ML18037A697: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 11 :42 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-2b7n Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for-Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0108 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter Information Name: Diana Dehm Address: PI Box 806 SUNSI Review Complete Template= ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Huntington Beach, CA, 92648 Email: Dianadehm@sbpintl.com i Add= Jer_~f5Mtf, (JCt>5) j ____ , ______________ ---------*-**---~*------n----*-*---------*-**-*****--*--~-*-----***---*-**-----------**----*--*-**-... ..J General Comment we are smarter than this, it's time to innovate. Burying the spent nuclear waste and the fuel waste at sea level in the midst of sea level rise, on an earthquake fault, is potentially a national security issue especially with the Marines and the Navy located so close by. We understand that nuclear fuel waste is recyclable, and it's being recycled throughout Europe. My recommendation is 2 research and find the best practices and there around the world, and bring the smartest people to the table to figure this out. Burying fuel waste at sea level, and one of our most beautiful surf breaks in the world, is not sustainable for a Next Generation. There are Fortune 500 out there right now recycling fuel waste and using new technologies through r~search to properly dispose of nuclear fuel waste, that has potential for renewable energy. Additionally, there are funds within the federal government they could be used for this solutions base thinking and deployment. In the meantime, the waste should be removed and relocated to a certified nuclear waste storage area. nuclear fuel waste and nuclear waste is https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a44&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 moved on a regular basis, and it's been happening for many years safely. It's time to innovate through public private Partnerships, and science and Engineering to negate an accident that would affect the entire California coastline businesses schools our military and our next generation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a44&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 | {{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 11 :42 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-2b7n Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for-Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0108 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter Information Name: Diana Dehm Address: PI Box 806 SUNSI Review Complete Template= ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Huntington Beach, CA, 92648 Email: Dianadehm@sbpintl.com i Add= Jer_~f5Mtf, (JCt>5) j ____ , ______________ ---------*-**---~*------n----*-*---------*-**-*****--*--~-*-----***---*-**-----------**----*--*-**-... ..J General Comment we are smarter than this, it's time to innovate. Burying the spent nuclear waste and the fuel waste at sea level in the midst of sea level rise, on an earthquake fault, is potentially a national security issue especially with the Marines and the Navy located so close by. We understand that nuclear fuel waste is recyclable, and it's being recycled throughout Europe. My recommendation is 2 research and find the best practices and there around the world, and bring the smartest people to the table to figure this out. Burying fuel waste at sea level, and one of our most beautiful surf breaks in the world, is not sustainable for a Next Generation. There are Fortune 500 out there right now recycling fuel waste and using new technologies through r~search to properly dispose of nuclear fuel waste, that has potential for renewable energy. Additionally, there are funds within the federal government they could be used for this solutions base thinking and deployment. In the meantime, the waste should be removed and relocated to a certified nuclear waste storage area. nuclear fuel waste and nuclear waste is https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a44&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 moved on a regular basis, and it's been happening for many years safely. It's time to innovate through public private Partnerships, and science and Engineering to negate an accident that would affect the entire California coastline businesses schools our military and our next generation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a44&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}} | ||
}} | |||
Revision as of 01:16, 18 May 2018
| ML18037A697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/2018 |
| From: | Dehm D - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 82FR52944 00107, NRC-2017-0211 | |
| Download: ML18037A697 (2) | |
Text
As of: 1/9/18 11 :42 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-2b7n Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for-Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0108 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter Information Name: Diana Dehm Address: PI Box 806 SUNSI Review Complete Template= ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Huntington Beach, CA, 92648 Email: Dianadehm@sbpintl.com i Add= Jer_~f5Mtf, (JCt>5) j ____ , ______________ ---------*-**---~*------n----*-*---------*-**-*****--*--~-*-----***---*-**-----------**----*--*-**-... ..J General Comment we are smarter than this, it's time to innovate. Burying the spent nuclear waste and the fuel waste at sea level in the midst of sea level rise, on an earthquake fault, is potentially a national security issue especially with the Marines and the Navy located so close by. We understand that nuclear fuel waste is recyclable, and it's being recycled throughout Europe. My recommendation is 2 research and find the best practices and there around the world, and bring the smartest people to the table to figure this out. Burying fuel waste at sea level, and one of our most beautiful surf breaks in the world, is not sustainable for a Next Generation. There are Fortune 500 out there right now recycling fuel waste and using new technologies through r~search to properly dispose of nuclear fuel waste, that has potential for renewable energy. Additionally, there are funds within the federal government they could be used for this solutions base thinking and deployment. In the meantime, the waste should be removed and relocated to a certified nuclear waste storage area. nuclear fuel waste and nuclear waste is https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a44&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 moved on a regular basis, and it's been happening for many years safely. It's time to innovate through public private Partnerships, and science and Engineering to negate an accident that would affect the entire California coastline businesses schools our military and our next generation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a44&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018