ML18033A593: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 9:53 AM Received:
January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-lb51 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG -SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Document:
NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0058 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734
_ A~d= :J~hl~ c.jec.s:SJ Submitter Information
(!) 't ;J, Pl< 6;Jf:fl.f(f Name: Patrick Bosold 11 /;3/;;~17 General Comment It is almost unbelievable that any regulatory agency would approve thin casks for storage of nuclear waste. The risks are so high and the benefits are so modest and short-sighted that it defies common sense, basic principles of safety engineering and reams of science on the \ Dry cask storage that is safe and reliable is already available.
Make the power companies, investor-owned utilities and the others who have generated this waste deal with it properly -and tell them that it is NOT acceptable to use thin cask technology that exposes millions of people to horrific risk for the sake of reduced cost and increased profits. https://www .fdms.gov/fdms/
getcontent?objectld=0900006482d907 e2&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}}

Latest revision as of 03:59, 6 July 2018

Comment (57) of Patrick Bosold Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A593
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From: Bosold P
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00057, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18033A593 (1)
v • d • e


Text

As of: 1/9/18 9:53 AM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-lb51 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG -SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Document:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0058 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734

_ A~d= :J~hl~ c.jec.s:SJ Submitter Information

(!) 't ;J, Pl< 6;Jf:fl.f(f Name: Patrick Bosold 11 /;3/;;~17 General Comment It is almost unbelievable that any regulatory agency would approve thin casks for storage of nuclear waste. The risks are so high and the benefits are so modest and short-sighted that it defies common sense, basic principles of safety engineering and reams of science on the \ Dry cask storage that is safe and reliable is already available.

Make the power companies, investor-owned utilities and the others who have generated this waste deal with it properly -and tell them that it is NOT acceptable to use thin cask technology that exposes millions of people to horrific risk for the sake of reduced cost and increased profits. https://www .fdms.gov/fdms/

getcontent?objectld=0900006482d907 e2&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18033A593&oldid=809938"