ML15147A173: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Singal, BalwantSent:Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:07 AMTo:'Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)Cc:'Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Singal, Balwant Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:07 AM To:'Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)
Cc:'Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132)Tim,  By letter dated April 22, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15120A038), Luminant Generation Company LLC, requested approval for alternative to the reactor pressure vessel head penetration weld inspection frequency from 10 to 15 years for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1.
Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Co manche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132)
Tim,  By letter dated April 22, 2015 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15120A038), Luminant Generation Company LLC, requested approval for alternative to the reactor pressure vessel head penetration weld inspection frequency from 10 to 15 years for Comanche Peak Nuclear  


The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
Power Plant, Unit 1.  


If you have any questions, please contact me. Balwant K. Singal Senior Project Manager, Comanche Peak and Columbia Balwant.singal@nrc.gov 301-415-3016 Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  2109  Mail Envelope Properties  (192BB59294514E41B5305C3C82867608018BDBE5A04E)  
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Balwant K. Singal Senior Project Manager, Comanche Peak and Columbia  
 
Balwant.singal@nrc.gov 301-415-3016  
 
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  2109  Mail Envelope Properties  (192BB59294514E41B5305C3C82867608018BDBE5A04E)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132)  Sent Date:  5/27/2015 9:07:23 AM  Received Date:  5/27/2015 9:07:00 AM From:    Singal, Balwant Created By:  Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov Recipients:    "'Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)" <Jack.Hicks@luminant.com>  Tracking Status: None   
Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132)  Sent Date:  5/27/2015 9:07:23 AM  Received Date:  5/27/2015 9:07:00 AM From:    Singal, Balwant Created By:  Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov Recipients:    "'Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)" <Jack.Hicks@luminant.com>  Tracking Status: None   
"'Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)" <Timothy.Hope@luminant.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:  HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov   Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1893      5/27/2015 9:07:00 AM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
"'Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)" <Timothy.Hope@luminant.com>  Tracking Status: None  
 
Post Office:  HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1893      5/27/2015 9:07:00 AM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 23:50, 30 June 2018

2015/05/27 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132)
ML15147A173
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 05/27/2015
From: Singal B K
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Hope T R
Luminant Generation Co
References
TAC MF6132
Download: ML15147A173 (2)


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Singal, Balwant Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:07 AM To:'Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)

Cc:'Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)

Subject:

Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Co manche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132)

Tim, By letter dated April 22, 2015 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15120A038), Luminant Generation Company LLC, requested approval for alternative to the reactor pressure vessel head penetration weld inspection frequency from 10 to 15 years for Comanche Peak Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit 1.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in

sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Balwant K. Singal Senior Project Manager, Comanche Peak and Columbia

Balwant.singal@nrc.gov 301-415-3016

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2109 Mail Envelope Properties (192BB59294514E41B5305C3C82867608018BDBE5A04E)

Subject:

Acceptance Review - Relief Request 1B3-4, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No. MF6132) Sent Date: 5/27/2015 9:07:23 AM Received Date: 5/27/2015 9:07:00 AM From: Singal, Balwant Created By: Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov Recipients: "'Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)" <Jack.Hicks@luminant.com> Tracking Status: None

"'Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)" <Timothy.Hope@luminant.com> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1893 5/27/2015 9:07:00 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: