ML20356A074

2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Quality Checklist ES-301-3

ML20356A074
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	08/25/2020
From:	Indiana Michigan Power Co
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Shared Package
ML19121A511	List: ML20356A033 ML20356A074 ML20356A080 ML20356A084 ML20356A086 ML20356A091 ML20356A095 ML20356A099 ML20356A101
References
Download: ML20356A074 (1)

Text

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: {) <.. C.oo u ... 'I,,;. \ "l.. Date of Examination: -,/1,0/ Cl1.0 Operating Test Number: \

Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c*

a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved ouUine; changes are consistent with dwr samplina reauirements (e.a .. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance. safetv function distribution). -1'

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered dwr durino this examination. -v'

c. The ooeratino test shall not duplicate items from the aoolicants' audit test(sl (see Section D.1.a.). -v J dwr

-v

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. .,_.J dwr

e. It appears that lhe operating lest will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent aoolicants at the desianated license level. -V' dwr

2. Walkthrough Criteria I -- I - I I --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

.. initial conditions

.. initialing cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average lime allowed for completion) and specific

. designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include-dwr

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the seauence of steos, if annllcable -,/

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC dwr examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. -ti ..J

3. Simulator Criteria -- - -

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed tn accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a coov is attached. -,/

--e..) dwr Printed Name/Signature Date

!J:_61 Volt:::-

.  ::S-zz, L¥' .

't'h,/-ic

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*) 1,111,rrt,'J! t.J. - s-f&/io

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) David W. Reeser Digitally signed by David W. Reeser Date: 2020.07.28 11:01:31 -05'00'

d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2020.07.28 15:52:53 -05'00'

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column *c*: the chief examiner concurrence is reauired.