ML071030148

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML071030148
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	03/02/2007
From:	Constellation Energy Group
To:	Caruso J Operations Branch I
Sykes, Marvin D.
Shared Package
ML060800077	List: IR 05000220/2007301 ML070610189 ML070820469 ML070820475 ML070820484 ML070820520 ML070820529 ML070820535 ML070820542 ML070820551 ML070820557 ML070820563 ML070820570 ML070820573 ML070871016 ML071030148 ML071340128
References
Download: ML071030148 (14)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 1

=acility: P I * /

Date of Examination:

r I

?k -167 leveloped by: Written - Facility R N R C u // Operating - Facility NRC Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l .a; C.2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

P A

[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 211 9 '

V

(-751 6. Integratedexamination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2,S-201-3.

ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-11 ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.l .e and f; C.3.d) 9 Tz<

~~~~

u '-

(-701

(-45) v.

8.

licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)) r Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and fe dback provided to facility IO z Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, an$113 V '

scenarios, as applicable). supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.l .e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9.

ES-202) /

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's due (C.1.l; C.2.g;

/ l /o I1

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form (C.l .I; C.2.i; ES-202) r W

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facili licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) If a7

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14.' Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >IO) applications audited to confirm qualificationsI eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) / 2 /I v

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) f4,

\r '\

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measur distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)  %

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examinatios date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 24 of 27

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Initials Item Task Description a b' c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T

E

- N 2.

S I

M U

L A

T 0

R

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain@)the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetitionfrom the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determineif there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered b

in the appropriate exam sections.

E N

E 0 d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: fvlllL dllc f?ornt Uvht i Date of Examination: &tr SL,2Jb70peratin est Number:

1. General Criteria

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

C. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test@).(see Section D.l .a,)

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrativewalk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ATTACHMENT 6: NRC EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT ts-201 txamination Security Aqreement t-orm tS-201-3

1. Pre-Examination

\ LJ-1 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of b d + d % s of the date of m signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any ersons who have not been authorized by the R i N C chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feed ack t o those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the hysical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facili licensees Y

procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions o f t is agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an en orcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. In addition, I understand by signing that any violation of this agreement will result in disciplinary action up to an including discharge. This may also result in civil penalties imposed by the USNRC.

2. Post-Examination

• c ~t,t&q To the best of m ulge to an unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week&

instruct, evaluate, K

the date t at I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authori PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBLILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE f21 DATE NOTE COPY ON BRIGHT COLORED PAPER Page 34 TA P-TQS-06 Rev 15

ATTACHMENT 6: NRC EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT LS-201 txamination Security Aqreement Form tS-201-3

1. Pre-Examination rlsr 12, w, I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of d i o f i h e date of m signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the 4

N C chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below R

and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the hysical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facili licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions o f t is agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an en orcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that

'y examination security may have been compromised. In addition, I understand by signing that any violation of this agreement will result in disciplinary action up to an including discharge. This may also result in civil penalties imposed by the USNRC.

2. Post-Examination

• r-IL,L&l To the best of m knowledge, I did not divulge to an unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week&) o$-)&un instruct, evaluate, or rovide perfor

!I the date t at I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ce feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorize by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBLILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE NOTES: I. This note indicates that the individual was personally briefed as to hislher responsibilities in complying with this security agreement.

COPY ON BRIGHT COLORED PAPER Page 34 TAP-TQS-06 Rev 15

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of E/la& l L , b 7 a s of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of fi1td4 \Z,%lFrom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 10.

11.

12.

13.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Nine Mile Point 1 Date of Exam: March 12, 2007 Scenario Numbers: 1/213/4 Operating Test No.: NRC LLh the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

.. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

IO. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form alonq with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

n

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

~

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) 1 n

Actual Attributes 1 l 2 1 3 1 4

-- I I-- --

1I 1. Total malfunctions (5-8)

I 2.

II Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

I 3. Abnormal events (2-4)

II 5.

Major transients (1-2)

EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2)

I Unit 1 2006 Final Exam Submittal NUREG-1021, Revision 9 2/22/2007 11 :01:52 AM

1 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 1 Facility: Nine Mile Point 1 Date of Exam: March 12,2007 Operating Test No. ALL Reactivity 4 NA 1 1 1 0 SRO-I 2 Normal NA 2 2 2 1 1 1 Driscoll Inst/Comp 48 4,lO 4,9 6 4 4 2 Major 6 7 6 3 2 2 1 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

Unit 1 Final E x a m Submittal 26 of 27 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 2/22/2007 8:26 AM

~

ES-301 C O M P E T E N C I E S CHECKLIST F O R M ES-301-6 I

Applicants Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO Y Comply With and Operate Control Boards (2) I NA Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) I 123, 6,7 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Tech Spec compliance for an RO (2) Optional for an SRO-U (3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Unit 1 Final Exam Submittal 2/22/2007 NUREG-I021 Revision 9 2/22/2007 9:45:17 AM

ES-301 COMPETENCIES CHECKLIST F O R M ES-301-6 Ap p Iicants Competencies French and O'Brien ommunicate an (1 ) Includes Tech Spec compliance for an RO (2) Optional for an SRO-U (3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Unit 1 Final Exam Submittal NUREG-IO21 Revision 9 2/22/2007 10:04:53 AM

ES-401 WRITTEN EXAMINATION QUALITY CHECKLIST FORM ES-401-6 FACILITY: Nine Mile Point 1 DATE OF EXAM March 12,2007 EXAM LEVEL SRO Initials Item Descriotion 1 Question and answers are technically accurate.

2 a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions.

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available.

3 SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401.

4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions was repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

5 Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed X the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started the examinations were developed independently the licensee certifies that there is no duplication other (explain) 6 Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual 20/25 question distribution(s). at right 20% 0% 80%

7 Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam (including 10 new questions) Memory are written at the comprehension/analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KIAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual ROlSRO 12% 88%

question distribution(s) at right.

I I 8 Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9 Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10 Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in E S Appendix B.

11 The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet.

I/ Printed Name / Signalure Note:

• The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initials Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG 1021 Rev 9 ES-401 Final Exam Submittal

ES-401 WRITTEN EXAMINATION QUALITY CHECKLIST FORM ES-401-6 FACILITY: Nine Mile Point 1 DATE OF EXAM MARCH 12, 2007 EXAM LEVEL RO Initials Item Description 1 Question and answers are technically accurate.

2 a. NRC KlAs referenced for all questions.

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available.

3 SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401.

4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions was repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

5 Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed X the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started the examinations were developed independently the licensee certifies that there is no duplication other (explain) 6 Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual 24175 47175 question distribution(s) at right 32% 63%

7 Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam (including 10 new questions) Memory are written at the comprehensionlanalysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual ROISRO 41 % 59%

question distribution(s) at right.

I I 8 Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9 Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10 Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

11 The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items, the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet.

b Facility Reviewer (*)

c NRC Chief Examiner(#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

• The facility reviewers initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initials Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required.

• • See Form 401-6 for SRO Level Examination NUREG 1021 Rev 9 ES-401 Final Exam Submittal

From: "Bobka, Gerald" <Gerald.Bobka@consteIlation.com> -

To: <jgc@nrc.gov>

Date: 03/02/2007 8:30:53AM

Subject:

NMP Written Exam The following is provided for your info regarding Form 401 -6 Item 4.

There are 3 repeat questions on the RO written exam from the 2004 NRC exam. There is 1 repeat question on the SRO exam from the 2004 NRC exam.

There are no repeat questions, JPMs or scenarios used on the audit exam for this class.

Gerald Bobka NMP Exam Developer

>>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP1

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~ l t & ~ i k ~Date ~of~ f - 3\Icp(0*7 Exam: Exam Level: R O C S R O R I

Initials Item Description a b C 1.

2.

3.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers sDot check > 25% of examinations)

-hG=

45 G3 flg5 a3 FP

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 52% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, *4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail kf3 G3 Y-

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

@fi are justified /&

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Nam e/S ig nat u re Date

a. Grader Idd7

b. Facility Reviewer(*) 3/26 (17

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5