ML061840373: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/29/2005
| issue date = 12/29/2005
| title = E-mail from Boland to House, Follow-up Info
| title = E-mail from Boland to House, Follow-up Info
| author name = Boland A T
| author name = Boland A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| addressee name = House J
| addressee name = House J
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Anne Boland To: John House ,.. _Date: Thu, Dec 29, 2005 7:17 AM  
{{#Wiki_filter:'.
From:               Anne Boland                                                                               I    7 I
To:                 John House                                                                           ,.. _
Date:               Thu, Dec 29, 2005 7:17 AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Fwd: Re: Follow-up Info John -Please develop a response to Pete's comments.
Fwd: Re: Follow-up Info John - Please develop a response to Pete's comments. His comments are relative to the his document that you revised yesturday - I'd like to get him the feedback and close this out this am. We have ongoing inspection into what they did in 1998/2000 so we will want to add that caveat.
His comments are relative to the his document that you revised yesturday  
Also, Marty Virgilio would like for us to develop a Q&A for the comm plan for the following question. We can work with Roland/Jan on this:
-I'd like to get him the feedback and close this out this am. We have ongoing inspection into what they did in 1998/2000 so we will want to add that caveat.Also, Marty Virgilio would like for us to develop a Q&A for the comm plan for the following question.
Question: The State of Illinois has issued a number of violations to Braidwood. What is the NRC's view or role associated with the state's issuance of the violations?
We can work with Roland/Jan on this: Question:
I still have the comm plan so we can add it before it goes to Reynolds.
The State of Illinois has issued a number of violations to Braidwood.
Anne T. Boland, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety NRC Region III 630-829-9701 CC:                 Jan Strasma; Roland Lickus; Steven West deleted
What is the NRC's view or role associated with the state's issuance of the violations?
.iormation in this record was
I still have the comm plan so we can add it before it goes to Reynolds.Anne T. Boland, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety NRC Region III 630-829-9701 CC: Jan Strasma; Roland Lickus; Steven West'.I 7 I.iormation in this record was deleted*1 accordance
*1accordance #ith the Freedom of informationi                                                               \py$
#ith the Freedom of informationi Act, exemptions FOIA- '06 -\py$
Act, exemptions FOIA-             '06 -
From: To: Date:  
 
From:             Peter Habighorst To:               Anne Boland Date:             Thu, Dec 29, 2005 6:02 AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Peter Habighorst Anne Boland Thu, Dec 29, 2005 6:02 AM Re: Follow-up Info 2 0 V Thanks Anne, The one feedback item on the comments ..... I think we want to specifically discuss Braidwood's RETS limits. The limits should focus on tritium in the drinking water supply (i.e. gaseous limits and dose to organs should be eliminated)..I think we should try to put in prespective either the Appendix I or 10 CFR 20 limits based upon practical applications (i.e. concentration of X pci/L, taken internally of this amount would result in X mrem/yr or Y mrem/quarter  
Re: Follow-up Info                                                                       2 Thanks Anne, The one feedback item on the comments ..... I think we want to specifically discuss Braidwood's RETS limits. The limits should focus on tritium in the drinking water supply (i.e. gaseous limits and dose to organs should be eliminated)..I think we should try to put in prespective either the Appendix I or 10 CFR 20 limits based upon practical applications (i.e. concentration of X pci/L, taken internally of this amount would result in X mrem/yr or Y mrem/quarter ......
......Thanks for all of'yor help and have a good new year .....>>> Anne Boland 12128/05 5:12 PM >>>Pete -We took a look at your document and would offer a few comments.
0V Thanks for all of'yor help and have a good new year .....
See what you think and give me a call if you have questions.
  >>> Anne Boland 12128/05 5:12 PM >>>
I am also attaching the latest version of the comm plan which addresses some of the issues (note -its still in concurrence).
Pete - We took a look at your document and would offer a few comments. See what you think and give me a call ifyou have questions. I am also attaching the latest version of the comm plan which addresses some of the issues (note - its still in concurrence).
Let me know if this is what you were looking for. I will be in the rest of the week.Anne T. Boland, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety NRC Region III 630-829-9701 CC: Steven West}}
Let me know if this is what you were looking for. I will be in the rest of the week.
Anne T. Boland, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety NRC Region III 630-829-9701 CC:               Steven West}}

Latest revision as of 17:43, 23 November 2019

E-mail from Boland to House, Follow-up Info
ML061840373
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/29/2005
From: Boland A
NRC/RGN-III
To: House J
NRC/RGN-III
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0115
Download: ML061840373 (2)
v • d • e


Text

'.

From: Anne Boland I 7 I

To: John House ,.. _

Date: Thu, Dec 29, 2005 7:17 AM

Subject:

Fwd: Re: Follow-up Info John - Please develop a response to Pete's comments. His comments are relative to the his document that you revised yesturday - I'd like to get him the feedback and close this out this am. We have ongoing inspection into what they did in 1998/2000 so we will want to add that caveat.

Also, Marty Virgilio would like for us to develop a Q&A for the comm plan for the following question. We can work with Roland/Jan on this:

Question: The State of Illinois has issued a number of violations to Braidwood. What is the NRC's view or role associated with the state's issuance of the violations?

I still have the comm plan so we can add it before it goes to Reynolds.

Anne T. Boland, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety NRC Region III 630-829-9701 CC: Jan Strasma; Roland Lickus; Steven West deleted

.iormation in this record was

  • 1accordance #ith the Freedom of informationi \py$

Act, exemptions FOIA- '06 -

From: Peter Habighorst To: Anne Boland Date: Thu, Dec 29, 2005 6:02 AM

Subject:

Re: Follow-up Info 2 Thanks Anne, The one feedback item on the comments ..... I think we want to specifically discuss Braidwood's RETS limits. The limits should focus on tritium in the drinking water supply (i.e. gaseous limits and dose to organs should be eliminated)..I think we should try to put in prespective either the Appendix I or 10 CFR 20 limits based upon practical applications (i.e. concentration of X pci/L, taken internally of this amount would result in X mrem/yr or Y mrem/quarter ......

0V Thanks for all of'yor help and have a good new year .....

>>> Anne Boland 12128/05 5:12 PM >>>

Pete - We took a look at your document and would offer a few comments. See what you think and give me a call ifyou have questions. I am also attaching the latest version of the comm plan which addresses some of the issues (note - its still in concurrence).

Let me know if this is what you were looking for. I will be in the rest of the week.

Anne T. Boland, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety NRC Region III 630-829-9701 CC: Steven West

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML061840373&oldid=2189576"