ML111360413: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Assessment Meeting Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Safety Performance in 2010
{{#Wiki_filter:Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Assessment Meeting Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1
                      &
U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1


Agenda
Agenda

Latest revision as of 21:56, 10 March 2020

NRC Meeting Slides - Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant - 2011 Annual Assessment
ML111360413
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/12/2011
From: Glenn Dentel
Reactor Projects Branch 1
To:
Dentel, G RGN-I/DRP/BR1/610-337-5233
Shared Package
ML110610670 List:
References
Download: ML111360413 (18)


Text

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Assessment Meeting Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Discussion of Calvert Cliffs safety performance
  • Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of nuclear plant events in Japan
  • Closing remarks
  • NRC to address public questions 2

Todays NRC Representatives

  • James Clifford - Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
  • Glenn Denel - DRP Branch Chief
  • Karl Farrar - Meeting Facilitator

NRC Assessment Summary

  • Constellation Energy operated Calvert Cliffs safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
  • Unit 1 was in the Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Unit 2 was in the Regulatory Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections as well as a Supplemental Inspection are planned for 2011 4

NRC Action Matrix Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are 1 or 2 White 2 White or 1 Multiple Yellow Overall Green; Inputs; Yellow Input; Inputs or 1 Red Unacceptable Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Input; Cornerstone Performance; Objectives Objectives Objectives Met w/ Objectives Met w/ Plants not Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Significant permitted to Degradation in Degradation in Operate w/in this Safety Safety Performance Column; Performance Unacceptable Margin to Safety

  • Increasing safety significance
  • Increasing NRC inspection efforts
  • Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
  • Increasing regulatory actions

Inspection Activities in 2010

  • 6800 hours0.0787 days <br />1.889 hours <br />0.0112 weeks <br />0.00259 months <br /> of inspection and related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
  • 15 regional inspections
  • 2 team inspections 6

Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010

  • All Green Performance Indicators
  • 13 Green inspection findings
  • 1 White inspection finding 7

2010 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Assessment Summary

  • Calvert Cliffs was operated safely
  • Unit 1 Licensee Response column / Unit 2 Regulatory Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections as well as a supplemental inspection for 2011 8

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9

U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe

  • NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
  • NRC requires a defense-in-depth approach to safety
  • NRC performs independent safety inspections
  • NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10

Designed for Site Specific Natural Events

  • Tsunamis
  • Hurricanes
  • Floods
  • Tornadoes 11

The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth

  • Redundant and diverse safety systems
  • Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
  • Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
  • Emergency planning 12

NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program

  • NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
  • At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
  • NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13

NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:

  • NRC operating experience program
  • Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
  • Post TMI Actions
  • Post 9/11 Orders
  • Generic Safety Issues 14

NRC Response to Events in Japan

  • NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
  • Near-term actions (<90 days)

- conducting additional inspections

- identifying near-term operational issues

  • Longer-term actions 15

Directors Comments James Clifford, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects USNRC, Region I 16

Meeting Ground Rules

1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17

Questions 18