ML20356A160

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Outline Quality Checklist ES-201-2
ML20356A160
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/25/2020
From: David Reeser
Operations Branch III
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co, NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Reeser D
Shared Package
ML19121A510 List:
References
Download: ML20356A160 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 excludes the written examination outline which was developed by the NRC and provided tho the facility.

Facility:

De. Coo u ....:,; 'q. '- Date of Examination: 1/-J.o/?.o o Initials Item Task Description a b* c **

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. 'V "T...'.>

w b. Assess IMlether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I

Section 0.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. ,v T

T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. -v l*Y:...)

E N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. --v
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major dwr

-,v s transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule dwr L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A

T least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. --v ,.,_;

0 C. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in dwr Section 0.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test." of ES-301 (including overlap). .,y -iJ

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). dwr (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form. -11' R

0 b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

dwr G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

"V '"If.)

H C. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of dwr applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. .,y

-.; -,r._J dwr

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. --v dwr N

E

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. A,/ -, o dwr R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. -11 -ff.)

dwr A

-I dwr

=

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). .,,,/ 4J dwr Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Author -r;,,,;,1 v... 1,--1
b. Facility Reviewer (*) -r;;;.n,w {,J(e.£
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) David W. Reeser Digitally signed by David W. Reeser Date: 2020.05.29 09:03:48 -05'00'
d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2020.07.28 15:47:57 -05'00'
  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination ouUines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column *c*; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.