ML15282A474: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/24/2015
| issue date = 08/24/2015
| title = 2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
| title = 2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
| author name = Beilby M E
| author name = Beilby M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES
 
ES-403                              Written Examination Grading                            Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:  fetcm i                  Date of Exam:  8~8//s  Exam Level:    RO C0'sRO                D Item Description                                              Initials a          b        c
: 1.        Clean answer sheets copied before grading
{'I' {>I)      7"' I~
: 2.        Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~            r' rJPr
: 3.        Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~              ..,. lli~
: 4.        Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
                                                                                ~"              7' tVA-
: 5.        All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                                                        f1f
                                                                                                /      NA.
: 6.        Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of              ~f              ~I ~
questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature                                            Date
: a. Grader                        tni Ke  Oo"''ti It"'    A.;z                          ~ ;, LLf>:'
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)          .,...,. 8et!a:T'$        ~                              '/'11-5
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)        Mic£1Q£) r  t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;-  '
                                        - - *?~                    ~'2(1 thh~
                                                        *n _/£3 '~ -.
                                                        *.        ~/
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)              /J17!JtiA
{/
                                                        .Pi/
(*)      The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
 
ES-403                                Written Examination Grading                    Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i                    Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level:  RO DsRo            ~
Item Description                                      Initials a        b        c
: 1.      Clean answer sheets copied before grading
{'A~      7" /H{d{
I
: 2.      Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                                        (1\~        7"'    NPt
: 3.      Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)                        f'f                tntq
                                                                                        /
: 4.      Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,
                                                                                ~
as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail            .f          'r      rJp,.
: 5.      All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
                                                                              ~{l are justified
                                                                            ~          r      rJf\
: 6.        Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~          I    fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature                                    Date
: a. Grader                        tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6--                  q{t/15
: b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*)          ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.:                            ~L~:r' I
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(")        If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~&#xa3;11;;              9!4;~
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)          /It@~ /J&#xa3;n~ th//J/'
(*)      The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
 
2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES
 
ES-403                              Written Examination Grading                            Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:  fetcm i                  Date of Exam:  8~8//s  Exam Level:    RO C0'sRO                D Item Description                                              Initials a          b        c
: 1.        Clean answer sheets copied before grading
{'I' {>I)      7"' I~
: 2.        Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~            r' rJPr
: 3.        Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~              ..,. lli~
: 4.        Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
                                                                                ~"              7' tVA-
: 5.        All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                                                        f1f
                                                                                                /      NA.
: 6.        Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of              ~f              ~I ~
questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature                                            Date
: a. Grader                        tni Ke  Oo"''ti It"'    A.;z                          ~ ;, LLf>:'
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)          .,...,. 8et!a:T'$        ~                              '/'11-5
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)        Mic&#xa3;1Q&#xa3;) r  t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;-  '
                                        - - *?~                    ~'2(1 thh~
                                                        *n _/&#xa3;3 '~ -.
                                                        *.        ~/
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)              /J17!JtiA
{/
                                                        .Pi/
(*)      The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
 
ES-403                                Written Examination Grading                    Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i                    Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level:  RO DsRo            ~
Item Description                                      Initials a        b        c
: 1.      Clean answer sheets copied before grading
{'A~      7" /H{d{
I
: 2.      Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                                        (1\~        7"'    NPt
: 3.      Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)                        f'f                tntq
                                                                                        /
: 4.      Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,
                                                                                ~
as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail            .f          'r      rJp,.
: 5.      All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
                                                                              ~{l are justified
                                                                            ~          r      rJf\
: 6.        Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~          I    fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature                                    Date
: a. Grader                        tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6--                  q{t/15
: b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*)          ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.:                            ~L~:r' I
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(")        If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~&#xa3;11;;              9!4;~
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)          /It@~ /J&#xa3;n~ th//J/'
(*)      The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Latest revision as of 09:31, 5 February 2020

2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
ML15282A474
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/2015
From: Beilby M
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Detroit Edison, Co
Shared Package
ML15268A032 List:
References
Download: ML15282A474 (3)


Text

2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: fetcm i Date of Exam: 8~8//s Exam Level: RO C0'sRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'I' {>I) 7"' I~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~ r' rJPr
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~ ..,. lli~
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

~" 7' tVA-

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f

/ NA.

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~f ~I ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' A.;z ~ ;, LLf>:'
b. Facility Reviewer(*) .,...,. 8et!a:T'$ ~ '/'11-5
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) Mic£1Q£) r t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;- '

- - *?~ ~'2(1 thh~

  • n _/£3 '~ -.
  • . ~/
d. NRC Supervisor (*) /J17!JtiA

{/

.Pi/

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level: RO DsRo ~

Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'A~ 7" /H{d{

I

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (1\~ 7"' NPt
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) f'f tntq

/

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail .f 'r rJp,.

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

~{l are justified

~ r rJf\

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~ I fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6-- q{t/15
b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*) ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.: ~L~:r' I
c. NRC Chief Examiner(") If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~£11;; 9!4;~
d. NRC Supervisor(*) /It@~ /J£n~ th//J/'

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: fetcm i Date of Exam: 8~8//s Exam Level: RO C0'sRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'I' {>I) 7"' I~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented f'~ r' rJPr
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) f~ ..,. lli~
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

~" 7' tVA-

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f

/ NA.

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~f ~I ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' A.;z ~ ;, LLf>:'
b. Facility Reviewer(*) .,...,. 8et!a:T'$ ~ '/'11-5
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) Mic£1Q£) r t.i),*etbt:~'. '!JuJ~JPI!iiii:~ 9Lg-J;:;- '

- - *?~ ~'2(1 thh~

  • n _/£3 '~ -.
  • . ~/
d. NRC Supervisor (*) /J17!JtiA

{/

.Pi/

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~e U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u} 1). Exam Level: RO DsRo ~

Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

{'A~ 7" /H{d{

I

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (1\~ 7"' NPt
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) f'f tntq

/

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail .f 'r rJp,.

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

~{l are justified

~ r rJf\

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants f~ I fl1ti3 Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1~i'lttv /ly6-- q{t/15
b. FaciliTy Reviewer(*) ""li<l)!~ ~,.,.;--_.: ~L~:r' I
c. NRC Chief Examiner(") If!I tiul el t f5J'e fb{ir. ~£11;; 9!4;~
d. NRC Supervisor(*) /It@~ /J£n~ th//J/'

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6