|
|
Line 27: |
Line 27: |
| ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== |
|
| |
|
| By letter dated August 7,1997, the licensee certified permanent cessation of power operations and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor at the Maine Yankee facility. By letter dated August 15, 1997, as supplemented by letters dated September 19. 1997 and October 21, 1997. the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (the licensee) submitted a request for change to the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station Technical Specification (TS) Section 5.0. Administrative Controls, to define the facility staffing and training requirements for a permanently shutdown and defueled facility. By letter dated August 15. 1997, the licensee also submitted a related " Request for Approval of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program." By two letters dated August 15, 1997 and August 28. 1997, the licensee requested exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.54 and 10 CFR 50.120 related to this proposed amendment. These exemptions are not required. | | By {{letter dated|date=August 7, 1997|text=letter dated August 7,1997}}, the licensee certified permanent cessation of power operations and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor at the Maine Yankee facility. By {{letter dated|date=August 15, 1997|text=letter dated August 15, 1997}}, as supplemented by letters dated September 19. 1997 and October 21, 1997. the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (the licensee) submitted a request for change to the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station Technical Specification (TS) Section 5.0. Administrative Controls, to define the facility staffing and training requirements for a permanently shutdown and defueled facility. By letter dated August 15. 1997, the licensee also submitted a related " Request for Approval of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program." By two letters dated August 15, 1997 and August 28. 1997, the licensee requested exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.54 and 10 CFR 50.120 related to this proposed amendment. These exemptions are not required. |
| The proposed amendment would eliminate requirements for licensed operators and a licensed operator training program. The purpose of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program is to equip appropriate operations personnel for fuel handling operations, including responses to abnormal events / accidents. | | The proposed amendment would eliminate requirements for licensed operators and a licensed operator training program. The purpose of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program is to equip appropriate operations personnel for fuel handling operations, including responses to abnormal events / accidents. |
| The September 19, 1997, supplemental letter provided additional clarifying information. The Octder 21. 1997, supplemental letter removed a reference to the licensee's requested exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.64 which the staff has subsequently determined is not required. The supplemental letters did not change the staff's original no signif' cant hazards consideration determination published in the Federal Reaister on September 10. | | The September 19, 1997, supplemental letter provided additional clarifying information. The Octder 21. 1997, supplemental letter removed a reference to the licensee's requested exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.64 which the staff has subsequently determined is not required. The supplemental letters did not change the staff's original no signif' cant hazards consideration determination published in the Federal Reaister on September 10. |
Latest revision as of 19:07, 7 December 2021
Similar Documents at Maine Yankee |
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20196K4821999-07-0606 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Because of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Status of Myaps Facility,Confirmatory Orders No Longer Necessary for Safe Operation or Maint of Plant ML20206H1611999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 164 to License DPR-36 ML20206G5731999-05-0303 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-36 ML20205D5261999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program for Maine Yankee.Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program Consistent with Current Licensing Practice for Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning ML20204C4631999-03-16016 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License DPR-36 ML20197C8231998-09-0303 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & (C) & App E to 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning ML20236U8451998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Operational QA Program ML20217H5241998-03-30030 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License DPR-36 ML20202D3181997-11-26026 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-36 ML20216F1511997-08-0808 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-36 ML20141G6511997-05-19019 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-36 ML20138G3541997-05-0202 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-36 ML20058E2641993-11-0505 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 143 to License DPR-36 ML20056F7831993-08-23023 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 142 to License DPR-36 ML20127D5061993-01-11011 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 136 to License DPR-36 ML20126H6211992-12-29029 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 135 to License DPR-36 ML20059K9991990-09-20020 September 1990 SER Accepting Methodology Re Statistical Combination of Uncertainties for RPS Setpoints ML20059H5901990-09-12012 September 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Facility Response to Station Blackout Rule.Issue of Conformance to Station Blackout Rule Will Remain Open at Facility Until Identified Nonconformances Resolved ML20059D0501990-08-30030 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 117 to License DPR-36 ML20055C2911990-02-20020 February 1990 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Assessment of Asymmetric LOCA Loads Problem ML20246F6281989-07-10010 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 113 to License DPR-36 ML20245J0571989-04-25025 April 1989 SER Re Accepting Facility Emergency Response Capability in Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97,Rev 3,w/exception of Instrumentation Re Variables Accumulator Tank Level & Pressure & Containment Sump Water Temp ML20245D4481989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 111 to License DPR-36 ML20245D4351989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 112 to License DPR-36 ML20155B4631988-09-27027 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 107 to License DPR-36 ML20154A1411988-09-0707 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 106 to License DPR-36 ML20150D7681988-07-0707 July 1988 Safety Evaluation Approving Util Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation Sys Contingent on Completion of Emergency Procedures & Operator Training & Submittal of Applicable Tech Specs ML20153A9641988-06-28028 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Proposed Reflood Steam Cooling Model ML20196G6871988-06-23023 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 105 to License DPR-36 ML20151W5861988-04-26026 April 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 104 to License DPR-36 ML20153B3381988-03-16016 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831110,840216,0412,1214, 850618 & 0820 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.2, Based on Stated Util Commitments,Insp Rept 50-309/86-07 & Actions Described in Procedure for Vendor Interface ML20149H2831988-02-17017 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 103 to License DPR-36 ML20196C4301988-02-0909 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 102 to License DPR-36 ML20235M4661987-09-29029 September 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 101 to License DPR-36 ML20236F6441987-07-29029 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Response to Item 2.1 of Generic Ltr 83-28 ML20234B1781987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 100 to License DPR-36 ML20216J0371987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 99 to License DPR-36 ML20215E9301987-06-15015 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 98 to License DPR-36 ML20214W3841987-06-0404 June 1987 SER Supporting Util 831110 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 2.2 (Part 1) Re Requirement for Program Description to Ensure All Components of safety-related Sys Identified as safety-related on Informational Matls ML20214M1491987-05-21021 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2) Re Established Interface W/Nsss or Vendors of Each Component of Reactor Trip Sys ML20214J6001987-05-20020 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 97 to License DPR-36 ML20210C6631987-04-23023 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Adequacy of Offsite Power Sys.Further Evaluation Cannot Continue Until All Requested Info Received.Surowiec Line Not Acceptable Substitute for Mason Line During Startup or Normal Operations ML20206U9231987-04-0909 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 96 to License DPR-36 ML20197D4421987-04-0707 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting 850807 Request for Relief from ASME Code,Section XI Inservice Testing Requirements for Pump & Valves ML20197D4241987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 94 to License DPR-36 ML20205M6391987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Upgraded Seismic Design Program Contingent on Licensee Commitment to Upgrade Items in Table 3 ML20212N7091987-03-0404 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 93 to License DPR-36 ML20211G4361987-02-14014 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831110 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re on-line Testing for Reactor Trip Sys Reliability ML20210V1831987-02-0909 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 92 to License DPR-36 ML20207N2181987-01-12012 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Response to NRC 860721 Request for Addl Info Re Reactor Coolant Pump Shaft Integrity,Per IE Info Notice 86-019 1999-07-06
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20211M4841999-08-31031 August 1999 Replacement Pages 2-48,2-49 & 2-50 to Rev 14 of Defueled Sar ML20211D7111999-08-0909 August 1999 Rev 17 to Maine Yankee Defueled Safety Analysis Rept (Dsar) ML20196K4821999-07-0606 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Because of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Status of Myaps Facility,Confirmatory Orders No Longer Necessary for Safe Operation or Maint of Plant ML20206H1611999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 164 to License DPR-36 ML20206G5731999-05-0303 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-36 ML20205D5261999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program for Maine Yankee.Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program Consistent with Current Licensing Practice for Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning ML20204C4631999-03-16016 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License DPR-36 ML20206D7491998-12-31031 December 1998 Co Annual Financial Rept for 1998. with ML20155G9591998-11-0303 November 1998 Rev 1 to Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20155D8651998-10-28028 October 1998 Public Version of, Maine Yankee Emergency Preparedness Exercise ML20197C8231998-09-0303 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & (C) & App E to 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning ML18066A2771998-08-13013 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Deficiency in CE Current Screening Methodology for Determining Limiting Fuel Assembly for Detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic Sa.Evaluations Were Performed for Affected Plants to Determine Effect of Deficiency ML20236X1751998-08-0303 August 1998 Rev 16 to Defueled Sar ML20236U8451998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Operational QA Program ML20248D3011998-05-26026 May 1998 Rev 14,page 16 of 17,Section II of QA Program ML20247J0211998-05-11011 May 1998 Revised Page 16 of 17 of Section II of QA Program,Rev 14 ML20247D3451998-05-0606 May 1998 Rev 15 to Defueled SAR, Replacing List of Effective Pages ML20217J9811998-04-28028 April 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Incorrect Description of Drift Specification for Model 1154,gauge Pressure Transmitters,Range Code 0 in Manual Man 4514,Dec 1992.Cause Indeterminate.Will Issue & Include Errata Sheets in All Future Shipments to Users ML20217H5241998-03-30030 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License DPR-36 ML20217D9691998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Maine Yankee.W/ ML20216D7681998-02-25025 February 1998 Rept to Duke Engineering & Services,Inc,On Allegations of Willfulness Related to Us NRC 971219 Demand for Info ML20203A3011998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Maine Yankee ML20202F3771998-01-31031 January 1998 Annual Rept of Facility Changes & Relief & Safety Valve Failures & Challenges ML20202E0541998-01-30030 January 1998 Rev 14 to Myaps Defueled Safety Analysis Rept ML20199K3211998-01-27027 January 1998 Rev 13 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co,Qa Program ML20199K3471998-01-22022 January 1998 Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co QA Program ML20199C2281997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217R2301997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Annual Financial Rept for 1997 ML20203F8551997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20202D3181997-11-26026 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-36 ML20198R6371997-11-0606 November 1997 Yankee Mutual Assistance Agreement ML20155G9511997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to M01-1258-002, Decommissioning Cost Analysis for Myaps ML20198P9431997-10-31031 October 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217K5191997-10-24024 October 1997 Part 21 Rept Re Five Valves That May Have Defect Related to Possible Crack within Forging Wall at Die Flash Line.Caused by Less than Optimal Forging Temperatures.Newer Temperature Monitoring Devices at Forging Area Heating Ovens Procured ML20211N0571997-10-0707 October 1997 Revised Pages to Jul/Aug 1994 SG Insp Summary Rept ML20198K0201997-09-30030 September 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20199H1861997-09-25025 September 1997 Rev 12 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co,Qa Program ML20217A9251997-08-31031 August 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217R1051997-08-27027 August 1997 Myaps Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20216F1511997-08-0808 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-36 ML20210M4451997-07-31031 July 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1997 for Myaps ML20151M1351997-07-21021 July 1997 Rev 0 to Technical Evaluation 172-97, Cable Separation Safety Assessment Rept ML20141H2691997-06-30030 June 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20141B9951997-05-31031 May 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1997 for Maine Yankee.W/ ML20141G6511997-05-19019 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-36 ML20138G3541997-05-0202 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-36 ML20141G2871997-04-30030 April 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20137Z1971997-04-14014 April 1997 Forwards to Commission Results of Staff Evaluation of Performance of Licensees W/Ownership Structure Similar to Plant ML20137N7541997-03-31031 March 1997 Rev 11 to Operational Quality Assurance Program ML20138B1491997-03-31031 March 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1997 for Maine Yankee 1999-08-09
[Table view] |
Text
_ - _ - _ - _ - -
- nat:0 g- *, UNITED STATES
,' p
,j
't NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20665 4001
\, * * * * * /
SAFETY EVALUATION Bv THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.160 TO FAClllTY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-36 MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY MAlf;E YANKEE ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET N0. 50-309
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 7,1997, the licensee certified permanent cessation of power operations and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor at the Maine Yankee facility. By letter dated August 15, 1997, as supplemented by letters dated September 19. 1997 and October 21, 1997. the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (the licensee) submitted a request for change to the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station Technical Specification (TS) Section 5.0. Administrative Controls, to define the facility staffing and training requirements for a permanently shutdown and defueled facility. By letter dated August 15. 1997, the licensee also submitted a related " Request for Approval of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program." By two letters dated August 15, 1997 and August 28. 1997, the licensee requested exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.54 and 10 CFR 50.120 related to this proposed amendment. These exemptions are not required.
The proposed amendment would eliminate requirements for licensed operators and a licensed operator training program. The purpose of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program is to equip appropriate operations personnel for fuel handling operations, including responses to abnormal events / accidents.
The September 19, 1997, supplemental letter provided additional clarifying information. The Octder 21. 1997, supplemental letter removed a reference to the licensee's requested exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.64 which the staff has subsequently determined is not required. The supplemental letters did not change the staff's original no signif' cant hazards consideration determination published in the Federal Reaister on September 10.
1997 (62 FR 47698).
2.0 EV.%UATION The proposed amendment would revise the Maine Yankee TS staffing and training requirements to reflect the permanent cessation of activities that require licensed operators or senior licensed o)erators. The licensee has also submitted for NRC approval a Certified ruel Handler Training and Retraining Program, which will provide the training necessary for operators at a defueled facility.
l 9712040233 971126 PDR W ADOCK 05000309 PM ;
l . .
1- 2
. The proposed amendment is designed to eliminate the requirements for licensed operators and a licensed operator training and retraining program and to replace those positions and programs with certified fuel handlers and a certified fuel handler training and retraining program. This change ensures that the qualifications of the operations personnel are commensurate with the tasks to be performed and the conditions requiring a response.Section 50.120 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Training and Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel, requires training programs to be established, implemented and maintained, and derived using a systems approach to training D (SAT) as defined in 10 CFR 55.4. In its submittal, the licensee has described the systematic approach taken to develop, implement, and maintain the certified fuel handler training and retraining program. The approach as described by the licensee contains five key elements and is intended to 3rovide a training system that will ensure successful performance on the job ay trained and qualified personnel. The five key elements are (1) analysis of job performance requirements and training needs. (2) derivation of learning objectives based upon this analysis. (3) design and implementation of the training program based upon learning objectives. (4) trainee evaluatior, and (5) program evaluation and revision.
N e proposed amendment to the Maine Yankee TS and the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program are consistent with current 1icensing practice and provide adequate confidence that appropriate SAT-based training of personnel who perform certified fuel handler duties is conducted to ensure the facility is maintained in a safe and stable condition. Accordingly, the proposed amendment to the fiaine Yankee TS and the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Petraining Program are found to be acceptable.
3.0 STALE CONSULTATION In accordance with the Commission's regulations. on October 16, 1997 Mr. Pat Dostle of the State of Maine. Office of Nuclear Safety was notified of the proposed issuance of this ammendment. The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.21. 51.32 ard 51.35, an environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact was published in the Federal Recister on November 25, 1997 (62 FR 62788).
Accordingly, based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has determined that issuance of this ammendment will not have a significant effect on the quality of the numan environment. .
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has corcluded. based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner. (2) such activities will be co.1 ducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributors: Richard M. Pelton Craig W. Smith Date: Novemoer 26, 1997 l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ __