ML15100A367: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Miller, EdSent:Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:01 PMTo:lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Miller, Ed Sent:Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:01 PM To:lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for Request to Use a Later Edition of the ASME CodeLarry, By letter dated March 16, 2015, Duke Energy submitted a request for Catawba Nuclear Station (CNS). The request was to use a later edition of the ASME Code (TAC Nos. MF5866 & MF5867).
Acceptance Review for Request to Us e a Later Edition of the ASME CodeLarry, By letter dated March 16, 2015, Duke Energy submitted a request for Catawba Nuclear Station (CNS). The request was to use a later edition of the ASME Code (TAC Nos. MF 5866 & MF5867).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plants.   
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plants.   


The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.   
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.   


If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481. G. Edward Miller Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 
If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481.
G. Edward Miller  


Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  1983  Mail Envelope Properties  (Ed.Miller@nrc.gov20150409120000)  
Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  1983  Mail Envelope Properties  (Ed.Miller@nrc.gov20150409120000)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for Request to Use a Later Edition of the ASME Code  Sent Date:  4/9/2015 12:00:56 PM  Received Date:  4/9/2015 12:00:00 PM From:    Miller, Ed Created By:  Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:    "lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com" <lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1526      4/9/2015 12:00:00 PM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
Acceptance Review for Request to Use a Later Edition of the ASME Code  Sent Date:  4/9/2015 12:00:56 PM  Received Date:  4/9/2015 12:00:00 PM From:    Miller, Ed Created By:  Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:    "lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com" <lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1526      4/9/2015 12:00:00 PM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 03:00, 1 July 2018

2015/04/09 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Request to Use a Later Edition of the ASME Code
ML15100A367
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/09/2015
From: Ed Miller
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Rudy L J
Duke Energy Corp
References
TAC MF5866, TAC MF5867
Download: ML15100A367 (2)
v • d • e


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Miller, Ed Sent:Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:01 PM To:lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Request to Us e a Later Edition of the ASME CodeLarry, By letter dated March 16, 2015, Duke Energy submitted a request for Catawba Nuclear Station (CNS). The request was to use a later edition of the ASME Code (TAC Nos. MF 5866 & MF5867).

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plants.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.

If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481.

G. Edward Miller

Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1983 Mail Envelope Properties (Ed.Miller@nrc.gov20150409120000)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Request to Use a Later Edition of the ASME Code Sent Date: 4/9/2015 12:00:56 PM Received Date: 4/9/2015 12:00:00 PM From: Miller, Ed Created By: Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients: "lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com" <lawrence.rudy@duke-energy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1526 4/9/2015 12:00:00 PM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15100A367&oldid=779872"