ML11124A000: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11124A000
| number = ML11124A000
| issue date = 05/02/2011
| issue date = 05/02/2011
| title = Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos. ME5982 and ME5983)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1
| author name = Lingam S P
| author name = Lingam S
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee name = Green D
| addressee name = Green D
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Lingam, Siva Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:51 AM To: dgreen@tva.gov Cc: Broaddus, Doug; Wolfgang, Robert
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Lingam, Siva Sent:                       Monday, May 02, 2011 9:51 AM To:                         dgreen@tva.gov Cc:                         Broaddus, Doug; Wolfgang, Robert


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relie f Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos.
Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos.
ME5982 and ME5983)By letter dated April 1, 2011, Tennessee Valley Authority submitted a relief request for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. Relief is requested from measuring the pump flow rate during the preservice and inservice testing of the Essential Raw Cooling Water Screen Wash Pumps and from measuring differential pressure at five points during preservice testing and establishment of a pump curve. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its det ailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
ME5982 and ME5983)
By letter dated April 1, 2011, Tennessee Valley Authority submitted a relief request for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. Relief is requested from measuring the pump flow rate during the preservice and inservice testing of the Essential Raw Cooling Water Screen Wash Pumps and from measuring differential pressure at five points during preservice testing and establishment of a pump curve. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL22)
Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Location: O8D5; Mail Stop: O8G9a Telephone: 3014151564; Fax: 3014151222 Email address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov 1


The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         16 Mail Envelope Properties   (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20110502095100)
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed
 
technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
SivaP.LingamU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionProjectManager(NRR/DORL/LPL2 2)SequoyahNuclearPlantLocation:O8 D5;MailStop:O8 G9aTelephone:301 415 1564;Fax:301 415 1222E mailaddress:siva.lingam@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 16   Mail Envelope Properties   (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20110502095100)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos. ME5982 and ME5983) Sent Date:   5/2/2011 9:51:18 AM Received Date: 5/2/2011 9:51:00 AM From:   Lingam, Siva Created By:   Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Wolfgang, Robert" <Robert.Wolfgang@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "dgreen@tva.gov" <dgreen@tva.gov>
Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos. ME5982 and ME5983)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2069     5/2/2011 9:51:00 AM
Sent Date:           5/2/2011 9:51:18 AM Received Date:       5/2/2011 9:51:00 AM From:                 Lingam, Siva Created By:           Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Wolfgang, Robert" <Robert.Wolfgang@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "dgreen@tva.gov" <dgreen@tva.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                         Size                 Date & Time MESSAGE                       2069                 5/2/2011 9:51:00 AM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 04:34, 21 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1
ML11124A000
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/2011
From: Siva Lingam
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Green D
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
Download: ML11124A000 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Lingam, Siva Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:51 AM To: dgreen@tva.gov Cc: Broaddus, Doug; Wolfgang, Robert

Subject:

Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos.

ME5982 and ME5983)

By letter dated April 1, 2011, Tennessee Valley Authority submitted a relief request for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. Relief is requested from measuring the pump flow rate during the preservice and inservice testing of the Essential Raw Cooling Water Screen Wash Pumps and from measuring differential pressure at five points during preservice testing and establishment of a pump curve. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL22)

Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Location: O8D5; Mail Stop: O8G9a Telephone: 3014151564; Fax: 3014151222 Email address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 16 Mail Envelope Properties (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20110502095100)

Subject:

Sequoyah 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of Relief Request RP-01, Revision 1 (TAC Nos. ME5982 and ME5983)

Sent Date: 5/2/2011 9:51:18 AM Received Date: 5/2/2011 9:51:00 AM From: Lingam, Siva Created By: Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Wolfgang, Robert" <Robert.Wolfgang@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "dgreen@tva.gov" <dgreen@tva.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2069 5/2/2011 9:51:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: