ML15245A471: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:2015 Davis-Besse Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review I. Operating Test A. RO Admin JPMs 1. JPM A1.1 K/A 2.1.43 was selected and tested on the last RO Exam; was the K/A randomly selected? RESPONSE: The previous two exams included reactivity calculations all of which test similar knowledge and abilities. Recommend replacement of the selected K/A with one that does not involve a reactivity calculation. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A (2.1.20) Reactor Water Inventory Balance 2. JPM A2 K/A 2.2.13 has been selected and tested on two of the last three exams; was the K/A randomly selected? RESPONSE: These exams tested the preparation/review of tagouts/clearances. Recommend selecting a different K/A that doesn't involve safety tagging/clearances. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A (2.2.15) Use plant drawings to determine how to isolate a leak. B. SRO Admin JPMs 1. JPM A1.1 K/A 2.1.43 was selected and tested on the last SRO Exam; was the K/A randomly selected. RESPONSE: The previous two exams included review of reactivity calculations all of which test similar knowledge and abilities. Recommend replacement of the selected K/A with one that does not involve a reactivity calculation/review. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A (2.1.20) Review Reactor Water Inventory Balance 2015 Davis-Besse Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review 2. JPM A4 Two of the last three SRO exams have included JPMs to classify emergency events and make notifications. Recommend selecting a JPM that does not involve an emergency classification. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A Task to initiate notification of ERO. C. Control Room Systems/In-Plant JPMs - No Comments D. Simulator Scenarios 1. ES-301-5 Recommend testing a crew with two ROs and the Upgrade SRO and a crew with two of the SROIs using a Surrogate in the BOP position. 2. Scenario 1, Event 6 Evaluate whether BOP should get a NORMAL credit for power reduction. RESPONSE: Determined that BOP should NOT get a NORMAL credit for power reduction. 3. Scenario 1, Event 7 Are the automatic reactor trip functions also disabled? Auto trips must be disabled to take credit for the Critical Task. RESPONSE: AUTO trips are disabled. 4. Scenario 2, Event 7 What is the feasibility of three Nis failing at the same time? RESPONSE: Highly unlikely, but only way to exercise the AOP action. 5. Scenario 2, Event 6/Scenario 3, Event 5 The BOP should probably get credit for a NORMAL evolution associated with the Power Reduction RESPONSE: Will evaluate during validation. RESPONSE: Determined that BOP should NOT get a NORMAL credit for power reduction. | |||
2015 Davis-Besse Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review 6. Scenario 3, Event 2 Why is response to the PORV leak a Critical Task? Does the leak exceed the capacity of the MU/ECCS? RESPONSE: Leak does not exceed capacity of MU/ECCS. Reclassified as a non-critical task. POST EXAM COMMENT - Should have remained a Critical Task, since failure to complete task significantly impacts the mitigation of the subsequent Steam Generator Tube Rupture. II. Written Exam - No Comments}} | |||
Revision as of 11:39, 6 June 2018
| ML15245A471 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/2015 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Reeser, D W | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15217A089 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML15245A471 (3) | |
Text
2015 Davis-Besse Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review I. Operating Test A. RO Admin JPMs 1. JPM A1.1 K/A 2.1.43 was selected and tested on the last RO Exam; was the K/A randomly selected? RESPONSE: The previous two exams included reactivity calculations all of which test similar knowledge and abilities. Recommend replacement of the selected K/A with one that does not involve a reactivity calculation. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A (2.1.20) Reactor Water Inventory Balance 2. JPM A2 K/A 2.2.13 has been selected and tested on two of the last three exams; was the K/A randomly selected? RESPONSE: These exams tested the preparation/review of tagouts/clearances. Recommend selecting a different K/A that doesn't involve safety tagging/clearances. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A (2.2.15) Use plant drawings to determine how to isolate a leak. B. SRO Admin JPMs 1. JPM A1.1 K/A 2.1.43 was selected and tested on the last SRO Exam; was the K/A randomly selected. RESPONSE: The previous two exams included review of reactivity calculations all of which test similar knowledge and abilities. Recommend replacement of the selected K/A with one that does not involve a reactivity calculation/review. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A (2.1.20) Review Reactor Water Inventory Balance 2015 Davis-Besse Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review 2. JPM A4 Two of the last three SRO exams have included JPMs to classify emergency events and make notifications. Recommend selecting a JPM that does not involve an emergency classification. RESPONSE: Selected another K/A Task to initiate notification of ERO. C. Control Room Systems/In-Plant JPMs - No Comments D. Simulator Scenarios 1. ES-301-5 Recommend testing a crew with two ROs and the Upgrade SRO and a crew with two of the SROIs using a Surrogate in the BOP position. 2. Scenario 1, Event 6 Evaluate whether BOP should get a NORMAL credit for power reduction. RESPONSE: Determined that BOP should NOT get a NORMAL credit for power reduction. 3. Scenario 1, Event 7 Are the automatic reactor trip functions also disabled? Auto trips must be disabled to take credit for the Critical Task. RESPONSE: AUTO trips are disabled. 4. Scenario 2, Event 7 What is the feasibility of three Nis failing at the same time? RESPONSE: Highly unlikely, but only way to exercise the AOP action. 5. Scenario 2, Event 6/Scenario 3, Event 5 The BOP should probably get credit for a NORMAL evolution associated with the Power Reduction RESPONSE: Will evaluate during validation. RESPONSE: Determined that BOP should NOT get a NORMAL credit for power reduction.
2015 Davis-Besse Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review 6. Scenario 3, Event 2 Why is response to the PORV leak a Critical Task? Does the leak exceed the capacity of the MU/ECCS? RESPONSE: Leak does not exceed capacity of MU/ECCS. Reclassified as a non-critical task. POST EXAM COMMENT - Should have remained a Critical Task, since failure to complete task significantly impacts the mitigation of the subsequent Steam Generator Tube Rupture. II. Written Exam - No Comments