ML18033A603: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 9:56 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 , PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-gtgt Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0065 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 I. ---S.ubmitter Information ~* fJ. FR 5J Cfl/1/ Name: Edward Hopkins Address: 4978 Niagara Ave #9 | {{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 9:56 AM Received: | ||
* San Diego, CA, 92107 Email: edwardehopkins@yahoo.com 11 /1,1" /tf(0/7 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= J~~~m,#t C..Y<s 5.J **---*---------------**------------------*-**--*--------~--------*-*--*--*-~--------------~--*-----*----' General Comment As a Dartmoth College trained scientist and engineer with 20 years of experience I am completely shocked by the decision to use light walled steel cases in such close vicinity to salt water which degrades metal at a very fast rate, not. to mention the earthquake and tsunami risk. Clearly the Yucca Mountain project would have been the most intelligent long term storage option and it is unfortunate that bipartisan bickering has destroyed a national resource. The danger with this project is not only the risk of a radiation leak that could affect tens of millions if Southern California residents, but that it also will set legal precedence for all other reactor waste storage sites across the nation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 This is a poorly planned project that does not even meet minimum military standards even though it is on leased Navy property, and is a political boondoggle that will continue to significantly degrade the reputation of anyone who chooses to fight for it until some reasonable and intelligent optJon is at least considered. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}} | January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 , PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-gtgt Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: | ||
NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0065 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 I. ---S.ubmitter Information | |||
~* fJ. FR 5J Cfl/1/ Name: Edward Hopkins Address: 4978 Niagara Ave #9 | |||
* San Diego, CA, 92107 Email: edwardehopkins@yahoo.com 11 /1,1" /tf(0/7 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= J~~~m,#t C..Y<s 5.J **---*---------------**-------------- | |||
----*-**--*--------~--------*-*--*--*-~--------------~--*-----*----' | |||
General Comment As a Dartmoth College trained scientist and engineer with 20 years of experience I am completely shocked by the decision to use light walled steel cases in such close vicinity to salt water which degrades metal at a very fast rate, not. to mention the earthquake and tsunami risk. Clearly the Yucca Mountain project would have been the most intelligent long term storage option and it is unfortunate that bipartisan bickering has destroyed a national resource. | |||
The danger with this project is not only the risk of a radiation leak that could affect tens of millions if Southern California residents, but that it also will set legal precedence for all other reactor waste storage sites across the nation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 This is a poorly planned project that does not even meet minimum military standards even though it is on leased Navy property, and is a political boondoggle that will continue to significantly degrade the reputation of anyone who chooses to fight for it until some reasonable and intelligent optJon is at least considered. | |||
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}} | |||
Latest revision as of 02:59, 6 July 2018
| ML18033A603 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/2018 |
| From: | Hopkins E - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 82FR52944 00064, NRC-2017-0211 | |
| Download: ML18033A603 (2) | |
Text
As of: 1/9/18 9:56 AM Received:
January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 , PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-gtgt Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:
NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0065 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 I. ---S.ubmitter Information
~* fJ. FR 5J Cfl/1/ Name: Edward Hopkins Address: 4978 Niagara Ave #9
- San Diego, CA, 92107 Email: edwardehopkins@yahoo.com 11 /1,1" /tf(0/7 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= J~~~m,#t C..Y<s 5.J **---*---------------**--------------
*-**--*--------~--------*-*--*--*-~--------------~--*-----*----'
General Comment As a Dartmoth College trained scientist and engineer with 20 years of experience I am completely shocked by the decision to use light walled steel cases in such close vicinity to salt water which degrades metal at a very fast rate, not. to mention the earthquake and tsunami risk. Clearly the Yucca Mountain project would have been the most intelligent long term storage option and it is unfortunate that bipartisan bickering has destroyed a national resource.
The danger with this project is not only the risk of a radiation leak that could affect tens of millions if Southern California residents, but that it also will set legal precedence for all other reactor waste storage sites across the nation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 This is a poorly planned project that does not even meet minimum military standards even though it is on leased Navy property, and is a political boondoggle that will continue to significantly degrade the reputation of anyone who chooses to fight for it until some reasonable and intelligent optJon is at least considered.
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018