ML15021A457

Comment (26) of 19 Individuals on NRC-2014-0223 Re Storage of Spent Fuel at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

ML15021A457
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	12/30/2014
From:	Gonzales M, Osborne G J, Joshua Wilson - No Known Affiliation
To:	Bladey C K Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
NRC-2014-0223
Download: ML15021A457 (1)

Text

RULE," ' ,'-. cTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC '014 30 Pl 41: 00Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, lAddress: 3-P $a4 .'QS rt -)r-cA /

ULES i-r, .. VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC "3 -Ne 4: 00Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF FI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Ddpartment of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, IName: fAR.'4 41Address: Ca Gt4SALE SA% CAR,.EL CO RULES , 9."- .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 2 -0Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subjecto tpermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name:Address: J0-e'j _--7 7 0zaf, 7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RULELS C lVS?U1LI, ¶iT V, F L, 00R F I\\/ F-0As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a fimal deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name:Address: AtA(54VI05-1 RUL IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0 1 1`7-L 30 P* M 4: 0 1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F FDAs a resident of Laguna Niguel, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name"Street AddressCity State

-F KJICTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey PM qir .j pj' !: 01Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF-! I. , --V 1\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name: v~QCAC~Address: Ct9-h ,La ,o--t RULES " ICTtVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey V1--_ HC -3 PN M: 02Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFCF7!\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name: .-Address: Cv0 RULES .:IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .: 02Office of Administration, NRC 2 1q. 30 2Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F FC-\/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ,.Name:Address: / 5// 4J4 AA 77.

.RULI;S o , '.TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0T, C 10 '4 01: 00Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

V E R-DAs a resident of Newport Beach, which is located within the 25-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Daniel Reitz29 Via AmantiNewport Coast, CA 92657 L,;!_77 iTIVES"; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 79!) *.,h) -5 I'j 2:4 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: /Address:Z2- &I /C-) r)e4 CA/ cm -,2 2-1 , 1 RULE' -TVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7G 0 J; 51 -5 PM 2: 4L6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF, 7 ! DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name: J -- "Address: $? LQ-A vai{

LULE .CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 00 -7 2: 4 5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFC- !\ EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel AName:Address:/92Vk£. Cw RULE I ) MiiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey i,., " PIvTI 38UOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F !- ",/- FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name:Address:

CT ~(I'VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey LU) ! ,3Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

.IAs a resident of Southern California, and a former resident of Corona del Mar, which islocated within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiationaccident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learnthat the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rodson site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final depositrepository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinc ely,NameStreet AddressCity State RULES ..'-, EC.TtVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 1 3 i P .H 36Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name: L -JAddress: ')& qY2, I( 0 P, BULES -L-EC]IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201S 1 3 P11 11: 35Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RP F ,-iFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning fumds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name:4/Address: (jof57r4 ry"A C RULS L' ILIRECTVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2015 -.' p; I: /JOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

JfF-/As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitelyuntil the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognizedtsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terroristattack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there,we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come backto the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name:Address:64qz 5-HUII I VLISU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 3l!:.3J PH tl: 02Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of Califormia were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain the e.Sincerely,Email_, _I HULL.-:.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey PIN? 34i P U: 0(2Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NamemailirIII