ML16326A113: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1Burkhardt, JanetFrom:Singal, BalwantSent:Monday, November 21, 2016 9:33 AMTo:Richardson, MichaelCc:hgh6@pge.com; Watford, Margaret
{{#Wiki_filter:1Burkhardt, Janet From:Singal, Balwant Sent:Monday, November 21, 2016 9:33 AM To:Richardson, Michael Cc:hgh6@pge.com; Watford, Margaret


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206, Petition on Apparent Violation of 10 CFR 50.9 by Union of Concerned Scientists for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Implement Alternative SourceMike,  As per guidance of Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions," Part IV, "Petition Review Activities," the licensee may provide voluntary response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff on the issues identified in the petition. Please note that your response will be made publically available and you should provide a copy of your response to the petitioner also at the following address:
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation s (10 CFR) Section 2.206, Petition on Apparent Violation of 10 CFR 50.9 by Union of Concerned Scientists for Diablo Canyon  
 
Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amen dment Request to Implement Alternative SourceMike,  As per guidance of Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions," Part IV, "Petition Review Activities," the licensee may provide voluntary response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff on the issues identified in the petition. Please note that your response will be made publically available and you should provide a copy of your response to the petitioner also at the following address:  
 
Mr. David A. Lochbaum Director, Nuclear Safety Project Union of Concerned Scientists P.O. Box 15316 Chattanooga, TN 37415  
Mr. David A. Lochbaum Director, Nuclear Safety Project Union of Concerned Scientists P.O. Box 15316 Chattanooga, TN 37415  


Please let the NRC staff know as soon as possible if you intend to provide your response. Your response needs to be submitted within 30 days from the date of this e-mail, if you choose to do so.
Please let the NRC staff know as soon as possible if you intend to provide your response. Your response needs to be submitted within 30 days from the date of this e-mail, if you choose to do so.  
Also, please include the petitioner in your distribution list for all future correspondence related to the subject licensing action. Thanks. BalwantK.SingalSeniorProjectManager(DiabloCanyonandWolfCreek)NuclearRegulatoryCommissionDivisionofOperatingReactorLicensingBalwant.Singal@nrc.govTel:(301)4153016Fax:(301)4151222}}
 
Also, please include the petitioner in your distribution list for all future correspondence related to the subject licensing action.
Thanks. BalwantK.SingalSeniorProjectManager(DiabloCanyonandWolfCreek)NuclearRegulatoryCommissionDivisionofOperatingReactorLicensingBalwant.Singal@nrc.govTel:(301)4153016Fax:(301)4151222}}

Revision as of 02:38, 30 June 2018

OEDO-16-00436 - Email to Licensee Voluntary Response to Staff on Issues Identified in Union of Concerned Scientists Petition Re Apparent Violation of 10 CFR 50.9 at Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2
ML16326A113
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/2016
From: Singal B K
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Richardson M
Pacific Gas & Electric Co
Singal B K
References
OEDO-16-00436, CAC MF8123, CAC MF8124
Download: ML16326A113 (1)


Text

1Burkhardt, Janet From:Singal, Balwant Sent:Monday, November 21, 2016 9:33 AM To:Richardson, Michael Cc:hgh6@pge.com; Watford, Margaret

Subject:

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation s (10 CFR) Section 2.206, Petition on Apparent Violation of 10 CFR 50.9 by Union of Concerned Scientists for Diablo Canyon

Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amen dment Request to Implement Alternative SourceMike, As per guidance of Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions," Part IV, "Petition Review Activities," the licensee may provide voluntary response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff on the issues identified in the petition. Please note that your response will be made publically available and you should provide a copy of your response to the petitioner also at the following address:

Mr. David A. Lochbaum Director, Nuclear Safety Project Union of Concerned Scientists P.O. Box 15316 Chattanooga, TN 37415

Please let the NRC staff know as soon as possible if you intend to provide your response. Your response needs to be submitted within 30 days from the date of this e-mail, if you choose to do so.

Also, please include the petitioner in your distribution list for all future correspondence related to the subject licensing action.

Thanks. BalwantK.SingalSeniorProjectManager(DiabloCanyonandWolfCreek)NuclearRegulatoryCommissionDivisionofOperatingReactorLicensingBalwant.Singal@nrc.govTel:(301)4153016Fax:(301)4151222