ML061320194: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061320194
| number = ML061320194
| issue date = 02/22/2006
| issue date = 02/22/2006
| title = E-mail from T. Rice of the State of New York to Dcroule@Entergy.Com and J. Noggle of Usnrc, Regarding Preliminary 2/7 H-3 Results
| title = E-mail from T. Rice of the State of New York to Dcroule@Entergy.Com and J. Noggle of USNRC, Regarding Preliminary 2/7 H-3 Results
| author name = Rice T
| author name = Rice T
| author affiliation = State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
| author affiliation = State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:James Noggle -Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results ,.. .-. I 7.,e 2; ..d v ...Page 1 From: To: Date:  
{{#Wiki_filter:James Noggle - Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results                                                                                   Page 1
  ,..I . -. 7.,e   2;     .. d v   ...
From:               "Timothy Rice" <tbrice &#xa9;gw.dec.state.ny.us>
To:                 <dcroule @entergy.com>, <jdn &#xa9;nrc.gov>
Date:               2/22/06 11:38AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
"Timothy Rice" <tbrice &#xa9; gw.dec.state.ny.us>
Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results Hello Jim and Don, Attached is an Excel file with the first of the State's preliminary H-3 results from the 2/7 splits.
<dcroule @ entergy.com>, <jdn &#xa9; nrc.gov>2/22/06 11:38AM Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results Hello Jim and Don, Attached is an Excel file with the first of the State's preliminary H-3 results from the 2/7 splits.I compared them to the #s Kathleen sent in her update and was pleasantly surprised at just how well they agreed.The only significant difference was for MW-30.John Frisone, our person there for the sampling, explained that GZA collected that particular sample and did it by consecutively filling the three containers from the well sampling pump output tube. Not a true split sample.The rest of the samples were collected as splits by first filling a single larger container and then filling the three sample containers from that. This appears to explain the difference in precision of results between MW-1l1 and the other sample points.I will provide the other data as soon as I get it from Wadsworth.
I compared them to the #s Kathleen sent in her update and was pleasantly surprised at just how well they agreed.
If you need to report our results, please preface it with the explanation that the data has not gone through the labs full QA process yet and the final results may vary somewhat from these preliminary values.Tim CC: "Barbara Youngberg" <bayoungb@gw.dec.state.ny.us>, <rpsO2 @ health.state.ny.us>  
The only significant difference was for MW-30.
-.d~i~:, .'s LINC Sample Number 200620865001 200620865002 200620865003 200620865004 200620865005 200620865006 200620865007 200620865008 IPEC NUMBER MW-30 MW-31 MW-32 MW-33 MW-34 MW-35 MW-36 MW-38 Collection Date TRITIUM RESULT 3.76E+05 3.38E+04 1.92E+04 2.02E+05 1.74E+05 8.88E+04 2.1 OE+04 pCi/L+/- 1.14E+04+/- 1.16E+03+/- 7.30E+02+/- 6.19E+03+/- 5.38E+03+/- 2.82E+03+/- 7.73E+02< 1.12E+02}}
John Frisone, our person there for the sampling, explained that GZA collected that particular sample and did it by consecutively filling the three containers from the well sampling pump output tube. Not a true split sample.
The rest of the samples were collected as splits by first filling a single larger container and then filling the three sample containers from that. This appears to explain the difference in precision of results between MW-1l1 and the other sample points.
I will provide the other data as soon as I get it from Wadsworth. If you need to report our results, please preface it with the explanation that the data has not gone through the labs full QA process yet and the final results may vary somewhat from these preliminary values.
Tim CC:                 "Barbara Youngberg" <bayoungb@gw.dec.state.ny.us>, <rpsO2 @health.state.ny.us>
 
d~i~:, .'s LINC         IPEC  Collection TRITIUM Sample Number NUMBER Date      RESULT    pCi/L 200620865001 MW-30             3.76E+05   +/-    1.14E+04 200620865002  MW-31              3.38E+04   +/-   1.16E+03 200620865003  MW-32              1.92E+04  +/- 7.30E+02 200620865004  MW-33              2.02E+05  +/-   6.19E+03 200620865005  MW-34              1.74E+05  +/- 5.38E+03 200620865006  MW-35              8.88E+04  +/-   2.82E+03 200620865007  MW-36              2.1 OE+04  +/- 7.73E+02 200620865008  MW-38                          < 1.12E+02}}

Latest revision as of 06:00, 23 March 2020

E-mail from T. Rice of the State of New York to Dcroule@Entergy.Com and J. Noggle of USNRC, Regarding Preliminary 2/7 H-3 Results
ML061320194
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/2006
From: Rice T
State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
To: Croulet D
Entergy Nuclear Operations, NRC/FSME
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0140
Download: ML061320194 (2)
v • d • e


Text

James Noggle - Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results Page 1

,..I . -. 7.,e 2; .. d v ...

From: "Timothy Rice" <tbrice ©gw.dec.state.ny.us>

To: <dcroule @entergy.com>, <jdn ©nrc.gov>

Date: 2/22/06 11:38AM

Subject:

Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results Hello Jim and Don, Attached is an Excel file with the first of the State's preliminary H-3 results from the 2/7 splits.

I compared them to the #s Kathleen sent in her update and was pleasantly surprised at just how well they agreed.

The only significant difference was for MW-30.

John Frisone, our person there for the sampling, explained that GZA collected that particular sample and did it by consecutively filling the three containers from the well sampling pump output tube. Not a true split sample.

The rest of the samples were collected as splits by first filling a single larger container and then filling the three sample containers from that. This appears to explain the difference in precision of results between MW-1l1 and the other sample points.

I will provide the other data as soon as I get it from Wadsworth. If you need to report our results, please preface it with the explanation that the data has not gone through the labs full QA process yet and the final results may vary somewhat from these preliminary values.

Tim CC: "Barbara Youngberg" <bayoungb@gw.dec.state.ny.us>, <rpsO2 @health.state.ny.us>

d~i~:, .'s LINC IPEC Collection TRITIUM Sample Number NUMBER Date RESULT pCi/L 200620865001 MW-30 3.76E+05 +/- 1.14E+04 200620865002 MW-31 3.38E+04 +/- 1.16E+03 200620865003 MW-32 1.92E+04 +/- 7.30E+02 200620865004 MW-33 2.02E+05 +/- 6.19E+03 200620865005 MW-34 1.74E+05 +/- 5.38E+03 200620865006 MW-35 8.88E+04 +/- 2.82E+03 200620865007 MW-36 2.1 OE+04 +/- 7.73E+02 200620865008 MW-38 < 1.12E+02

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML061320194&oldid=2664933"