ML15306A497: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SEn | {{#Wiki_filter:SEn tergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 October 30, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power | |||
MA | |||
Commission | Commission | ||
ATTN: Document | ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 | ||
Control | SUBJECT: Reply to a Notice of Violation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35 REFERENCE: | ||
DC 20555-0001 | NRC Letter to Entergy, "Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Problem Identification | ||
SUBJECT:Reply to a Notice of Violation | |||
Pilgrim Nuclear Power | |||
NRC Letter to Entergy, | |||
"Pilgrim | |||
Nuclear Power Station - | |||
and Resolution | and Resolution | ||
Inspection 05000293/201 | Inspection 05000293/201 | ||
5010 | 5010 and Notices of Violation," dated October 1, 2015 LETTER NUMBER: 2.15.077 Dear Sir or Madam, This letter provides the information | ||
dated October 1, | |||
the information | |||
requested | requested | ||
in the Notice of Violation | in the Notice of Violation | ||
received | received at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in the above referenced | ||
at | |||
letter. The requested | letter. The requested | ||
information | information | ||
is provided | is provided in the Attachment | ||
to this letter.This letter contains no commitments. | |||
to this letter.This letter contains | |||
no commitments. | |||
Should you have any questions | Should you have any questions | ||
concerning | concerning | ||
the content of this letter or require additional | the content of this letter or require additional | ||
information, | information, please contact me at (508) 830-8227.Sincerely, Manager, Emergency | ||
please contact me at (508) 830-8227. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Manager, | |||
Emergency | |||
Preparedness | Preparedness | ||
DC/ | DC/mew Attachment: | ||
Reply to a Notice of Violation | Reply to a Notice of Violation | ||
(2 Pages) | (2 Pages) | ||
PNPS Letter 2.15. | PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Page 2 of 2 Cc: Mr. Daniel H. Dorman Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Administrator, | |||
Region | |||
Commission | Commission | ||
2100 Renaissance | 2100 Renaissance | ||
Boulevard, | Boulevard, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-1 415 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station | ||
Suite | |||
PA 19406-1 | |||
Inspector | |||
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station | |||
Attachment | Attachment | ||
To PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Reply to a Notice of Violation (2 Pages) | |||
(2 Pages) | |||
Attachment | Attachment | ||
to PNPS Letter 2.15. | to PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Page 1 of 2 Reply to Notice of Violation During an NRC inspection | ||
During an NRC inspection | |||
conducted | conducted | ||
from August 3 through 20, 2015, a violation | from August 3 through 20, 2015, a violation | ||
of | of NRC requirements | ||
was identified. | was identified. | ||
The violation | The violation | ||
Line 83: | Line 59: | ||
No. Description | No. Description | ||
201 5010-02 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) | 201 5010-02 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) | ||
requires, | requires, in part, that a holder of a nuclear power reactor operating | ||
in part, that a holder of a nuclear | license shall follow and maintain the effectiveness | ||
license shall follow and maintain | of an emergency | ||
the effectiveness | |||
plan that meets the requirements | plan that meets the requirements | ||
in Appendix | in Appendix E to this part, and the planning standards | ||
E to | of 10 CFR 50.47(b).10 CFR 50.47(b) (8) requires, in part, that adequate equipment | ||
standards | to support the emergency | ||
of 10 CFR 50.47(b). | response are provided and maintained. | ||
10 CFR 50.47(b) | Contrary to the above, since December 2011, Entergy did not follow and maintain the effectiveness | ||
(8) requires, | |||
in part, that adequate | |||
equipment | |||
response | |||
are provided | |||
and maintained. | |||
Contrary | |||
to the above, since December | |||
2011, Entergy did not | |||
the effectiveness | |||
of the Pilgrim Emergency | of the Pilgrim Emergency | ||
Plan to | Plan to meet the requirement | ||
that adequate | that adequate equipment | ||
equipment | to support the emergency response was provided and maintained. | ||
to support the emergency | Specifically, in December 2011, Entergy cancelled | ||
response | |||
was provided | |||
and maintained. | |||
Specifically, | |||
in | |||
preventive | preventive | ||
maintenance | maintenance | ||
of the 160' back- | of the 160' back-up meteorological | ||
tower, and that tower became non-functional. | tower, and that tower became non-functional. | ||
As | As a result, on eight occasions | ||
between March 18, 2012, and August 15,2015, when the 220' primary meteorological | between March 18, 2012, and August 15, 2015, when the 220' primary meteorological | ||
tower was also non-functional | tower was also non-functional | ||
for various reasons, | for various reasons, Pilgrim did not have instrumentation | ||
Pilgrim did not have instrumentation | |||
available | available | ||
on either tower for continuous | on either tower for continuous | ||
reading of the wind speed, | reading of the wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, and delta air temperature. | ||
air temperature, | |||
and delta air temperature. | |||
Attachment | Attachment | ||
to PNPS Letter 2.15. | to PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Page 2 of 2 VIOLATION | ||
201 5010-02 -Failure to Maintain | 201 5010-02 -Failure to Maintain Station Meteorological | ||
Station Meteorological | Towers Reason for the Violation During the 2015 NRC Problem Identification | ||
and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection | |||
During the 2015 NRC Problem Identification | a Green Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued for failure to follow and maintain the effectiveness | ||
and Resolution | of the Pilgrim Emergency | ||
(PI&R) Inspection | |||
a Green | |||
(NOV) was issued for failure to follow and maintain | |||
the effectiveness | |||
of the | |||
Plan to meet the requirement | Plan to meet the requirement | ||
that adequate | that adequate equipment | ||
equipment | to support the emergency response was provided and maintained. | ||
to support the emergency | The failure to properly maintain the 220' tower and restore or replace the 160' tower was previously | ||
response | |||
was provided | |||
and maintained. | |||
The failure to properly | |||
maintain | |||
the 220' tower | |||
identified | identified | ||
in Non-Cited | in Non-Cited | ||
Violation | Violation (NCV)2013008-02 | ||
(NCV)2013008-02 | |||
issued for violation | issued for violation | ||
of 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2). | of 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2). | ||
Line 161: | Line 104: | ||
Entergy did not address the adverse condition | Entergy did not address the adverse condition | ||
within a reasonable | within a reasonable | ||
period of time after the | period of time after the NRC documented | ||
the initial Green NOV.An organizational | the initial Green NOV.An organizational | ||
performance | performance | ||
Line 168: | Line 111: | ||
monitoring | monitoring | ||
and issue resolution | and issue resolution | ||
did not have a single point of ownership, | did not have a single point of ownership, such that the priority to resolve issues was not properly evaluated | ||
such that the priority | |||
evaluated | |||
to ensure timely resolution. | to ensure timely resolution. | ||
As a consequence, | As a consequence, previously | ||
previously | |||
identified | identified | ||
corrective | corrective | ||
actions were untimely | actions were untimely with inadequate | ||
with inadequate | |||
organizational | organizational | ||
engagement | engagement | ||
to monitor performance | to monitor performance | ||
or resolve issues.Corrective | or resolve issues.Corrective | ||
steps' that have been taken and the results | steps' that have been taken and the results achieved The Emergency | ||
Preparedness | Preparedness | ||
Department | Department (EPD) has taken ownership | ||
(EPD) has taken ownership | |||
of the meteorological | of the meteorological | ||
towers. The EPD obtained | towers. The EPD obtained the necessary | ||
the necessary | project funding, engineering | ||
project funding, | design support, and installation | ||
engineering | |||
design support, | |||
support to install the replacement | support to install the replacement | ||
160' tower. The tower structure | 160' tower. The tower structure | ||
is in place. | is in place. The meteorological | ||
instruments | instruments | ||
have been installed. | have been installed. | ||
Post installation | Post installation | ||
testing of the instruments | testing of the instruments | ||
and data communication | |||
system is in progress. | system is in progress.The Regulatory | ||
The Regulatory | |||
Assurance | Assurance | ||
Weekly Report was modified | Weekly Report was modified to include a "deadline" date for completion | ||
to include a "deadline" | |||
date | |||
of corrective | of corrective | ||
actions associated | actions associated | ||
with regulatory | with regulatory | ||
findings. | findings. | ||
Additionally, | Additionally, a Regulatory | ||
a Regulatory | |||
Assurance | Assurance | ||
review has been incorporated | review has been incorporated | ||
as a required | as a required element for corrective | ||
element for corrective | actions associated | ||
with NRC Findings.Corrective | |||
with NRC Findings. | steps that will be taken Post installation | ||
Corrective | |||
steps that will be | |||
testing of the new 160' tower will be completed | testing of the new 160' tower will be completed | ||
and the tower placed in service.Date when full compliance | and the tower placed in service.Date when full compliance | ||
will be | will be achieved The current schedule for resolution | ||
for resolution | is on or before December 16, 2015, at which time full compliance | ||
is on or before December | |||
16, 2015, at which time | |||
to the NRC requirements | to the NRC requirements | ||
will be achieved. | will be achieved. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 20:42, 8 July 2018
ML15306A497 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Pilgrim |
Issue date: | 10/30/2015 |
From: | Calabrese D Entergy Nuclear Operations |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
2.15.077, IR 2015010 | |
Download: ML15306A497 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000293/2015010
Text
SEn tergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 October 30, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
SUBJECT: Reply to a Notice of Violation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35 REFERENCE:
NRC Letter to Entergy, "Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Problem Identification
and Resolution
Inspection 05000293/201
5010 and Notices of Violation," dated October 1, 2015 LETTER NUMBER: 2.15.077 Dear Sir or Madam, This letter provides the information
requested
in the Notice of Violation
received at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in the above referenced
letter. The requested
information
is provided in the Attachment
to this letter.This letter contains no commitments.
Should you have any questions
concerning
the content of this letter or require additional
information, please contact me at (508) 830-8227.Sincerely, Manager, Emergency
Preparedness
DC/mew Attachment:
Reply to a Notice of Violation
(2 Pages)
PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Page 2 of 2 Cc: Mr. Daniel H. Dorman Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
2100 Renaissance
Boulevard, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-1 415 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
Attachment
To PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Reply to a Notice of Violation (2 Pages)
Attachment
to PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Page 1 of 2 Reply to Notice of Violation During an NRC inspection
conducted
from August 3 through 20, 2015, a violation
of NRC requirements
was identified.
The violation
is associated
with the following
requirement:
Violation
No. Description
201 5010-02 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2)
requires, in part, that a holder of a nuclear power reactor operating
license shall follow and maintain the effectiveness
of an emergency
plan that meets the requirements
in Appendix E to this part, and the planning standards
of 10 CFR 50.47(b).10 CFR 50.47(b) (8) requires, in part, that adequate equipment
to support the emergency
response are provided and maintained.
Contrary to the above, since December 2011, Entergy did not follow and maintain the effectiveness
of the Pilgrim Emergency
Plan to meet the requirement
that adequate equipment
to support the emergency response was provided and maintained.
Specifically, in December 2011, Entergy cancelled
preventive
maintenance
of the 160' back-up meteorological
tower, and that tower became non-functional.
As a result, on eight occasions
between March 18, 2012, and August 15, 2015, when the 220' primary meteorological
tower was also non-functional
for various reasons, Pilgrim did not have instrumentation
available
on either tower for continuous
reading of the wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, and delta air temperature.
Attachment
to PNPS Letter 2.15.077 Page 2 of 2 VIOLATION
201 5010-02 -Failure to Maintain Station Meteorological
Towers Reason for the Violation During the 2015 NRC Problem Identification
and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection
a Green Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued for failure to follow and maintain the effectiveness
of the Pilgrim Emergency
Plan to meet the requirement
that adequate equipment
to support the emergency response was provided and maintained.
The failure to properly maintain the 220' tower and restore or replace the 160' tower was previously
identified
in Non-Cited
Violation (NCV)2013008-02
issued for violation
The 2015 PI&R inspection
determined
Entergy did not address the adverse condition
within a reasonable
period of time after the NRC documented
the initial Green NOV.An organizational
performance
gap existed in that the meteorological
towers performance
monitoring
and issue resolution
did not have a single point of ownership, such that the priority to resolve issues was not properly evaluated
to ensure timely resolution.
As a consequence, previously
identified
corrective
actions were untimely with inadequate
organizational
engagement
to monitor performance
or resolve issues.Corrective
steps' that have been taken and the results achieved The Emergency
Preparedness
Department (EPD) has taken ownership
of the meteorological
towers. The EPD obtained the necessary
project funding, engineering
design support, and installation
support to install the replacement
160' tower. The tower structure
is in place. The meteorological
instruments
have been installed.
Post installation
testing of the instruments
and data communication
system is in progress.The Regulatory
Assurance
Weekly Report was modified to include a "deadline" date for completion
of corrective
actions associated
with regulatory
findings.
Additionally, a Regulatory
Assurance
review has been incorporated
as a required element for corrective
actions associated
with NRC Findings.Corrective
steps that will be taken Post installation
testing of the new 160' tower will be completed
and the tower placed in service.Date when full compliance
will be achieved The current schedule for resolution
is on or before December 16, 2015, at which time full compliance
to the NRC requirements
will be achieved.