ML15021A457
| ML15021A457 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/2014 |
| From: | Gonzales M, Osborne G J, Joshua Wilson - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Bladey C K Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| NRC-2014-0223 | |
| Download: ML15021A457 (1) | |
Text
RULE," ' ,'-. cTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC '014 30 Pl 41: 00 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, l Address: 3-P $a4 .'QS rt -)r-cA /
ULES i-r, .. VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC "3 -Ne 4: 00 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF FI\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Ddpartment of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I Name: fAR.'4 41 Address: Ca Gt4SALE S A% CAR,.EL CO RULES , 9."- .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 2 -0 Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subjecto t permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: Address: J0-e'j _--7 7 0 zaf, 7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RULELS C lVS?U1LI, ¶iT V, F L, 00 R F I\\/ F-0 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a fimal deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: Address: At A(5 4VI05-1 RUL IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0 1 1`7-L 30 P* M 4: 0 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F FD As a resident of Laguna Niguel, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name" Street Address City State
-F KJICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PM qir .j pj' !: 01 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-! I. , --V 1\ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: v~QCAC~Address: Ct9-h , La ,o--t RULES " ICTtVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey V1--_ HC -3 PN M: 02 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF7!\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: .-Address: Cv0 RULES .:IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey .: 02 Office of Administration, NRC 2 1q. 30 2 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F FC-\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ,.Name: Address: / 5// 4J4 AA 77.
.RULI;S o , '.TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0T, C 10 '4 01: 00 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
V E R-D As a resident of Newport Beach, which is located within the 25-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Daniel Reitz 29 Via Amanti Newport Coast, CA 92657 L,;!_77 iTIVES"; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 79!) *.,h) -5 I'j 2:4 6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: /Address: Z2- &I /C-) r)e4 CA/ cm -, 2 2-1 , 1 RULE' -TVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7G 0 J; 51 -5 PM 2: 4L6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF, 7 ! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: J -- " Address: $? LQ-A vai{
LULE .CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 00 -7 2: 4 5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC- !\ ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel A Name: Address:/92 Vk£. Cw RULE I ) MiiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey i,., " PIvTI 38U Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F !- ",/- F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: Address:
CT ~(I'VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey LU) ! ,3 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.I As a resident of Southern California, and a former resident of Corona del Mar, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinc ely, Name Street Address City State RULES ..'-, EC.TtVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 1 3 i P .H 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: L -J Address: ')& qY2, I( 0 P, BULES -L-EC]IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201S 1 3 P11 11: 35 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RP F ,-iFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning fumds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name:4/Address: (jof57r4 ry"A C RULS L' ILIRECTVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2015 -.' p; I: /J Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
JfF-/As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for 60 years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed because of faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The site is not a safe place to store spent fuel. It is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name: Address: 64qz 5-HUII I VLIS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 3l!:.3J PH tl: 02 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of Califormia were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain the e.Sincerely, Email_, _I HULL.-:.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PIN? 34i P U: 0(2 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, NamemailirIII