ML18032A195: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION Docket: NRC-201 7-0211 , As of: 1/8/18 4:51 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 Tracking No. lk2-90pe-tz4e Comments Due: January 02, 2018, Submission Type: Web Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0046 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 ).--*-*-----*----*------*--------* -*--*-----~-----------------------*----------**---~-------*--------*---**--------------------------*-------------Submitter Information Name: T Strohmeier Anonymous General Comment {fj) ~J. ff< ~;l9t/t/ II /15 / 2017 I am terribly disturbed by information that I have read regarding the San Onofre plan for spent fuel dry storage. First of all, I cannot believe that it is being left on the waters edge. Thick casks are the only acceptable
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION Docket: NRC-201 7-0211 , As of: 1/8/18 4:51 PM Received:
* way to ensure our ocean will be protected. Secondly, I am equally disturbed that authorities are even considering the thin temporary storage containers as an option. As a local resident and water enthusiast please make the thick casks the ONLY option on this process. -* SUNSI Review Complete Template= ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= -* .)-(..r-~5Mdft ( J t<s-s:) https://www_.fdms.gov /fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d903 6f&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018}}
January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 Tracking No. lk2-90pe-tz4e Comments Due: January 02, 2018, Submission Type: Web Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:
NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0046 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734  
).--*-*-----*----*------*--------*  
-*--*-----~---
-------------------
-*----------**---~-------*--------*---**--------------------------*-------------
Submitter Information Name: T Strohmeier Anonymous General Comment {fj) ~J. ff< ~;l9t/t/
II /15 / 2017 I am terribly disturbed by information that I have read regarding the San Onofre plan for spent fuel dry storage.
First of all, I cannot believe that it is being left on the waters edge. Thick casks are the only acceptable
* way to ensure our ocean will be protected.  
: Secondly, I am equally disturbed that authorities are even considering the thin temporary storage containers as an option. As a local resident and water enthusiast please make the thick casks the ONLY option on this process.  
-* SUNSI Review Complete Template=
ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= -* .)-(..r-~5Mdft  
( J t<s-s:) https://www_.fdms.gov  
/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d903 6f&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018}}

Revision as of 04:18, 29 June 2018

Comment (45) of T. Strohmeier on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A195
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From: Strohmeier T
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00045, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18032A195 (1)


Text

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Docket: NRC-201 7-0211 , As of: 1/8/18 4:51 PM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 Tracking No. lk2-90pe-tz4e Comments Due: January 02, 2018, Submission Type: Web Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0046 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734

).--*-*-----*----*------*--------*

-*--*-----~---


-*----------**---~-------*--------*---**--------------------------*-------------

Submitter Information Name: T Strohmeier Anonymous General Comment {fj) ~J. ff< ~;l9t/t/

II /15 / 2017 I am terribly disturbed by information that I have read regarding the San Onofre plan for spent fuel dry storage.

First of all, I cannot believe that it is being left on the waters edge. Thick casks are the only acceptable

  • way to ensure our ocean will be protected.
Secondly, I am equally disturbed that authorities are even considering the thin temporary storage containers as an option. As a local resident and water enthusiast please make the thick casks the ONLY option on this process.

-* SUNSI Review Complete Template=

ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= -* .)-(..r-~5Mdft

( J t<s-s:) https://www_.fdms.gov

/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d903 6f&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018