ML19345H357: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'
{{#Wiki_filter:'
                                    *
(=
(=
              ,,
                                                                                                           \-
                                                                                                           \-
cmco
cmco UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                    ust NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION                ,'q}    g                    ,    ;
            -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                    ust NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION                ,'q}    g                    ,    ;
In the Matter of:                        )
In the Matter of:                        )
f1      Citic:cf the Swelary kckt!'s&Scaice
f1      Citic:cf the Swelary kckt!'s&Scaice Eend            d y
                                                                              '
Eend            d y
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS          )                                  o>
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS          )                                  o>
COMPANY, ET AL.                                                                        cn Docket No. 50-395-0L            9      *
COMPANY, ET AL.                                                                        cn Docket No. 50-395-0L            9      *
(Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station,                                                                    4 Unit 1)                                                                        6                  j May 11, 1981          8                g.
(Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station,                                                                    4 Unit 1)                                                                        6                  j May 11, 1981          8                g.
                                                                                                           *f ' --
                                                                                                           *f ' --
                                                                                     %D              N          U INTERVEN0R FUA'S RESPONSE TO                                                  b APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SCHEDULING                  /-          E            2
                                                                                     %D              N          U INTERVEN0R FUA'S RESPONSE TO                                                  b APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SCHEDULING                  /-          E            2 w t' On April 30, 1981, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board issued a
                                                                                          %
w t' On April 30, 1981, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board issued a
       " Partial Order Following Prehearing Conference . . . " admitting Fairfield United Action as an Intervenor in the above-captioned proceeding. Ap-plicants South Carolina Electric and Gas Company and the South Carolina Pub 1'c Service Authority (" Applicants") filed " Applicants' Nc*. ice of Ap-peal . . . of Licensing Board Order Admitting Fairfield United Action
       " Partial Order Following Prehearing Conference . . . " admitting Fairfield United Action as an Intervenor in the above-captioned proceeding. Ap-plicants South Carolina Electric and Gas Company and the South Carolina Pub 1'c Service Authority (" Applicants") filed " Applicants' Nc*. ice of Ap-peal . . . of Licensing Board Order Admitting Fairfield United Action
       ...    " and " Applicants' Motion for Expedited Scheduling" on Mayi8,1981.
       ...    " and " Applicants' Motion for Expedited Scheduling" on Mayi8,1981.
Service was made on this party by hand delivery by one of Applicants' many lawyers on Saturday evening, May 9, 1981.
Service was made on this party by hand delivery by one of Applicants' many lawyers on Saturday evening, May 9, 1981.
Intervenor FUA opposes Applicants' motion, which requests the Ap .
Intervenor FUA opposes Applicants' motion, which requests the Ap .
peals Board to direct parties to submit briefs on Applicants' appeal by
peals Board to direct parties to submit briefs on Applicants' appeal by May 15, 1981.
'
May 15, 1981.
The Applicants allege no specific good cause for granting their motion for expedited scheduling.        Nor does the present scheduling of the Licensing Hearings warrant expedited scheduling of submission of those briefs.
The Applicants allege no specific good cause for granting their motion for expedited scheduling.        Nor does the present scheduling of the Licensing Hearings warrant expedited scheduling of submission of those briefs.
1
1 8105200 N C,
,
8105200 N C,
;
s --( O Lagr 46 zw          m w ;._ s. .c,.e &m.- w ; m eg g + n      g p.1 ,e;;-      _ g;mqmp.~ c
s --( O Lagr 46 zw          m w ;._ s. .c,.e &m.- w ; m eg g + n      g p.1 ,e;;-      _ g;mqmp.~ c


_
                                .
  ' -
Unlike Applicants, on whose behalf two additional attornies have noticed appearances in this proceeding in.the past week, FUA does not have available to it a stable of lawyers. The requirement of production of a brief on such short notice would be burdensome to FUA and prejudicial to its interests. FUA is prepared to meet its obligations under the orderly schedule set forth in the regulations and intends. timely to file a brief on this matter.
Unlike Applicants, on whose behalf two additional attornies have noticed appearances in this proceeding in.the past week, FUA does not have available to it a stable of lawyers. The requirement of production of a brief on such short notice would be burdensome to FUA and prejudicial to its interests. FUA is prepared to meet its obligations under the orderly schedule set forth in the regulations and intends. timely to file a brief on this matter.
If Applicants' are concerned about delay, it is they and not FUA which must bear the burden of any delay or additional. work occasioned by this appeal. Filing the appeal was their choice.
If Applicants' are concerned about delay, it is they and not FUA which must bear the burden of any delay or additional. work occasioned by this appeal. Filing the appeal was their choice.
CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Applicants' Motion for Expe-
CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Applicants' Motion for Expe-dited Scheduling should be denied.
                                                                -
dited Scheduling should be denied.
                                                            .
                                                                     /
                                                                     /
f M ohn C. Ruoff, Ph.D[ h Authorized Representative Fairfield United Action P.O. Box 96 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
f M ohn C. Ruoff, Ph.D[ h Authorized Representative Fairfield United Action P.O. Box 96 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
             < %%-anad t.nem              m#        .
             < %%-anad t.nem              m#        .
4 .s      .c          gg :m,}}
4 .s      .c          gg :m,}}

Latest revision as of 04:44, 18 February 2020

Response Opposing Applicants' 810508 Notice of Appeal of ASLB 810430 Order Admitting Fairfield United Action (Fua) & Motion for Expedited Scheduling.No Good Cause Shown. Expedited Hearing Would Be Burdensome & Prejudicial to Fua
ML19345H357
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/11/1981
From: Ruoff J
FAIRFIELD UNITED ACTION
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8105200195
Download: ML19345H357 (2)
v • d • e


Text

'

(=

\-

cmco UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ust NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION ,'q} g ,  ;

In the Matter of: )

f1 Citic:cf the Swelary kckt!'s&Scaice Eend d y

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS ) o>

COMPANY, ET AL. cn Docket No. 50-395-0L 9 *

(Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station, 4 Unit 1) 6 j May 11, 1981 8 g.

  • f ' --

%D N U INTERVEN0R FUA'S RESPONSE TO b APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SCHEDULING /- E 2 w t' On April 30, 1981, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board issued a

" Partial Order Following Prehearing Conference . . . " admitting Fairfield United Action as an Intervenor in the above-captioned proceeding. Ap-plicants South Carolina Electric and Gas Company and the South Carolina Pub 1'c Service Authority (" Applicants") filed " Applicants' Nc*. ice of Ap-peal . . . of Licensing Board Order Admitting Fairfield United Action

... " and " Applicants' Motion for Expedited Scheduling" on Mayi8,1981.

Service was made on this party by hand delivery by one of Applicants' many lawyers on Saturday evening, May 9, 1981.

Intervenor FUA opposes Applicants' motion, which requests the Ap .

peals Board to direct parties to submit briefs on Applicants' appeal by May 15, 1981.

The Applicants allege no specific good cause for granting their motion for expedited scheduling. Nor does the present scheduling of the Licensing Hearings warrant expedited scheduling of submission of those briefs.

1 8105200 N C,

s --( O Lagr 46 zw m w ;._ s. .c,.e &m.- w ; m eg g + n g p.1 ,e;;- _ g;mqmp.~ c

Unlike Applicants, on whose behalf two additional attornies have noticed appearances in this proceeding in.the past week, FUA does not have available to it a stable of lawyers. The requirement of production of a brief on such short notice would be burdensome to FUA and prejudicial to its interests. FUA is prepared to meet its obligations under the orderly schedule set forth in the regulations and intends. timely to file a brief on this matter.

If Applicants' are concerned about delay, it is they and not FUA which must bear the burden of any delay or additional. work occasioned by this appeal. Filing the appeal was their choice.

CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Applicants' Motion for Expe-dited Scheduling should be denied.

/

f M ohn C. Ruoff, Ph.D[ h Authorized Representative Fairfield United Action P.O. Box 96 Jenkinsville, SC 29065

< %%-anad t.nem m# .

4 .s .c gg :m,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19345H357&oldid=2480348"