NEW Upon further review, question is SRO only. Removed teaching from the stem. Question SAT 8/4/2009.
LOD I     3. Psychometric Flaws
S eR3 -Modified as discussed.
                        ~--~~r---~--~--~--~--~---r---;
5 Sats, nUnsats, and 8 Enhancements g
: 4. Job Content Flaws          5. Other    6.                        7.
ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 ROWritten Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 1. I 2., I 3. Psychometric Flaws LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) 6. 7. Q# Stem Icues I T/F I cred*1 Partial I JOb-I Minutia I #1 I Back-I Q= I SRO I utE! Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Explanation Instructions  
(F/H) (1-5)   Stem  Cues I T/F Stem Icues         Credo Partial T/F I cred*1 Partial I JOb-I Job- Minutia Minutia I #1  Back- Q=
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
                                                                                #1 I Back-I   Q= I SRO SRO I U/EI utE!                   Explanation Focus               Dist.           Link           units ward KIA       Only   S Instructions
IEnter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. IEnter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable).
[Refer to Section D0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
IEnter Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD)
IEnter                            (LaD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
Line 1,313: Line 1,650:
* The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
* The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
* The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
* The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
* One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if ajob content error is identified:
* One or more distractors is ((are)  are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
: 4.     Check the appropriate box if ajob     a job content error is identified:
* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
* The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
* The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
* The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.  
* The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
: 5. Check guestions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).  
: 5.               guestions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA Check questions and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
: 6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?  
: 6.     Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
: 7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 ROWritten Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws LOD
: 7.     At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
: 5. Other 6. 7. (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Instructions
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws     5. Other   6.                           7.
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1     Back-8ack- Q=     SRO UlEI U/EI                     Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only S H    2                        X                                                    E 001 AA2.05 Question appears to match KIA.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LaD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable).
Distractors A and B may not be plausible. What 1                                                                                            procedure actions would be taken if MUV-31 was open (attempt to close MUV-31).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
NEW Explained the plausibility of distractors A S and B Question is SAT 8/13/2009 CR3 - No change.
* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
H    2                                                                 X            U 003AK1.10 Question does not appear to match the KIA. The KIA is knowledge of the 2                                                                                            operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod:
* The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
Definitions of core quadrant power tilt. This question is dealing with a mis-aligned control rod.
* The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
BANK Licensee to change to dropped rod, will change power levels to match. And Verify that the correct technical Spec limit is the only correct answer. Will also run on simulator to verify indications.
* The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
8/13/2009 CR3 - Modified question as discussed.
* One or more distractors is ( are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
: 1.      2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                           7.
* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
Q# LOK      LOD (F/H)   (1-5) Stem Cues    TlF T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #/    Back- Q=    SAO SRO UlEJ U/EI                      Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward    KIA    Only  S F        2                        X                                                    E 003K6.14 Question kind of matches the KJ    KIA.
* The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
A.
* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
S, is not plausible. Are both oil lift Distractor B, 3                                                                                                pumps for the B S Rep always running when preparing to start the pump? Does the applicant have to make any assumptions?
* The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
BANK S CR3 - Lowered RCS pressure to 1000# to make more plausible. Removed "electrically" from stem. RCP-1 B is the only RCP with 2 oil pumps. If a lift oil pump were to trip on any of the other RCPs then "A" distractor would be true.
: 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).  
H        2                                                                  X            U 004K2.06 Question does not appear to match KJ A. What eves instrumentation power supply KIA.
: 6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?  
4                                                                                                is being tested?
: 7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). 
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 001 AA2.05 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B may not be plausible.
modified) .
What 1 procedure actions would be taken if MUV-31 was open (attempt to close MUV-31). NEW S Explained the plausibility of distractors A and B Question is SAT 8/13/2009 CR3 -No change. H 2 X U 003AK1.10 Question does not appear to match the KIA. The KIA is knowledge of the 2 operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Definitions of core quadrant power tilt. This question is dealing with a mis-aligned control rod. BANK Licensee to change to dropped rod, will change power levels to match. And Verify that the correct technical Spec limit is the only correct answer. Will also run on simulator to verify indications.
closedl Discussed changes to valve fails closed!
8/13/2009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed.  
manual control is not available, etc. Will review revised question. 8/13/2009 CR3 - All distractors modified per S
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 001 AA2.05 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B may not be plausible.
discussion .
What 1 procedure actions would be taken if MUV-31 was open (attempt to close MUV-31). NEW S Explained the plausibility of distractors A and B Question is SAT 8/13/2009 CR3 -No change. H 2 X U 003AK1.10 Question does not appear to match the KIA. The KIA is knowledge of the 2 operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Definitions of core quadrant power tilt. This question is dealing with a mis-aligned control rod. BANK Licensee to change to dropped rod, will change power levels to match. And Verify that the correct technical Spec limit is the only correct answer. Will also run on simulator to verify indications.
discussion.
8/13/2009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws            4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                          7.                     I Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F      Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1      Back- Q=    SRO  utEi U/EI                    Explanation                i Focus                  Dist.         Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S H     2                                                                               S 005AK3.05 Question appears to match KIA.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TlF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEJ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 003K6.14 Question kind of matches the KJ A. Distractor B, is not plausible.
May want to add the word limits after DNBR and 5                                                                                              LHR. Otherwise SAT.
Are both oil lift 3 pumps for the B Rep always running when preparing to start the pump? Does the applicant have to make any assumptions?
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
BANK S CR3 -Lowered RCS pressure to 1000# to make more plausible.
eR3 - replaced "criteria is" with "limits are" CR3 H    2                          X                                  X                E 005K2.01 Question kind of matches KIA, using a backwards logic. Distractor C may not be 6                                                                                              plausible. Note in EOP 12 states not to use any procedures while in EOP except for AP 880, so why would someone pick distractor C?
Removed "electrically" from stem. RCP-1 B is the only RCP with 2 oil pumps. If a lift oil pump were to trip on any of the other RCPs then "A" distractor would be true. H 2 X U 004K2.06 Question does not appear to match KJ A. What eves instrumentation power supply 4 is being tested? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).  
NEW S CR3 eR3 - No change. RO has to know of the existence of that NOTE in order to rule out "C" distractor.
-Discussed changes to valve fails closed! manual control is not available, etc. Will review revised question.
                                                                                                "e"
8/13/2009 S CR3 -All distractors modified per discussion. , 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SAO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 003K6.14 Question kind of matches the KIA. Distractor S, is not plausible.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
Are both oil lift 3 pumps for the S Rep always running when preparing to start the pump? Does the applicant have to make any assumptions?
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-   Q=     SRO U/EI UJE/                      Explanation Focus                 Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S H
BANK S CR3 -Lowered RCS pressure to 1000# to make more plausible.
H    2                                                                             E 005KS.03 Question Kind of matches KIA. Not sure if testing 3 items is going to work (Le.
Removed "electrically" from stem. RCP-1 B is the only RCP with 2 oil pumps. If a lift oil pump were to trip on any of the other RCPs then "A" distractor would be true. H 2 X U 004K2.06 Question does not appear to match KIA. What eves instrumentation power supply 4 is being tested? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified) . . Discussed changes to valve fails closedl manual control is not available, etc. Will review revised question.
7                                                                                            open/closed/heatup) to answer the question correctly you only have two know what two of the components will do, to narrow the correct answe r down.
8/13/2009 S CR3 -All distractors modified per discussion . .
answer BANK CR3 - No change. Closed/closed and S
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. I Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utEi Explanation i Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 005AK3.05 Question appears to match KIA. May want to add the word limits after DNBR and 5 LHR. Otherwise SAT. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
open/open valve positions not plausible.
eR3 -replaced "criteria is" with "limits are" H 2 X X E 005K2.01 Question kind of matches KIA, using a backwards logic. Distractor C may not be 6 plausible.
That was my reason for needing 3 items.
Note in EOP 12 states not to use any procedures while in EOP except for AP 880, so why would someone pick distractor C? NEW S eR3 -No change. RO has to know of the existence of that NOTE in order to rule out "e" distractor.  
F    2                                                                            S OOSA2.10 Question appears to match the KIA.
----1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 005AK3.05 Question appears to match KIA. May want to add the word limits after DNBR and 5 LHR. Otherwise SAT. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
SAT. Need to make sure that all of the 8                                                                                            distractors are actually incorrect.
CR3 -replaced "criteria is" with "limits are" H 2 X X E 005K2.01 Question kind of matches KIA, using a backwards logic. Distractor C may not be 6 plausible.
NEW st S CR3 - Deleted part of 1st        item in each distractor. Not needed. Per TS bases "C" is the only correct answer.
Note in EOP 12 states not to use any procedures while in EOP except for AP 880, so why would someone pick distractor C? NEW S CR3 -No change. RO has to know of the existence of that NOTE in order to rule out "C" distractor.
H H    2                                                                            S 006K5.04 OOSK5.04 Question appears to match the KIA.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO UJE/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 005KS.03 Question Kind of matches KIA. Not sure if testing 3 items is going to work (Le. 7 open/closed/heatup) to answer the question correctly you only have two know what two of the components will do, to narrow the correct answer down. BANK S CR3 -No change. Closed/closed and open/open valve positions not plausible.
SAT.
That was my reason for needing 3 items. F 2 S OOSA2.10 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. Need to make sure that all of the 8 distractors are actually incorrect.
9 NEW S
NEW S CR3 -Deleted part of 1 st item in each distractor.
CR3- No change.
Not needed. Per TS bases "C" is the only correct answer. H 2 S 006K5.04 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. 9 NEW S CR3-No change. ----1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 005KS.03 Question Kind of matches KIA. Not sure if testing 3 items is going to work (Le. 7 open/closed/heatup) to answer the question correctly you only have two know what two of the components will do, to narrow the correct answe r down. BANK S CR3 -No change. Closed/closed and open/open valve positions not plausible.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                             7.                     ~
That was my reason for needing 3 items. F 2 S OOSA2.10 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. Need to make sure that all of the 8 distractors are actually incorrect.
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-   Q=     SRO U/EI                        Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S H    2                                                               X           E 007A4.09 Not sure if the question meets the KJA. Are the RCDT parameters higher than KIA.
NEW S CR3 -Deleted part of 1 st item in each distractor.
10                                                                                          normal operating parameters? It appears from your distractor analysis that they are, but with pressurizer level not changing (I understandtha understand tha level control is in automatic and would mask a leak of this magnitude) and all others beside the RS RB sump stable I need to verify that the RCDT parameters have changed from normal operating parameters.
Not needed. Per TS bases "C" is the only correct answer. H 2 S OOSK5.04 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. 9 NEW S CR3-No change.
BANK S CR3 - No Change. RCDT pressure normally maintained less than 2 psig to ensure seal leakage is not routed to the RB sump.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 007 A4.09 Not sure if the question meets the KIA. Are the RCDT parameters higher than 10 normal operating parameters?
F    2                          X                                                  E 007EA2.02 Question appears to match KIA. KJA. Not sure if C is plausible. Does EOP-02 ever direct 11                                                                                          the operator to open these breakers? If not this is not plausible (lAW EOP-2.0)
It appears from your distractor analysis that they are, but with pressurizer level not changing (I understandtha level control is in automatic and would mask a leak of this magnitude) and all others beside the RS sump stable I need to verify that the RCDT parameters have changed from normal operating parameters.
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
BANK S CR3 -No Change. RCDT pressure normally maintained less than 2 psig to ensure seal leakage is not routed to the RB sump. F 2 X E 007EA2.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not sure if C is plausible.
S CR3 - Changed number of control rods stuck out. Breakers in distractor "C" may be
Does EOP-02 ever direct 11 the operator to open these breakers?
                                                                                          . opened in the previous step of EOP-02.
If not this is not plausible (lAW EOP-2.0) MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws     5. Other   6.                           7.
S CR3 -Changed number of control rods stuck out. Breakers in distractor "C" may be . opened in the previous step of EOP-02. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 007 A4.09 Not sure if the question meets the KJ A. Are the RCDT parameters higher than 10 normal operating parameters?
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1      8ack- Q=     SAO SRO  UlEi                      Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only S H    2                         X                                                       00SA1.03 U OOSA    1.03 Question appears to match KIA.
It appears from your distractor analysis that they are, but with pressurizer level not changing (I understand tha level control is in automatic and would mask a leak of this magnitude) and all others beside the RB sump stable I need to verify that the RCDT parameters have changed from normal operating parameters.
Distractors A and 0 do not appear to be 12                                                                                                                                      you plausible. If NPSH is maintained why would YOL enter an LCO, and if NPSH is not maintained, why would you not enter the LCO?
BANK S CR3 -No Change. RCDT pressure normally maintained less than 2 psig to ensure seal leakage is not routed to the RB sump. F 2 X E 007EA2.02 Question appears to match KJ A. Not sure if C is plausible.
NEW Changed stem to start with conditions, and then changes to conditions. Will continue to work S/13/2009.
Does EOP-02 ever direct 11 the operator to open these breakers?
CR3 - Modified per discussion. The S nitrogen overpressure on the tank is not an NPSH concern.
If not this is not plausible (lAW EOP-2.0) MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
H     2                                                                             S 00SAG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA.
S CR3 -Changed number of control rods stuck out. Breakers in distractor "C" may be opened in the previous step of EOP-02.
Sat 13 NEW CR3 - Changed "could/should" in stem to S "would/will".
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SAO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U OOSA 1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and 0 do not appear to be 12 plausible.
M      1                                                                              S 008K4.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
If NPSH is maintained why would YOL enter an LCO, and if NPSH is not maintained, why would you not enter the LCO? NEW Changed stem to start with conditions, and then changes to conditions.
14 BANK S
Will continue to work S/13/2009.
CR3 - No change.
CR3 -Modified per discussion.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                             7.
The S nitrogen overpressure on the tank is not an NPSH concern. H 2 S 00SAG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA. Sat 13 NEW S CR3 -Changed "could/should" in stem to "would/will".
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H)
M 1 S 008K4.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
(FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F TfF    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #f #/ Back- Q=     SRO U/EI utEi                       Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only   S H     1                                                                            S 009EK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. The cooldown rate should 15                                                                                          be closer to the limit. Otherwise sat.
14 BANK S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 00SA1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and 0 do not appear to be 12 plausible.
BANK S CR3 - Changed excessive/acceptable to above/below TS limit to remove subjectivity.
If NPSH is maintained why would you enter an LCO, and if NPSH is not maintained, why would you not enter the LCO? NEW Changed stem to start with conditions, and then changes to conditions.
F    1                                                              X           U U 010K5.01 Not sure this matches the KIA. What is the condition of fluid in PZR? We make no 16                                                                                          mention of this. Not very discriminating.
Will continue to work S/13/2009.
BANK Continue to work question to match KIA including operational implications. (consider general operating procedure actions) 8/13/2009 CR3 - Replaced question.
CR3 -Modified per discussion.
H    2                                                                            S 011 EK3.07 Question appears to match KIA.
The S nitrogen overpressure on the tank is not an NPSH concern. H 2 S 00SAG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA. Sat 13 NEW CR3 -Changed "could/should" in stem to S "would/will".
SAT 17 NEW S
M 1 S 008K4.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
CR3 - No change.
14 BANK S CR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 1 S 009EK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
Q# LOK   LOD (FIH)
The cooldown rate should 15 be closer to the limit. Otherwise sat. BANK S CR3 -Changed excessive/acceptable to above/below TS limit to remove subjectivity.
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back-   Q=     SRO SAO  utEi U/EI                     Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only   S F    1                                                                            S 012G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. Low discriminating value. Otherwise SAT.
F 1 X U 010K5.01 Not sure this matches the KIA. What is the condition of fluid in PZR? We make no 16 mention of this. Not very discriminating.
18 NEW S
BANK Continue to work question to match KIA including operational implications. (consider general operating procedure actions) 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question. H 2 S 011 EK3.07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 17 NEW S CR3 -No change. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 1 S 009EK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
eR3 - No change.
The cooldown rate should 15 be closer to the limit. Otherwise sat. BANK S CR3 -Changed excessive/acceptable to above/below TS limit to remove subjectivity.
CR3 F    2                                                                           S 012K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. Top part of stem is not needed. Need to ensure that 19                                                                                          b, c, and d are not correct. Otherwise SAT NEW S CR3 eR3 - Removed top part of stem. "B",  "8", "C" and "0" verified incorrect.
F 1 X U 010K5.01 Not sure this matches the KIA. What is the condition of fluid in PZR? We make no 16 mention of this. Not very discriminating.
H    2                                                                           S 013K2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 20                                                                                          BANK S CR3 eR3 - No change.
BANK Continue to work question to match KIA including operational implications. (consider general operating procedure actions) 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question.
H    2                                                                            S 015/017 AK1.05 Question appears to match KIA.
H 2 S 011 EK3.07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 17 NEW S CR3 -No change. 
21 NEW S
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 1 S 012G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. Low discriminating value. Otherwise SAT. 18 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 S 012K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. Top part of stem is not needed. Need to ensure that 19 b, c, and d are not correct. Otherwise SAT NEW S CR3 -Removed top part of stem. "B", "C" and "0" verified incorrect.
eR3 - No change.
H 2 S 013K2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 20 BANK S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 015/017 AK1.05 Question appears to match KIA. 21 NEW S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SAO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 1 S 012G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. Low discriminating value. Otherwise SAT. 18 NEW S eR3 -No change. F 2 S 012K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. Top part of stem is not needed. Need to ensure that 19 b, c, and d are not correct. Otherwise SAT NEW S eR3 -Removed top part of stem. "8", "C" and "0" verified incorrect.
CR3
H 2 S 013K2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 20 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 015/017 AK1.05 Question appears to match KIA. 21 NEW S eR3 -No change. 
                                          ~
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 015K3.01 Question appears to match KJ A. Add axial to the -6% imbalance in the stem. 22 Otherwise SAT (Why do they need a reference?
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws           5. Other   6.                         7.
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-           0=
Q=     SRO utE!                    Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward         KIA   Only   S H     2                                                                                   S 015K3.01 Question appears to match KIA. KJA. Add axial to the -6% imbalance in the stem.
22                                                                                                  Otherwise SAT (Why do they need a reference?
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
CR3 - Added "axial power" to stem.
S Removed reference, not needed to answer question.
H    2                                                                                     S 016A4.02 Question appears to match KIA. KJA. SAT 23                                                                                                  BANK S    CR3 - No change.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws            4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                           7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 8ack- Q=     SRO U/EI                       Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link           units ward   KIA   Only S H     2   X      X                                                    X            U 017K5.02 Question kind of matches KIA.
Although the applicant can correctly answer the 24                                                                                            question and not match the KIA. The question has three items being tested in each distractor,
: 1. How many core exit thermocouples are used
                                                                                              ,,2.
: 2. where does the subcooling inputs come from SPDS, and 3. if an inadequate cooling event is in progress.
An applicant need only know that SPDS is the input, and that 8 thermocouples are used and can answer this question without determining if the plant is subcooled, saturated, or superheated. Need to remove one of the items being tested to ensure that the KIA is being adequately tested.
BANK Change to highest and average, and subcooled or saturated. 8/13/2009 811312009 CR3 - Modified question as discussed.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
Q# LOK   LOD LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-   Q=     SAO SRO U/EI                       Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S H     2           X X                                                               U 022AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA.
Again the question is testing three items, and 25                                                                                          the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Use remain the same/throttled as one of the choices.
NEW Will Make changes to a 2 and 2 format.
eR3 - Modified question as discussed.
CR3 S
F    2                                                                            S 022K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 26                                                                                          NEW S eR3 - No change.
M M      2                                                                            S 025AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT 27 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 eR3 - No change.
                              -~
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                           7.
0#
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1      Back- 0=
Q=    SRO  utE!                      Explanation Focus                Dist.         Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S F    2                        X                                                    E 026A1.01 Question appears to match the KIA.
What position are the BSV SSV-3  -3 &4 valves in with 28                                                                                            out HPI activation? Are these valves normally open or closed. I think one of the distractors (or two) should state closed if you think that someone might miss that a manual activation should have been implemented. Will discuss.
NEW S CR3- Changed Band D        0 distractors from "throttled" to "closed".
F     2                        X                                                    U 026AK3.02 If this is the equivalent of the CCW system then the question meets the KIA.
29                                                                                            Reasons on Distractors C and D    0 are not plausible. How would SW be a heat input to the RB?
RS?
NEW Rewrite to include leakage from RB via the SW system as the correct reason. Also    A.lso need a clearly wrong but plausible reason for the other distractor. Also add times with RBIC and SWT level in the stem.
S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
: 1. 2.         3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other  6.                           7.
Q# LOK  LOD (FIH)
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #/ Back- 0=    SRO  U/EI                      Explanation Focus                Dist.         Link          units ward KIA    Only  S H    2                        X                                                  E 027AK3.04 Question appears to match the KIA.
Change distractor C to read lower because all 30                                                                                          pressurizer heaters must be manually reset to energize.
BANK eR3 - No change. Two banks of heaters will S automatically reset once level rises above 40".
F    2                                                                           S 027K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 31                                                                                          NEW S eR3 - No change.
F    2                                                                X          J1 028A2.02 Question as written meets only the
                                                                                      ;1 S
S first part of the KIA. There are not any 32                                                                                          procedure usage steps to control correct, or mitigate the consequences. The b part of the KIA must be met.
NEW Not operationally valid for an RO, no actions in current procedures. Gerry to supply New KIA.
NEW KIA Number 001A2.12 eR3 - New question written.
 
1.
1-    2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                              7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- Q=     SRO  utEi U/EI                        Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only S M 2 M                                      X                                             U 029EA 029EA1.121.12 Question kind of matches KIA. Can reactor trip breakers be manually opened? If 33                                                                                            3305 and 3312 did not open from the control room, would it not be prudent to go to step 2.3?
I am not sure that we should test ROs on what is in the cross-step document document. We should be testing them on the procedure being used. Will Discuss. What is incorrect about distractor 8?                                    B?
NEW Determined that the question does meet the KIA. Licensee will look at changing to remove so much of the information in the distractors to simplify the answer.
eR3 - No change yet.
H     2                                                                                   033A1.01 S 033A    1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 34                                                                                            BANK S eR3 CR3 - No change.
H    2                                                                              S 034G2.2.40 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT. Reference OK. TS-3.7.15 35 NEW S
CR3 - No change.
eR3
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
Q# LOK   LOD (FIH)
(FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F TfF    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1#f Back- Q=     SRO UlEI U/EI                      Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only   S H     2                                                                           S 038EG2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA.
Isn't C always correct? Will discuss otherwise 36                                                                                          SAT.
NEW 5 CR3 - No change.
S              chanSJe. C is correct only if ADVs are open.
F    1                                                                            S 039K3.05 Question appears to match KIA. Low discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT.
37 BANK 5
S CR3 - No change.
H     2                                                                           E 041 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. how the failure affects Turbine control and TBV 38                                                                                          should be included. i.e. ICS will lower header pressure and the plant will trip if no actions are taken.
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -Added "axial power" to stem. Removed reference, not needed to answer question.
CR3 - No change. Plant will not trip. Only 5 controlling setpoint for turbine control will S
H 2 S 016A4.02 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 23 BANK S CR3 -No change. ----_ .. _---1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 015K3.01 Question appears to match KIA. Add axial to the -6% imbalance in the stem. 22 Otherwise SAT (Why do they need a reference?
be 15 psig higher.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other    6.                      7.
Q# LOK  LOD LCD (FIH)
(FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F TfF    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #f Back- Q=    SRO  U/EI                  Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward KIA KJA    Only  S F    2                                                                                                                    KJA.
S 054AA1.01 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT 39 BANK S
eR3 - No change.
F    2                                                                                                                    KJA.
S 055EK3.02 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT 40 BANK S
eR3 - No change.
change .
H    2                                                                            S 056AA1.05 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT 41 eR3 - Deleted some fluff from stem. Not S needed to answer question.
42  F    2                                                                            S 056Kl.03                            KJA. SAT 056K1.03 Question appears to match KIA.
BANK 5S eR3 - No change.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                          7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1      Back- Q=    SRO SAO  utEi UlEi                    Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S H     2                                                                             S 058AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT 43 NEW S
CR3 - No change.
H    2                                                                              S 059A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 44                                                                                            NEW S CR3 - No change.
a H    2                                                                              S 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA.
Might want to add directly cause a EFW 45                                                                                            actuation. Otherwise SAT NEW CR3 - Does not directly cause and EFW actuation. Valve stroking causes the booster pump to trip which in turn causes the main FW pumps to trip which then actuates EFIC.
S CR3 - No change.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                          7.
Q# LOK  LOD (FfH)
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    TIF TfF    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #f 8ack-Back- Q=    SRO  utE!                    Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S F    2                                                                              S 061 AG2.1.12 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT Question was listed as CIA, C/A, but appears to 46                                                                                            be a memory level question.
NEW S CR3- No change in question content.
Changed CIA to MEM.
H    2                                                                              S 061 K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 47                                                                                            MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 - No change.
H    2                                                                              S 062A2.16 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 48                                                                                            MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 - No change.
                                          -~
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws   5. Other   6.                           7.
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-   Q=     SRO utEi utE!                       Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward KIA   Only S F    2                                                                            E 063A3.01 Question appear to match KIA.
Distractor D may be considered a correct 49                                                                                          statement. For the light to go out batt volts must be less than 72 volts, if it is less than 72 volts, and the battery charger is till aligned then it too would be less than 72 volts, and battery charger voltage would be less than 124 volts.
Will discuss NEW CR3 - No change.
S H     2                                                                           E 064G2.4.45 064G2.4.4S Question appears to match the KIA.
Again the question is testing three items, and 50                                                                                          the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two.
NEW S CR3 - Modified to test only 2 items per distractor.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other  6.                            7.
0#
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-    0=
Q=    SRO  U/EI UlEi                      Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward KIA    Only  S H    2                                                                            E 064K4.01 Question appears to match KIA.
However, the first two distractors are electrical 51                                                                                          trips and very few electrical trips will trip the engine. If the imbalance is enough, enough torque could be generated to damage the engine, and the engine would trip then. Would this make any of these correct? Need to work on this question some to make it more clear and tight.
NEW S
CR3 - Only other electrical engine trip is the 87DG - generator differential OC. oe. Changed distractors A and B to relay actuations that will trip the breaker, but not the engine.
H    2                                                                            E 06SAG2.4.8 Question appears.to appears to match KIA.
Fire protection is only listed in one distractor 52                                                                                          along with the SSO procedure, and AP -880 with a fire in place why would I not pick this one.
Need to add Fire protection to one of the other choices as well. May also want to Take EOP 12 out of some of the distractors. Will discuss.
NEW S CR3- AP-880 listed in 2 distractors. Added    Added .
names of procedures to stem and removed*  removed from distractors.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      s.
: 5. Other    6.                          7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5)
(1-S) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1      Back-
                                                                  #/ 8ack-  Q=    SRO  UlEi u/E/                      Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S F    2                                                                              E 068K4.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, 53                                                                                            and the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two.
Will discuss.
NEW S
eR3 - No change.
F    2                                                                              S 073A4.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
54 BANK 5S eR3 - No change.
H    2                                                                              S 074EA2.03 Question appears to match KIA.
Very little discriminating value. Reference is 55                                                                                            okay.
BANK S eR3 - No change.
H    2                                                                              S 076G2.4.8 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 56                                                                                            NEW S eR3 - No change.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other  6.                          7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues      T/F  Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-    Q=    SRO  utE!
U/EI                      Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward KIA    Only  S H    2                                                                            S 077 AK2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 57                                                                                          NEW S CR3 - No change.
F    2                                                                            S 078K1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT If the high temperature is 125&deg;F will the 58                                                                                          compressor ever get to 130&deg;F? May want to change this number.
BANK CR3 - Slightly modified all temperatures.
S Changed B distractor to CDP-1 A from FWP-2A for plausibility.
H    2                                                                            E 103A2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. What is wrong with diverse containment isolation? 8 59                                                                                          could be argued as correct.
NEW S CR3 - No change.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws    5. Other    6.                          7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-    Q=    SRO  utE!
U/EI                      Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link          units ward KIA    Only  S F    2                                                                            U 103K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA.
The KIA is asking for the physical connections 60                                                                                          and/or cause effect relationships between the reactor building and the containment cooling system, not the containment spray system.
Unless the only cooling for the RS is containment spray)
BANK Develop a question on RB coolers/fans.
Cause and effect. 8/13/2009 CR3 - Replaced question.
H    2                                                                            S BW/A02AG2.2.12 Question Kind of matches KIA. SAT 61 NEW 5S eR3 CR3 - No change.
H    2                                                                            E BW/A06AK1.3 Question kind of matches KIA. 15    Is there anything wrong with using MUV-31 62                                                                                          locally? If not you should state in the stem lAW AP-990.
BANK 5S CR3 - Added lAW AP-990 to stem.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      5. Other  6.                            7.
Q# LOK  LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 8ack- Q=    SRO  utE!                      Explanation Focus                Dist.        Link            units ward  KIA    Only  S F    2                                                                  X            U BW/A07AK2.1 Question may not meet KIA.
Asked for another opinion. Determined that 63                                                                                            question did not meet KIA.
CR3 eR3 - Wrote new question.
H    2                                                                              E BW/E04EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA.
Very similar to # 25 on the SRO examination.
64 BANK CR3 - No change. Compared with SRO #25 S on 8/13/09 and determined to be SAT.
F    2    X      X            X                                                    Y BW/E08EA1.1 Question kind of matches KIA.
                                                                                          )(
Some cueing in stem. Distractors Band D  0 do 65                                                                                            not appear to be plausible. How could SW temperatures exceed design limits if the coolers were degraded / fouled?
Which ONE of the following describes the reason for ensuring only 1 ES selected RB cooling unit is running in low speed per EOP-8A SA ...
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -Added "axial power" to stem. Removed reference, not needed to answer question.
S CR3 - Modified stem slightly. Determined SAT with this change on 8-13-09.
H 2 S 016A4.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 23 BANK S CR3 -No change.  
                                                            -  ~
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X U 017K5.02 Question kind of matches KIA. Although the applicant can correctly answer the 24 question and not match the KIA. The question has three items being tested in each distractor, 1. How many core exit thermocouples are used , 2. where does the subcooling inputs come from SPDS, and 3. if an inadequate cooling event is in progress.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws     5. Other   6.                           7.
An applicant need only know that SPDS is the input, and that 8 thermocouples are used and can answer this question without determining if the plant is subcooled, saturated, or superheated.
Q# LOK   LOD (FIH)
Need to remove one of the items being tested to ensure that the KIA is being adequately tested. BANK Change to highest and average, and subcooled or saturated.
(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #/ Back-8ack- Q=     SRO utE!
8/13/2009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X U 017K5.02 Question kind of matches KIA. Although the applicant can correctly answer the 24 question and not match the KIA. The question has three items being tested in each distractor, 1. How many core exit thermocouples are used ,2. where does the subcooling inputs come from SPDS, and 3. if an inadequate cooling event is in progress.
U/EI                       Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only   S F    2                         X                                                   E G2.1.3 Question appears to match KIA. K/A.
An applicant need only know that SPDS is the input, and that 8 thermocouples are used and can answer this question without determining if the plant is subcooled, saturated, or superheated.
Distractor 0 is not plausible. What kind of 66                                                                                            turnover between the OACOAG and BOP is required? Need to add this to make better choices. (better discriminating value)
Need to remove one of the items being tested to ensure that the KIA is being adequately tested. BANK Change to highest and average, and subcooled or saturated.
NEW Gerry to write new distractor for D. 8-19-09 CR3-H      2                        X                                                    E G2.1.36 Question appears to match KIA. K/A.
811312009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed. 
Distractor C does not make sense. Cease 67                                                                                            insertion of fuel assembly? What will the crew do with it? Stop and hold it in place. Please explain why this is plausible.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 022AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 25 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Use remain the same/throttled as one of the choices. NEW Will Make changes to a 2 and 2 format. S CR3 -Modified question as discussed.
BANK 5 CR3 - Modified C distractor.
F 2 S 022K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 26 NEW S eR3 -No change. M 2 S 025AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 27 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
F   2                                                                              S G2.1.40 Question appears to match KIA. K/A. SAT 68                                                                                            MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 022AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 25 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Use remain the same/throttled as one of the choices. NEW Will Make changes to a 2 and 2 format. S eR3 -Modified question as discussed.
5 CR3 - No change
F 2 S 022K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 26 NEW S eR3 -No change. M 2 S 025AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 27 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws          4. Job Content Flaws      s. Other
S eR3 -No change. 
: 5.         6.                             7.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 026A 1.01 Question appears to match the KIA. What position are the BSV -3 &4 valves in with 28 out HPI activation?
Q# LOK  LOD (FIH)
Are these valves normally open or closed. I think one of the distractors (or two) should state closed if you think that someone might miss that a manual activation should have been implemented.
(F/H) (1-5)
Will discuss. NEW S CR3-Changed Band D distractors from "throttled" to "closed".
(1-S) Stem Cues    T/F    Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- 0=
F 2 X U 026AK3.02 If this is the equivalent of the CCW system then the question meets the KIA. 29 Reasons on Distractors C and D are not plausible.
Q=    SRO SAO  utE!                        Explanation Focus                Dist.
How would SW be a heat input to the RB? NEW Rewrite to include leakage from RB via the SW system as the correct reason. A.lso need a clearly wrong but plausible reason for the other distractor.
Dis!.        Link          units ward  KIA    Only  S F    2                         X                                                    E G2.2.20 Question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if distractor D is plausible. Did not see in AI-500 69                                                                                            where this was an option at any time.
Also add times with RBIC and SWT level in the stem. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
BANK 5 eR3 - No change.
_. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 026A 1.01 Question appears to match the KIA. What position are the SSV-3 &4 valves in with 28 out HPI activation?
S F     2                                                                              S G2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Place wide range and narrow range in front of RS  RB 70                                                                                            sump level (Le. wide range RS    RB sump level and
Are these valves normally open or closed. I think one of the distractors (or two) should state closed if you think that someone might miss that a manual activation should have been implemented.
                                                                                              ... ) Otherwise SAT.
Will discuss. NEW S CR3-Changed Band 0 distractors from "throttled" to "closed".
BANK 5
F 2 X U 026AK3.02 If this is the equivalent of the CCW system then the question meets the KIA. 29 Reasons on Distractors C and 0 are not plausible.
S eR3 - Modified as requested.
How would SW be a heat input to the RS? NEW Rewrite to include leakage from RB via the SW system as the correct reason. Also need a clearly wrong but plausible reason for the other distractor.
F     2                                                                 X            U G2.3.11 May not meet KIA. How are operators I/ plant controlling the release? Asked for a 71                                                                                             second opinion. Distractors Sand   Band C do not appear to be plausible.
Also add times with RBIC and SWT level in the stem. S CR3 -Modified as discussed. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 027 AK3.04 Question appears to match the KIA. Change distractor C to read lower because all 30 pressurizer heaters must be manually reset to energize.
BANK S eR3 -No change. Two banks of heaters will automatically reset once level rises above 40". F 2 S 027K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 31 NEW S eR3 -No change. F 2 X J1 028A2.02 Question as written meets only the S first part of the KIA. There are not any 32 procedure usage steps to control correct, or mitigate the consequences.
The b part of the KIA must be met. NEW Not operationally valid for an RO, no actions in current procedures.
Gerry to supply New KIA. NEW KIA Number 001A2.12 eR3 -New question written. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 027 AK3.04 Question appears to match the KIA. Change distractor C to read lower because all 30 pressurizer heaters must be manually reset to energize.
BANK S eR3 -No change. Two banks of heaters will automatically reset once level rises above 40". F 2 S 027K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 31 NEW S eR3 -No change. F 2 X ;1 028A2.02 Question as written meets only the S first part of the KIA. There are not any 32 procedure usage steps to control correct, or mitigate the consequences.
The b part of the KIA must be met. NEW Not operationally valid for an RO, no actions in current procedures.
Gerry to supply New KIA. NEW KIA Number 001A2.12 eR3 -New question written. 
-------------------
--------------------------------1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S M 2 X U 029EA 1.12 Question kind of matches KIA. Can reactor trip breakers be manually opened? If 33 3305 and 3312 did not open from the control room, would it not be prudent to go to step 2.3? I am not sure that we should test ROs on what is in the cross-step document We should be testing them on the procedure being used. Will Discuss. What is incorrect about distractor 8? NEW Determined that the question does meet the KIA. Licensee will look at changing to remove so much of the information in the distractors to simplify the answer. eR3 -No change yet. H 2 S 033A 1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 34 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 034G2.2.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT. Reference OK. TS-3.7.15 35 NEW S eR3 -No change. 1-2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S M 2 X U 029EA1.12 Question kind of matches KIA. Can reactor trip breakers be manually opened? If 33 3305 and 3312 did not open from the control room, would it not be prudent to go to step 2.3? I am not sure that we should test ROs on what is in the cross-step document.
We should be testing them on the procedure being used. Will Discuss. What is incorrect about distractor B? NEW Determined that the question does meet the KIA. Licensee will look at changing to remove so much of the information in the distractors to simplify the answer. eR3 -No change yet. H 2 S 033A1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 34 BANK S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 034G2.2.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT. Reference OK. TS-3.7.15 35 NEW S CR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 038EG2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA. Isn't C always correct? Will discuss otherwise 36 SAT. NEW S CR3 -No chanSJe. C is correct only if ADVs are open. F 1 S 039K3.05 Question appears to match KIA. Low discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT. 37 BANK S CR3 -No change. H 2 E 041 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. how the failure affects Turbine control and TBV 38 should be included.
i.e. ICS will lower header pressure and the plant will trip if no actions are taken. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -No change. Plant will not trip. Only controlling setpoint for turbine control will be 15 psig higher. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 038EG2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA. Isn't C always correct? Will discuss otherwise 36 SAT. NEW 5 CR3 -No change. C is correct only if ADVs are open. F 1 S 039K3.05 Question appears to match KIA. Low discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT. 37 BANK 5 CR3 -No change. H 2 E 041 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. how the failure affects Turbine control and TBV 38 should be included.
i.e. ICS will lower header pressure and the plant will trip if no actions are taken. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
5 CR3 -No change. Plant will not trip. Only controlling setpoint for turbine control will be 15 psig higher. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LCD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only S F 2 S 054AA 1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 39 BANK S eR3 -No change. F 2 S 055EK3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 40 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 056AA 1.05 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT 41 eR3 -Deleted some fluff from stem. Not S needed to answer question.
42 F 2 S 056Kl.03 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 5 eR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 054AA 1.01 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 39 BANK S eR3 -No change. F 2 S 055EK3.02 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 40 BANK S eR3 -No change . .. H 2 S 056AA 1.05 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT 41 eR3 -Deleted some fluff from stem. Not S needed to answer question.
42 F 2 S 056K1.03 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT BANK S eR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 058AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 43 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 059A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 44 NEW S CR3 a No change. H 2 S 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Might want to add directly cause a EFW 45 actuation.
Otherwise SAT NEW CR3 -Does not directly cause and EFW actuation.
Valve stroking causes the booster pump to trip which in turn causes the main FW pumps to trip which then actuates EFIC. S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 058AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 43 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 059A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 44 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Might want to add directly cause a EFW 45 actuation.
Otherwise SAT NEW CR3 -Does not directly cause and EFW actuation.
Valve stroking causes the booster pump to trip which in turn causes the main FW pumps to trip which then actuates EFIC. S CR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 061 AG2.1.12 Question appears to match KIA. SAT Question was listed as CIA, but appears to 46 be a memory level question.
NEW S CR3-No change in question content. Changed CIA to MEM. H 2 S 061 K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 47 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 062A2.16 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 48 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 061 AG2.1.12 Question appears to match KIA. SAT Question was listed as C/ A, but appears to 46 be a memory level question.
NEW S CR3-No change in question content. Changed CIA to MEM. H 2 S 061 K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 47 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 062A2.16 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 48 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 063A3.01 Question appear to match KIA. Distractor D may be considered a correct 49 statement.
For the light to go out batt volts must be less than 72 volts, if it is less than 72 volts, and the battery charger is till aligned then it too would be less than 72 volts, and battery charger voltage would be less than 124 volts. Will discuss NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 E 064G2.4.45 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 50 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. NEW S CR3 -Modified to test only 2 items per distractor.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 063A3.01 Question appear to match KIA. Distractor D may be considered a correct 49 statement.
For the light to go out batt volts must be less than 72 volts, if it is less than 72 volts, and the battery charger is till aligned then it too would be less than 72 volts, and battery charger voltage would be less than 124 volts. Will discuss NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 E 064G2.4.4S Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 50 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. NEW S CR3 -Modified to test only 2 items per distractor. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 064K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. However, the first two distractors are electrical 51 trips and very few electrical trips will trip the engine. If the imbalance is enough, enough torque could be generated to damage the engine, and the engine would trip then. Would this make any of these correct? Need to work on this question some to make it more clear and tight. NEW S CR3 -Only other electrical engine trip is the 87DG -generator differential OC. Changed distractors A and B to relay actuations that will trip the breaker, but not the engine. H 2 E 06SAG2.4.8 Question appears.to match KIA. Fire protection is only listed in one distractor 52 along with the SSO procedure, and AP -880 with a fire in place why would I not pick this one. Need to add Fire protection to one of the other choices as well. May also want to Take EOP 12 out of some of the distractors.
Will discuss. NEW S CR3-AP-880 listed in 2 distractors.
Added .. names of procedures to stem and removed* from distractors.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 064K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. However, the first two distractors are electrical 51 trips and very few electrical trips will trip the engine. If the imbalance is enough, enough torque could be generated to damage the engine, and the engine would trip then. Would this make any of these correct? Need to work on this question some to make it more clear and tight. NEW S CR3 -Only other electrical engine trip is the 87DG -generator differential oe. Changed distractors A and B to relay actuations that will trip the breaker, but not the engine. H 2 E 06SAG2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Fire protection is only listed in one distractor 52 along with the SSO procedure, and AP -880 with a fire in place why would I not pick this one. Need to add Fire protection to one of the other choices as well. May also want to Take EOP 12 out of some of the distractors.
Will discuss. NEW S CR3-AP-880 listed in 2 distractors.
Added names of procedures to stem and removed from distractors. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ 8ack-Q= SRO u/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 068K4.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, 53 and the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Will discuss. S NEW eR3 -No change. F 2 S 073A4.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
54 BANK 5 eR3 -No change. H 2 S 074EA2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very little discriminating value. Reference is 55 okay. BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 076G2.4.8 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 56 NEW S eR3 -No change. ---1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 068K4.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, 53 and the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Will discuss. S NEW eR3 -No change. F 2 S 073A4.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.
54 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 074EA2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very little discriminating value. Reference is 55 okay. BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 076G2.4.8 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 56 NEW S eR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 077 AK2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 57 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 S 078K1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT If the high temperature is 125&deg;F will the 58 compressor ever get to 130&deg;F? May want to change this number. BANK S CR3 -Slightly modified all temperatures.
Changed B distractor to CDP-1 A from FWP-2A for plausibility.
H 2 E 103A2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. What is wrong with diverse containment isolation?
8 59 could be argued as correct. NEW S CR3 -No change. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 077 AK2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 57 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 S 078K1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT If the high temperature is 125&deg;F will the 58 compressor ever get to 130&deg;F? May want to change this number. BANK S CR3 -Slightly modified all temperatures.
Changed B distractor to CDP-1 A from FWP-2A for plausibility.
H 2 E 103A2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. What is wrong with diverse containment isolation?
8 59 could be argued as correct. NEW S CR3 -No change. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 U 103K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is asking for the physical connections 60 and/or cause effect relationships between the reactor building and the containment cooling system, not the containment spray system. Unless the only cooling for the RS is containment spray) BANK Develop a question on RB coolers/fans.
Cause and effect. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question.
H 2 S BW/A02AG2.2.12 Question Kind of matches KIA. SAT 61 NEW 5 eR3 -No change. H 2 E BW/A06AK1.3 Question kind of matches KIA. 15 there anything wrong with using MUV-31 62 locally? If not you should state in the stem lAW AP-990. BANK 5 CR3 -Added lAW AP-990 to stem. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 U 103K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is asking for the physical connections 60 and/or cause effect relationships between the reactor building and the containment cooling system, not the containment spray system. Unless the only cooling for the RS is containment spray) BANK Develop a question on RB coolers/fans.
Cause and effect. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question.
H 2 S BW/A02AG2.2.12 Question Kind of matches KIA. SAT 61 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 E BW/A06AK1.3 Question kind of matches KIA. Is there anything wrong with using MUV-31 62 locally? If not you should state in the stem lAW AP-990. BANK S CR3 -Added lAW AP-990 to stem. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U BW/A07AK2.1 Question may not meet KIA. Asked for another opinion. Determined that 63 question did not meet KIA. CR3 -Wrote new question.
H 2 E BW/E04EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Very similar to # 25 on the SRO examination.
64 BANK S CR3 -No change. Compared with SRO #25 on 8/13/09 and determined to be SAT. F 2 X X X )( BW/E08EA1.1 Question kind of matches KIA. Some cueing in stem. Distractors Band 0 do 65 not appear to be plausible.
How could SW temperatures exceed design limits if the coolers were degraded / fouled? Which ONE of the following describes the reason for ensuring only 1 ES selected RB cooling unit is running in low speed per EOP-8A ... MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -Modified stem slightly.
Determined SAT with this change on 8-13-09. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U BW/A07AK2.1 Question may not meet KIA. Asked for another opinion. Determined that 63 question did not meet KIA. eR3 -Wrote new question. H 2 E BW/E04EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Very similar to # 25 on the SRO examination.
64 BANK S CR3 -No change. Compared with SRO #25 on 8/13/09 and determined to be SAT. F 2 X X X Y BW/E08EA1.1 Question kind of matches KIA. Some cueing in stem. Distractors Band D do 65 not appear to be plausible.
How could SW temperatures exceed design limits if the coolers were degraded / fouled? Which ONE of the following describes the reason for ensuring only 1 ES selected RB cooling unit is running in low speed per EOP-SA ... MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
S CR3 -Modified stem slightly.
Determined SAT with this change on 8-13-09. 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.1.3 Question appears to match KIA. Distractor 0 is not plausible.
What kind of 66 turnover between the OAG and BOP is required?
Need to add this to make better choices. (better discriminating value) NEW Gerry to write new distractor for D. 8-19-09 CR3-H 2 X E G2.1.36 Question appears to match KIA. Distractor C does not make sense. Cease 67 insertion of fuel assembly?
What will the crew do with it? Stop and hold it in place. Please explain why this is plausible.
BANK 5 CR3 -Modified C distractor.
F 2 S G2.1.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 68 MOD (need to see original question to 5 ensure it is modified).
CR3 -No change 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.1.3 Question appears to match K/ A. Distractor 0 is not plausible.
What kind of 66 turnover between the OAC and BOP is required?
Need to add this to make better choices. (better discriminating value) NEW Gerry to write new distractor for D. 8-19-09 CR3-H 2 X E G2.1.36 Question appears to match K/ A. Distractor C does not make sense. Cease 67 insertion of fuel assembly?
What will the crew do with it? Stop and hold it in place. Please explain why this is plausible.
BANK 5 CR3 -Modified C distractor.
F 2 S G2.1.40 Question appears to match K/ A. SAT 68 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
5 CR3 -No change 
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.2.20 Question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if distractor D is plausible.
Did not see in AI-500 69 where this was an option at any time. BANK S eR3 -No change. F 2 S G2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Place wide range and narrow range in front of RS 70 sump level (Le. wide range RS sump level and ... ) Otherwise SAT. BANK S eR3 -Modified as requested.
F 2 X U G2.3.11 May not meet KIA. How are operators I plant controlling the release? Asked for a 71 second opinion. Distractors Sand C do not appear to be plausible.
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified.
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified.
Will write a containment release (RMA 1) that does not totally isolate. eR3 -Modified as discussed.
Will write a containment release (RMA   (RMA1)
-1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO utE! Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.2.20 Question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if distractor D is plausible.
: 1) that does not totally isolate.
Did not see in AI-500 69 where this was an option at any time. BANK 5 eR3 -No change. F 2 S G2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Place wide range and narrow range in front of RB 70 sump level (Le. wide range RB sump level and ... ) Otherwise SAT. BANK 5 eR3 -Modified as requested.
eR3 - Modified as discussed.
F 2 X U G2.3.11 May not meet KIA. How are operators
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws     5. Other   6.                           7.
/ plant controlling the release? Asked for a 71 second opinion. Distractors Band C do not appear to be plausible.
Q# LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- Q=     SRO utE!
MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified.
U/EI                     Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only S F     2                                                                             S G2.3.12 Question appears to match KJ    K/A. SAT 72                                                                                           BANK S CR3 - Modified stem to remove fluff. No change in intent.
Will write a containment release (RMA1) that does not totally isolate. eR3 -Modified as discussed.
F     2                                                                             S 2.3.14 Question appears to match KJ  K/A. SAT Not very discriminating.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S G2.3.12 Question appears to match K/ A. SAT 72 BANK S CR3 -Modified stem to remove fluff. No change in intent. F 2 S 2.3.14 Question appears to match K/ A. SAT Not very discriminating.
73 NEW S
73 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 X U 2.4.35 Question kind of matches KIA. Distractors B &0 are not plausible.
CR3 - No change.
Do the 74 480V switchgear rooms have DC knife switches located in them? BANK Will work on another angle to make better distractors.
F     2                         X                                                   U 2.4.35 Question kind of matches KIA.KJA.
CR3 -Removed "knife switch" from stem and modified C and D distractors. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S G2.3.12 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 72 BANK S CR3 -Modified stem to remove fluff. No change in intent. F 2 S 2.3.14 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT Not very discriminating.
Distractors B &0
73 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 X U 2.4.35 Question kind of matches KJ A. Distractors B &D are not plausible.
                                                                                                            &D are not plausible. Do the 74                                                                                           480V switchgear rooms have DC knife switches located in them?
Do the 74 480V switchgear rooms have DC knife switches located in them? BANK Will work on another angle to make better distractors.
BANK Will work on another angle to make better distractors.
CR3 -Removed "knife switch" from stem and modified C and 0 distractors. 
CR3 - Removed "knife switch" from stem and modified C and D   0 distractors.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia Focus Dist. Link F 2 75 40 Sats, J4 Unsats, and 21 Enhancements 10 #1 8ack-units ward 5. Other 6. 7. Q= SRO U/EI Explanation KIA Only S E G2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Could the shift manager also be the procedure director?
                                                          ~ --
NEW S eR3 -Not unless aU the other SROs were unavailable.
: 1. 2.       3. Psychometric Flaws           4. Job Content Flaws     5. Other   6.                         7.
The SM could, but lAW AI-505, he would not due to other duties. Generic Comments:
Q#     LOK   LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues     T/F   Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- Q=     SRO U/EI                    Explanation Focus               Dist.         Link         units ward   KIA   Only S F     2                                                                             E G2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Could the shift manager also be the procedure 75                                                                                                director?
All bank or modified questions should have the answers rotated from original (i.e. if the answer was originally A, swap the correct answer to B, C, or D. Need to see the original questions for all modified questions.
NEW S eR3 - Not unless aU all the other SROs were unavailable. The SM could, but lAW AI-505, AI-50S, he would not due to other duties.
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia Focus Dist. Link F 2 75 40 Sats, J4 Unsats, and 21 Enhancements 10 #1 Back-units ward 5. Other 6. 7. Q= SRO U/EI Explanation KIA Only S E G2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Could the shift manager also be the procedure director?
40 Sats,     J4 Unsats,       and 21 Enhancements 10 Generic Comments: All bank or modified questions should have the answers rotated from original (i.e. if the answer was originally A, swap the correct answer to B, C, or D.
NEW S eR3 -Not unless all the other SROs were unavailable.
Need to see the original questions for all modified questions.
The SM could, but lAW AI-50S, he would not due to other duties. Generic Comments:
 
All bank or modified questions should have the answers rotated from original (i.e. if the answer was originally A, swap the correct answer to B, C, or D. Need to see the original questions for all modified questions.
ES-403, Rev. 9                       Written Examination Grading                      Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist I Facility:     Crystal River 3           Date of Exam:       09/22/2009       Exam Level: RO/SRO      I Initials Item Description a    b        c
ES-403, Rev. 9 Facility:
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
Crystal River 3 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 09/22/2009 Item Description  
                                                                                    ~ MA        IJ
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 2.       Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                                           /i/{
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)  
1/
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on theSRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 6. are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants
f/
: a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)
                                                                                                ~
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor
: 3.       Applicants' scores checked for addition errors                                           :/
(*) Form ES-403-1 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials a b c MA IJ /i/{ f/ 9t :/ f , 1#/, (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required . . . ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist I Facility:
(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)                           9t            .~
Crystal River 3 Date of Exam: 09/22/2009
                                                                                                  ~[L f
: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Item Description Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on theSRO-only) reviewed in detail                 9~
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on theSRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature  
: 5.       All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                                                     1#/,
: a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants                             If Printed Name/Signature                             Date
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor  
: a. Grader
(*) Form ES-403-1 Exam Level: RO/SRO I Initials a b c 1/ If Date (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist J:1:3 Date of Exam:
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
Exam Level: RO Item Descri tion 1. 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations  
(*)     The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified  
required .
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature  
 
: a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                     Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facili                  f.~u&#xa3;lZ f(~uf.lZ :lt3 J:1:3 Date of Exam: 'T-~~-O~
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor
                                                          '1-~~~~~      Exam Level: RO Initials Item Descri tion                               a      b      c 1.
(*) Initials a b Date c (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ( ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facili
: 2.     Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
:lt3 Date of Exam:
: 3.     Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations
Exam Level: RO 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Item Descri tion Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature
: 4.       Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
: a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
: 5.       All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor  
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity
(*) Initials a b Date c (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}
(          of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature                           Date
: a. Grader
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*)     The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Latest revision as of 07:29, 12 March 2020

Initial Exam 2009-301 Final Administrative Documents
ML093270191
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/18/2009
From:
Division of Nuclear Materials Safety II
To:
Progress Energy Co
References
50-302/09-301
Download: ML093270191 (97)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Fonn 8/31-Facility: Crystal River 2009-301 Date of Examination: 9/18/2009 Facility Examinations Developed by: Written 1 I Operating Test Chief Target TflSk Description (Reference) TilSk Examiner's Date* .. i Initials 

  -180        l.
1. Examination administration date confmned confIrmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 3/26/2009
  -120        2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d;     (C.1.d; C.2.e)                             05/04/2009
  -120        3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)                                 3/26/2009
  -120        4.              notifIcation letter sent (C.2.d)

Corporate notification 05/04/2009 [-90] [5. Reference material due (C. (C.1.e; I.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] NIA {-75 } {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 06/17/2009 (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) applicable (C.l.e {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 6/23/2009 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 07/22/2009 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l.e, (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) , 

                                                ,:.~.: ~.
                                                    \.~ ..   '. ,
   -30        9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.              1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

(C.1.l; 07/31/2009 07/3112009 

   -14        10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. 1.1;          I.!; C.2.i; ES-202)    08/10/2009 08110/2009
   -14        11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 1l.                                                                                                     08/10/2009 (C.2.h; C.3.f)
   -14        12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j;     (C.1.j; C.2.f C.2.fand and h; C.3.g)                08/10/2009
    -7        13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor                                  811712009 8117/2009 (C.2.i; C.3.h)
    -7        14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confmn       confIrm qualifIcations 1I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent qualifications                                                                                      8/17/2009 8/1712009 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
    -7             Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee
15. Proctoring/written 8/17/2009 (C.3.k)
    -7        16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to                           8117/2009 8/17/2009 NRC examiners (C.3.i)
  • facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date Target dates are generally based on fitcility-prepared identifIed in the corporate notification identified notifIcation letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Fonn Form ES-201-2 ,( Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 I Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 08/31109 09/21109 f". Initials Item Task Description a b* # 

                                                                                                                                                      .c#

l.

1. a. Verify VerifY that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. AK .4-/

4-1 IJ 14 P W R I

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-40 I and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

ofES-401 D.I AK 4J .~ T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics AK 4{ <] T E N 2. S I M U d. a. b. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal Using Form ES-301-5, verifY evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or AK AK AK 41 f{ l{ If( 

                                                                                                                                          , i tM   u significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and L                that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

A T o R c. a. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. Verify VerifY that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-301-2: AK r" 

                                                                                                                                            /,i
                                                                                                                                          ,,1i    It*a 1t t (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form fonn          AK
3. (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit teste s) testes)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonn form W (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. 41 $ I/ b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form Fonn ES-301-1: ES-301-1 : C ( T (I) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (1) (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified AK If (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

AK 41 

                                                                                                                                        ~JJ
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the
4. appropriate exam sections.

AK .£ G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate AK .41; "! ~ E N

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 AK :1I (fl. ~

E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. AK If ,~ 

                                                                                                                                                        .~

R 

                                                                                                                                          /ff
e. AK Iff I

A Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO) AK /fl Date Alan Kennedy 06110109

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*) Floyd Lawrence 11Uf"~ 06111/09 06/11109
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 06/Z~/ad1 I
d. NRC Supervisor DO/Z!;' /t) 1 I C./

l( Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of 1I F:\NRC - 2009\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist) NRC 2009 Rev O.docx ES-201

CRY5TftL 1l.{lA;iC. -3 200Cf-30l ZOO<t-30l ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 ES-201.-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
                                                                                                                          ~

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE NAT RE(2)

1. Alan Kennedy Instructor 1 Facility Author\ 01/29/09 ~
2. TRue. J)UDIfI'r Sr14UL.IH",,/t G~tr~N.tGA '1./10/01 .
       ~'l L, K05~

3.

4. (]cotlbe, ;t1.I'7~1f(
                                     '5 n~*'1 Vl~ liN C-I /II Ii,o[
                                     .$( /l/vc,     &/'5   /M5'?l<

re 

                                                                                   ~ ,L. c L~,
                                                                                   ~.I a l l .

OJ..:-IO~()9 

                                                                                                                             '0 J:IJ /
5. ~"'-cr fL Cr.f'b l"r Sr IJ<:.; r Of; (4/ ) fA..
6. Floyd [r,..vJt&. (l 5"uPV~ 6-:c-r 4~ ~ a9 tf/n/q T~~r- 'b'f-'1a 7.~~~ ~,,~~~<"""'\ b&...-~
8. Gdd*e ~ --,-t!a5~------

NOTES: .Jt b;.s(~.s$(6 tm~~1 (tY:"'t'\5flV~+'1) C6J.>([/lrJ "",at... t;{tlli'1 ir eO\>-~~~~ (~A 'fL! c~ ~ IO/'/tn 1( lOrda') 

                                                                                   /~"

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21109 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE

1. Am.~S'D~ ~ ~,,_
2. /1. Lee L>L S/"" 0"vff'r f oi/.71o'J
3. &.Mt /3~ s RV ' J/23/r!L
  • 4. I?oberf ;(3cL/N 5.t:("nesT,i.c- E2-
                                      ~A1I1 1e(/e:.I-D~ -,rgJ../fJ C/f-/O                            ~
                                                                           ~                               ,'-,
                                                                                                        ;l.OI4~cr~ ~r01 v'              __

g/l.;4tVLHA./M/JJ~ ~. :b ~ 6. 7/tcli1lltJ tJ.~ ~ b'~-r ~ #7 8./frdi£ NOTES: L~ -r {!"N'b 

                                     £~~V/~.H/            /'/"r/'        ~~          ~
                                                                                                         £:'2.0
                                                                                                         #:Lot
                                                                                                                              ~

C - - - _ _IL.:. Cft-z.li "ir ew t i e~ tl~ V \ A ~nt.Q ; I ~ q!;;"fi! o~ 

                                                                 -1( q/:J-~/aq

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 / RESPONSIBILITY DATE ~ DATE DATE DATE NOTE NOTE

1. ~"<
    ~'< lJ\~~
            ~~~\...'&A               -s,,\~"\
                                     -::>\..             ~~'i::..lL
                                                   \..A.~~~
                                             *.:'\ \.A tr "(     "
                                                                                                                         'S"1~o9
                                                                                                                         'S+1..~()9                                      'i ~L.Ccz-6t
                                                                                                                                                                         ., .'Uo-6l
                              -------------                                    ----'---'+---"..-------::-----,~---             -----'O...FJ--rr----it-+--- - - -                -
2. l< d::- O1e.J&A..

tleL vYle-lb S:Jv N 

                                         <;;Jv    f1      VY!"O~ ~

fJ1-11~""7ft/" 

                                                                  ....v         ---If..T6,-ILlL..'4-~--- ~fo~k1--~~~-

3.JR R %fe.=\ 3.:JR W~< _O_~ o~ ___ 0"_ _ _ _ _ _ --+-~'---=-'_f_T'_;__'_'I=-~__,,__--0j;101 O_\_/'v'- ------:;,-:--:r---r--r-

4. fJAak (JAW ~
  /VJAf          VA-! ~=':.& '               .5 iL{;,                                                                  ~ 7/'6 5e:::t' 5*1,'4 t4.

4. 6. 7. 7. 

        ~~~er.. K?Il t~I-\(4S~fi...
   !'v. Itr

(,.JJ I Q""'- Qw.. K?J.l ~ A- Krt.k!S 

                     ~ s::lA-
                                   ~ Cf$
                                    . tPt..~ ~""rri\..

cI<~~ 

                                        ~ /"f I
                                                      /6fS   5 a~'W\..
                                                                                       - - - - .* ""'P=V'1
                                                                                                                          -#i~~.-=::)-

1f*1---+-\--;\l\-{\~<J'd-+M~ _D - ~ I . -, - f_----='-------=-------=---'-"--""""~

8. JJOUI/I V tJUI1 /~ey tJ /'ft1Iey ~71f
                                            >;1} //00      0 t;                             ."'" , 6'                       "Jf7~_{)7,-----*--u-:---~-

fr j NOTE~: NOTES: 

    "* CMfJ-avvt~1)

C~f~£1) VI'A-y,'4 £wt6.-~1 dN' 

                                   ~~I             ~ 0/.sojOlJ 07.kJ/oq 1f; 7{ 7}'.&/~
                                                                            ?}I.xIb'j

                                                                                        /f**i"*-~"

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY

1. 2oAlA-r..,{j' (l!tilt.. .5h:tJ MCtf/('ifP' tIICt-t:.-t-vI
2. tv;tI,\<,-~ fJ4st\g= "Tc Gf( 5 leI <:-,~
3. aad~5 J. HOd}? 1l£ OJ>eOtliav l1P1tttljRr
                                                       '~

4',!3.M~.;1 SrvT-{ ~,~ 5~jllme:5 I '~MsoA/ tAlc /D ~i!etu <...J-I'At.ff(~ 6, e-J Hc/(j'L--- C{JO / D ~ 7, V. Lle'-'-6/(':(IJ ,.. de", c.-fvr V\ "Dg, 8,ljr," q&\ V\ 8.l)Y "De\.'..." V\'" 11\ IA",... v t- I V\ -\- ev ~ NOTES: (l) R~bY'ned (0 R~iv-rned b:> to 0lF' t.lF' ~ qa.? 9. a. <<

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s} week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and
                        .(e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator ill authorized by the NRC 1e.g.,                                                              i~ acceptable if the individual does not select the training cont~nt or feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility provide direct or indirect feedback}.

licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination during the week(s}

administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. 1...:r~1c 1~~k. 3to PRINTED NAME 3~r\"'-z<!r rpl6*~r o JOB TITLE I/ RESPONSIBILITY c.~sylQ.::;t:: 

                                    ~"' S 'It ..:;r a .

SIGNATURE (1) SIGNATUR~ I (2) DATfO 

                                                                                                                                                       . , ~¥ 69          A          9ccj' 2.

2.~______~~________________________________~~~~--~----------- 1l~'& ~ 3.S~ K~£ 3.Sa.trff- i~~.Jc-. k- 5(.0 Xk\s-kv-c.Ao(""

4. Aitu\

Ai.. ~II" 'lk S4t; 

    ~vt ;;>'C-Vt{     Ik              ~it('prwt                                                                                  +-------~~-~t--

2"+~y--f (;..J-O(r 5.,5tf\d (;,.}-"lr 9f.b "J.hr.J-l'l4( Jcr je7V"" ' 0; 01

6. KOe~ I<'fl'<)Nr4;\M~)'t~ ~~ ~;J~IJtULwyt ~ _ ~ f/3!}m2 ..:<ids >ss gblI.fl 'YI"l'\~'\ 1/

f i- n ~ l, Iii f\ 4 . . . 7fZ1lQllJ. tp

7. Broy~.m1j~ Lend

~'o~~¥"4t (But H, s ~ ~. - -- ... - .._-- --..-------ft- 

                                                                                  .. - - f T - - - -         --=-...:.....;;.... ----+-~-__!,.

~ ~efe""'4D VNt t-¥Yt~1 ~ %1~~ -('t:1/'b1/u,

r';~"\ ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., 9cting ?cting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or
  • provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1

1. tjt1/c.
   /0, /(G,f:1U &tl.f8'il8£{         ~---=-L...,.L--.oo<Z~~':"=:"-
                                       .                                    - -,~~
                                                                                -1 ~(!-A+~- -f-I, -~" '-loL~o-.<."'.;-=:'.If7-"01--$ef3Lk,
                                                                                                                                      !N,/o'~~--PL--    /, '"

2.Wui~.~ 2_ (~1~.~ & ~ ~V ~ W;~ *.----I-~~A-- i,A e-3.~/UXl G~e. 3.L.JlOQ Gc.~e. S~b c5'~(:) ~t!I'+ 

                                                                                    ~~I.+                                           Cf*3*9_~~~~
                                                                                                                                    '1*,3*9               ........ItC>¥YrlA" , ~     .,,, ... ,
4. SfCIl/'en SfC{llte(l 6tlil. 6t-rb gO.
                                                 /2..0                                  .4
                                                                                        ...d                                          9-.l-2 9-./      . . 2__~_---J~               !
5. 'B.L1,SJ/ber
     'j).L1,SJ/6e,                             0~S.

C~S l~fLo /~e.D q(~/5 qfJ3_~~~=-- "J"-7V-~-'

6. ~~ ~D
     ':S              ~~ tl t-                '76Y1t1
                                             '76N\                                                                                   qlq( f/f/1./

i ~-.':!'J.~~-------, 

                                                                                                                                                              "'1=,     _

7.

7. 'T';\~othy M. },AQ.{'01;"'<bj 1';\'1\othy Mo.\'c.,,~ \\\uc Sye,t,l<Ui~t" O£~ Syeou\
                                             \\\Uc. Ops                ~t*                                                          q {iol #

q{iO{O' . D<'1+----+-_-R-I--+'--I--+-___¥_ I I 4' ,. I I It Jo~A'"B*l-M.J l-tu-&*c..*tC.-~

8. Joo->A-n+A10 I-/u.&c£ff.. sg.,

6t+1 r;..r r:-r 1v!A10"AG--6~ k,{M-SAG-6R- 

                                                                             --~~~~~~==~---~-+=~~~~~~--                              ~. r~ _h.~                                _

NOTES: iit e~+~e~li.D (!tft-J ~~t:~l iP I~Pr tM*~1 I;Pr tfl'lt4-~ I <JV\ 

                                                       ~ ~r!()~

crpr!()~ 

                                                              -( 1/u/o1 1/25/01

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and

.authorized ,authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth oPEtrator opE~.rator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not not.select select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE M't..J~q,1 1.&Jt.J.tHJ

1. YI ft c,..J KeTlfl2,-J
                    ;Ie              _-,S:..:..~...::::b_-""-,D'-'-'lr--=<3=L'-'-+

SRoD,r-<3L+_ _ _ _ ~ ~-N.ub'.=""""-'L~~L"",,, L i 9-/7- o0 1---------+-- 

                                                                                                                 . = __L"""'"----9                                         ~
2. _
3. _
4. _
5. _ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ __
6. _
7. __ __ __ __ __ _ __ __ __
8. :-:::-:::-=-_

NOTES: -------- ---- NOTES: 

             'k) eO\ll.fftrn~l\

C~f~~~ U~ ~i tAA-(?v\.. IDhh ID/'h 7t\ /{);'4~ lo/,1c1

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-~01-~ ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 / RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. Alan Kennedy Instructor / Facility

_..:..;In..:.;s::,.:-.t,-,,ru,,,,c,,,,to,,,,,r...:..I...:..F.,.o:a:..;:,:c.:.:.:i Author\' -.-,___ _L~~~--.!3.~~~~~__ 01/29/09 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ lic:Jty,,,,,A,-=ut,,,,,h,,;;:.o.:..-r\' __ __ __ 

        ~lJc. J)UDIII;-
2. ~lIC. J)UOlllt S rI4UL1f relit GAl"..];' ,vGGt? .....:=:~~~~~::::r_--Z/ zj10/0 10/0_1 ______ ____
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 -----~------
3. ~'f'f L f(

f?eg;z () 5 ~ K(JSt: <) i\/~'t j,ALA-v-tl~ 1i,rJC'-Ir//i,f 5nrtiA-L.AJ:O~ !iN (-/ N' Ii /£ i\ rZ _--f---J.F--+.rl--"7"T"~=--=--OMO*09 

                                                                                                                                                                                )r~>I:..&~              OMO-Oq _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                                 __ _ __

4 ~46e- t11.f'1:,,#!

4. (J&,1Ibf- ;t1.11711( S(
         ,-:.~"cr !Zt2 Crt'b
5. ,JPI"'.cv C',r.,r b {f'r
                                                 .$( AI..-<-        /live.. 0/:5                   cyS /1<i5;r,<

{~/r ---=--S...:....I"'~;U_v...:....r_a__'{...:....)_r:_V_)_(._IA......_ Sr )Jv r Of; (v) (A. - " " 7 ' 7 r i -lit{ 

                                                                                                                                  /M57i<                                    ~~:-'           0/2         '5/'0"-,--------

vJ02 yIf 7/rf/ A---L...-.--- Y 71v.:::.-tf11--_ _ _ _ _ _ [toyd LAw~

6. [(oy) LAvJ~(l (l 'Sul!v. 6:r::T'
                                                    'Sul!Vv                              61:7"'                                                                               '-,t,(D.. _             r!n!tt _______

1/17/'1 __ _ 

      .~~ ~ 4vsY'""'\.~S""'"'"\

77.~~~ 4v" Y'"""-+.~~~~s::=-..-4--.-Lh~~"""""""'~~~- b~~ --C~~:::*=~::?;~~;;;;;",..,.- (-~ <\ '-=d ~ .:..-J/L.':2==¥"'":!..../-!~t:>-\-'t-- ____ __4/~/r:,cr Gdci-e ~ --,-C!aS~-----

8. Gdd-e
8. --,-&6~:..........-~_ _ _ 7£ ~~~'--------
                                                                                                                                                                                '7Y _ _ _ -L--'f                - ;;... ~~ ?
                                                                                                                                                                                                            $I'-~~,..?

NOTES: "*'* b~.s(t.I.>5(D b~.s(l.l.s5(D ttm~~1 m~ ~ I (tfA-~5{(lj,4Z-~+;) ([YA-f\\ Sf! v~ +..,) C6J,)([Il~ C6].)([/l1J tAJ;-{.k cfJ talZ , I'A-' ak 6]t(U7 

                                                                                                                                                                                                           ~~ lief<.

lief<. ()OJ378f& 00)3781& 

                                                                                ,,~

ES-201 ES*201 Examination Security Agreement ES-201-3 Form ES*201*3

1. Pre*Examination Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. ~~S'V~ WJ\) J;l k'4Jb ----
2. fj, ie~ LI 'afza S/';?1, 0~lf""t + thUoi ----
3. Maw l A~eJl sRo sb/cq ----
4. 2be-rf '20LI-v &11; H1I1 be:", ~I-O fJG/Z "..;:g).)fJ ~ siZe/til ----

5.~'J1~5rLe e..- ___ Clue.'? ~. ;J..Oft,I<.yOq r 1 ----

6. 3t'l,tW~ M;~ C-N" ~ £".7.0 7:ltVtMJtJ; ~ b'we-r ~~$Mtlr t&tM --

s/lrd:e.£~ NOTES: 

                                   ~A...A:''          #/1"'/          ~~                          -Yo/'ot                             __

ES~201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 / RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. ~'< ~~t>.,lLL-I6A
   ~'<~~~UM                            '5"'\~T
                                       '5,\"     \ ~T LA~t....(:,~

LA. ~ t..6c;:JL 'S'1~o9 

                                                                                                                                          ~1-u.Jc.:>9
                                             ~Jvr N (J1;<JYI,n-p: -------!<r"----"+-~--"'~..---.~---=.--;r--- ~6f{-----==
                               ---------------------------~~~~~~--~------
2.  ?( c.-L vy]~tb l(c.L O1e.Jf~ _--=S"--'.....:N:.....;f1'--'-.---..J(}1L.:...L-"D"-'",c........,...-ff-y-'---_ --J.J--L-.f£.lLl4~""'----- .;-6-*1------- _ _ __
3. _______________________________________________________________________ _ _ __ _
4. _________________________________________________________________________________ _ _ __ _
5. ________________________________________________________________________________ _ _ __ _
6. ______________________________________________________________________________ _ _ __ _
7. _________________________________________________________________________ _ _ __ _
8. _ _~_ _ _ _ _ _

NOTES: ----------- ---- NOTES: 

              ,"~"                                                                                                                                                      ~"
                                                                                           <,,~""':"-<'
                                                                                             ;:,,:piA'"                      ", f ' " " " (

UI',,": ' ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. Alan Kennedy _.,;..:In-.:.;:s 'tr:..;:u:...::c=to ' r-'-1 Instructor Facility I-'-F..=a=c.:..:..:i -'A...o.u=.;t 'h' ' ' o'-r\'---_ _ -1.~~~~~~~~IL--- 01/29/09 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

li.=.,,tY'Author\

2. ~LJc.

2, ~LJC ])UDllltt 

                  ])UONtt                       SrMUL~~QR G#r~~~G~                                                                                    .-:::=;~~~~~--z/IO/O_'------_---

z/lo/01

3. PfgJZ"I Lc WJZ'1 L R R. 05t:

() 5 c 5n,....'l(lt~ 

                                              '5       nYl v<-L-I>Cf-(JK !i;JC-fr/li(£                       /iN C-f r/ Ii r£ i\ _~<---hof--~~,---=-_OUO,()qf F        /A 71£"=- ~, OUO-td:! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
4. ~/lGt- ;11.

GoIIGi- t1 "'%! 

                   ;11.1"7'$'1(              ~ /l/v'-
                                             $.               /l/v'- C)j15              ~j15
                                                                                          ,                     /M.577<
                                                                                                                /tU57l<                                                             '3/'0"---------
5;!0'l
~~"'-c r
5. :,~~.cr !2 ere b (f'r --=-S_~___'__~_v_r_0....L.r_)

c,'-trb,f'T S r /'Jv r af; _(_v_)_f._fA...._ (v' ) (!A... -~h4---'------ Y /17dft...::...+------- ____ y1'7dft Floyd LAv.J'

6. flDyd h-t ({

LAvJ%<.! 5"upv~ 5"u[1V. Q-:c-r 6-z:-r --L:I-=-h#~"'-"--,---==~_ __ 'I/l7l1 

                                                                                                                                                                                    '1/n{1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

7.~~ ~ 4"~~~C""\ 7.~~~ 4,,~r_.+2l~~~<"'"""'-'---+,-_h-=-":~~~~~t-- h~tr-....., _-'-~~~~~~~~""--_-"\-_'I-/2=--=:P--+!--"t),,-"+-- ( .. ~ q '-.:d DOS? .Ac- L:Z:Jri "0 ':t _ _ _ __

8. Gdd-e IZ~ ~ --'--,-eas~----- -C!aS--=-'----_ _ _ _ ~~~'-------L-tf- tf-~~ B,..?

NOTES; NOTES: -* b;.s(lA>~(O tmt4d b;.sCLA55(1) tm~~/ ([1A-~5f(4AL~+i) ([1A-VM.5fUfAZ.~+i) C6Jj({~AJ C6~({~AJ ~ak ~tal2( pJ;-.t1- ~tall7 ~ 

                                                                                                                                                                                        -A\  1/(( 0033181&

11(( 003318/&

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

J;J PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. Mn~SQ~ c...tJD k~b ----
2. fj . Le~ L, ~ta S'I"IY) , 0",;lf't f ~, ..L..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

3.Ma~ i3~1 SRQ &:zk f--------------- ---

4. ~berf -;(3oL/,J EfI:-'ffl1 'U(/ ~1-OPG4. -;g MfJ ~ s/~/ffJ L..-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

5.~ne$r~e. <L CIVO ~ 2 0 1tt<yCPCI' 

                                                                                                                   -/------------ --- ---
                                                                                                                                            ==

7

6. 3"a,4N'£I'M~ &v6 ~ £:2.*. ,

7iidtMJ(}; ___~ fMM blfMk-t =-=~~M~r s.Ardi?.£7= NOTES: 

                                   ~~/~                  #/"/'         ~~                              ~"'2'                                -

                                                                                                                                                                                       ,?~

J ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I/ RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. ~.l.:*< )..AtC..~
   ~'<     }..AtC..~                 ~\"T "5\..             ~ A.6o'i::..L LA~~~
                                           * .:."\ LA
                               -------------------------------~~--~--~----------

or * ( " 

                                                                                              .                        oS' 1-u.J
                                                                                                                       -s+v..)o9 D9,
2. lcc.k- O1eAb <;;Jv N YYlA'J'l . . . ;rif - ------------

v 3.:3v-eRW~ o~ 0\"'.... i'1A.zt< (;ArJ ~ ~ c;!<.!1: K?/l 4 --L.----~--_,t__'-----=--------- c ". -- - ---'T+- 1"1 +------------------- 1 -

5. $ ..,...,.,.."". =, " '/. ,
                                                                          ----.-.;.~l"""~'Jr'S,.......","""I__fl__----- -'~-f-     -------------------- - - - - - - - -   --
6. ..~~ . I ~~ ci'~"Ttf'\... +--"d'~~c..v-~~rJ_=_------- ~~q...:-f__------------------

7.t0JtrQ~A-~ ~ !6fS '--"'V'-=V'1 

                                                                          ------'~--....:...!..~'---""'-l_----- --'--~           -------------------- -                  _ --- - _ ---
8. JtJUI/l tJ 7f1/¥ )f/j /00 -,IN '£/ __
                                                                          ----------ffL"--L....£,<..------------ - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or fa~ility provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the fa9ility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 

   ;2ol'lflrLJj' (Vi2Ii-
1. 2oAflw.Jj* (1.(121i- ..£h;f) (iAC<Wir
                                         .>h;{).                     [II Cl-ffA-J (iAC(f;(c,f'4"" tCI....:A.J    lZ1s~y~

QJs~ c;,1hs-tCf7 __ tv,-

2. t,.,j; II (L'(J.-.
            \'<,-""  f -1<

F -/4 S$ ".t{" Tce (\=4"' J t<. c., f( G s I Srsr c:.n~ <:-n~ W~~~ W~~~ ~ __________ Wh -------

3. aavk5
3. aad~s J,
4. .E. ~~rI
  .E' 5;0ffme6 / \

501tme5 

            ~~:-7 J I'km577I I  Mcro? 77I AbM504 J, JlrbM50Al

()~~ S:-.r s ~ /~ t!.40 (!d 0 I~ ~ ~ ()wJz~ I1qQayRr I I1PiQtlJlfT r e~ezu D re~ezu 

                                                                                        ~~ file;
                                                                                        ~
                                                                                        ~

zkdr- 

                                                                                                            ~['*7 m/¢9
                                                                                                                                          ==
6. ____________________________________________ _ _ __
7. ____________________________________________
7. _ _ ____
8. __________________________________________

8.~~ _________________________ __ NOTES: ------------ ------- NOTES:

ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 08/31109 thru 09118109 09118/09 Examination Level: RO [?SJcgJ SRO [?SJcgJ Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Topic Type. Describe activity to be performed (See Note) Code* SRO Only - (COl) - Determine actions for primary to secondary leakage. Conduct of Operations D,R KIA - G2.1.25 G2.l.25 SROSR04.2 4.2 CP-152 RO && SRO - (C02) - Perform a time to boil 1 core uncovery calculation. Conduct of Operations M,R KIA - G2.1.23 G2.l.23 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 OP-103H RO && SRO - (EC 1) - Perform a monthly NI Imbalance Comparison. KlA-G2.2.12 R03.7 SR04.l KlA-G2.2.l2 SR04.1 Equipment Control D,R SRO Only - After completing the Imbalance Comparison determine required ITS actions, if any. KIA - G2.2.40 SRO 4.7 4. 7 SP-312B RO && SRO - (RC1)(RC 1) - Calculate the maximum permissible D,M,P, stay time with an Emergency Event in progress. Radiation Control R KIA - G2.3.4 RO 3.2 SRO 3.7 EM-202 RO - (EP1) (EP 1) - Make required notifications using provided State of Florida Notification Message form. Emergency Procedures SRO Only - (EP2) - Determine Emergency Action Level D, S 1 Plan and Protective Action Recommendations. KlA-2.4.43 KIA - 2.4.43 ROR03.2 3.2 SR03.8 SRO 3.8 EM-202 All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless Note: they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required. (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (.:s (.::::: 3 for ROs;.::::: ROs;.:s 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

  • Type Codes & & Criteria:

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (~ (2: 1) (P)revious 2 exams ( :Sl; .:::::1; randomly selected) Page 1 of 11HINRC HINRC -- 20091Post 20091Post Prep Prep WeeklJPMIAdminlNRC WeeklJPMIAdminlNRC 2009 2009 Form Form ES-301-1 ES-30 I - I (JPM (JPM Admin Admin Outline) FINAL. docxE S-301 Outline) FINAL.docxES-301

ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Control Room 1 In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 09118/09 08/31109 thru 09/18/09 Exam Level: RO [8J ~ SRO-I [8J ~ SRO-U [8J ~ Operating Test Number: 1 Control Room systems@ (8 for RO; 7for SRO-I; SRO-J; 2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) Type Safety System I JPM Title Code* Function

a. CA - Perform an RCS Boration [SRO-U]

ISRO-Uj A,D,S 1 KIA - 024AA2.04 RO 3.4 SRO 4.2 (EOP-2) [RO,SRO-I] IRO, SRO-Ij

b. CVCS - Restore PZR level during OTSG tube rupture cvcs [SRO-U]

ISRO-Uj A,D,P,S 2 KIA - 006A4.02 RO 4.0 SRO 3.8 (EOP-6) [RO. SRO-I] SRO-Ij

c. RCS - Respond to a stuck open PZR spray valve A,D,L,P, 3

KIA - 002A4.01 RO 4.2 SRO 4.4 (AP-520) SRO-Ij [RO, SRO-I] S

d. S/GS - Establish EFW flow to raise OTSG level D.S 4

KlA-E03EA1.3 R03.6 SR03.8 (EOP-3) [RO. IRO. SRO-I] SRO-Ij Primary

e. MSS - Perform actions for a stuck open MSSV D,P,S 4

KIA - 039A2.04 RO 3.4 SRO 3.7 (EOP-2) [RO. SRO-I] SRO-Ij Secondary

f. CCS - Ensure proper alignment of ES equipment [SRO-U]

[SRO-Uj A,EN,N, S 5 KIA - 022A4.01 RO 3.6 SRO 3.6 (EOP-2) SRO-Ij [RO. SRO-I]

g. AC - Energize a dead bus D,S 6 KIA - 062A2.05 RO 2.9 SRO 3.3 (AP-770) [RO]

[ROj

h. ES - Respond to an invalid ES Actuation A,D,EN, S A,D,EN,S 8 KIA - 008A3.08 R03.6 KlA-008A3.08 RO 3.6 SR03.7 SRO 3.7 (AP-340) SRO-Ij

[RO, SRO-I] SPARE MU - Restart a MOP MUP following an RCS leak isolation D, S D,S 2 002A2.0 1 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 (AP-520) KIA - 002A2.01 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-L' SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.

1. PPcs - Depressurize the RCS using HP Aux. Spray D,E,R 3 KlA-E14EA1.1 R03.8 SR03.6 (EOP-14,Enc.13)

KlA-E14EAl.1 [RO. IRO. SRO-I] SRO-Ij

j. DHR - Establish DHR from outside control room [SRO-U]

[SRO-Uj 4 E,L,N,R KIA - A06AAl.1 A06AA 1.1 RO 4.3 SRO 4.2 (AP-990) [RO, SRO-Il [RO,SRO-Il Primary

k. AC - Transfer vital bus to normal power supply [SRO-Uj

[SRO-UJ D 6 KIA - 062A3.04 R02.7 KlA-062A3.04 RO 2.7 SR02.9 SRO 2.9 (OP-703) [RO, SRO-I] IRO,SRO-I] SPARE FS/OTSG - Transfer excess secondary inventory to FST D,E 3,8 KIA - 038EK3.06 RO 4.2 SRO 4.5 (EOP-14, Enc. 9) All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety 

     @       functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
  • Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-I I SRO-U (A)ltemate path 4-6 14-6 12-3 I 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank ~9/~8/~4
                                                                                             .::;9/.::;8/.::;4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant                                                             ;::11;::11;::1
                                                                                             ?:  II?: II?: 1 (EN)gineered safety feature                                     (control room system)         -

I - I;:: I?:l1 (L )ow Power I Shutdown  ;::11;::11;::1 

                                                                                             ?:1I?:1I?:1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A)                                                ;::2/;::2/;::1
                                                                                             ?:2/?:2/?:1 (P)revious 2 exams                                                                            ~3/~3/~2
                                                                                             '::;3/'::;3/'::;2 (R)CA                                                           (randomly selected)           ;::11;::11;::1
                                                                                             ?:1I?:1I?:1 (S)imulator Page 1 of IH:\NRC IHINRC - 2009\Post 20091Post Prep Week\JPM\Plant\NRC           ES-30 1-2 (JPM MCR-Plant Outline) FINAL.docx ES-30 1 WeeklJPMlPlantlNRC 2009 Form ES-301-2

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 ( Facility: Crystal River Unit 3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 Operating Test No: 1 Initials

1. General Criteria A 8*

S* ~.# 'Jf

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

AK FL 'i,'~~ 

                                                                                                                                            \
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

AK FL I~

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) AK FL '"'I.",' A' Safety Function 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 ;2 G KIA Topic(s) IR #

007EA2.02 - Ability to determine or 007 (BW/E02 & EI0) EIO) interpret the following as they apply to a Reactor Trip - Stabilization - Recovery - 1 X reactor trip: Proper actions to be taken if 4.3 1 the automatic safety functions have not taken place 00SAG2.1.23 - Ability to perform OOS Pressurizer Vapor Space specific system and integrated plant Accident 1 3 X procedures during all modes of plant 4.3 1 operation. 009EK2.03 - Knowledge of the 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 X interrelations between the small break 3.0 1 LOCA and the S/Gs. 011EK3.07 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 X to the Large Break LOCA: Stopping 3.5 1 HPI bypass flow (recirdlow OK per GL) 015/017 AKl.05 - Knowledge of the 015/017AK1.05 operational implications of the following i concepts as they apply to RCP 015117 RCP Malfunctions 14 X I**.* malfunction (Loss ofRC Flow): Effects 2.7 1 of unbalanced RCS flow on in-core average temperature, core imbalance, and quadrant power tilt. 022AKl.03 - Knowledge of the 022AK1.03 operational implications of the following 022 Loss ofRx Coolant Makeup 1 2 X concepts as they apply to Loss of 3.0 1 Reactor Coolant Makeup: Relationship between makeup flow and PZR level 025AA2.01 - Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to 025 Loss ofRHR System 1 144 X the Loss of Decay Heat Removal 2.7 1 System: Proper amperage of running LPI/decay heat removal/RHR removallRHR pump(s) Page 2 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL 2009-301 \FINAL - WRITIEN WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1

I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 111I Group 1 A~G 

                                                                                         ',\."

E/APE # I Name I K K KK K K A '1 KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 ... 

                                                                                 .... I I                  .*..*.

026AK3.02 - Knowledge of the reasons 

                                                                        '{i            Ii                         for the following responses as they apply to the Loss of Nuclear Services 1 Decay 026 Loss of Component                                        I ...** 1< *. . . .*

Cooling Water 1 188 X

.,'" I Heat Closed Cycle Cooling: The 3.6 1 automatic actions (alignments) within
                                                             ~jf:I,.,>. *..

the SWS 1 DCS resulting from the 

                                                                                        <                         actuation  of the ESF AS

,i~ "'1:* 027AK3.04 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 027 PZR Pressure Control X ../ ........................* to the PZR Pressure Control 2.8 1 System Malfunction 1 3 Malfunctions: Why, if ifPZR PZR level is lost 1

  • 029EAI.12 029EA1.l2 - Ability to operate and 029 ATWS 11 X monitor the following as they apply to an 4.1 1 rH';:; 1,'124 ATWS: Reactor trip breakers I~> ~~~ I;} i'"
    • 038EG2.1.28 - Knowledge of the 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 13 X purpose and function of major system 4.1 1 13 li'-- controls .
    components and controls. 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line '.',..'\ Rupture - Excessive Heat ......  !/ ..* i Transfer 14 I i. j * . . ,. . . . . . . ,../ ...... 054AAl.Ol - Ability to operate and lor 054AA1.Ol I*.* .* . . . . .*.*.*.*
    • monitor the following as they apply to 054 Loss of Main Feedwater X >.,. the Loss of Main Feedwater (MFW): 4.5 1 14 t;~" . . ,
    ii/; > EFW controls, including the use of alternate EFW sources * * } i'* it;'..; !.>:( .'.<,':' 055EK3.02 - Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 055 Station Blackout 16 16 X ........*.  ;; 0';*'< ~;,:;~ to the Station Blackout: Actions contained in EOP for loss of offsite and 4.3 1 onsite power power.. l~;~c\; 056AAl.05 - Ability to operate and 1 lor or 056 Loss of Offsite Power 1 h;\; monitor the following as they apply to 6 X the Loss of Offsite Power: Initiation 3.8 1 ..*.****. '. .*" r (manual) of safety injection process Page 3 of 140:\Crystal Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam 140:\Cl)1stai River Examinations\Initiai Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I KK K K K K A . iA:** cA , <(jj: Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 2*....1i'6,j ., .:... KIA Topic(s) IR # 057 Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus 1/ 6 .... ./ 058AKl.Ol - Knowledge ofthe of the I*'" Ii. operational implications of the following I** .* , .... 058 Loss of DC Power 16 X concepts as they apply to Loss of DC 2.8 1 .. Power: Battery charger equipment and instrumentation 062 Loss of Nuclear Services Water 1 4 .. 065AG2.4.8 - Knowledge of how of Instrument Air 1 065 Loss ofInstrument 8 X abnormal operating procedures are used 3.8 1 in conjunction with EOPs. BWIE04EA2.1 - Ability to determine BW/E04EA2.1 r;~) I., I;. and interpret the following as they apply BWIE04 Inadequate Heat BW/E04 I* to the (Inadequate Heat Transfer): Transfer - Loss of ~.~> li< ,. .*.i I" .. Facility conditions and selection of 3.2 1 Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 Ii appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations. 077 AK2.03 - Knowledge of the 077 Generator Voltage and ,,' . . interrelations between Generator Voltage Electric Grid Disturbances 1 X and Electric Grid disturbances and the 3.0 1 6 I following: Sensors, detectors, indicators.. indicators I*.**.* KJ A Category Totals KIA 3 2 4 3 3 3 3' Group Point Total 18/6 Page 4 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL 2009-30 I \FINAL - WRITTEN WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2 ........ / E/APE # I Name I K K K A I:~!.* I...A.,. Safety Function 1 2 3 1 liz*' 2 .**.*.*. ~ G ***.. KIA Topic(s) IR # xii.*. .*. **. / .... 001AA2.05 - Ability to determine and OOlAA2.05 **.*i interpret the following as they apply to >l~r~ 001 Continuous Rod Withdrawal/I Withdrawal/ 1 X i****i.:. the Continuous Rod Withdrawal: 4.4 1
    . ~
    . Uncontrolled rod withdrawal from ..... :f*j available indications ~I, 003AKl.l0 - Knowledge of the  ; **** operational implications of the following 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 X  ;( .*...*... concepts as they apply to Dropped 2.6 1 .*...*. }. Control Rod: .. quadrant powerDefinitions of core tilt i.;i . . . . iii.:;:' 005AK3.05 - Knowledge of the reasons
    .i >.
    ...... for the following responses as they apply 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod / 1 X to the Inoperable / Stuck Control Rod: 3.4 1 ii*.* i .* Power limits on rod misalignment
    i*i;;
    024 Emergency Boration / 1  ! I* * ~* *.* *
    • I .. ******
    \ . ..................... 028 PZR Level Malfunction / *....... 2 .... i , 032 Loss of Source Range NIl NI/77 iI."I: . . I**.* ... *.* * *.* 033 Loss ofIntermediate I~;):;i: 2 \;(:: Range NI /7/7 Ii. 1 "1*...* y.: 036 (BW/A08) Fuel Handling Accident / 8 IH~ II1~ 037 Steam Generator Tube Leak/3 ~~~~ ~5i~l 051 Loss of Condenser j.l~::.:i '/..;~:i~i' Vacuum/4 Vacuum /4  ; .......... ........ .....? 059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste ReI. / 9  ;~i& Page 5 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL 2009-30 1\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 II ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2 r~Z \,~i,':i~(. E/APE # I Name I/ KK KK K K A Safety Function 1 2 3 1 Gc, ,! KIA Topic(s) IR # 060 Accidental Gaseous I',j;,), ", I,", Radwaste ReI. 19 I9 061AG2.2.12 - Knowledge of 061 ARM System Alarms 17 I7 I X surveillance procedures. 3.7 1 I. 067 Plant Fire On-site 1 I8 BW/A06AK1.3 - Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to the (Shutdown 068 (BW/A06) (BWIA06) Control Ij. ",s. Room Evac. 1 I8 X I. ..*'L' Outside Control Room): Annunciators and conditions indicating signals, and 3.4 1 ". remedial actions associated with the L (Shutdown Outside Control Room) Room).. 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity .,.('. ,. 15 074EA2.03 - Ability to determine detennine or .i: interpret the following as they apply to a 074 Inad. Core Cooling 14 I4 X ..' ':X. Inadequate Core Cooling: Availability 3.8 1 of turbine bypass valves for cooldown 076 High Reactor Coolant . Activity 19 I9 BW1 I AO 1 Plant Runback 1 I 1 BW/A02AG2.2.12 - Knowledge of surveillance procedures. (Loss of NNI-BW/A02&A03 Loss ofNNI-XIY 17I7 ".
    lC X X while performing an SP OK per 3.7 1
    ...ii GL) BW/A04 Turbine Trip 14 \, , ' BW1 I A05 Emergency Diesel ,; ii '. Actuation I 6 Page 6 of 14o:\Crystal Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-3011FINAL 14o:ICrystal River ExaminationslInitial 2009-30 1\FINAL - WRITIEN WRITTEN EXAMIRO EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K KKK K K A ,A: A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 11 2 2 3 3 1 2 BW/A07AK2.l - Knowledge of the BW/A07AK2.1 interrelations between the (Flooding) and the following: Components, and BW/A07 Flooding 18 xX functions of control and safety systems, 3.7 1 including instrumentation, signals, I: ..... interlocks, failure modes, and automatic " , and manual features. BW/E03 Inadequate i' Subcooling Margin 1 I4 BW IE08EAl.l - Ability to operate and 1 BW/E08EAl.l I or monitor the following as they apply to the (LOCA Cooldown): Components, IE08 LOCA Cooldown-BW/E08 BW Depress. 14 Cooldown - xX and functions of control and safety 4.0 1 systems, including instrumentation, signals., interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features. BW/E09 BW IE09 Natural Circ. 14 I4 BW/E13&El4 EOP Rules BW/E13&E14 and Enclosures KIA Category Totals 2 1 1 1 2 . 2 Group Point Total 9/4 Page 7 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 2009-30 1\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam FINAL.docx Outline (401-2) FIN AL docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 r; . .* K K K K K K KK K K K K A A A A Ie System # / Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 .2 3 4 f 003K6.14 - Knowledge of the effect 003 Reactor Coolant I of a loss or malfunction on the X following will have on the RCPs: 2.6 1 Pump/4 Starting Requirements I.. 1:;', .... : I , 004K2.06 - Knowledge of bus power 004 Chemical and X supplies to the CVCS control 2.6 1 Volume Control / 1 & 2 .'" " instrumentation. 005K2.01 - Knowledge of bus power X supplies to the DH pumps. 3.0 1 005 Residual Heat Removal / 4 Removal/4 005K6.03 - Knowledge of the effect , of a loss or malfunction on the X  : following will have on the Decay 2.5 1 {"
    Heat System: DH heat exchanger 006K5.04 - Knowledge of the I
    operational implications of the X **** following concepts as they apply to 2.9 1 ECCS: Brittle fracture, including I*:.'. causes and preventative actions I " 006 Emergency Core Cooling / 2 & 3 006A2.10 - Ability to (a) predict the 1< impacts of a low boron concentration in the ECCS; and (b) X based on those predictions, use 3.4 1 procedures to correct, control, or , I mitigate the consequences of this malfunction.. malfunction 007 A4.09 - Ability to manually
    . operate and/or monitor in the control 007 PZR Relie£'Quench Relief/Quench X room: relationships between PZR 2.5 1 Tank/5 level and changing levels of the PR PRTT and bleed holdup tank 008K4.02 - Knowledge of SWS /
    dO . DCS design feature(s) and/or 008 Component Cooling X interlock(s) which provide for 2.9 1 Water /8 '" operation of the surge tank, including It* I the associated valves and controls. Page 8 of 140:\Crystal 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 \FINAL - WRITIEN 2009-301IIFINAL WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A ., System # / Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 008Al.03 - Ability to predict and/or I . monitor changes in parameters (to 008 Component Cooling prevent exceeding design limits) X .' associated with operating the SWS / 2.7 1 ater /8 Water 1;<**.*. DCS controls including: CCW pressure. pressure . 010K5.01 OIOK5.01 - Knowledge of the operational implications of the 010 Pressurizer Pressure following concepts as the apply to X the PZR PCS: Determination of 3.5 1 Control / 3 condition of fluid in PZR, using steam tables 012G2.4.6 - Knowledge ofEOP X mitigation strategies. strategies, 3.7 1 12 Reactor Protection / 012 7 OI2K5.01 - Knowledg~ 012K5.01 Knowledge of the i operational implications of the X following concepts as they apply to 3.3 1 the RPS: DNB Q13K2.01 OI3K2.01 - Knowledge of bus power 13 Engineered Safety 013 X supplies to the ESF AS / safeguards 3.6 1 eatUres Actuation / 2 Features equipment control. 022K4.0l - Knowledge ofCCS 022K4.01 design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) 022 Containment X which provide for the following: 2.5 1 Cooling /5 Cooling of reactor building penetrations. 026Al.Ol 026Al.0 1 - Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to 0266 Containment Spray / .' prevent exceeding design limits) X associated with operating the BSS 3.9 1 5 t*** .' controls including: Reactor Building pressure 039K3.05 - Knowledge of the effect 039 Main and Reheat that a loss or malfunction of the X MRSS will have on the following; following: 3.6 1 Steam / 4 RCS 14o:\CrystaJ River Examinations\lnitial Page 9 of 14o:\Crystal Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 IJ\FINAL - WRITfEN WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 I/ Group 1 l~ '8 K K K K K K A A A A System # I/ Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 059 Main Feedwater /4 fi ..*.... X
    'ii"*
    /i ii 059A3.04 - Ability to monitor automatic operation of the MFW, including: Turbine driven feed pump 059K3.02 - Knowledge of the effect 2.5 1 X  : .... that a loss or malfunction of the MFW will have on the following:
    3.6 1 I****..********* **
    .i{ EFW system i.*.*.*.*
    061 Auxiliary I/ i' 061K3.02 - Knowledge of the effect X I' Ii:,:*  :.**.*i * *
    • that a loss or malfunction of the 4.2 1 Emergency Feedwater /
    ,'~\j EFW will have on the following: 4 1<* 1*<; .*... S/G Il';' '0 062A2.16 - Ability to (a) predict the Iii. .. impacts of the following **** malfunctions or operations on the AC distribution system; and (b) 062 AC Electrical I'~X based on those predictions, use 2.5 1 rt~:i; Distribution I/ 6 l*i***.***.** procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those
    • IX? malfunctions or operations:
    Degraded system voltages *./i I).*.**. ******************* I~/ 063A3.01 - Ability to monitor automatic operation of the dc 063 DC Electrical ******i *....... X IiI Distribution I/ 6 .. electrical system, including: Meters, 2.7 1 .. annunciators, dials, recorders, and indicating lights . .; 064G2.4.45 - Ability to prioritize and ...... \. XX interpret the significance of each 4.1 1 . >. . annunciator or alarm. ": i**** ~l~ 064 Emergency Diesel Generator I/ 6 ... ti*;' 064K4.01 - Knowledge ofED/G  ;: ~~:{j ~i~ l~w'(') ~&m system design feature(s) and/or ,ymm X .~ interlock(s) which provide for the following: Trips while loading the 3.8 1 ED/G (frequency, voltage, speed) .***** i> ******** ' .. 073A4.03 - Ability to manually X'" operate and/or monitor in the control 073 Process Radiation ....*..... X 3.1 1 Monitoring I/ 7 ........ room: Check source for operability demonstration Page 10 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL - WRITTEN WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K K K K A A A A 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 I~:;~/ 14 ~ *3 3 4 12'~  ;,~. G KIA Topic(s) IR # ~
    • 076G2.4.8 - Knowledge of how I:ii 076 Service Water / 4 X abnormal operating procedures are 3.8 1
    [<' I,l used in conjunction with EOPs EOPs.. f,~I I:~ij.. 078K1.04 078Kl.04 - Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-078 Instrument Air / 8 X effect relationships between the lAS 2.6 1 1< lxi, and the following systems: Cooling I,:: I; I . water to compressor I:," I I 103A2.03 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following I.i I malfunctions or operations on the r I~!i) reactor building system and (b) based [~X on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the 3.5 1 103 Containment / 5 ii Ii consequences of those malfunctions >; andB or operations: Phase A and B  !:( isolation * * .***i .....'......, 103K1.01 I03K1.01 - Knowledge of the i( '<'.' Ii physical connections and/or cause-X >i. Ii effect relationships between the 3.6 1 );' it, .. reactor building system and the following systems: CCS lr) I'S KIA Category Totals 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 13 *3 2 2 3 Ij I>.** .*,* . Group Point Total 28/5 Page 11 of 140:\Crystal I40;\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 2009-30 1\FINAL IFINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 '2 2 3 4 , cc' cC 001 A2.I2 - Ability to (a) predict the 001A2.12 I, impacts of the following ofthe I)' malfunctions or operations on the CRDS; and (b) based on those 001 Control Rod Drive / X predictions, use procedures to 3.6 1 1 correct, control or mitigate the 'cCc consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Erroneous ECP calculation I> 002 Reactor Coolant / 2 c,c*. &4 1.<'" 011 Pressurizer Level Control/2 , 00 014 Rod Position Indication / 1 ,. 015K3.01 - Knowledge of the effect 015 Nuclear X that a loss or malfunction of the NIS 3.9 1 Instrumentation / 7 will have on the following: RPS 016A4.02 - Ability to manually 016 Non-nuclear X operate and/or monitor in the control 2.7 1 Instrumentation / 7 room: Recorders 017K5.02 - Knowledge of the operational implications of the 017 In-core Temperature X ..... following concepts as they apply to 3.7 1 Monitor //77 'c' .. ..,. the ITM system: Saturation and 1'0. ,:' , *. subcooling of water 1('. I 027Kl.01 - Knowledge of the 027Kl.Ol ':<', physical connections and/or cause-I}:: . 027 Containment Iodine Removal/5 X II *.**
    effect relationships between the 3.4 1 CIRS and the following systems:
    CSS 028 Hydrogen Recombiner and Purge Control/5 029 Containment Purge / 8 Page 12 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 2009-3011\FINAL - WRITIEN WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 K K K K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 033Al.O 1 - Ability to predict and/or 033A1.0 I; ". .< monitor changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) 033 Spent Fuel Pool X associated with operating Spent Fuel 2.7 1 Cooling /8 Pool Cooling System controls I', including: Spent fuel pool water I; I: level. 034G2.2.40 - Ability to apply 034 4 Fuel Handling X Technical Specifications for a 3.4 1 Equipment /8 /8 system. 0355 Steam Generator / 4 I' 041K6.03 - Knowledge of the effect of a loss or malfunction on the 041 Steam following will have on the Turbine Dump/Turbine Bypass X Bypass Valves: Controller and 2.7 1 Control / 4 . positioners, including ICS, S/G, CRDS 045 Main Turbine Generator / 4 055 Condenser Air Removal / 4 056Kl.03 - Knowledge of the I' physical connections and/or cause-0566 Condensate / 4 X ..... effect relationships between the 2.6 1 Condensate System and the L following systems: MFW
    068K4.011 - Knowledge of design 068K4.0 feature(s) and/or interlock(s) which provide for the following: Safety 068 Liquid Radwaste / 9 X and environmental precautions for 3.4 1 handling hot, acidic, and radioactive liquids 0711 Waste Gas Disposal
    /99 072 Area Radiation Monitoring / 7 0755 Circulating Water / I'",' 8 Page 13 of 140;\Crystal 14o:ICrystal River ExaminationslInitial Exarninations\Initial Exam 2009-301 2009-301\FINAL \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO EXAMIRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx FINAL.docx ES-40 ES-4011 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 K K K K K K A A A A KKKKKKA System # / Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2342 3 4 5 6 1 2 *. 3 4 079 Station Air / 8 0866 Fire Protection / 8 KIA A Category Totals 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 11 1 11 11 1 0 1 1 Group Point Total 10/3 Page 14 of 140:\Crystal 140.\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 ES-4011 ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Fonn ES-401-4 RO Tier! Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA Not applicable to CR3. Containment fan coolers have no 111 01IEK3.04 011EK3.04 dampers. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OllEK3.07. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related III 022AK1.02 022AKl.02 to this KA. High delta P, more flow. Low delta P, less flow. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA#022AK1.03. No IR value assigned in NUREG-1122. NUREG-l 122. Chief Examiner III 111 055EK2.04 randomly selected new KA #055EK3.02. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 1/2 112 0OlAA2.02 0OIAA2.02 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OOlAA2.05. Not applicable to CR3. Our ECCS system has no water level input for automatic operation and no manual operator actions 211 006K5.01 based on water level. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO6K5.04. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 2/1 211 103A2.05 I03A2.05 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #103A2.03. IR value only2.2 for ROs. Chief Examiner randomly selected Generic 2.1.35 new KA #G2.1.36. Not applicable to CR3. CR3 does not have "first-out" alarm 111 007EA2.05 indications for a reactor trip. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO7EA2.02. Not applicable to CR3. CR3 does not have SW/RW flow control 111 III 056AA1.28 valves. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #056AA1.05. At CR3 actions for this KA are SRO only level knowledge. 2/2 212 028A2.03 Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #028A2.02. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 2/2 028A2.02 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OOlA2.l2. #OOlA2.12. Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline - Rejected o:\Crystal River Examinations\lnitial KAs(401-4)FINAL.docx KAs (401-4) FINAL.docx ES-4011 ES-40 FINAL ES-401 SRO - PWR Examination Outline - (Sept, 2009) Form ES-401-2 Facility: Facility: Crystal Crystal RiverRiver Unit Unit #3 Date Date of of Exam: Exam: September, September, 2009 2009 RO KIA RO KJA Category Category PointsPoints SRO-Only SRO-Only Points Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A AA A A A A G TOTAL A2 A2 G* TOTAL 11 22 3 44 5 6 11 22 3 44
    • I.
    1. 1 18 3 3 6 Emergency & Abnonnal 2 N/A N/A 9 22 22 4 Plant Evolutions Tier Tier 27 5 5 10 Totals 1 28 3 22 5 2. Plant 2 10 22 11 3 Systems Tier 38 5 3 8 Totals Totals
    3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Abilities Categories 10 7 2 2 1 2 Note: l.
    1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each KIA category shall not be less than two).
    2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.
    3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l.b of ES-40 I for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.
    4,
    4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before evolution.
    selecting a second topic for any system or evolution, 5,
    5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KlAs having an importance rating (IR) of2,5 of2.5 or higher shall be selected, selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively, respectively.
    6,
    6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories, categories.
    7,* 7.* (0) KI As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 ofthe The generic (G) of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. system, Refer to section d, I, b of ES-40 I for the applicable KI As. d.l.b As,
    8. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* 0* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of ofColurnn Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply),
    apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-exams. only exams, 9,
    9. Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the KIA catalog, and enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#)
    For Tier3, ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to KlAs that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43, on Fonn ES-401-3, 55.43. Page 1 of lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 II ES-401 PWR P"'R Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K A A A. G' .. " KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ',2,,' 2: :...;;',',;.' ,i:; . 007 (BW/E02 & E10) ElO) Reactor Trip - Stabilization  :'t .:**i,. *..*,';; ******** - Recovery - 1 '. 008 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident 13 ", 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 015/17 RCP Malfunctions 14 " ~~j1'~"¢' ." ...... 022AA2.01 - Ability to determine and 022 Loss of Rx Coolant  :.~0! >. . interpret the following as they apply to ~'i\ ofRx '.' the Loss of Reactor Coolant Pump 3.8 1 Makeup 1 2 I,~~~, .....: Makeup: Whether makeup line leak . exists 025 Loss ofRHR System 1 4 026 Loss of Component Cooling Water 18 18 of low power 1 027 AG2.4.9 - Knowledge oflow 027 PZR Pressure Control System Malfunction 1 133 1;:\( ;X .... X shutdown implications in accident (e.g. LOCA or loss ofDH) mitigation 4.2 1 . strategies. 029 ATWS 1 111 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 1 3 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line .' Rupture - Excessive Heat < */1. Transfer 1 4 054 Loss of Main Feedwater ) . I,i* ' '"i, . "'" 14 I*:*****:* 055 Station Blackout 1 6 Page 2 of 1100:\Crystal OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30l\FINAL-2009-301\FINAL - WRIITEN WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-4011 ES-40 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 11 1 I Group 1 L';~; ~~ E/APE # I Name I/ K K KK K K A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 '2 '. ," IX 056AG2,4,45 - Ability to prioritize and 056AG2.4.45 056 Loss of Offsite Power 1 .......... I** *X *.*.* * )*
    • interpret the significance of each 4.3 1 6
    it.: *
    • annunciator or alann.
    alarm. \. .............,.... 057 Loss of Vital AC .**...*X I"* '.'< ~..*...*1\ the Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus: determine and 057 AA2.05 - Ability to detennine interpret the following as they apply to Instrument Bus 1 6 3.8 1 I:****.* . S/G pressure and level meters if~I': ~iiii~ systems. 058AA2.03 - DC loads lost; impact on 058 Loss of DC Power 16 1% .... ability to operate and monitor plant 3.5 1 ). systems. 062 Loss of Nuclear Services ....:. lil Water 1 4 'iJI(r I':i; * .* ;J.( , 065 Loss of 8 Instrument Air 1/ ofInstrument <>' I: BW/E04 BWIE04 Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of i**** Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 ..... Ii . . . 077 Generator Voltage and 077AG2.2.12 - Knowledge of Electric Grid Disturbances 1 6 \i"<" X Ii? surveillance procedures. 4.1 1 I; <**if I;*\(*i,' i> :' \.,~30 Ii;:):! KIA Category Totals .*."".' ,*1.*. 03" Group Point Total 18/6 1OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 Page 3 of 100:\Crystal 2009-301\FINAL I \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-4011 ES-40 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 II ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2 *...... \1 E/APE # I Name I Safety Function K 1 K 2 K 3 I;[~\i f?! A ;>~ 1 "i':** *.>0:* KIA Topic(s) IR # 001 Continuous Rod Withdrawal/ 1 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 r** I*' 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod / 1 024 Emergency Boration / 1 I, Ii '. '.' 028 PZR Level Malfunction / I:'" ....  ; 2 1**.***.;<* 032 Loss of Source Range .... NIl 7 I 033 Loss ofIntermediate Range NI / 7 ..... .'} . . 036 (BW / A08) Fuel (BW/A08)  ;.....  : Handling Accident / 8 ": ..... .' 037 Steam Generator Tube Leak/3 Leak /3 051 Loss of Condenser Vacuum Vacuum/4 /4 059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste ReI. Rel. / 9 ii . . 060 Accidental Gaseous Rel. I/ 9 Radwaste ReI. .... 061AA2.06 - Ability to determine and I.... .'. interpret the following as they apply to 061 ARM System Alarms / 7 I. iX" X ..,.,'....... , the Area Radiation Monitoring (ARM) System Alarms: Required actions if 4.l 4.1 1 .... : I alarm channel is out of service 067 Plant Fire On-site / 8 ';"; Page 4 of 100;\Crystal I OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline(401-2)FINAL.docx Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I KKK K K K A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 11 2 2 3 3 1 2 068 (BW/A06) Control Room Evac. I 8 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity 069AG2.2.38 - Knowledge of IS 15 1:,,';:; :X conditions and limitations in the facility 4.5 1 I*:; ..; ;)'; license. 074 Inad. Core Cooling I 4 076 High Reactor Coolant Activity I 9 Runback I I BW/AOI Plant Runbackl BW/A02&A03 Loss ofNNI- BW/A03AG2.4.6 - Knowledge ofEOP I ,X mitigation strategies. 4.7 1 XIY 17 I7 BW/A04 Turbine Trip I 4 BWI A05 Emergency Diesel BW/A05 Actuation I 6 BW/A07 Flooding 18 BWIE03 Inadequate BW/E03 Subcooling Margin I 4 ,I') ,: ' BW/E08 BW LOCA Cooldown - 1E08,LOCA Depress. 14 BW/E09 Natural Circ. 14 BWlE09 BW/E09EA2.2 - Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the (Natural Circulation Cooldown): X Adherence to appropriate procedures and 4.0 1 operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments. KIA Category Totals 2 2 Group Point Total 9/4 Page 5 of 100:\Crystal lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam 2009-301\FINAL-Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-4011 ES-40 ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K K K A A A A 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 ,i~ r~G KIA Topic(s) IR # 003 Reactor Coolant *............ Pump /4 ,~\~: 'il'., ... .. ~i ~ 004 Chemical and i;';j Control / 1 & Volume Control/I & 2 i ........*.... I: 005A2.0l1 - Ability to (a) predict the 00SA2.0 . impacts of the following malfunctions * . .* or operations on the Decay Heat . . . . .~.c: System, and (b) based on those OOS Residual Heat 005 predictions, use procedures to correct, X control, or mitigate the consequences 2.9 1 Removal/4  :. I of those malfunctions or operations: Failure modes for pressure, flow, T(;* pump motor amps, motor temperature, and tank level instrumentation ~r'1;; }; 006 Emergency Core Cooling / 2 && 3 n. /:? *...... ......*...... 1< 007 PZR Relief/Quench ., I Tank / S Tank/5 .* > .........*..' I I*.*.* * *. 008 Component Cooling Water /8 /8 [iii! 008 Component Cooling .. Water /8 010 Pressurizer Pressure <. Control/3  ;;i)* I~ 012 Reactor Protection / .. ' .... , Ol2G2.2.l2 Ol2G2.2.12 - Knowledge of ,~ .' X procedures.. surveillance procedures 4.1 1 7 o013 l3 Engineered Safety Features Actuation /2 /2 ~ll ~~ Page 6 of 100:\Crystal lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx FINAL.docx ES-401 !I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2! ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A KKKKKKA " System # / Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 12 3 4 022 Containment I,:,: Cooling! 5 026 Containment Spray! Spray / 5 039G2.4.20 - Knowledge of the 039 Main and Reheat X operational implications of EOP 4.3 1 Steam! 4 warnings, cautions, and notes. 059 Main Feedwater ! 4 061 Auxiliary ! Emergency Feedwater! 4 062A2.01 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the AC distribution system; and (b) 062 AC Electrical based on those predictions, use X procedures to correct, control, or 3.9 1 Distribution!/ 6 lDi!!tril::.uticm mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Types of loads that, if de-energized, would degrade or hinder plant operation 063 DC Electrical Distribution!/ 6 UDi!!tril::.uticm 064 Emergency Diesel Generator! Generator / 6 073 Process Radiation Monitoring!177 IIMo'nitoring Page 7 of 1OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Examinations\lnitial Exam 2009-301 2009-301\FINAL \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ES-401 !I ES-401 SRO ES-401-2!I Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 I Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A System # I Name G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 . , 076A2.01 - Ability to (a) predict the I,,** impacts of the following 11:.< n malfunctions or operations on the I: ':. r  :, RWS; and (b) based on those 076 Service Water //44 *X:X' predictions, use procedures to 3.7 1 ... correct, control, or mitigate the 1< .. : consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Loss of RWS I .*. 078 Instrument Air / 8 ..... ;,.  :..  ; I.. 103 103 Containment / 5 ":)~ ....; I***. ...... I K! KJ A Category Totals 3 2 Group Point Total 28/5 Page 8 of 1OO;\C!),stai 2009-3011\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 System # / Name N arne K K K K KK K K K K K 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2~i 3 4 lit: K A k;. A A G G l KIA Topic(s) IR # Drive!/ 001 Control Rod Drive ****.*....* < 1 ['>i*> ...... I iii 002A2.02 - Ability to (a) predict the I' I: impacts of the following !1~ malfunctions or operations on the I.' RCS; and (b) based on those I~, Coolant!/ 2 002 Reactor Coolant ,X predictions, use procedures to 4.4 I1 &4 " correct, control or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions I . ** i.' or operations: Loss of coolant Iii r pressure I* /. 011 Pressurizer Level Control! 2 Control/2 ~li l;t*iJ I{/ 014 Rod Position Indication!/ 1 Indication 1/" I******.***. fi X o14G2.1.27 - Knowledge of system purpose and! and / or function. 4.0 1 015 Nuclear Instrumentation!/ 7 Instrumentation I.***.** 016 Non-nuclear ..... Instrumentation!/ 7 Instrumentation .. 017 In-core Temperature 1<***** I Monitor!/ 7 Monitor ';'" Iii:: 027 Containment Iodine Removal! 5 Removal/5 i;\i Iii I' . .
    • I, "
    028 Hydrogen Recombiner and Purge Control! 5 Control/5 in I~F! ":, 029 Containment PurgePurge!/ ...................*.* 8 ....
    • 033 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling!/ 8 Cooling I~ii; ./', ':,
    Page 9 of 1OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1I\FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-4011 ES-40 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems - Tier 2 / Group 2 ~~ A******* K K K K KK K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name KIA Topic(s) Topic(s} IR # 3 4 >"G"o}, "~;:: 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 e:e il.Y* 034A2.01 - Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following eee.e ,:2 malfunctions or operations on the 034 Fuel Handling Equipment / 8 ~~ X I I*I,) Fuel Handling System; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control or mitigate the 4.4 1 / 1.*(;.* consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Dropped fuel element I 035 Steam Generator /4 /4 Ii I> .* *.*.***.*i 041 Steam ii ......... Dump/Turbine Bypass i:*>. *. *. *** I'>j ********* Control /4 Control/4 *i j I*' 045 Main Turbine t{ Generator / 4 .*.r. i IiI.i. 055 Condenser Air Removal / 4  :<::, 1**.*.**.*\*.*. Iz> c.** ii* 1>/ 056 Condensate / 4 I. j *.***.******.**** 068 Liquid Radwaste / 9 Ii ............ 071 Waste Gas Disposal ['i}  !> 1/9 /9 Ii I.e i*. * *  ;~~ I' 072 Area Radiation Monitoring / 7 ItJ1} 075 Circulating Water / 8 ~~\ 1,1i, 079 Station Air /8 /8 I. . .... 086 Fire Protection / 8 I' K/ A Category Totals KIA 1-2  :\ e 1 Group Point Total 10/3 Page 10 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam 2009-301\FINAL Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 ES-4011 ES-401 Record of Rejected KJ As Fonn FOnTI ES-401-4 SRO Tier/ Tierl Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJ KJA A Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound 112 061AA2.02 question related to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #061AA2.06. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound 211 062A2.14 question related to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #062A2.01. Not applicable to CR3. Containment iodine removal is accomplished via the RB Spray system. There are 2/2 212 027A2.01 NO filters associated with this system. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #034A2.01. Not applicable to CR3. No hydrogen recombiner or 2/2 212 028A2.01 hydrogen recombining equipment at CR3. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO2A2.02. Not possible to write an SRO level question for this 111 065AA2.04 KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #058AA2.03. Page 1 of 1O:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 2009-301\FINAL \FINAL - WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline - Rejected KAs (401-4) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist ES-401-6 Form ES*401*6 I~y: Facility:* Crystal River Unit 3 09/22109 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/22/09 Exam Level: R RO O * . SRO
    • SRO.
    Initial Item Description a b* fl tl.
    1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. AK FL L4l AJt
    2. a.
    b. NRC KJAs KlAs are referenced for all questions. Facility learning leaminQ objectives are referenced as available. AK FL ~,~ I*~) ~ 3. 4. 5. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled AK AK FL FL " Jt .~ as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or AK FL X the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _ other (explain)
    6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest AK new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. 37 I 8 DID 010 38/17
    ~~  !~~
    7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly AK FL selected KJAs KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter 35 I 5 40 I 20 the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right.
    8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers ~
    or aid in the elimination of distractors. AK FL ~
    9. Question content conforms with specific KJA KIA statements in the previously approved IJ examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; AK FL deviations are justified.
    justified. ~
    10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines Quidelines in ES Appendix B. AK FL 1~
    11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; AK FL I
    r! the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. ~~ature ~ Printed Name /)1J~ature I / _ ,d" // Date
    a. Author Alan Kennedv Kennedy /~ ~ ..~..tIid~ .u;;... / 09/08/09
    b. Facility Reviewer (*) Flo'Ld Lawrence .-;tjlJfP~ '.... .Jf1; 09/0810.9 c.
    C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) c,#7/ (IJfj
    d. NRC Regional Supervisor "/I?-lo9 I~] \
    Note:
    • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
    # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    0# Q# LOK LOD ~--~~~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~ (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Stem Icuesl Focus T/F I cred'l Credo Partial Dist. Job- Minutia Partial I JOb-I Link Minutia I #1 Back- 0= #/ I Back-I units ward KIA Q= I SROSRO Only IutE! utE! S Explanation Instructions [Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) (LaD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
    • The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
    • The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
    • The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
    • The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
    • One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
    4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
    • The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
    • The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
    • The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
    • The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
    5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
    6. (E)ditori~1 Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
    7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X B U 002A2.02 May not meet KIA. (Question meets the* the second portion, but can be written to meet both) 01fi6 01176 What is the impact on the RCS of lowering RCS Pressure? You are testing the impact of a component that will wi" affect RCS Pressure. Borderline SRO. Distractor C may also be considered correct as written. Nothing in the stem makes a failed number 1 seal on 1B plausible. NEW Understand Issues will continue to work. 8/5/2009 eR3 - Replaced question. H 2 X U 005A2.01 Appears to meet KIA. Not SRO only. 02fi7 02177 This question can be answered using systems knowledge, and procedure entry requirements. The only item in this question that would indicate upcoming pump damage is pump cavitation. NEW Continue to work CR3 - Replaced question.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Parlia I Job- Minutia #1 Back-Credo Partia Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dis!. Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X S 012G2.2.12 Question appears to match KIA. 03na 03/78 Question may not be SRO only. This appears to be a precaution/limitation in the surveillance procedure. Who performs the procedure? If this procedure is performed by an RO then this is RO knowledge. Will discuss. NEW Procedure not performed by RO Sat eR3 - No change. CR3 S 4/79 H 2 X E 014G2.1.27 Question kind of matches KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Why do you state in the distractors "for SDM SOM purposes," the basis document discusses control rod operability as a function of being able to insert into the core. By this definition the rod is operable lAW TS 3.1.4. Some enhancements in the structure of the question are needed. MOD 2006 Oconee NRC Exam (need to see the original question or this will be treated as a bank question) Made several changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/5/2009. S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7.
    0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 8ack- 0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E 022AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 5/80 What in the conditions of the stem allows the operator to determine that a small PZR steam space leak is not occurring? What is incorrect about going through the first steps of AP 520? NEW Changes to stem (event! appropriate path) SAT 8/5/2009 CR3- Modified as discussed. 5S H 2 X X X X U 027AGG2.4.9 Kind of matches KIA. As written, 6/81 not SRO only. Distractors A and C are not plausible (535 degrees is not even close to PTS concerns). Ask what action is required, not what action you would direct the RO to take. If A and C are not plausible, then the question can be answered using systems knowledge, therefore not SRO only. Made changes to stem to make a and C more plausible. SRO only. NEW SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EI u/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 7/82 H 2 X E 034A2.01 Question appears to match Kf KIA. A. Appears to be SRO only. Stem focus needs to be improved. Which ONE of the following choices "Correctly" completes the .... Is the Iodine removal factor a common term at CR-3? NEW Made changes to stem and distractors. SAT. 8/6/2009 eR3 - Modified as discussed. S 8/83 H 2 S 039G2.4.20 Question appears to match the KIA. Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 - No change. H 2 S 056AG2.4.45 Question appears to match the 9/84 KIA. Appears to be SRO Only. NEW S eR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 8ack- Q= SRO U/EI u/E1 Explanation Focus Dis!. Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 3 X U 057AA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA. Question does not appear to be SRO 10/85 only. Although the step is in the middle of the procedure, the applicant need only know which fFW EFW pump valves could be controlled to determine that the #1 EFW pump should' be started. NEW Changed the stem. All distractors, Moved picture. SAT. 8/6/2009 S CR3 - Modified as discussed. F 2 061AA2.06 S 061 AA2.06 Question appears to match the K/ KIA. A. 11/86 Appears to be SRO only. NEW S CR3 - No change. eR3 H 2 B E 062A2.01 Question appears to match K/ A. KIA. 12/87 Borderline SRO will Discuss. Otherwise sat. NEW Added fOP* EOP- 14 enclosure 7. SAT. S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    0# Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back-8ack- 0= Q= SRO utE! U/EI Explanation i Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 065AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. 13/88 Does not appear to be SRO only. Typically when to trip the reactor on loss of Instrument air is an RO knowledge item. NEW Gerry to select new KIA. NEW KA - 058AA2.03 CR3 - Wrote new question. H 2 X E 069AG2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Appears to be SRO only. The way the question 14/89 is written, it appears that the plant is in mode 4, and it is okay to continue to heat up ( and stay in mode 4). The question should be is the plant allowed to change modes. What reference is to be provided to the applicant? Second part of question needs some work. NEW Changed stem and distractors. SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SAO SRO utE! U/E! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 076A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. With 15/90 an operability assessment of the UHS, the question appears to be SRO only. The operability determination needs to be more pronounced. (the UHS is operable/ operablel inoperable). BANK Changed stem and distractors SAT 4/06/2009 eR3 - Modified as discussed. CR3 S H 2 X X X AG2.2.12 U 077AG2.2. 12 Question kind of matches KIA.K/A. 16/91 This question is based on the precautions and limitations of SPs. Who normally performs these SPs? If these are performed by an RO, then the RO is also responsible for the P and L's, and this is not an SRO level question. What is the difference between an EGDG and an ES DG. Are we talking about the same diesel in this question? Did not find in SP-354A the step that directs the CRS to have the operator perform SP907A enclosure 2. Not sure that there is a correct answer for the question as written. NEW Made some changes to stem. Will havE have another examiner look at. CR3 - No change yet.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO u/E1 utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X X U BW/A03AG2.4.6 Question appears to match 17/92 KIA. Not sure this is SRO only. This appears to be a question on EOP/AOP procedure usage that may be both RO and SRO knowledge. I found no material that supports answer D 0 as the only correct answer, in fact answer B 8 could also be correct, if the SRO determined that he did not have an operator available to perform the ARP. Need to tighten up the question. ARP, MOD Need a copy of the original question to verify that this is a modified question. Made changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/07/2009. S eR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1#/ Back- Q= SAO SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW IE09EA2.2 Question does not meet the KIA. BW/E09EA2.2 18/93 The KIA asks for the Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Natural Circulation Cooldown): Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments. The question as written lists the procedure flowpath from the point of entry into the EOPs until the final procedure selection is made. No limitations are being tested. This procedure flowpath can be determined from procedure entry requirements, therefore it is not SRO only. Rewrite using limits for cooldown. eR3 - Wrote new question.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    0# Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= Q= SRO UlEi U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U G2.1.5 (Question in exam submittal has KIA as 19/94 2.1.15, but the ES 401-3 has the KIA listed as 2.1.5. Question appears to match KIA 2.1.5. Distractors A and B are essentially stating the same thing, if one is incorrect both are, and if one is correct, then both would be correct. Therefore, distractors A and B are not plausible. Replace distractors A and B. BANK Changed A and B distractors and moved order of distractors. SAT. Sn12009. S CR3 - Modified as discussed. I H 2 B E G2.1.S Question appears to match KIA. Not 20/95 Sure if it is SRO only. Could the answer be determined using only systems knowledge? Will discuss. NEW Made changes to stem and discussed why question was SRO only. SAT Snl2009 S eR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO utE! U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E G2.2.37 Question appears to match KIA. 21/96 Appears to be SRO only based on the basis documents required. Need to ensure that all other distractors are truly incorrect. BANK Added lAW TS SAT an12009. 5S eR3 - Modified as discussed. F 2 S G2.2.43 Question appears to match the KIA. 22/97 Appears to be SRO only. As written the question is a little. confusing, may want to consider changing the format. NEW 5S eR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 8ack- Q= SRO UlEI U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X X X X U G2.3.15 Questions appears to match KIA. Not 23/98 sure it is SRO only. It appears that you are testing the purposes of the radiation monitors. This is an RO knowledge item. Distractors B and D are not plausible. Why would anyone use the fuel building radiation monitor to determine anything on a Large Break LOCA? It also appears that mechanical damage is only used for the spent fuel pool. NEW CR3 - Wrote new question. F 2 X X U G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA. U 24/99 This question appears to be just the definition of a classification. Could be considered GET knowledge. Does not appear to be SRO knowledge. BANK (got second opinion from an additional examiner). an12009 Rewrite anl2009 CR3 - Replaced question.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LaD LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo PartiaI Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SAO SRO U/EJ UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X X E G2.4.3 Question appears to match KIA. May not 25/100 be SRO. Why do you give the details of EOP-03 step 3.14. This is cuing. Question is very similar to #64 on the RO Exam. NEW Upon further review, question is SRO only. Removed teaching from the stem. Question SAT 8/4/2009. eR3 - Modified as discussed. I S 5 Sats, nUnsats, >2'Unsats, and 8 Enhancements g ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 ROWritten Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 Q# 1. LOK I 2. 2., LOD I 3. Psychometric Flaws ~--~~r---~--~--~--~--~---r---;
    4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues I T/F Stem Icues Credo Partial T/F I cred*1 Partial I JOb-I Job- Minutia Minutia I #1 Back- Q= #1 I Back-I Q= I SRO SRO I U/EI utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Instructions [Refer to Section D0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] IEnter Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) IEnter (LaD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
    • The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
    • The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
    • The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
    • The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
    • One or more distractors is ((are) are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
    4. Check the appropriate box if ajob a job content error is identified:
    • The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
    • The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
    • The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
    • The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
    5. guestions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA Check questions and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
    6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
    7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-8ack- Q= SRO UlEI U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 001 AA2.05 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B may not be plausible. What 1 procedure actions would be taken if MUV-31 was open (attempt to close MUV-31). NEW Explained the plausibility of distractors A S and B Question is SAT 8/13/2009 CR3 - No change. H 2 X U 003AK1.10 Question does not appear to match the KIA. The KIA is knowledge of the 2 operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Definitions of core quadrant power tilt. This question is dealing with a mis-aligned control rod. BANK Licensee to change to dropped rod, will change power levels to match. And Verify that the correct technical Spec limit is the only correct answer. Will also run on simulator to verify indications. 8/13/2009 CR3 - Modified question as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TlF T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #/ Back- Q= SAO SRO UlEJ U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 003K6.14 Question kind of matches the KJ KIA. A. S, is not plausible. Are both oil lift Distractor B, 3 pumps for the B S Rep always running when preparing to start the pump? Does the applicant have to make any assumptions? BANK S CR3 - Lowered RCS pressure to 1000# to make more plausible. Removed "electrically" from stem. RCP-1 B is the only RCP with 2 oil pumps. If a lift oil pump were to trip on any of the other RCPs then "A" distractor would be true. H 2 X U 004K2.06 Question does not appear to match KJ A. What eves instrumentation power supply KIA. 4 is being tested? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). modified) . closedl Discussed changes to valve fails closed! manual control is not available, etc. Will review revised question. 8/13/2009 CR3 - All distractors modified per S discussion . discussion.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. I Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO utEi U/EI Explanation i Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 005AK3.05 Question appears to match KIA.
    May want to add the word limits after DNBR and 5 LHR. Otherwise SAT. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). eR3 - replaced "criteria is" with "limits are" CR3 H 2 X X E 005K2.01 Question kind of matches KIA, using a backwards logic. Distractor C may not be 6 plausible. Note in EOP 12 states not to use any procedures while in EOP except for AP 880, so why would someone pick distractor C? NEW S CR3 eR3 - No change. RO has to know of the existence of that NOTE in order to rule out "C" distractor. "e"
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack- Q= SRO U/EI UJE/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H H 2 E 005KS.03 Question Kind of matches KIA. Not sure if testing 3 items is going to work (Le. 7 open/closed/heatup) to answer the question correctly you only have two know what two of the components will do, to narrow the correct answe r down. answer BANK CR3 - No change. Closed/closed and S open/open valve positions not plausible. That was my reason for needing 3 items. F 2 S OOSA2.10 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. Need to make sure that all of the 8 distractors are actually incorrect. NEW st S CR3 - Deleted part of 1st item in each distractor. Not needed. Per TS bases "C" is the only correct answer. H H 2 S 006K5.04 OOSK5.04 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. 9 NEW S CR3- No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. ~
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 007A4.09 Not sure if the question meets the KJA. Are the RCDT parameters higher than KIA. 10 normal operating parameters? It appears from your distractor analysis that they are, but with pressurizer level not changing (I understandtha understand tha level control is in automatic and would mask a leak of this magnitude) and all others beside the RS RB sump stable I need to verify that the RCDT parameters have changed from normal operating parameters. BANK S CR3 - No Change. RCDT pressure normally maintained less than 2 psig to ensure seal leakage is not routed to the RB sump. F 2 X E 007EA2.02 Question appears to match KIA. KJA. Not sure if C is plausible. Does EOP-02 ever direct 11 the operator to open these breakers? If not this is not plausible (lAW EOP-2.0) MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 - Changed number of control rods stuck out. Breakers in distractor "C" may be . opened in the previous step of EOP-02.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack- Q= SAO SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X 00SA1.03 U OOSA 1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and 0 do not appear to be 12 you plausible. If NPSH is maintained why would YOL enter an LCO, and if NPSH is not maintained, why would you not enter the LCO? NEW Changed stem to start with conditions, and then changes to conditions. Will continue to work S/13/2009. CR3 - Modified per discussion. The S nitrogen overpressure on the tank is not an NPSH concern. H 2 S 00SAG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA. Sat 13 NEW CR3 - Changed "could/should" in stem to S "would/will". M 1 S 008K4.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. 14 BANK S CR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F TfF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #f #/ Back- Q= SRO U/EI utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 1 S 009EK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. The cooldown rate should 15 be closer to the limit. Otherwise sat. BANK S CR3 - Changed excessive/acceptable to above/below TS limit to remove subjectivity. F 1 X U U 010K5.01 Not sure this matches the KIA. What is the condition of fluid in PZR? We make no 16 mention of this. Not very discriminating. BANK Continue to work question to match KIA including operational implications. (consider general operating procedure actions) 8/13/2009 CR3 - Replaced question. H 2 S 011 EK3.07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 17 NEW S CR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO SAO utEi U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 1 S 012G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. Low discriminating value. Otherwise SAT. 18 NEW S eR3 - No change. CR3 F 2 S 012K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. Top part of stem is not needed. Need to ensure that 19 b, c, and d are not correct. Otherwise SAT NEW S CR3 eR3 - Removed top part of stem. "B", "8", "C" and "0" verified incorrect. H 2 S 013K2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 20 BANK S CR3 eR3 - No change. H 2 S 015/017 AK1.05 Question appears to match KIA. 21 NEW S eR3 - No change. CR3 ~
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 015K3.01 Question appears to match KIA. KJA. Add axial to the -6% imbalance in the stem. 22 Otherwise SAT (Why do they need a reference? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). CR3 - Added "axial power" to stem. S Removed reference, not needed to answer question. H 2 S 016A4.02 Question appears to match KIA. KJA. SAT 23 BANK S CR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 8ack- Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X U 017K5.02 Question kind of matches KIA. Although the applicant can correctly answer the 24 question and not match the KIA. The question has three items being tested in each distractor,
    1. How many core exit thermocouples are used
    ,,2.
    2. where does the subcooling inputs come from SPDS, and 3. if an inadequate cooling event is in progress.
    An applicant need only know that SPDS is the input, and that 8 thermocouples are used and can answer this question without determining if the plant is subcooled, saturated, or superheated. Need to remove one of the items being tested to ensure that the KIA is being adequately tested. BANK Change to highest and average, and subcooled or saturated. 8/13/2009 811312009 CR3 - Modified question as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SAO SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U 022AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 25 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Use remain the same/throttled as one of the choices. NEW Will Make changes to a 2 and 2 format. eR3 - Modified question as discussed. CR3 S F 2 S 022K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 26 NEW S eR3 - No change. M M 2 S 025AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 27 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 eR3 - No change. -~
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    0# Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 026A1.01 Question appears to match the KIA. What position are the BSV SSV-3 -3 &4 valves in with 28 out HPI activation? Are these valves normally open or closed. I think one of the distractors (or two) should state closed if you think that someone might miss that a manual activation should have been implemented. Will discuss. NEW S CR3- Changed Band D 0 distractors from "throttled" to "closed". F 2 X U 026AK3.02 If this is the equivalent of the CCW system then the question meets the KIA. 29 Reasons on Distractors C and D 0 are not plausible. How would SW be a heat input to the RB? RS? NEW Rewrite to include leakage from RB via the SW system as the correct reason. Also A.lso need a clearly wrong but plausible reason for the other distractor. Also add times with RBIC and SWT level in the stem. S CR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #/ Back- 0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 027AK3.04 Question appears to match the KIA. Change distractor C to read lower because all 30 pressurizer heaters must be manually reset to energize. BANK eR3 - No change. Two banks of heaters will S automatically reset once level rises above 40". F 2 S 027K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 31 NEW S eR3 - No change. F 2 X J1 028A2.02 Question as written meets only the ;1 S S first part of the KIA. There are not any 32 procedure usage steps to control correct, or mitigate the consequences. The b part of the KIA must be met. NEW Not operationally valid for an RO, no actions in current procedures. Gerry to supply New KIA. NEW KIA Number 001A2.12 eR3 - New question written. 1. 1- 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- Q= SRO utEi U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S M 2 M X U 029EA 029EA1.121.12 Question kind of matches KIA. Can reactor trip breakers be manually opened? If 33 3305 and 3312 did not open from the control room, would it not be prudent to go to step 2.3? I am not sure that we should test ROs on what is in the cross-step document document. We should be testing them on the procedure being used. Will Discuss. What is incorrect about distractor 8? B? NEW Determined that the question does meet the KIA. Licensee will look at changing to remove so much of the information in the distractors to simplify the answer. eR3 - No change yet. H 2 033A1.01 S 033A 1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 34 BANK S eR3 CR3 - No change. H 2 S 034G2.2.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT. Reference OK. TS-3.7.15 35 NEW S CR3 - No change. eR3
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F TfF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1#f Back- Q= SRO UlEI U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 038EG2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA. Isn't C always correct? Will discuss otherwise 36 SAT. NEW 5 CR3 - No change. S chanSJe. C is correct only if ADVs are open. F 1 S 039K3.05 Question appears to match KIA. Low discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT. 37 BANK 5 S CR3 - No change. H 2 E 041 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. how the failure affects Turbine control and TBV 38 should be included. i.e. ICS will lower header pressure and the plant will trip if no actions are taken. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). CR3 - No change. Plant will not trip. Only 5 controlling setpoint for turbine control will S be 15 psig higher.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD LCD (FIH) (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F TfF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #f Back- Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA KJA Only S F 2 KJA. S 054AA1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 39 BANK S eR3 - No change. F 2 KJA. S 055EK3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 40 BANK S eR3 - No change. change . H 2 S 056AA1.05 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT 41 eR3 - Deleted some fluff from stem. Not S needed to answer question. 42 F 2 S 056Kl.03 KJA. SAT 056K1.03 Question appears to match KIA. BANK 5S eR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO SAO utEi UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 058AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 43 NEW S CR3 - No change. H 2 S 059A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 44 NEW S CR3 - No change. a H 2 S 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Might want to add directly cause a EFW 45 actuation. Otherwise SAT NEW CR3 - Does not directly cause and EFW actuation. Valve stroking causes the booster pump to trip which in turn causes the main FW pumps to trip which then actuates EFIC. S CR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF TfF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #f 8ack-Back- Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 061 AG2.1.12 Question appears to match KIA. SAT Question was listed as CIA, C/A, but appears to 46 be a memory level question. NEW S CR3- No change in question content. Changed CIA to MEM. H 2 S 061 K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 47 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 - No change. H 2 S 062A2.16 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 48 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 - No change. -~
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack- Q= SRO utEi utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 063A3.01 Question appear to match KIA. Distractor D may be considered a correct 49 statement. For the light to go out batt volts must be less than 72 volts, if it is less than 72 volts, and the battery charger is till aligned then it too would be less than 72 volts, and battery charger voltage would be less than 124 volts. Will discuss NEW CR3 - No change. S H 2 E 064G2.4.45 064G2.4.4S Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 50 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. NEW S CR3 - Modified to test only 2 items per distractor.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    0# Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= Q= SRO U/EI UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 064K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. However, the first two distractors are electrical 51 trips and very few electrical trips will trip the engine. If the imbalance is enough, enough torque could be generated to damage the engine, and the engine would trip then. Would this make any of these correct? Need to work on this question some to make it more clear and tight. NEW S CR3 - Only other electrical engine trip is the 87DG - generator differential OC. oe. Changed distractors A and B to relay actuations that will trip the breaker, but not the engine. H 2 E 06SAG2.4.8 Question appears.to appears to match KIA. Fire protection is only listed in one distractor 52 along with the SSO procedure, and AP -880 with a fire in place why would I not pick this one. Need to add Fire protection to one of the other choices as well. May also want to Take EOP 12 out of some of the distractors. Will discuss. NEW S CR3- AP-880 listed in 2 distractors. Added Added . names of procedures to stem and removed* removed from distractors.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s.
    5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- #/ 8ack- Q= SRO UlEi u/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 068K4.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, 53 and the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Will discuss. NEW S eR3 - No change. F 2 S 073A4.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. 54 BANK 5S eR3 - No change. H 2 S 074EA2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very little discriminating value. Reference is 55 okay. BANK S eR3 - No change. H 2 S 076G2.4.8 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 56 NEW S eR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO utE! U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 077 AK2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 57 NEW S CR3 - No change. F 2 S 078K1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT If the high temperature is 125°F will the 58 compressor ever get to 130°F? May want to change this number. BANK CR3 - Slightly modified all temperatures. S Changed B distractor to CDP-1 A from FWP-2A for plausibility. H 2 E 103A2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. What is wrong with diverse containment isolation? 8 59 could be argued as correct. NEW S CR3 - No change.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO utE! U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 U 103K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is asking for the physical connections 60 and/or cause effect relationships between the reactor building and the containment cooling system, not the containment spray system. Unless the only cooling for the RS is containment spray) BANK Develop a question on RB coolers/fans. Cause and effect. 8/13/2009 CR3 - Replaced question. H 2 S BW/A02AG2.2.12 Question Kind of matches KIA. SAT 61 NEW 5S eR3 CR3 - No change. H 2 E BW/A06AK1.3 Question kind of matches KIA. 15 Is there anything wrong with using MUV-31 62 locally? If not you should state in the stem lAW AP-990. BANK 5S CR3 - Added lAW AP-990 to stem.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 8ack- Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U BW/A07AK2.1 Question may not meet KIA. Asked for another opinion. Determined that 63 question did not meet KIA. CR3 eR3 - Wrote new question. H 2 E BW/E04EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Very similar to # 25 on the SRO examination. 64 BANK CR3 - No change. Compared with SRO #25 S on 8/13/09 and determined to be SAT. F 2 X X X Y BW/E08EA1.1 Question kind of matches KIA. )( Some cueing in stem. Distractors Band D 0 do 65 not appear to be plausible. How could SW temperatures exceed design limits if the coolers were degraded / fouled? Which ONE of the following describes the reason for ensuring only 1 ES selected RB cooling unit is running in low speed per EOP-8A SA ... MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 - Modified stem slightly. Determined SAT with this change on 8-13-09. - ~
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 #/ Back-8ack- Q= SRO utE! U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.1.3 Question appears to match KIA. K/A. Distractor 0 is not plausible. What kind of 66 turnover between the OACOAG and BOP is required? Need to add this to make better choices. (better discriminating value) NEW Gerry to write new distractor for D. 8-19-09 CR3-H 2 X E G2.1.36 Question appears to match KIA. K/A. Distractor C does not make sense. Cease 67 insertion of fuel assembly? What will the crew do with it? Stop and hold it in place. Please explain why this is plausible. BANK 5 CR3 - Modified C distractor. F 2 S G2.1.40 Question appears to match KIA. K/A. SAT 68 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). 5 CR3 - No change
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other
    5. 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (F/H) (1-5) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- 0= Q= SRO SAO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.2.20 Question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if distractor D is plausible. Did not see in AI-500 69 where this was an option at any time. BANK 5 eR3 - No change. S F 2 S G2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Place wide range and narrow range in front of RS RB 70 sump level (Le. wide range RS RB sump level and ... ) Otherwise SAT. BANK 5 S eR3 - Modified as requested. F 2 X U G2.3.11 May not meet KIA. How are operators I/ plant controlling the release? Asked for a 71 second opinion. Distractors Sand Band C do not appear to be plausible. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified. Will write a containment release (RMA (RMA1)
    1) that does not totally isolate.
    eR3 - Modified as discussed.
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- Q= SRO utE! U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S G2.3.12 Question appears to match KJ K/A. SAT 72 BANK S CR3 - Modified stem to remove fluff. No change in intent. F 2 S 2.3.14 Question appears to match KJ K/A. SAT Not very discriminating. 73 NEW S CR3 - No change. F 2 X U 2.4.35 Question kind of matches KIA.KJA. Distractors B &0 &D are not plausible. Do the 74 480V switchgear rooms have DC knife switches located in them? BANK Will work on another angle to make better distractors. CR3 - Removed "knife switch" from stem and modified C and D 0 distractors. ~ --
    1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.
    Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 8ack-Back- Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E G2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Could the shift manager also be the procedure 75 director? NEW S eR3 - Not unless aU all the other SROs were unavailable. The SM could, but lAW AI-505, AI-50S, he would not due to other duties. 40 Sats, J4 Unsats, and 21 Enhancements 10 Generic Comments: All bank or modified questions should have the answers rotated from original (i.e. if the answer was originally A, swap the correct answer to B, C, or D. Need to see the original questions for all modified questions. ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist I Facility: Crystal River 3 Date of Exam: 09/22/2009 Exam Level: RO/SRO I Initials Item Description a b c
    1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
    ~ MA IJ
    2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented /i/{
    1/ f/ ~
    3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors  :/
    (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 9t .~ ~[L f
    4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on theSRO-only) reviewed in detail 9~
    5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 1#/,
    6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants If Printed Name/Signature Date
    a. Grader
    b. Facility Reviewer(*)
    c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
    d. NRC Supervisor (*)
    (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. required . ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facili f.~u£lZ f(~uf.lZ :lt3 J:1:3 Date of Exam: 'T-~~-O~ '1-~~~~~ Exam Level: RO Initials Item Descri tion a b c 1.
    2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
    3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations
    4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
    5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified
    6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity
    ( of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
    a. Grader
    b. Facility Reviewer(*)
    c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
    d. NRC Supervisor (*)
    (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}
    • Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML093270191&oldid=2560836"