ML17037B563: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


==DearMr.Lear:==
==DearMr.Lear:==
ThisletterisinresponsetoyourFebruary17,1976re-questforinformationconcerningAppendixIof10CFR50.Inordertomeettherequirementsof10CFR50.34a,weplantosubmitsuf-ficientinformationforanevaluationofthemeansemployedforkeepinglevelsofradioactivityineffluentstounrestrictedareasas'lowaspracticable.Becauseofthevolumeofworkinvolvedinsupplyingthisinformation,weplantosubmititintwophases.ThatportionwhichhasbeencompletedbyJune4,1976willbesubmittedonthatdate.TheremainderwillbesubmittedbyOctober1,1976.WealsoplantosubmitrevisedTechnicalSpecifications.However,theserevisionswillbedeferred'endingfurtherguidancefromyouasstatedinyourletter.Wewillbeavailableatyourconveniencetomeetwithyoutodiscussthesubmittalofdataandmethodsofevaluationasrequestedbyyourletter.Verytrulyyours,~GealKRhdeVicePresiden-EngineeringGKR/pen  
ThisletterisinresponsetoyourFebruary17,1976re-questforinformationconcerningAppendixIof10CFR50.Inordertomeettherequirementsof10CFR50.34a,weplantosubmitsuf-ficientinformationforanevaluationofthemeansemployedforkeepinglevelsofradioactivityineffluentstounrestrictedareasas'lowaspracticable.Becauseofthevolumeofworkinvolvedinsupplyingthisinformation,weplantosubmititintwophases.ThatportionwhichhasbeencompletedbyJune4,1976willbesubmittedonthatdate.TheremainderwillbesubmittedbyOctober1,1976.WealsoplantosubmitrevisedTechnicalSpecifications.However,theserevisionswillbedeferred'endingfurtherguidancefromyouasstatedinyourletter.Wewillbeavailableatyourconveniencetomeetwithyoutodiscussthesubmittalofdataandmethodsofevaluationasrequestedbyyourletter.Verytrulyyours,~GealKRhdeVicePresiden-EngineeringGKR/pen}}
 
}}

Revision as of 01:30, 19 May 2018

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 - Letter Responding to 02/17/1976 Request for Information Concerning Appendix I of 10 CFR 50
ML17037B563
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/25/1976
From: Rhode G K
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML17037B563 (4)


Text

NRCFORM195~iU,S,NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMIS~'~N't2-76)NRCDISTRIBUTIONFoRPART50DOCKETMATERIALDOCKETNUMBERFILENUMBERTO:MrLeafFROM:NiagaraMohawkPwrCorpSyracuse,NYGKRhoaeDATEOFDOCUMENT3-25-76DATERECEIVED32g76QLETTERORIGINALOCOPY0NOTORIZED%UNCLASSIFIEDPROPINPUTFORMNUMBEROFCOPIESRECEIVEDoneszgnedDESCRIPTIONLt:rreour2-17-761tr....turne.sh7.nginfoconceringAppenaixIinfo......rENCLOSURE~GTaZZOjrgIAC~Q+'ly4iQGEG<SAFETYFORACTION/INFORMATIONENVIRO4-2-76ehrASSIGNEDAD:BRANCHCHIEF:PROJECTMANAGER:LIC~SSTo.ASSIGNEDAD:BRANCHCHIEF~PROJECTMANAGER:LICASSTINTERNALDISTRIBUTIONCPDRI&EGOSSICK&STAFFPROJECTMANAGEMENTBOYDPCOLLINSHOJSTONPETERSONMELTZHELTEIIESSKOVHOLTLPDRtuhlTICNSASLBENGtF'ERNKNIGHTSIHMEILPAWICKIREACTORSAFETYROSSNOVAKROSZTOCZYCHECKAT&ISALTZMANRUTBERGEXTERNALISTRIBUTIONNATLLABREGV-IELAPDR.CONSULTANTS,BENAROY2LIPPOLITOOPERATINGREACTORSSTELLOOPERATINGTECHEISENHUTSHAOBAERSCHWENCERGRIMESSITESAFETY&ENVANALYSISDENTON&MULLEBROOKHAVENNATLLABULRIKSON(ORNL)ERNSTALRDSPANGLERSITETECHGAMMILLSTEPPHULMANCtrc,crSITEANALYSISVOLLMERBUNCHJ,COLLINSKREGERCONTROLNUMBERNRCFORM196(2.76) g~wt~~~~~~~~IJ0g NIAGARAMOHAWKPOWERCORPORATION,,4II~t",NIAGARAI'OHAWK300ERIEBOULEVARD,WESTSYRACUSE.N.Y.I3202March25,1976DirectorofNuclearReactorRegulationAttn:Mr.GeorgeLear,ChiefBranchf13UnitedStatesNuclearRegulatoryCommissionWashington,D.C.20555Re:NineMilePointUnit1DocketNo.50-220DPR-63OlC+gO,g0.opsCO

DearMr.Lear:

ThisletterisinresponsetoyourFebruary17,1976re-questforinformationconcerningAppendixIof10CFR50.Inordertomeettherequirementsof10CFR50.34a,weplantosubmitsuf-ficientinformationforanevaluationofthemeansemployedforkeepinglevelsofradioactivityineffluentstounrestrictedareasas'lowaspracticable.Becauseofthevolumeofworkinvolvedinsupplyingthisinformation,weplantosubmititintwophases.ThatportionwhichhasbeencompletedbyJune4,1976willbesubmittedonthatdate.TheremainderwillbesubmittedbyOctober1,1976.WealsoplantosubmitrevisedTechnicalSpecifications.However,theserevisionswillbedeferred'endingfurtherguidancefromyouasstatedinyourletter.Wewillbeavailableatyourconveniencetomeetwithyoutodiscussthesubmittalofdataandmethodsofevaluationasrequestedbyyourletter.Verytrulyyours,~GealKRhdeVicePresiden-EngineeringGKR/pen