ML061840450: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
We would ask that OPA be put on for a copy.                                                      I    -~
We would ask that OPA be put on for a copy.                                                      I    -~
     ->>> Steven Orth 12/12/05 8:19 AM >>>
     ->>> Steven Orth 12/12/05 8:19 AM >>>
I
I Greetings,
                                                                                                          ,*
Greetings,
* I Based on new information obtained this week, we have prepared a draft Revision 1 to the Braidwood              ./
* I Based on new information obtained this week, we have prepared a draft Revision 1 to the Braidwood              ./
Communications Plan for comment (attached). Please provide comments to Wayne Slawinski (WJS2) by Noon on Monday, December 12, 2005.
Communications Plan for comment (attached). Please provide comments to Wayne Slawinski (WJS2) by Noon on Monday, December 12, 2005.

Latest revision as of 03:25, 23 March 2020

E-mail from Hayden to Various Re Revision I to Braidwood Communications Plan
ML061840450
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/12/2005
From: Hayden E
Office of Public Affairs
To: Jamnes Cameron, House J, Lickus R, Jeffery Lynch, Viktoria Mitlyng, Steven Orth, Richard Skokowski, Strasma J
Office of Public Affairs Region II
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0115
Download: ML061840450 (1)


Text

A(.Do

- From: Elizabeth Hayden V P F' To: James Lynch¶-'Yamnes Cameron; Jan Strasma; John House; Richard Skokowski; Roland Lickus; Steven Orth; Viktoria Mitlyng Date: 12/12/05 4:07PM

Subject:

Re: Revision 1 to Braidwood Communicatoins Plan Y.

We would ask that OPA be put on for a copy. I -~

->>> Steven Orth 12/12/05 8:19 AM >>>

I Greetings,

  • I Based on new information obtained this week, we have prepared a draft Revision 1 to the Braidwood ./

Communications Plan for comment (attached). Please provide comments to Wayne Slawinski (WJS2) by Noon on Monday, December 12, 2005.

Recent Preliminary Results -

NRC results of split sample analyses have been reasonably consistent with the licensee's results:

Licensee NRC Residential well 1151 (L.200) 2046 L( 300) 1524 (+200) 1230 (+ 300)

The remaining split samples of other residential wells and offsite monitoring wells near the blowdown line were found to be indistinguishable from background by the licensee and the NRC's laboratory.

Thank you, Steve CC: A. Randolph Blough; Anne Boland; Cynthia Pederson; Gregory Roach; James Noggle; John White; Mahesh Chawla; Mark Satorius; Marsha Gamberoni; NirodhShah; Peter Habighorst; Raeann Shane; Rosetta Virgilio; Stephen Klementowicz; Steven Reynolds; Undine Shoop; Wayne Slawinski information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act exemptions --5" ~4i FOIA- -_ _ A_-_//,_ -