ML20203C010: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:- . - . ___ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ._ _ ___. _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ - _ . . . . | ||
From: Mark Satorius To: NCD2.AR1.GMVg 7//M. [ | |||
Date: 2/16/96 4:42pm | |||
==Subject:== | |||
W3 01 Reports mike l | |||
notwithstanding our earlier conversations on the proper course of action wrt the w3 oi reports, thru a short dialogue w/ lieberman, i think that he will want to have a converstation via the weekly enforcement call w/ r4 on these w3 log falsification problems. the outcome (ncv) may , | |||
very well be the same. based on your comments, it did not sound like the reg would be ready i to discuss these for a week or so. let me know. i mark ps - w3 has a history of these problems. ask greg pick (or better yet steve campbell who was the actual inspector) about a 1993ish issue [and violation, if my memory serves me] at w3 re: | |||
inadequate watch performance that in many people's view (primarily bill beach) was deliberate and should have been considered for escalated enforcement. | |||
1 i | |||
l I | |||
9902110122 990208 PDR FOIA QUNTER99 PDR r y-}} | |||
Revision as of 03:12, 1 January 2021
| ML20203C010 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/16/1996 |
| From: | Satorius M NRC |
| To: | Vasquez G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20203B905 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-99-76 NUDOCS 9902110122 | |
| Download: ML20203C010 (1) | |
Text
- . - . ___ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ._ _ ___. _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ - _ . . . .
From: Mark Satorius To: NCD2.AR1.GMVg 7//M. [
Date: 2/16/96 4:42pm
Subject:
W3 01 Reports mike l
notwithstanding our earlier conversations on the proper course of action wrt the w3 oi reports, thru a short dialogue w/ lieberman, i think that he will want to have a converstation via the weekly enforcement call w/ r4 on these w3 log falsification problems. the outcome (ncv) may ,
very well be the same. based on your comments, it did not sound like the reg would be ready i to discuss these for a week or so. let me know. i mark ps - w3 has a history of these problems. ask greg pick (or better yet steve campbell who was the actual inspector) about a 1993ish issue [and violation, if my memory serves me] at w3 re:
inadequate watch performance that in many people's view (primarily bill beach) was deliberate and should have been considered for escalated enforcement.
1 i
l I