ML24239A381

Form 2.3-2, Operating Test Quality Checklist (DC Cook 2024)

ML24239A381
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	06/11/2024
From:	NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB
To:	Indiana Michigan Power Co
Travis Iskierka-Boggs
Shared Package
ML22335A447	List: ML24239A381 ML24239A383 ML24256A147
References
Download: ML24239A381 (1)

Text

DC Cook 07/22/24 GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) 4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

5.

The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to observe and evaluate applicant performance.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4.

10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4-1 submitted with the scenario set.

11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4)

1.

Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP) entry (1-2) 2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3.

Major transients (1-2) 4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions

( 1 per scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarios prepared for the scheduled exam) 6.

Preidentified critical tasks(> 2)

Printed Name/Signature Actual Attributes by Scenario No.

I I '-I JI I

2. h

'2 4 14 I I

I 2 I

\\

I l I I I I 1.. I 1.. I a.

Author

\\<>J. \\J._\\l<..:z'. 1

b.

Facility Reviewer(*) C.h&lit :f>ir\\le. j c.

NRC Reviewer (#)

NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

(Y)es I (N)o a

b*

c#

'/ I 'I 1

'/Iv "'

,.,111 µl

"/ 'I H li/v \\'\\

>Jjy \\\\1 1v/-1 i

'i Iv '\\

"" "\\'\\

(Y)es / (N)o a

b*

c#

"I" h\\i

.,,,\\, 11

ii" 1 '{

ii,, ' '{

1/-1,

'<11 ,i Dale

?..'6/2'/

t:fi I fay

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.

ES-2.3, Page 11 of 19 GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR N/A GR Gregory M. Roach, Jr. / Gregory M. Roach, Jr.

6/11/2024 TRAVIS ISKIERKA-BOGGS Digitally signed by TRAVIS ISKIERKA-BOGGS Date: 2024.06.11 13:00:42 -04'00' PAUL ZURAWSKI Digitally signed by PAUL ZURAWSKI Date: 2024.06.11 15:03:07 -05'00'