ML061870175: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/03/2004
| issue date = 08/03/2004
| title = Email from Berlrf@Inel.Gov to D. Loveless (Riv), Subject: Cooper Model Comparisons
| title = Email from Berlrf@Inel.Gov to D. Loveless (Riv), Subject: Cooper Model Comparisons
| author name = Buell R F
| author name = Buell R
| author affiliation = Idaho National Engineering & Environmental Lab (INEEL)
| author affiliation = Idaho National Engineering & Environmental Lab (INEEL)
| addressee name = Loveless D P
| addressee name = Loveless D
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV
| docket = 05000298
| docket = 05000298
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:iDavid Loveless -Cooper Model Comparisons Pe Paa 1
{{#Wiki_filter:iDavid Loveless - Cooper Model Comparisons                                                 Pe Paa 1
-Cooper Model Comparisons From: <BUELRF@ inel.gov>To: "David Loveless'  
*'David--Love]ess From:               <BUELRF@ inel.gov>
<DPL@nrc.gov>
To:                 "David Loveless' <DPL@nrc.gov>
Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2004 1:05 PM  
Date:               Tue, Aug 3, 2004 1:05 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Cooper Model Comparisons Dave, I have reviewed the four models that you sent to me and have identified the differences between them. I compared the NRC-Base to the NPPD-Base and I compared the NRC-Current to the NPPD-Current.
Cooper Model Comparisons Dave, I have reviewed the four models that you sent to me and have identified the differences between them. I compared the NRC-Base to the NPPD-Base and I compared the NRC-Current to the NPPD-Current.
NRC-Base to the NPPD-Base The only logic difference between the two models was in the 'DG-ESW fault tree under gate "DG-ESW-ESW".
NRC-Base to the NPPD-Base The only logic difference between the two models was in the 'DG-ESW fault tree under gate "DG-ESW-ESW". The NPPD model used a 2/4 gate while the NRC model used a 3/4 gate at this location. Itappears that the NPPD model is correct in that it agrees with our base model.
The NPPD model used a 2/4 gate while the NRC model used a 3/4 gate at this location.
The only other model difference is in the data values for the EDGs failing to run. The NPPD-Base model incorrectly uses a 3.5 hour mission for EPS-DGN-FR-FTRM in lieu of the correct 13.5 hour mission used in the NRC-Base model. Similarly, the EPS-DGN-FR-FTRL values also differ.
It appears that the NPPD model is correct in that it agrees with our base model.The only other model difference is in the data values for the EDGs failing to run. The NPPD-Base model incorrectly uses a 3.5 hour mission for EPS-DGN-FR-FTRM in lieu of the correct 13.5 hour mission used in the NRC-Base model. Similarly, the EPS-DGN-FR-FTRL values also differ.NRC-Current to the NPPD-Current The only logic difference between the two models was in the 'DG-ESW fault tree under gate "DG-ESW-ESW".
NRC-Current to the NPPD-Current The only logic difference between the two models was in the 'DG-ESW fault tree under gate "DG-ESW-ESW". The NPPD model used a 2/4 gate while the NRC model used a 3/4 gate at this location. It appears that the NPPD model is correct in that it agrees with our base model.
The NPPD model used a 2/4 gate while the NRC model used a 3/4 gate at this location.
The NRC-Current model has removed all of the elements within the following flag sets: LOOP, LOOP-1HR, LOOP-2HR, LOOP-4HR, LOOP-10HR and SBO. For the model to operate correctly, the elements within these flags must be restored.
It appears that the NPPD model is correct in that it agrees with our base model.The NRC-Current model has removed all of the elements within the following flag sets: LOOP, LOOP-1HR, LOOP-2HR, LOOP-4HR, LOOP-10HR and SBO. For the model to operate correctly, the elements within these flags must be restored.The only other model difference is in the data values for the EDGs failing to run. The NPPD-Base model incorrectly uses a 3.5 hour mission for EPS-DGN-FR-FTRM in lieu of the correct 13.5 hour mission used in the NRC-Base model. Similarly, the EPS-DGN-FR-FTRL values also differ.I did not perform a Current-vs-Base comparison but I can if so desired.Thanks, Robert Buell Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3850 Phone: 208-526-9400 FAX: 208-526-2930}}
The only other model difference is in the data values for the EDGs failing to run. The NPPD-Base model incorrectly uses a 3.5 hour mission for EPS-DGN-FR-FTRM in lieu of the correct 13.5 hour mission used in the NRC-Base model. Similarly, the EPS-DGN-FR-FTRL values also differ.
I did not perform a Current-vs-Base comparison but I can if so desired.
Thanks, Robert Buell Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3850 Phone: 208-526-9400 FAX: 208-526-2930}}

Latest revision as of 17:36, 23 November 2019

Email from Berlrf@Inel.Gov to D. Loveless (Riv), Subject: Cooper Model Comparisons
ML061870175
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/2004
From: Buell R
Idaho National Engineering & Environmental Lab (INEEL)
To: David Loveless
NRC Region 4
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0007
Download: ML061870175 (1)
v • d • e


Text

iDavid Loveless - Cooper Model Comparisons Pe Paa 1

  • 'David--Love]ess From: <BUELRF@ inel.gov>

To: "David Loveless' <DPL@nrc.gov>

Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2004 1:05 PM

Subject:

Cooper Model Comparisons Dave, I have reviewed the four models that you sent to me and have identified the differences between them. I compared the NRC-Base to the NPPD-Base and I compared the NRC-Current to the NPPD-Current.

NRC-Base to the NPPD-Base The only logic difference between the two models was in the 'DG-ESW fault tree under gate "DG-ESW-ESW". The NPPD model used a 2/4 gate while the NRC model used a 3/4 gate at this location. Itappears that the NPPD model is correct in that it agrees with our base model.

The only other model difference is in the data values for the EDGs failing to run. The NPPD-Base model incorrectly uses a 3.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> mission for EPS-DGN-FR-FTRM in lieu of the correct 13.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> mission used in the NRC-Base model. Similarly, the EPS-DGN-FR-FTRL values also differ.

NRC-Current to the NPPD-Current The only logic difference between the two models was in the 'DG-ESW fault tree under gate "DG-ESW-ESW". The NPPD model used a 2/4 gate while the NRC model used a 3/4 gate at this location. It appears that the NPPD model is correct in that it agrees with our base model.

The NRC-Current model has removed all of the elements within the following flag sets: LOOP, LOOP-1HR, LOOP-2HR, LOOP-4HR, LOOP-10HR and SBO. For the model to operate correctly, the elements within these flags must be restored.

The only other model difference is in the data values for the EDGs failing to run. The NPPD-Base model incorrectly uses a 3.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> mission for EPS-DGN-FR-FTRM in lieu of the correct 13.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> mission used in the NRC-Base model. Similarly, the EPS-DGN-FR-FTRL values also differ.

I did not perform a Current-vs-Base comparison but I can if so desired.

Thanks, Robert Buell Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3850 Phone: 208-526-9400 FAX: 208-526-2930

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML061870175&oldid=2189412"