ML20203C010: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-                   . -  . ___        _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ._ _ ___. _          _ _ _ _      - _ . . _ - _ . . . .
{{#Wiki_filter:-
From:           Mark Satorius To:              NCD2.AR1.GMVg 7//M.                         [
From:
Date:           2/16/96 4:42pm
Mark Satorius NCD2.AR1.GMVg 7//M.
[
To:
Date:
2/16/96 4:42pm


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
W3 01 Reports mike l
W3 01 Reports mike l
notwithstanding our earlier conversations on the proper course of action wrt the w3 oi reports, thru a short dialogue w/ lieberman, i think that he will want to have a converstation via the weekly enforcement call w/ r4 on these w3 log falsification problems. the outcome (ncv) may                     ,
notwithstanding our earlier conversations on the proper course of action wrt the w3 oi reports, thru a short dialogue w/ lieberman, i think that he will want to have a converstation via the weekly enforcement call w/ r4 on these w3 log falsification problems. the outcome (ncv) may very well be the same. based on your comments, it did not sound like the reg would be ready to discuss these for a week or so. let me know.
very well be the same. based on your comments, it did not sound like the reg would be ready                     i to discuss these for a week or so. let me know.                                                                 i mark ps - w3 has a history of these problems. ask greg pick (or better yet steve campbell who was the actual inspector) about a 1993ish issue [and violation, if my memory serves me] at w3 re:
i mark ps - w3 has a history of these problems. ask greg pick (or better yet steve campbell who was the actual inspector) about a 1993ish issue [and violation, if my memory serves me] at w3 re:
inadequate watch performance that in many people's view (primarily bill beach) was deliberate and should have been considered for escalated enforcement.
inadequate watch performance that in many people's view (primarily bill beach) was deliberate and should have been considered for escalated enforcement.
1 i
i l
l I
I 9902110122 990208 PDR FOIA QUNTER99-76 PDR r
9902110122 990208 PDR   FOIA QUNTER99                             PDR r   y-}}
y-
-}}

Latest revision as of 01:49, 8 December 2024

Discusses Proper Course of Action Re W3 OI Repts
ML20203C010
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/16/1996
From: Satorius M
NRC
To: Vasquez G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20203B905 List:
References
FOIA-99-76 NUDOCS 9902110122
Download: ML20203C010 (1)


Text

-

From:

Mark Satorius NCD2.AR1.GMVg 7//M.

[

To:

Date:

2/16/96 4:42pm

Subject:

W3 01 Reports mike l

notwithstanding our earlier conversations on the proper course of action wrt the w3 oi reports, thru a short dialogue w/ lieberman, i think that he will want to have a converstation via the weekly enforcement call w/ r4 on these w3 log falsification problems. the outcome (ncv) may very well be the same. based on your comments, it did not sound like the reg would be ready to discuss these for a week or so. let me know.

i mark ps - w3 has a history of these problems. ask greg pick (or better yet steve campbell who was the actual inspector) about a 1993ish issue [and violation, if my memory serves me] at w3 re:

inadequate watch performance that in many people's view (primarily bill beach) was deliberate and should have been considered for escalated enforcement.

i l

I 9902110122 990208 PDR FOIA QUNTER99-76 PDR r

y-

-