ML17037C353

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter Regarding Amendment 2 to Niagara Mohawks Application for a Provisional Operating License and Enclosing Additional Information Required to Continue Review
ML17037C353
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/1968
From: Morris P
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
To: Pratt M
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
References
Download: ML17037C353 (6)


Text

Docket No. 50-220 JUL 3 X >968 DISTRIBUTION:

AEC PDR Formal Suppl,,

DR Reading DRL Reading RPB-2 Reading Orig:

VStello C. K. Beck M. M. Mann R.

S.

Boyd CO (2)

H. Steele R. L. Ferguson Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard Hest

Syracuse, New York 13202 bcc:

J.

R. -Buchanan, ORNL Attention:

Mr. Minot H. Pratt Vice President and Executive Engineer Gentlemen:

This refers to Amendment 2, dated June 1, 1967, to your 'applica-tion for a provisional operating license for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station located in the town of Scribe, New York.

I Our review of Amendment 2 indicates that additional information on the facility electrical system, instrument air systems and the actuation signals for the engineered safety features is necessary to enable us to continue our review of these matters.

A list of specific comments illustrating the kind of information needed is enclosed.

He will be available to discuss and clarify any of the specific comments.

Sincerely yours, Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing

Enclosure:

List of Comments cc:

Arvin E. Upton, Esquire

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 6 MacRae OFFICE >

SURNAME >

DATE >

BL.EP............

J)v~

.VSCe11ogd j.......

7/24/68 JKL136'..

RGT dsc--

7/

/68 D

S inc.........

7/

5 /68

$p RL ESBayd...........

7/S)/68

/fq P&ar.ria.

7$

/68

't'>

ghI'v Pnrm AEC-818 (RCV. 043)

IIS. GOVOINNCNTPRINTINGCfFICC c I~2 I~ 629

C 0

4 I

Ih E

1 pl

l ADDITIONAL INFORHATION RE UIRED f NIAGARA HOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE HILE POINT PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-220 1.

Evaluate the ability of the offsite power system to provide power for engineered safety feature and safe shutdown loads with a fault in the outside system.

This discussion should include (1) loss of one or more 345 KV transmission lines, (2) sudden loss of the NHP'enerating

capacity, and (3) sudden loss of the largest generating plant in the Niagara Hohawk grid.

2.

Evaluate the ability of the offsite power design to satisfy Criterion 39 in view of the two-minute time delay required before the 115 KV disconnect switch can be opened following a fault on'ne half of the 115 KV system.

3.

The FSAR does not discuss the use of d.c.

power for circuit breaker operation in the switchyard.

Describe how d.c.

power is supplied to the switchyard and evaluate the ability of the switchyard to operate properly with a single failure in the d.c. system.

4.

A recent electrical fire in a nuclear power station has emphasized the importance of the design of electrical penetrations and cable runs.

Describe and evaluate the designs being utilized fox the cable runs and electrical penetrations in the Nine Nile Point Station.

This dis-cussion should include, but not be limited to, the types of cables being

used, the design and spacing of cable trays and electrical penetrations,
derating, and circuit overload protection.

5.

Describe and evaluate the consequences of complete loss of station air and/or vital instrument air.

This discussion should include, but not be limited to, the failure modes of pneumatic instruments and valves under the following conditions:

1.

Pose-shutdown from full power operation.

2.

Post accident.

6.

The diesel generators are started upon loss of voltage at the essential buses.

Evaluate the need for starting the diesel generators on signals other than loss of voltage (e.g.,

coolant injection).

c'I h

~

7.

I Describe and evaluate the adequacy of the core spray actuation signals.

The lack of diverse signals for isolation valve actuation should 'be

", discussed.

~

,c:'c'e

~ I