ML13196A205: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Craver, PattiFrom: Egan, Joseph [jeganl@entergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:18 PMTo: Balsam, Briana
==Subject:==
RE: Pilgrim clarification question...
Briana,We completed dredging the intake canal (a.k.a. channel, embayment) at the end of last year (2011).Let me check and get back to you regarding any future dredging plans we might have.Thanks,JoeFrom: Balsam, Briana [mailto:Briana.Balsam0nrcoov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:26 PMTo: Egan, Joseph
==Subject:==
FW: Pilgrim clarification question...
Joe,I got (yet another!)
question from Julie Crocker at NMFS. The first part of her question is easy-the NRC doesnot require dredging in the Pilgrim operating license.
For the second part, the NRC's SEIS states that Entergyhas no plans to dredge the intake canal (Section 4.8., page 4-75, paragraph 2), but I wanted to check with youto make sure that this is still an accurate statement before sending Julie a response.
Thanks!BrianaBriana A. BalsamBiologist Division of License RenewalOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1042 briana.balsam@nrc.gov From: Julie Crocker [mallto:iulie.crockeranoaa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:20 PMTo: Balsam, Brlana
==Subject:==
Pilgrim clarification question...
\\( y*) (&~Hi Briana -I am working on addressing edits to our consultation letter -- the issue of dredging has come up. Could youplease clarify whether maintenance dredging of the intake canal or any other location is required as part of the1 6 113 license and whether NRC considers dredging as part of the action under consideration?
Thanks,JulieJulie CrockerProtected Resources DivisionNortheast Regional OfficeNational Marine Fisheries Service55 Great Republic DriveGloucester, MA 019302}}

Revision as of 22:01, 4 July 2018

Email from J. Egan, Entergy to B. Balsam, NRR Pilgrim Clarification Question.
ML13196A205
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 05/08/2012
From: Egan J
Entergy Corp
To: Balsam B A
Division of License Renewal
References
FOIA/PA-2013-0135
Download: ML13196A205 (2)


Text

Craver, PattiFrom: Egan, Joseph [jeganl@entergy.com]

Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:18 PMTo: Balsam, Briana

Subject:

RE: Pilgrim clarification question...

Briana,We completed dredging the intake canal (a.k.a. channel, embayment) at the end of last year (2011).Let me check and get back to you regarding any future dredging plans we might have.Thanks,JoeFrom: Balsam, Briana [1]

Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:26 PMTo: Egan, Joseph

Subject:

FW: Pilgrim clarification question...

Joe,I got (yet another!)

question from Julie Crocker at NMFS. The first part of her question is easy-the NRC doesnot require dredging in the Pilgrim operating license.

For the second part, the NRC's SEIS states that Entergyhas no plans to dredge the intake canal (Section 4.8., page 4-75, paragraph 2), but I wanted to check with youto make sure that this is still an accurate statement before sending Julie a response.

Thanks!BrianaBriana A. BalsamBiologist Division of License RenewalOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1042 briana.balsam@nrc.gov From: Julie Crocker [mallto:iulie.crockeranoaa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:20 PMTo: Balsam, Brlana

Subject:

Pilgrim clarification question...

\\( y*) (&~Hi Briana -I am working on addressing edits to our consultation letter -- the issue of dredging has come up. Could youplease clarify whether maintenance dredging of the intake canal or any other location is required as part of the1 6 113 license and whether NRC considers dredging as part of the action under consideration?

Thanks,JulieJulie CrockerProtected Resources DivisionNortheast Regional OfficeNational Marine Fisheries Service55 Great Republic DriveGloucester, MA 019302