ML14248A700: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 08/01/2014 | | issue date = 08/01/2014 | ||
| title = 2014 DC Cook Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2 | | title = 2014 DC Cook Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2 | ||
| author name = | | author name = Mcneil D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201, Rev. 9 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201, Rev. 9 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: D.C. Cook U1/U2 Date of Examination: Jul~ 21 -August 1, 2014 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# | ||
D.C. Cook U1/U2 Date of Examination: | 1. | ||
21 -August 1, 2014 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. f!l\0 i ,J/A Jill | w a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. f!l\0 i ,J/A Jill | ||
T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. I<Y-\J | : b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R ~\) | ||
dAI& | I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. d* | ||
T T | |||
: c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. I<Y-\J ~ | |||
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule | E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. ~\c) | ||
N dAI& | |||
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative | 2. | ||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the j&.\) | ~ | ||
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix | : a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s | ||
G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | and major transients. | ||
fl..'W AM | I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using | ||
4 .. E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. A.. R | ~\.) | ||
L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | L at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A | ||
T from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. d~ | |||
n/a n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner | 0 R | ||
(#) Dell R. McNeil/ _A'_,.L;£/ | : c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative ~\) ~ | ||
hA . ./A_,:£) | and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. | ||
02/05/204 | : a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | ||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form j&.\) | |||
, f/ Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.}} | (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) | ||
: 3. (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form | |||
~ | |||
w (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria I on the form. | |||
T | |||
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | |||
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form | |||
~\0 d"' | |||
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations | |||
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ~'# | |||
: 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. ~'W a. | |||
G E | |||
: b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. fl..'W AM N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~\.) 4.. | |||
E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~w A.. | |||
R A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~"" iLk L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~'w ~ | |||
: a. Author ~~e/~ | |||
R. Keith Walton 1 - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ | |||
Date 02/05/2014 | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a n/a | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Dell R. McNeil/ _A'_,.L;£/ hA. ./A_,:£) 02/05/204 | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor Hironori | |||
-, ~ | |||
Peterson'-~~:e"<...-'ffP.."-~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~~//f f/ | |||
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.}} |
Latest revision as of 18:48, 5 February 2020
ML14248A700 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 08/01/2014 |
From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
To: | Indiana Michigan Power Co |
Shared Package | |
ML14218A305 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML14248A700 (1) | |
Text
ES-201, Rev. 9 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: D.C. Cook U1/U2 Date of Examination: Jul~ 21 -August 1, 2014 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
1.
w a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. f!l\0 i ,J/A Jill
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R ~\)
I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. d*
T T
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. I<Y-\J ~
E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. ~\c)
N dAI&
2.
~
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s
and major transients.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using
~\.)
L at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A
T from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. d~
0 R
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative ~\) ~
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form j&.\)
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
- 3. (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form
~
w (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria I on the form.
T
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
~\0 d"'
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ~'#
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. ~'W a.
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. fl..'W AM N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~\.) 4..
E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~w A..
R A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~"" iLk L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~'w ~
- a. Author ~~e/~
R. Keith Walton 1 - - - - - _ _ _ _ _
Date 02/05/2014
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a n/a
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Dell R. McNeil/ _A'_,.L;£/ hA. ./A_,:£) 02/05/204
- d. NRC Supervisor Hironori
-, ~
Peterson'-~~:e"<...-'ffP.."-~
~
~
~~//f f/
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.