ML15265A600: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15265A600
| number = ML15265A600
| issue date = 09/22/2015
| issue date = 09/22/2015
| title = 2015/09/22 NRR E-mail Capture - Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Per 10 CFR 50.67
| author name = Lingam S P
| author name = Lingam S
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| addressee name = Soenen P R
| addressee name = Soenen P
| addressee affiliation = Pacific Gas & Electric Co
| addressee affiliation = Pacific Gas & Electric Co
| docket = 05000275, 05000323
| docket = 05000275, 05000323
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| project = TAC:MF6399, TAC:MF6400
| project = TAC:MF6399, TAC:MF6400
| stage =  
| stage = RAI
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Lingam, SivaSent:Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:15 PMTo:Soenen, Philippe R (PNS3@pge.com)Cc:Markley, Michael; Weerakkody, Sunil; Keefe, Molly; Schrader, Kenneth (KJSe@pge.com); 'mjrm@pge.com'Subject:Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)By a letter dated June 17, 2015 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15176A539), as supplemented by letter dated August 31, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15243A363), Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E, the licensee), submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the licensing bases to adopt the alternative source term (AST) as allowed by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Section 50.67, "Accident source term.Please note the following official requests for additional information (RAIs) from our Probabilistic Risk Assessment Operations and Human Factors Branch (APHB) for the AST LAR, and provide your responses within 30 days from the date of this e-mail. We transmitted the draft RAIs to you on August 18, 2015, for the purpose of any clarification call.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Lingam, Siva Sent:                       Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:15 PM To:                         Soenen, Philippe R (PNS3@pge.com)
1. Please identify any operator manual actions that will be added, deleted, or changed to support the proposed license amendment. If there are changes to operator actions please include the following information:
Cc:                         Markley, Michael; Weerakkody, Sunil; Keefe, Molly; Schrader, Kenneth (KJSe@pge.com);
                            'mjrm@pge.com'
 
==Subject:==
Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)
By a letter dated June 17, 2015 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML15176A539), as supplemented by letter dated August 31, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15243A363), Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E, the licensee), submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the licensing bases to adopt the alternative source term (AST) as allowed by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Section 50.67, Accident source term. Please note the following official requests for additional information (RAIs) from our Probabilistic Risk Assessment Operations and Human Factors Branch (APHB) for the AST LAR, and provide your responses within 30 days from the date of this e-mail. We transmitted the draft RAIs to you on August 18, 2015, for the purpose of any clarification call.
: 1. Please identify any operator manual actions that will be added, deleted, or changed to support the proposed license amendment. If there are changes to operator actions please include the following information:
* What cues are provided to personnel that manual action(s) is/are required?
* What cues are provided to personnel that manual action(s) is/are required?
* What cues are provided to personnel that the proposed action(s) is/are no longer required?
* What cues are provided to personnel that the proposed action(s) is/are no longer required?
* What administrative controls exist to assure that, when the action(s) is/are no longer required, the plant configuration is put in the correct configuration for the plant status? 2. Please describe any changes to operating procedures needed to support the proposed license amendment. 3. If the Emergency Operating Procedures are affected, describe any changes that were required of the Control Room task analysis that was done as part of your Detailed Control Room Design Review. If no update to the task analysis was necessary, describe how task requirements were developed. 4. Please describe any changes to controls or displays (including annunciators and alarms) needed to support the proposed license amendment. 5. Please describe any changes to training and the simulator needed to support the proposed license amendment. 6. Please describe any changes to staffing or qualification needed to support the proposed license amendment. 7. What has been or will be done to assure that any new or changed human actions can be done within the time limits of the relevant scenario(s)? 8. Has an operating experience review been done, including plant-specific condition reports, Licensee Event reports, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) reports, and other relevant sources?  
* What administrative controls exist to assure that, when the action(s) is/are no longer required, the plant configuration is put in the correct configuration for the plant status?
: 29. Please describe any increase in operator work load that will occur with the proposed license amendment. 10. Please provide engineering design procedures related to the human factors design of the proposed license amendment, or describe how human factors design is accomplished. 11. Describe the process used to verify and validate the ability of your operators to accomplish the tasks required for the proposed LAR. In lieu of a description, you may provide the relevant administrative procedure(s) for verification and validation. Did the Validation include a representative sample of operators, and was it done with Technical Specification (TS) minimum staffing and nominal staffing?
: 2. Please describe any changes to operating procedures needed to support the proposed license amendment.
12. Describe the process used to monitor manual actions to ensure that they remain feasible and reliable over the long term, and are not degraded because of design changes, inadequate training, or other mechanisms. Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL4-1)
: 3. If the Emergency Operating Procedures are affected, describe any changes that were required of the Control Room task analysis that was done as part of your Detailed Control Room Design Review. If no update to the task analysis was necessary, describe how task requirements were developed.
Cooper Nuclear Station Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Location: O8-D5; Mail Stop: O8-B3 Telephone: 301-415-1564; Fax: 301-415-1222 E-mail address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2399   Mail Envelope Properties   (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20150922131400)  
: 4. Please describe any changes to controls or displays (including annunciators and alarms) needed to support the proposed license amendment.
: 5. Please describe any changes to training and the simulator needed to support the proposed license amendment.
: 6. Please describe any changes to staffing or qualification needed to support the proposed license amendment.
: 7. What has been or will be done to assure that any new or changed human actions can be done within the time limits of the relevant scenario(s)?
: 8. Has an operating experience review been done, including plant-specific condition reports, Licensee Event reports, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) reports, and other relevant sources?
1
: 9. Please describe any increase in operator work load that will occur with the proposed license amendment.
: 10. Please provide engineering design procedures related to the human factors design of the proposed license amendment, or describe how human factors design is accomplished.
: 11. Describe the process used to verify and validate the ability of your operators to accomplish the tasks required for the proposed LAR. In lieu of a description, you may provide the relevant administrative procedure(s) for verification and validation. Did the Validation include a representative sample of operators, and was it done with Technical Specification (TS) minimum staffing and nominal staffing?
: 12. Describe the process used to monitor manual actions to ensure that they remain feasible and reliable over the long term, and are not degraded because of design changes, inadequate training, or other mechanisms.
Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL4-1)
Cooper Nuclear Station Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Location: O8-D5; Mail Stop: O8-B3 Telephone: 301-415-1564; Fax: 301-415-1222 E-mail address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov 2
 
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2399 Mail Envelope Properties     (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20150922131400)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)
Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)
Sent Date:   9/22/2015 1:14:33 PM Received Date: 9/22/2015 1:14:00 PM From:   Lingam, Siva Created By:   Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Markley, Michael" <Michael.Markley@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Weerakkody, Sunil" <Sunil.Weerakkody@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Keefe, Molly" <Molly.Keefe@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Schrader, Kenneth (KJSe@pge.com)" <KJSe@pge.com> Tracking Status: None "'mjrm@pge.com'" <mjrm@pge.com> Tracking Status: None "Soenen, Philippe R (PNS3@pge.com)" <PNS3@pge.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   3810     9/22/2015 1:14:00 PM   Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:      
Sent Date:             9/22/2015 1:14:33 PM Received Date:         9/22/2015 1:14:00 PM From:                   Lingam, Siva Created By:             Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:
}}
"Markley, Michael" <Michael.Markley@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Weerakkody, Sunil" <Sunil.Weerakkody@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Keefe, Molly" <Molly.Keefe@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Schrader, Kenneth (KJSe@pge.com)" <KJSe@pge.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'mjrm@pge.com'" <mjrm@pge.com>
Tracking Status: None "Soenen, Philippe R (PNS3@pge.com)" <PNS3@pge.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         3810                   9/22/2015 1:14:00 PM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 10:13, 19 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Per 10 CFR 50.67
ML15265A600
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/22/2015
From: Siva Lingam
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Soenen P
Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
TAC MF6399, TAC MF6400
Download: ML15265A600 (3)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Lingam, Siva Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:15 PM To: Soenen, Philippe R (PNS3@pge.com)

Cc: Markley, Michael; Weerakkody, Sunil; Keefe, Molly; Schrader, Kenneth (KJSe@pge.com);

'mjrm@pge.com'

Subject:

Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)

By a letter dated June 17, 2015 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML15176A539), as supplemented by letter dated August 31, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15243A363), Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E, the licensee), submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the licensing bases to adopt the alternative source term (AST) as allowed by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Section 50.67, Accident source term. Please note the following official requests for additional information (RAIs) from our Probabilistic Risk Assessment Operations and Human Factors Branch (APHB) for the AST LAR, and provide your responses within 30 days from the date of this e-mail. We transmitted the draft RAIs to you on August 18, 2015, for the purpose of any clarification call.

1. Please identify any operator manual actions that will be added, deleted, or changed to support the proposed license amendment. If there are changes to operator actions please include the following information:
  • What cues are provided to personnel that manual action(s) is/are required?
  • What cues are provided to personnel that the proposed action(s) is/are no longer required?
  • What administrative controls exist to assure that, when the action(s) is/are no longer required, the plant configuration is put in the correct configuration for the plant status?
2. Please describe any changes to operating procedures needed to support the proposed license amendment.
3. If the Emergency Operating Procedures are affected, describe any changes that were required of the Control Room task analysis that was done as part of your Detailed Control Room Design Review. If no update to the task analysis was necessary, describe how task requirements were developed.
4. Please describe any changes to controls or displays (including annunciators and alarms) needed to support the proposed license amendment.
5. Please describe any changes to training and the simulator needed to support the proposed license amendment.
6. Please describe any changes to staffing or qualification needed to support the proposed license amendment.
7. What has been or will be done to assure that any new or changed human actions can be done within the time limits of the relevant scenario(s)?
8. Has an operating experience review been done, including plant-specific condition reports, Licensee Event reports, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) reports, and other relevant sources?

1

9. Please describe any increase in operator work load that will occur with the proposed license amendment.
10. Please provide engineering design procedures related to the human factors design of the proposed license amendment, or describe how human factors design is accomplished.
11. Describe the process used to verify and validate the ability of your operators to accomplish the tasks required for the proposed LAR. In lieu of a description, you may provide the relevant administrative procedure(s) for verification and validation. Did the Validation include a representative sample of operators, and was it done with Technical Specification (TS) minimum staffing and nominal staffing?
12. Describe the process used to monitor manual actions to ensure that they remain feasible and reliable over the long term, and are not degraded because of design changes, inadequate training, or other mechanisms.

Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL4-1)

Cooper Nuclear Station Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Location: O8-D5; Mail Stop: O8-B3 Telephone: 301-415-1564; Fax: 301-415-1222 E-mail address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2399 Mail Envelope Properties (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20150922131400)

Subject:

Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Requests for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 15-03 to Adopt the Alternative Source Term per 10 CFR 50.67 (TAC Nos. MF6399 and MF6400)

Sent Date: 9/22/2015 1:14:33 PM Received Date: 9/22/2015 1:14:00 PM From: Lingam, Siva Created By: Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Markley, Michael" <Michael.Markley@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Weerakkody, Sunil" <Sunil.Weerakkody@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Keefe, Molly" <Molly.Keefe@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Schrader, Kenneth (KJSe@pge.com)" <KJSe@pge.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'mjrm@pge.com'" <mjrm@pge.com>

Tracking Status: None "Soenen, Philippe R (PNS3@pge.com)" <PNS3@pge.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3810 9/22/2015 1:14:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: