ML110770373

Op Retake Exam - Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML110770373
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	02/07/2011
From:	Operations Branch I
To:	Constellation Energy Nuclear Group
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML103200039	List: IR 05000317/2011301 ML103200040 ML103270084 ML110110538 ML110110561 ML110110571 ML110120259 ML110250611 ML110250629 ML110770373
References
50-317/11-301, 50-318/11-301, ES-201, TAC U01839 50-317/11-301, 50-318/11-301
Download: ML110770373 (4)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Date of Examination: Jan. 2011 JV/4 Developed by: Written - Facility NRC 1/ Operating - FaCility}( NRC Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials IL 1.:; '.

~

h,iI.

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) r' "0 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) .1'- E: S~~ij; .'. ,.\lZ: ~¥ii\

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

I MJ:

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

I tI!;

[-901 [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] ~ I

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3'4l ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

" IE T

IES3C 14 jf~ N/,A, IF

{-70} {7. ~xamination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to fac:~ i:

licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ~

ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) \.kL

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepa ES-202)

~

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h, C.3.f)

1/1f"

. ~

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)  !'It-- ~

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) VJd

~

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) I

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) tVA v;t

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) Jl

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Date of Examination: January Initials Item Task Description a b* C#

1.

W

a. Verify that the ouUine(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. N/A t-Jk  ;\-4 R

I

b. Assess whether the oulline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

N/A NIr' ;fit T

T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systj:lms, evolutions, or generic topics. N/A N'" ,Nk E

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. N/A tJlr tvJf

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, N/A wnr f.l4 S and major transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

o R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. N/A N.... M

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form f (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Date

a. Author Jeff Lofton 11/11/2010

b. Facility Reviewer (*) 1I-f-1.~I()

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ~v.J 5; 1.1< (J / ~I4J.I'\ ~

d. NRC Supervisor I~

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28

ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of /-1,- 'la" as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1-/7-41Otf' From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

~:~~.'~I=~ ~

3. _ ~_~ 6>-0],7Xvr.;"el;:(l 2 lo~'HIJ

=-

'¥

4. ( &;</htIt f(JJhtOtf1:>tL t2. .2 .10 -f:I~'T-"-IIffJ-~--::-----

5. ~~~3!tW~ £x&\4:, Vu I td4v Lmlk7 ~

6. -1'( J@G'l 'I"'sNJC.l'lI.I' ~<D _ ~

7. t:fiiiP( ~~c ~ VAUOh(lc tV  !.::..}::ll --'-"th.-H~~--

8.(: b,bfl}Q,6i>/

9. Mic","",e\

&/4.,;

S........ l "At Ib:7/fl.,A/

V~-,0o:b.o""

/ .. Ii ~II l/qill

! fW! 6 ()

10.khl...1. (c::rVl;;~J\.)U ~

Hlt4&~ ~;'$-P~

14._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

15. ---

NOTES: ---

ES-201, r ~ 27 of 28

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: Calvert Cliffs Date of Examination: Jan. 2011 OperatinQ Test Number: 2011 Initials

1. General Criteria a b* C#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplinQ requirements (e.Q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ~ a- #

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

N/A

~

Nt'" tJA

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) l<f d' Ij>l

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within N/A N~

acceptable limits. /1/.4

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. r ~ v;l

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- -

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions

• • initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

I/)J detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues ~ }

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

r ~ ~

3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with N/A Nt- M4 Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

prino;~;n~ 11/11/2010 Date

a. Author Jeff Lofton tf/t/ '-' v f.,

b. Facility Reviewer(*) Chris J'ones "Vv-- {-'-Ii

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) D"tv;~ 5;(k ( ~J~ Ilto/,f

d. NRC Supervisor S"lA~ fIa.".,sell/ ~ /

~ oCO Lt.!;I/"

/'"

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27