ML17037C004: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17037C004
| number = ML17037C004
| issue date = 03/20/1978
| issue date = 03/20/1978
| title = Nine Mile Point Unit 2 - Letter Responding to a September 20, 1976 Letter Requesting Information Relative to the Ownership and Current Status of the Construction Permit and Enclosing Amendment to Application for Licenses Which Would Amend C
| title = Letter Responding to a September 20, 1976 Letter Requesting Information Relative to the Ownership and Current Status of the Construction Permit and Enclosing Amendment to Application for Licenses Which Would Amend CPPR-112
| author name = Varga S A
| author name = Varga S
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name = Brand S A
| addressee name = Brand S
| addressee affiliation =  
| addressee affiliation =  
| docket = 05000410
| docket = 05000410
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 26
| page count = 26
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:hfAR '2 0 1978 Distribution:
Docket File Docket Ho. 60-410                                                                    RC Local
                                                                                              ~MPDR
          !Is. Shirley A. Brand                                                          LMRk'4 File R.F.D. 41. Box 169                                                              B. Bordenick, OELD Highland, Hew York 12528                                                        S. Varga M. Kane
==Dear Hs. Brand:==
M. Service By  letter dated September 20, 1976, to the United States fluclear Regulatory Comission (Commission) you requested information relative to the ownership of the Nine Nile Point Nuclear Station. Unit 2.
Additionally, you requested answers to a number of questions relating to the current status of the construction permit for the facility. In our letter to you dated November 5, 1976, we provided the information you sought.
As a  follow-up on our previous correspondence, and for your current information regarding the above matter, I am enclosing copies of the following documents which were recently filed by Niagara Yiohawk Power Corporation and relate to your original request:
P)    "Amendment    to Application for License" which would amend  Construction Permit No. CPPR-112, to include Central Hudson Gas 8 Hectric Corporation. Long Island Lighting Company. New York State Electric 5 Gas Corporation and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation as co-owners of the Nine Hile Point, Unit 2 facility-fiTed on February 6, 1978.
(2)    "Request for Extension of Latest Completion Date" for Nine tlile Point. Unit 2 - filed on February 27, 1978.
If you desire      to  have your name placed on the Commission              Staff's service list for Nine Nle Point        Nuclear SMtion, Unit 2 docket, please notify us either by letter or by calling.!Ir Hilliam F. Kane at 30]-492-7831.
Nr. Kane is the Licensing Prospect Manager for the facility in question.
Sincerely.
Original signed by:
Sa Ao Varga S.A. Yarga, Chief Light Mater Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Project fIanagement
==Enclosures:==
As  stated P!I:Ll R84        DP:    4 SURNAME~    M                        ce                a 3/W /78          3/    /78            P+ /78 WRC EORM 318 (976) HRClC 0240              4 u3 o. oovonuMswr rowrwo orricoc iore<<eoeea4
                    ~
                      'f
  ~) j g.i H Il H
II If Tf
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COa~JMISSION In the Matter of                      )
                                      )
NIAGARA NOIR'K POlJER CORPORATION )                      Docket No. 50-410 (Nine Mile Point Unit 2)            )
AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR LICENSES The purpose  of this  Amendment  to the Application for Licenses is to request  amendment  of Construction Permit    No. CPPP;112      to include Central Hudson  Gas  & Electric Corporation,    Long  Island Lighting      Company, New  York State Electric    & Gas  Corporation and Rochester  Gas and Electric Corporation    as co-owners    of the Nine Mile Point Unit      2  facility
=of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
In support of this request for      amendment,  Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation states as follows:
On September  22, 1975, the above-named    utilities entered into an agreement,    hereinafter referred to as'he Basic Agreement, with Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, whereby each of the    utilities would  own, as tenants      in common,  the following proportional interests of the Nine Mile Point Unit    2  facility:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation                  41X Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation                                      9X Long Island Lighting Company                      18/
New York State 'Electric & Gas Corporation                                    18X Rochester    Gas and  Electric Corporation                                    14X Participants      will share  the electrical output      and gh pay construction costs according to        their. respective shares    in the facility. Niagara      Mohawk Power    Corporation is acting    as  Applicant and has the responsibility for licensing, design, procurement, construction, operation and    all  related functions with respect to the        facility.
Participants      have delegated  to Niagara'ohawk Power Corporation the authority to act        in their, behalf in prosecuting such further      facility and    materials license applications      and amendments  as may be    required by law or    regulations.
None  of the participating    utilities is    owned, controlled or dominated      by an  alien,  a  foreign corporation, or  a  foreign government.
: 1. A  copy  of the Basic Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A.,
: 2. The  directors  and  principal officers of Niagara I
Mohawk Power      Corporation, their citizenships and the addresses    of such persons are attached hereto        as  Exhibit B.
3,  The  principal places of business, the directors and  principal officers of the co-owners, their citizenships and the addresses    of such persons are attached hereto as                          .
Exhibit  C.
4 ~  The Annual Reports    of each of the participating utilities    are about to be published.      These                reports      will show the  financial qualifications of      each  of the participants. When  available, these Reports                        will be submitted to the Commission to support the participants'inancial qualifications'.
5-  In accordance with Section    103  of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,      and Appendix L                      to Part  50 and Section 50.33 a      of the Commission's regulations, the Appendix L information entitled "Information Requested    by the Attorney General for Antitrust Review" is filed herewith    on behalf  of all  the participants.
This information    is attached hereto  as  Exhibit                    D.
: 6. The  latest cost estimates (not including allowance for funds used during construction) for the completion of the    facility are  as  follows:
Total nuclear production plant co'sts            $ 1,018,335,000 Transmission,    distribution  and general plant costs                                          7,559,000 Nuclear fuel inventory costs      for first core .                                        71 474 000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS                            $ 1,097,368,000
: 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit    E  is a  list of  principal trade and  news  publications for each of the participants.
: 8. Except as herein expressly amended,        the contents of the Application for Licenses, filed June 15, 1972, are hereby confirmed.
WHEREFORE,  Niagara ?fohawk prays (1) as    it did    in .its original Application for Licenses;      and (2)  that Construction Permit      CPPR-112 be amended    to include Central Hudson    Gas &  Electric Corporation,      Long Y
Island Lighting    Company, New York    State Electric    &  Gas  Corporation and Rochester    Gas and  Electric Corporation    as co-owners    of Nine Nile Point Unit 2.
IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Niagara mohawk Power Corporation has caused its  name  to  be hereunto signed by Gerald K. Rhode, Vice        President-System  Project  Nanagement,  this 1st  day of February, 1978.
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION B.
GE    D  K. ODE Vice Pres'ident-S  tern Project Management Subscribed and sworn to before me this 'F~= day of February, 1978.
8 TARY PUBLIC fVlnf. S. CnRafCf; Nofory I'ublic in lho Sfafe of Yew York Qusfifierf in 0rron. f.'o, iso. 4524460 Ify r.'unu<<is iun fakir<<s Afurch 30,f9'7S
~ ~
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of                    )
                                          )
VIAGARA MOHA'(0K POVER CORPORATION )                      Docket No. 50-410 (Nine Mile Point Unit 2)            )
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE Pursuant to Section 2.109 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Section 50.55(b) of the Commission's Regulations, Niagara      Mohawk I
Power  Corporation, holder of Construction Permit    No. CPPR-112,  hereby requests an extension of    its latest completion date for Nine Mile Point Unit 2. Xn  support of such request,'Niagara  Mohawk Power Corporation states as follows:
(1)  In the aforesaid construction permit, the latest completion date specified is July 31, 1978.      At t.his t'ime, the project is about 20 percent complete and cannot be finished within the time specified in the construction permit; (2)  Niagara Mohawk Power, Corporation requests    that the latest completion date in the construction permit  be extended  to December 31, 1984;
(3)  In late L973, the then President of the United States publicly  announced    the seriousness    of the energy crisis confronting      the United States.      Immediately thereafter  and  continuing to this time, there has been a  reduction in the use of    electricity    and, consequently,    for  power demand  in Niagara    Nohawk Power  Corporation's service area'.      Accordingly, the need  for this facility to produce      power has been postponed.
(4)  Niagara Hohawk Power Corporation, along with other privately  owned  public  utilities,  experienced    difficulty in obtaining funds for construction at rates which were considered reasonable.        This lack of funds at reasonable  rates has caused the construction of the facility to    be delayed.
(5)  In. addition to the above, the following unanticipated causes  for delay  have occurred during the      construction periods 1 ~  Additional time is required      due to design changes,  such as  safety/relief valve piping relocation, required to mit;igate      'Hark  II containment dynamic loads.        This area is under Commission review, and      additional requirements
ii. Additional time is required              due to  intensive study of geological features and phenomena as  reported to the Commission in iHiagara Hohawk Power    Corporation's          letter  dated December 13, 1976.'ii.
Additional time is required              due to a.change
    ,from once-through to closed loop circulating water cooling.            This change. was reported to the Commission by          letter  dated July 19, 1976.
ivy  Additional time is required              due to complete redesign of. electrical        raceway systems and major  structural          changes  in the Reactor Building, Control Building,              and cable  tunnels to implement the Regulat'ory Guide 1.75 separation requirements.
: v. Additional time is required            due to  labor problems including work stoppages in              1976 and 1977.
vi. Additional    time        is required  due to shortage    of qualified welders,          and  material procurement delays, such as for the primary containment liner.
vii. Additional    time is required  due to a delay
      'in the granting of the original Construction Pewmit which was  not,reflected in the previously revised dates for earliest      and latest completion of the facility    (see Attachment 1).
viii. Additional time. is required to implement      iHRC requirements for" flood. protection of  ECCS pumps'x.
Additional time is requ-'red    due to the implementation 'of pipe whip protection require-ments    similar to those, expressed in Regulatory Guide 1.46 which impacted the schedule      for .
completion of pipe stress analysis and liner fabrication.
X ~  Additional time is required    due to the imposition of Regulatory Guide 1.89 requirements on Class IE Equipment Vendors which has resulted    in shortages of acceptable vendors.
(6)      Xn  Niagara Hohawk Power Corporation's opinion, the requested 'action involves no            significant    hazards consideration;            good cause has been shown      for the delay; and the extension of the latest completion date which has been requested            is for  a  reasonable period.
MiEREFORE,          Niagara Hohawk Power Corporation requests                that the latest date in Construction Permit                    No. CPPR-112 be ext'ended        until December        31,    19811.
Respectfully submitted, NIAGARA HOHAVK POWER CORPORATION'
                                                                                  ~7 Gerald K. Rhode Vice. President  System Project Hanagement Subscribed and sworn to before me this>-~r'-          -day of February, 1978.
NOTARY PUBLIC HA2EL J, CARrdCY, Nolarv Prrlilic in iho Slalo ol Now YorR Quali(iad in Onon. Co. italo. >,>24~60 A1y Comrriis>ion E~riiros,llarch 30,'l9:,r~
~ g LEBOEUF, LAMB.LEIBY B. HACRAE 17S7 N STRgZV, N.'N.
WASHINGTON,D. C. 20036 ARVIII E. 'IJPTON                                                                OH C CHAS E HAH HATTAH CLIO ERE S, THOMAS) gR                                                                HEW YORIC, H,Y. IOC<
LCQNAIIO P. TROSYEN                            March 12, 1974 HARRY H. VOIQT WASHIHOTOH TCLCiiHC LCX K. LARSON WAOHIM4YOH PAAYNCIIS                                                                @OR  dVRMOOS CAQI C AOORCSS LALALUiWASHIHOTOH Daniel    M. Head,  Ksq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 Re:    niagara    Mohawk Power    Corporation Hine Mile Point Unit 2 AEC Docket No. 50-410
==Dear Mr. Head:==
E During our con erence call this morning with counsel for all parti s except the Environmental Defense Fund, mentioned that Niagara Mohawk had one revision to the form of proposed construction permit which was distributed by the AEC Regula toe~ S ta ff on February 28, 1974.
The  Appl'icant's proposed change concerns the earliest and  latest completion dates        mentioned in paragraph 3.A. on page  3 of the proposed construction permit.                Under the present circumstances, Applicant believes and thereby reques ts that the earliest completion date be October 1, 1978 and the                      latest date for completion of the facility be April 1, 1980.
We  would appreciate      having the Board revise the construction permit in this respect; Uery    truly yours, LEBOEUFt LMMs LEZBY        6c  MACRAE By E~ B    Thomast  LTD cc:    See page    2.                              Par tner
Dr. Harvin M. Mann Dr. Nilliam E. Martin Richard,. 1 . Goldsmith, Esq.
Carmine J. C1emen te, Esq.
Mrs. Suzanne:-5/cher Anthony R. Faisman, Esq.
Bernard H. Bordenicz,'sa.
Secretary, U.S. Atomic Energy Cormission Atomi'c Safety and Licensing Apaeal Board
                                          ~ -~ \
le}}

Latest revision as of 20:03, 4 February 2020

Letter Responding to a September 20, 1976 Letter Requesting Information Relative to the Ownership and Current Status of the Construction Permit and Enclosing Amendment to Application for Licenses Which Would Amend CPPR-112
ML17037C004
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/20/1978
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Brand S
References
Download: ML17037C004 (26)


Text

hfAR '2 0 1978 Distribution:

Docket File Docket Ho.60-410 RC Local

~MPDR

!Is. Shirley A. Brand LMRk'4 File R.F.D. 41. Box 169 B. Bordenick, OELD Highland, Hew York 12528 S. Varga M. Kane

Dear Hs. Brand:

M. Service By letter dated September 20, 1976, to the United States fluclear Regulatory Comission (Commission) you requested information relative to the ownership of the Nine Nile Point Nuclear Station. Unit 2.

Additionally, you requested answers to a number of questions relating to the current status of the construction permit for the facility. In our letter to you dated November 5, 1976, we provided the information you sought.

As a follow-up on our previous correspondence, and for your current information regarding the above matter, I am enclosing copies of the following documents which were recently filed by Niagara Yiohawk Power Corporation and relate to your original request:

P) "Amendment to Application for License" which would amend Construction Permit No. CPPR-112, to include Central Hudson Gas 8 Hectric Corporation. Long Island Lighting Company. New York State Electric 5 Gas Corporation and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation as co-owners of the Nine Hile Point, Unit 2 facility-fiTed on February 6, 1978.

(2) "Request for Extension of Latest Completion Date" for Nine tlile Point. Unit 2 - filed on February 27, 1978.

If you desire to have your name placed on the Commission Staff's service list for Nine Nle Point Nuclear SMtion, Unit 2 docket, please notify us either by letter or by calling.!Ir Hilliam F. Kane at 30]-492-7831.

Nr. Kane is the Licensing Prospect Manager for the facility in question.

Sincerely.

Original signed by:

Sa Ao Varga S.A. Yarga, Chief Light Mater Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Project fIanagement

Enclosures:

As stated P!I:Ll R84 DP: 4 SURNAME~ M ce a 3/W /78 3/ /78 P+ /78 WRC EORM 318 (976) HRClC 0240 4 u3 o. oovonuMswr rowrwo orricoc iore<<eoeea4

~

'f

~) j g.i H Il H

II If Tf

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COa~JMISSION In the Matter of )

)

NIAGARA NOIR'K POlJER CORPORATION ) Docket No. 50-410 (Nine Mile Point Unit 2) )

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR LICENSES The purpose of this Amendment to the Application for Licenses is to request amendment of Construction Permit No. CPPP;112 to include Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Long Island Lighting Company, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation as co-owners of the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 facility

=of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.

In support of this request for amendment, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation states as follows:

On September 22, 1975, the above-named utilities entered into an agreement, hereinafter referred to as'he Basic Agreement, with Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, whereby each of the utilities would own, as tenants in common, the following proportional interests of the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 facility:

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 41X Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation 9X Long Island Lighting Company 18/

New York State 'Electric & Gas Corporation 18X Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 14X Participants will share the electrical output and gh pay construction costs according to their. respective shares in the facility. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation is acting as Applicant and has the responsibility for licensing, design, procurement, construction, operation and all related functions with respect to the facility.

Participants have delegated to Niagara'ohawk Power Corporation the authority to act in their, behalf in prosecuting such further facility and materials license applications and amendments as may be required by law or regulations.

None of the participating utilities is owned, controlled or dominated by an alien, a foreign corporation, or a foreign government.

1. A copy of the Basic Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A.,
2. The directors and principal officers of Niagara I

Mohawk Power Corporation, their citizenships and the addresses of such persons are attached hereto as Exhibit B.

3, The principal places of business, the directors and principal officers of the co-owners, their citizenships and the addresses of such persons are attached hereto as .

Exhibit C.

4 ~ The Annual Reports of each of the participating utilities are about to be published. These reports will show the financial qualifications of each of the participants. When available, these Reports will be submitted to the Commission to support the participants'inancial qualifications'.

5- In accordance with Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and Appendix L to Part 50 and Section 50.33 a of the Commission's regulations, the Appendix L information entitled "Information Requested by the Attorney General for Antitrust Review" is filed herewith on behalf of all the participants.

This information is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

6. The latest cost estimates (not including allowance for funds used during construction) for the completion of the facility are as follows:

Total nuclear production plant co'sts $ 1,018,335,000 Transmission, distribution and general plant costs 7,559,000 Nuclear fuel inventory costs for first core . 71 474 000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $ 1,097,368,000

7. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a list of principal trade and news publications for each of the participants.
8. Except as herein expressly amended, the contents of the Application for Licenses, filed June 15, 1972, are hereby confirmed.

WHEREFORE, Niagara ?fohawk prays (1) as it did in .its original Application for Licenses; and (2) that Construction Permit CPPR-112 be amended to include Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Long Y

Island Lighting Company, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation as co-owners of Nine Nile Point Unit 2.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Niagara mohawk Power Corporation has caused its name to be hereunto signed by Gerald K. Rhode, Vice President-System Project Nanagement, this 1st day of February, 1978.

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION B.

GE D K. ODE Vice Pres'ident-S tern Project Management Subscribed and sworn to before me this 'F~= day of February, 1978.

8 TARY PUBLIC fVlnf. S. CnRafCf; Nofory I'ublic in lho Sfafe of Yew York Qusfifierf in 0rron. f.'o, iso. 4524460 Ify r.'unu<<is iun fakir<-~r'- -day of February, 1978.

NOTARY PUBLIC HA2EL J, CARrdCY, Nolarv Prrlilic in iho Slalo ol Now YorR Quali(iad in Onon. Co. italo. >,>24~60 A1y Comrriis>ion E~riiros,llarch 30,'l9:,r~

~ g LEBOEUF, LAMB.LEIBY B. HACRAE 17S7 N STRgZV, N.'N.

WASHINGTON,D. C. 20036 ARVIII E. 'IJPTON OH C CHAS E HAH HATTAH CLIO ERE S, THOMAS) gR HEW YORIC, H,Y. IOC<

LCQNAIIO P. TROSYEN March 12, 1974 HARRY H. VOIQT WASHIHOTOH TCLCiiHC LCX K. LARSON WAOHIM4YOH PAAYNCIIS @OR dVRMOOS CAQI C AOORCSS LALALUiWASHIHOTOH Daniel M. Head, Ksq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 Re: niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Hine Mile Point Unit 2 AEC Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Head:

E During our con erence call this morning with counsel for all parti s except the Environmental Defense Fund, mentioned that Niagara Mohawk had one revision to the form of proposed construction permit which was distributed by the AEC Regula toe~ S ta ff on February 28, 1974.

The Appl'icant's proposed change concerns the earliest and latest completion dates mentioned in paragraph 3.A. on page 3 of the proposed construction permit. Under the present circumstances, Applicant believes and thereby reques ts that the earliest completion date be October 1, 1978 and the latest date for completion of the facility be April 1, 1980.

We would appreciate having the Board revise the construction permit in this respect; Uery truly yours, LEBOEUFt LMMs LEZBY 6c MACRAE By E~ B Thomast LTD cc: See page 2. Par tner

Dr. Harvin M. Mann Dr. Nilliam E. Martin Richard,. 1 . Goldsmith, Esq.

Carmine J. C1emen te, Esq.

Mrs. Suzanne:-5/cher Anthony R. Faisman, Esq.

Bernard H. Bordenicz,'sa.

Secretary, U.S. Atomic Energy Cormission Atomi'c Safety and Licensing Apaeal Board

~ -~ \

le