ML18023A665: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/8/18 4:24 PM Received:
January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-evp3 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry*Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:
NRC-2017-02ll-DRAFT-0026 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter
'Information Name: Sharon Torrisi General Comment (!j) f J. F /2. sJ. 9~t/ // / 15 / J-{)/7 THIN CANS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE WASTE STORAGE SYSTEMS. THICK CASKS ARE MORE APPROPRIATE.
SUNS! Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= J'<<fYJ t:.y 51?1 ;pil { )tt.S 5J https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/
getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8:f953
&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018}}

Latest revision as of 04:18, 6 July 2018

Comment (25) of Sharon Torrisi Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18023A665
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From: Torrisi S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00025, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18023A665 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/8/18 4:24 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-evp3 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry*Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-02ll-DRAFT-0026 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter 'Information Name: Sharon Torrisi General Comment (!j) f J. F /2. sJ. 9~t/ // / 15 / J-{)/7 THIN CANS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE WASTE STORAGE SYSTEMS. THICK CASKS ARE MORE APPROPRIATE. SUNS! Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= J'<<fYJ t:.y 51?1 ;pil { )tt.S 5J https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8:f953 &format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018}}