ML17309A914: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRENCLOSURE 1toL-97-280ST.LUCIEUNIT2,CYCLE10COREOPERATING LIMITSREPORTRevision0+DDi060iVX 97<RRqPDRADDCK00000250'PDRPage1of14 0~1tlP TableofContentsDesritin1.0Introduction
{{#Wiki_filter:St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Core 0 eratin Limits Re ort COLR ENCLOSURE    1 to L-97-280 ST. LUCIE UNIT 2, CYCLE 10 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 0 Page 1 of 14
+DDi060iVX 97<RRq PDR ADDCK 00000250
                    'PDR


==2.0 CoreOperating==
0
Limits2.1Moderator Temperature Coefficient 2.2CEAPosition-Misalignment
~1 tl P
>15inches2.3Regulating CEAInsertion Limits2.4LinearHeatRate2.5TOTALPLANARRADIALPEAKINGFACTORS2.6TOTALINTEGRATED RADIALPEAKINGFACTOR2.7DNBParameters
-AXIALSHAPEINDEX~P'Rcd4"2.8Refueling Operations
-BoronConcentration 3.0'istofApprovedMethods12Ficlure~TitlListofFigures~Pae3.1-23.1-1aAllowable TimeToRealignCEAvs.InitialF,TCEAInsertion Limitsvs.THERMALPOWER3.2-1Allowable PeakLinearHeatRatevs.Burnup3.2-2AXIALSHAPEINDEXvs.MaximumAllowable PowerLevel3.2-3Allowable Combinations ofTHERMALPOWERandF,T,F~103.2-4AXIALSHAPEINDEXOperating Limitsvs.THERMALPOWER11St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page2of14


==1.0INTRODUCTION==
Table of Contents Des ri ti n                                                  ~P'R cd 1.0    Introduction 2.0    Core Operating Limits 2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 2.2 CEA Position - Misalignment > 15 inches 2.3 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits                              4" 2.4 Linear Heat Rate 2.5 TOTAL PLANAR RADIALPEAKING FACTORS 2.6 TOTAL INTEGRATED RADIALPEAKING FACTOR 2.7 DNB Parameters - AXIALSHAPE INDEX 2.8 Refueling Operations - Boron Concentration 3.0  'ist of Approved Methods                                        12 List of Figures Ficlure          ~Titl                                              ~Pa    e 3.1-1a      Allowable Time To Realign CEA vs. Initial F,T 3.1-2      CEA Insertion Limits vs. THERMAL POWER 3.2-1      Allowable Peak Linear Heat Rate vs. Burnup 3.2-2      AXIALSHAPE INDEX vs. Maximum Allowable Power Level 3.2-3      Allowable Combinations of THERMAL POWER and  F,T, F~      10 3.2-4      AXIALSHAPE INDEX Operating Limits vs. THERMAL POWER        11 St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR          Rev 0                Page 2 of 14


ThisCoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)describes thecycle-specific parameter limitsforoperation ofSt.LucieUnit2Cycle10.Itcontainsthelimitsforthefollowing asprovidedinSection2.Moderator Temperature Coefficient CEAPosition-Misalignment
==1.0    INTRODUCTION==
>15InchesRegulating CEAInsertion LimitsLinearHeatRateTOTALPLANARRADIALPEAKINGFACTORS-FTOTALINTEGRATED RADIALPEAKINGFACTOR-F,DNBParameter
-AXIALSHAPEINDEXRefueling Operations
-BoronConcentration Thisreportalsocontainsthenecessary figureswhichgivethelimitsfortheabovelistedparameters.
Termsappearing incapitalized typeareDEFINEDTERMSasdefinedinSection1.0oftheTechnical Specifications.
Thisreportispreparedinaccordance withtherequirements ofTechnical Specification 6.9.1.11.
St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLR,Rev0Page3of14


==2.0 COREOPERATING==
This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) describes the cycle-specific parameter limits for operation of St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10. It contains the limits for the following as provided in Section 2.
LIMITS2.1Moderator Temeratureoefficien (TS3.1.1.4)Themoderator temperature coefficient (MTC)shallbelessnegativethan-30pcml'FatRATEDTHERMALPOWER.2.2EAPosition-Misalinmen>1Iches(TS3.1.3.1)Thetimeconstraints forfullpoweroperation withonefull-length CEAmisaligned fromanyotherCEAinitsgroupbymorethan15inchesareshowninFigure3.1-1a.2.3ReulatinEAIsertionLimits(TS3.1.3.6)Theregulating CEAgroupsshallbelimitedtothewithdrawal sequenceandto'theinsertion limitsshownonFigure3.1-2,withCEAinsertion betweentheLongTermSteadyStateInsertion LimitsandthePowerDependent Insertion Limitsrestricted to:a.Lessthanorequalto4hoursper24hourinterval, b.Lessthanorequalto5Effective FullPowerDaysper30Effective FullPowerDays,andc.Lessthanorequalto14Effective FullPowerDayspercalendaryear.2.4~DN2tTS2.2.14ThelinearheatrateshallnotexceedthelimitsshownonFigure3.2-1.TheAXIALSHAPEINDEXpowerdependent controllimitsareshownonFigure3.2-2.Duringoperation, withthelinearheatratebeingmonitored bytheEcoreDetector~MiIt,thAXIANSNAPE INDEXhIlhItIdtthtthofFigure3.2-2.Duringoperation, withthelinearheatratebeingmonitored bytheIncoreDetector~M>>t,th2IPDItyIthtthiltdttdtlessthanorequaltothelimitsshownonFigure3.2-1.St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRey0Page4of14 2.5TTALPLANARRADIALPEAKINFTOR-FT(TS3.2.2)Thecalculated valueofF~Tshallbelimitedto<1.75.Thepowerdependent FTlimitsareshownonFigure3.2-3.2.6TLINTEGRATED RADIALPEAKINFATOR-F(TS3.2.3)Thecalculated valueofF,Tshallbelimitedto<1.70.Thepowerdependent F,limitsareshownonFigure3.2-3.2.7DNBParameters
Moderator Temperature Coefficient CEA Position - Misalignment > 15 Inches Regulating CEA Insertion Limits Linear Heat Rate TOTAL PLANAR RADIAL PEAKING FACTORS - F TOTAL INTEGRATED RADIALPEAKING FACTOR - F, DNB Parameter - AXIALSHAPE INDEX Refueling Operations - Boron Concentration This report also contains the necessary figures which give the limits for the above listed parameters.
-AXIALHAPEINDE(TS3.2.5)TheAXIALSHAPEINDEXshallbemaintained withinthelimitsspecified inFigure3.2-4.2.8.efuelin0erations-Borononcnraio(TS3.9.1)Withthereactorvesselheadclosureboltslessthanfullytensioned orwiththeheadremoved,theboronconcentration ofallfilledportionsoftheReactorCoolantSystemandtherefueling canalshallbemaintained uniformandsufficient toensurethatthemorerestrictive ofthefollowing reactivity conditions ismet:a.EitheraK,<<of0.95orless,orb.Aboronconcentration ofgreaterthanorequalto1720ppm.St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page5of14 0I11~0 1.72I.71.681.66~1.641.6201.61.581.561.543'1641.52051015202530354045505560657075TimeatFullPowertoRealignCEA,MinutesFIGURE3.1-1aAllowable TimetoRealignCEAvs.InitialF,TSt.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page6of14 O111G)OQOI-9y'IgG)0)+lQzill33IU033i~~0.800.70goeaI-m0.60I-040C)z0.30C)I-0200.IoC0c~0aPg8Qg(.8TEEQ,aoajQDg@CEEEPa0ocC5gogC02fg~N(LL,gQ5ag0o6cIIllIIIcl0jI'-Ini.:IQP,I-IIalIILONGTEAM"~-AIIOA'ETEAMsTEAOYsrEAnvSTATESIATEINSEATION.INSEAI)ONllMlrllMI2C02cg8QLaIEOAOOIS~l020406080100(1)6)(108.8)(81.6)
Terms appearing in capitalized type are DEFINED TERMS as defined in Section 1.0 of the Technical Specifications.
(5l.l)(27.2)(0)o2ocoenINloo020coeosoIoa(l)6)(IOS.S)(81.6)
This report is prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.11.
(5l.l)(27.2)(0)(1)6)(108.8)(81.6)
St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR,             Rev 0                           Page 3 of 14
(5l.l)(27.2)(0)02040M80100020406080100(I)6)(108.8)(41.&)(5l.l)(27.2)(0)(1)6)(108.8)(81.6)
(5l.l)(27.2)(0)425CEAINSEIITIAN(INCIIESCEAWIIIIDIIAWN)
~~~146)CC13CL0)32.ACCEPTABLE
~rOPERATION.
UNACCEPTRBL'E OPERATION
~~~BOLCYCLELIFEEOL(Fuel+Clad+Moderator)
FIGURE3.2-1Allowable PeakLinearHeatRatevs.BurnupSt.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page8of14 1.101Lo0.9~0.8E'0.7Xo0.600.5(-0.10,0.88)
(0.15,0.88)
ACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION(-0.50,0.60)
(0.50,0.60)
UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION0.4-0.6-0.4-0.200.2Peripheral AXIALSHAPEINDEX0.40.6(NotApplicable Below40%Power)FIGURE3.2-2AXIAL'SHAPE INDEXvs,MaximumAllowable PowerLevelSt.LucieUnit2Cycle)0COLRRev0Page9of14 MIOetOOO0C)O0IZlZlOCC)DillQlQC)0O0QOO2'DQ"0vlTlOC)gCg33mm33~QMI00ZlQCL:nKUj0CLCCIJIClillI-CL0C0OlULL6$01.21.j10.90.80.70.61.6~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~IIIUNACCEPTABLE OPERII~ATIOII(1.7,1.0);(175,:1II:.IIIIII0.800)III~-I---:-II-(1.7],.o.bO).'--
~~~1(1.77,IIIREGION.IIIIII..I.IIIFrLIMIT'CURVE ICEP7ABLE.OPERATION.
CI~~~1.75MeasuredF''.81.7N'RIIII~(<.8'0:85)'III.~I~~I~IECION-I--
IILIMITC(JRVE e'a~=g
(-0.08,1.00)
(0.15,1.00) 00.9~0.8I-CII-0.7CC0o060.5UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION(-0.50,0.65)
ACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGIONUNACCEPTABLE.
OPERATION REGION~(0.50,0.65) 0.4-0.6-0.4-0.200.20.4Peripheral AXIALSHAPEINDEX(Y1)0.6(NotApplicable Below40%Power)FIGURE3.2-4AXIALSHAPEINDEXOper'ating Limitsvs.THERMALPOWER(FourReactorCoolantPumpsOperating)
St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page11of14 "i*~i~g~-


==3.0 LISTOFAPPROVEDMETHODSTheanalytical==
2.0    CORE OPERATING LIMITS 2.1    Moderator Tem erature        oefficien (TS 3.1.1.4)
methodsusedtodetermine thecoreoperating limitsarethosepreviously approvedbytheNRC,andarelistedbelow.WCAP-11596-P-A, "Qualification ofthePHOENIX-P/ANC NuclearDesignSystemforPressurized WaterReactorCores,"June1988(Westinghouse Proprietary) 2.3.4..NF-TR-95-01, "NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPoint8St.LucieNuclearPlants,"FloridaPower&LightCompany,January1995(NRCSERdatedJune9,1995),8Supplement 1,August1997CENPD-199-P, Rev.1-P-A,"C-ESetpointMethodology:
The moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) shall be less negative than -30 pcml'F at RATED THERMAL POWER.
CELocalPowerDensityandDNBLSSSandLCOSetpointMethodology forAnalogProtection Systems,"
2.2      EA Position - Misali nmen >      1  I ches (TS 3.1.3.1)
January1986CENPD-266-P-A, "TheROCSandDITComputerCodeforNuclearDesign,"April19835.6.7.8.9.10.12.CENPD-275-P-A, "C-EMethodology forCoreDesignsContaining Gadolinia-Urania BurnableAbsorbers,"
The time constraints for full power operation with one full-length CEA misaligned from any other CEA in its group by more than 15 inches are shown in Figure 3.1-1a.
May1988CENPD-188-A, "HERMITE:
2.3    Re ulatin      EA  I  sertion Limits (TS 3.1.3.6)
AMulti-Dimensional Space-TimeKineticsCodeforPWRTransients,:
The regulating CEA groups shall be limited to the withdrawal sequence and to'the insertion limits shown on Figure 3.1-2, with CEA insertion between the Long Term Steady State Insertion Limits and the Power Dependent Insertion Limits restricted to:
July1976CENPD-153-P, Rev.1-P-A,"Evaluation ofUncertainty intheNuclearPowerPeakingMeasuredbytheSelf-Powered, FixedIncoreDetectorSystem,"May1980CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination ofUncertainties Methodology Part1:C-ECalculated LocalPowerDensityandThermalMargin/Low PressureLSSSforCalvertCliffsUnitsIandII,"December1979CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination ofUncertainties Methodology Part2:Combination ofSystemParameter Uncertainties inThermalMarginAnalysesforCalvertCliffsUnits1and2,"January1980CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination ofUncertainties Methodology Part3:C-ECalculated Departure fromNucleateBoilingandLinearHeatRateLimitingConditions forOperation forCalvertCliffsUnits1and2,"February1980CEN-191(B)-P, "CETOP-DCodeStructure andModelingMethodsforCalvertCliffsUnits1and2,"December1981Letter,J.W.Miller(NRC)toJ.R.Williams, Jr.(FPL),DocketNo.50-389,Regarding St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page12of14 C
: a. Less than or equal to 4 hours per 24 hour interval,
13.14.15.16.17.Unit2Cycle2LicenseApproval(Amendment No.8toNPF-16andSER),November9,1984(Approval ofCEN-123(F)-P (threeparts)andCEN-191(B)-P)
: b. Less than or equal to 5 Effective Full Power Days per 30 Effective Full Power Days, and
CEN-371(F)-P, "Extended Statistical Combination ofUncertainties,"
: c. Less than or equal to 14 Effective Full Power Days per calendar year.
.July1989Letter,J.A.Norris(NRC)toJ.H.Goldberg(FPL),DocketNo.50-389,"St.LucieUnit2-ChangetoTechnical Specification BasesSections'2.1.1ReactorCore'nd'3/4.2.5DNBParameters'TAC No.M87722),"
2.4  ~DN            2      tTS 2.2.14 The linear heat rate shall not exceed the limits shown on Figure 3.2-1.
March14,1994(Approval ofCEN-371(F)-P)
The AXIALSHAPE INDEX power dependent control limits are shown on Figure 3.2-2.
CENPD-161-P-A, "TORCCode,AComputerCodeforDetermining theThermalMarginofaReactorCore,"April1986CENPD-162-P-A, "Critical HeatFluxCorrelation forC-EFuelAssemblies withStandardSpacerGridsPart1,UniformAxialPowerDistribution,"
During operation, with the linear heat rate being monitored by the E core Detector
April1975CENPD-207-P-A, "Critical HeatFluxCorrelation forC-EFuelAssemblies withStandardSpacerGridsPart2,Non-uniform AxialPowerDistribution,"
      ~Mi      I      t,th      AXIANSNAPE INDEX h Ilh            I t I  d ttht th of Figure 3.2-2.
December198418.CENPD-206-P-A, "TORCCode,Verification andSimplified ModelingMethods,"
During operation, with the linear heat rate being monitored by the Incore Detector
June198119.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.CENPD-225-P-A, "FuelandPoisonRodBowing,"June1983CENPD-139-P-A, "C-EFuelEvaluation ModelTopicalReport,"July1974CEN-161(B)-P-A, "Improvements toFuelEvaluation Model,"August1989CEN-161(B)-P, Supplement 1-P-A,"Improvements toFuelEvaluation Model,"January1992CENPD-132, Supplement 3-P-A,"Calculative MethodsfortheC-ELargeBreakLOCAEvaluation ModelfortheAnalysisofC-EandWDesignedNSSS,"June1985CENPD-133, Supplement 5-A,"CEFLASH-4A, AFORTRAN77 DigitalComputerProgramforReactorBlowdownAnalysis,"
      ~M>>                t,th      2  IP      D    Ity I      thtt hilt        dt  tdt less than or equal to the limits shown on Figure 3.2-1.
June1985CENPD-134, Supplement 2-A,"COMPERC-II, aProgramforEmergency Refill-RefloodoftheCore,"June1985CENPD-135-P, Supplement 5,"STRIKIN-II, ACylindrical GeometryFuelRodHeatTransferProgram,"
St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR                Rey 0                        Page 4 of 14
April1977Letter,R.L.Baer(NRC)toA.E.Scherer(CE),"Evaluation ofTopicalReportSt.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page13of14 i.r4i0 28.29.CENPD-135, Supplement
 
&#xb9;5,"September 6,1978CENPD-137, Supplement 1-P,"Calculative MethodsfortheC-ESmallBreakLOCAEvaluation Model,"January1977CENPD-133, Supplement 3-P,"CEFLASH-4AS, AComputerProgramfortheReactorBlowdownAnalysisoftheSmallBreakLossofCoolantAccident,"
2.5    T TAL PLANAR RADIAL PEAKIN                F  TOR    -F  T (TS 3.2.2)
January197730.Letter,K.Kniel(NRC)toA.E.Scherer(CE),"Evaluation ofTopicalReportsCENPD-133, Supplement 3-PandCENPD-137, Supplement 1-P,"September 27,197731.32.33.34.35.36.37.38..39.CENPD-138, Supplement 2-P,"PARCH,AFORTRAN-IV DigitalProgramtoEvaluatePoolBoiling,AxialRodandCoolantHeatup,"January1977Letter,C.Aniel(NRC)toA.E.Scherer(CE),"Evaluation ofTopicalReportCENPD-138,Supplement 2-P,"April10,1978Letter,W.H.Bohlke(FPL)toDocumentControlDesk(NRC),"St.LucieUnit2,DocketNo.50-389,ProposedLicenseAmendment, Thanefom-co+/erg,"L-91-325, December17,1991Letter,J.A.Plorris (NRC)toJ.H.Goldberg(FPL),"St.LucieUnit2-IssuanceofAmendment Re:Moderator Temperature Coefficient (TACNo.M82517),"
The calculated value of F~T shall be limited to < 1.75.
July15,1992Letter,J.W.Williams, Jr.(FPL)toD.G.Eisenhut(NRC),"St.LucieUnitNo.2,88t~.88-888,88dtt8dt,~td,"I=84-448.
The power dependent F       T limits are shown on Figure 3.2-3.
June4,1984Letter,J.R.Miller(NRC)toJ.W.Williams, Jr.(FPL),DocketNo.50-389,Regarding
2.6    T      L INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKIN              FA TOR - F (TS 3.2.3)
'Unit2Cycle2LicenseApproval(Amendment No.8toNPF-16andSER),November9,1984(Approval ofMethodology contained inL-84-148)
The calculated value of  F,T shall be limited to < 1.70.
Letter,A.E.SchererEnclosure 1-PtoLD-82-001, "CESEC-Digital Simulation ofaCombustion Engineering NuclearSteamSupplySystem,"December1981SafetyEvaluation Report,"CESECDigitalSimulation ofaCombustion Engineering SteamSupplySystem(TACNo.:01142),"October27,1983CENPD-282-P-A, Volumes1,2,and3,Supplement 1-P,"Technical ManualfortheCENTSCode,"March1994St.LucieUnit2Cycle10COLRRev0Page14of14}}
The power dependent F, limits are shown on Figure 3.2-3.
2.7    DNB Parameters - AXIAL HAPE INDE (TS 3.2.5)
The AXIALSHAPE INDEX shall be maintained within the limits specified in Figure 3.2-4.
2.8 . efuelin  0  erations - Boron    onc n ra io (TS 3.9.1)
With the reactor vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed, the boron concentration of all filled portions of the Reactor Coolant System and the refueling canal shall be maintained uniform and sufficient to ensure that the more restrictive of the following reactivity conditions is met:
: a. Either a K,<<of 0.95 or less, or
: b. A boron concentration of greater than or equal to 1720 ppm.
St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR              Rev 0                        Page 5 of 14
 
0 I1 1~
0
 
1.72 I.7 1.68 1.66
~  1.64 1.62 0
1.6 1.58 1.56 3 '164 1.54 1.52 0    5  10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Time at Full Power to Realign CEA, Minutes FIGURE 3.1-1 a Allowable Time to Realign CEA vs. Initial F,T St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR        Rev 0                      Page 6 of 14
 
C        C
                              @            0 c
                                            ~ 0 EEE P
a 0          a P          C o c                      0 8        2 C5 g        g og          Qg
(.8 TEE a
Q,    fg~          N I            o a        (LL, g
I                                  Q O                            I          jQ                    5 111      i~~  0.80                        D cl 0
g                  a C
G)                            j                        g          0                            0 O            0.70                                    o        6                            2 I
                          '-                      c              Ill I                                                                c g    oea ni                        I g
Q      I-                                        .:I                                        8 O      m 0.60                                                                                QL I- 9    I-y'                                                                                             a 040        P                      ,I Q
Ig G)
C)                                        -I
: 0)     z C) 0.30            I                    al
+ lQ    I-I zill          020            ILONG TEAM"~ -AIIOA'E TEAM 33                              sTEAOY                    srEAnv STATE SIATE                    INSEAT ION .
: 0. Io              INSEA I)ON                llMlr I
U llMI2 0
33 OAOOI S      ~l 0    20       40 (1)6)(108.8)(81.6)
IE 60 (5l.l) 80 (27.2) 100 (0) 0      20      40    M      80 (I)6) (108.8) (41. &) (5l. l ) (27.2) 100 (0) 0      20    40 (1)6) (108.8)(81.6) 60 (5l.l )
80 (27.2) 100 (0) 4                                            2 o      2o      co      en      IN    loo      0      20    co    eo      so    Ioa (l)6)(IOS.S)(81.6)    (5l.l)    (27.2)  (0)    (1)6)(108.8)(81.6)  (5l.l)  (27.2)  (0) 5 CEA INSE IITIAN (INCIIES CEA WIIIIDIIAWN)
 
                                                                    ~      ~
    ~ 14 6)
UNACCEPTRBL'E OPERATION CC 13 CL                                            ~
r 0)
                            .ACCEPTABLE OPERATION.
32
                    ~      ~      ~
BOL                        CYCLE LIFE                          EOL (Fuel + Clad + Moderator)
FIGURE 3.2-1 Allowable Peak Linear Heat Rate vs. Burnup St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR          Rev 0                    Page 8 of 14
 
1.1 0      1                  UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION L
o  0.9
(-0.10,0.88)              (0.15,0.88)
  ~  0.8 E                                           ACCEPTABLE 0.7                                      OPERATION X                                              REGION o 0.6                    (-0.50,0.60)                          (0.50,0.60) 0 0.5 0.4
              -0.6        -0.4          -0.2        0    0.2        0.4    0.6 Peripheral AXIALSHAPE INDEX (Not Applicable Below 40% Power)
FIGURE 3.2-2 AXIAL'SHAPE INDEX vs, Maximum Allowable Power Level St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle )0 COLR            Rev 0              Page 9 of 14
 
M 1.2 I                                            ~  ~  ~  ~              ~  ~    ~  ~
I                            ~
I O          K              ~  ~
                                              ~  ~  ~  ~
e          Uj
                                                                                                ~  ~
I I                      I                            ~
I tO 0CL 1.j                      I        UNACCEPTABLE OPER ATION'R ECION-I--
I                      I O    O                                                                ~
I I
I O                                                                                                    I 0    0 Q                                (1.7, 1.0);                I (1 75,:1 0)
I  LIMITC(JR VE CC C)   O    IJI  1 O '
O    2                                                                              :
0I                                                                I                    . I          I D                                                          I                        I          I Zl    Q    Cl "0      ill                                                  I                        I          I vl Tl I- 0.9    ~    ~
                              - (1.7],.o.bO).'--  ~ 1      ~ - I- - -:-
O C)  CL                                                  I                        I          I Zl  gC33    0                                                  I                                (<.8'  0:85)'
O C    gmm    C I  ~
I C) 33 ~    0                                                              (1.77, 0.80 QM      O  0.8 I
lU                                                  I                        I 0    LL          Fr  LIMIT'CURVE                        I 0                                  I                      I I
I I
I Zl 6$
0.7  C CEP7ABLE.OPERATION. REGION.
                                              ~  ~  ~
                                                                                        ..I  .        I.
Q      0                          I                      I                        I CL                                                          I                        I ill D :n                                                          I                        I Ql Q
0.6 C) 0                  1.6                1.7                  1.75 Measured            F'
                                                                                    '.8
 
e'a g
    ~=
 
(-0.08,1.00)              (0.15,1.00)
UNACCEPTABLE                                        UNACCEPTABLE.
0              OPERATION                                            OPERATION 0.9          REGION                                                REGION ~
ACCEPTABLE OPERATION
~ 0.8                                          REGION I-CI I- 0.7 CC
(-0.50,0.65)                            (0.50,0.65) 0 o  06 0.5 0.4
              -0.6      -0.4        -0.2        0    0.2          0.4    0.6 Peripheral AXIALSHAPE INDEX (Y1)
(Not Applicable Below 40% Power)
FIGURE 3.2-4 AXIALSHAPE INDEX Oper'ating Limits vs. THERMAL POWER (Four Reactor Coolant Pumps Operating)
St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR            Rev 0                Page 11 of 14
 
"i
  *~
i~g
          ~-
 
3.0    LIST OF APPROVED METHODS The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits are those previously approved by the NRC, and are listed below.
WCAP-11596-P-A, "Qualification of the PHOENIX-P/ANC Nuclear Design System for Pressurized Water Reactor Cores," June 1988 (Westinghouse Proprietary)
: 2. NF-TR-95-01, "Nuclear Physics Methodology for Reload Design of Turkey Point 8 St. Lucie Nuclear Plants," Florida Power & Light Company, January 1995 (NRC SER dated June 9, 1995), 8 Supplement 1, August 1997
: 3. CENPD-199-P, Rev. 1-P-A, "C-E Setpoint Methodology: CE Local Power Density and DNB LSSS and LCO Setpoint Methodology for Analog Protection Systems,"
January 1986 4.. CENPD-266-P-A, "The ROCS and DIT Computer Code for Nuclear Design," April 1983
: 5. CENPD-275-P-A, "C-E Methodology for Core Designs Containing Gadolinia-Urania Burnable Absorbers," May 1988
: 6. CENPD-188-A, "HERMITE: A Multi-Dimensional Space - Time Kinetics Code for PWR Transients,: July 1976
: 7. CENPD-153-P, Rev. 1-P-A, "Evaluation of Uncertainty in the Nuclear Power Peaking Measured by the Self-Powered, Fixed Incore Detector System," May 1980
: 8. CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Methodology Part 1: C-E Calculated Local Power Density and Thermal Margin/Low Pressure LSSS for Calvert Cliffs Units I and II," December 1979
: 9. CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Methodology Part 2:
Combination of System Parameter Uncertainties in Thermal Margin Analyses for Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2," January 1980
: 10. CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Methodology Part 3: C-E Calculated Departure from Nucleate Boiling and Linear Heat Rate Limiting Conditions for Operation for Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2," February 1980 CEN-191(B)-P, "CETOP-D Code Structure and Modeling Methods for Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2," December 1981
: 12. Letter, J. W. Miller (NRC) to J. R. Williams, Jr. (FPL), Docket No. 50-389, Regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR            Rev 0                      Page 12 of 14
 
C Unit 2 Cycle 2 License Approval (Amendment No. 8 to NPF-16 and SER),
November 9, 1984 (Approval of CEN-123(F)-P (three parts) and CEN-191(B)-P)
: 13. CEN-371(F)-P, "Extended Statistical Combination of Uncertainties,".July 1989
: 14. Letter, J. A. Norris (NRC) to J. H. Goldberg (FPL), Docket No. 50-389, "St. Lucie Unit 2- Change to Technical Specification Bases Sections '2.1.1 Reactor Core'nd
      '3/4.2.5 DNB Parameters'TAC No. M87722)," March 14, 1994 (Approval of CEN-371(F)-P)
: 15. CENPD-161-P-A, "TORC Code, A Computer Code for Determining the Thermal Margin of a Reactor Core," April 1986
: 16. CENPD-162-P-A, "Critical Heat Flux Correlation for C-E Fuel Assemblies with Standard Spacer Grids Part 1, Uniform Axial Power Distribution," April 1975
: 17. CENPD-207-P-A, "Critical Heat Flux Correlation for C-E Fuel Assemblies with Standard Spacer Grids Part 2, Non-uniform Axial Power Distribution," December 1984
: 18. CENPD-206-P-A, "TORC Code, Verification and Simplified Modeling Methods,"
June 1981
: 19. CENPD-225-P-A, "Fuel and Poison Rod Bowing," June 1983
: 20. CENPD-139-P-A, "C-E Fuel Evaluation Model Topical Report," July 1974
: 21. CEN-161(B)-P-A, "Improvements to Fuel Evaluation Model," August 1989
: 22. CEN-161(B)-P, Supplement 1-P-A, "Improvements to Fuel Evaluation Model,"
January 1992
: 23. CENPD-132, Supplement 3-P-A, "Calculative Methods for the C-E Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model for the Analysis of C-E and W Designed NSSS," June 1985
: 24. CENPD-133, Supplement 5-A, "CEFLASH-4A, A FORTRAN77 Digital Computer Program for Reactor Blowdown Analysis," June 1985
: 25. CENPD-134, Supplement 2-A, "COMPERC-II, a Program for Emergency Refill-Reflood of the Core," June 1985
: 26. CENPD-135-P, Supplement 5, "STRIKIN-II,A Cylindrical Geometry Fuel Rod Heat Transfer Program," April 1977
: 27. Letter, R. L. Baer (NRC) to A. E. Scherer (CE), "Evaluation of Topical Report St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR            Rev 0                    Page 13 of 14
 
i.r 4i 0
 
CENPD-135, Supplement &#xb9;5," September 6, 1978
: 28. CENPD-137, Supplement 1-P, "Calculative Methods for the C-E Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model," January 1977
: 29. CENPD-133, Supplement 3-P, "CEFLASH-4AS, A Computer Program for the Reactor Blowdown Analysis of the Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident," January 1977
: 30. Letter, K. Kniel (NRC) to A. E. Scherer (CE), "Evaluation of Topical Reports CENPD-133, Supplement 3-P and CENPD-137, Supplement 1-P," September 27, 1977
: 31. CENPD-138, Supplement 2-P, "PARCH, A FORTRAN-IV Digital Program to Evaluate Pool Boiling, Axial Rod and Coolant Heatup," January 1977
: 32. Letter, C. Aniel (NRC) to A. E. Scherer (CE), "Evaluation of Topical Report CENPD-138, Supplement 2-P," April 10, 1978
: 33. Letter, W. H. Bohlke (FPL) to Document Control Desk (NRC), "St. Lucie Unit 2, Docket No. 50-389, Proposed License Amendment, T                han e f om -    c  o
      +/erg," L-91-325, December 17, 1991
: 34. Letter, J. A.Plorris (NRC) to J. H. Goldberg (FPL), "St. Lucie Unit 2 - Issuance of Amendment Re: Moderator Temperature Coefficient (TAC No. M82517)," July 15, 1992 35.
8 8 t ~ . 88-888, 8 8 June 4, 1984 d tt        8    d    t, ~td,"
Letter, J. W. Williams, Jr. (FPL) to D. G. Eisenhut (NRC), "St. Lucie Unit No. 2, I=84-448.
: 36. Letter, J. R. Miller (NRC) to J. W. Williams, Jr. (FPL), Docket No. 50-389, Regarding
      'Unit 2 Cycle 2 License Approval (Amendment No. 8 to NPF-16 and SER),
November 9, 1984 (Approval of Methodology contained in L-84-148)
: 37. Letter, A. E. Scherer Enclosure 1-P to LD-82-001, "CESEC-Digital Simulation of a Combustion Engineering Nuclear Steam Supply System," December 1981 38.. Safety Evaluation Report, "CESEC        Digital Simulation of a Combustion Engineering Steam Supply System (TAC No.: 01142)," October 27, 1983
: 39. CENPD-282-P-A, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, Supplement 1-P, "Technical Manual for the CENTS Code," March 1994 St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR              Rev 0                      Page 14 of 14}}

Latest revision as of 04:15, 4 February 2020

Rev 0 to St Lucie Unit 2,Cycle 10 Colr.
ML17309A914
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/29/1997
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17309A912 List:
References
NUDOCS 9801060191
Download: ML17309A914 (20)


Text

St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Core 0 eratin Limits Re ort COLR ENCLOSURE 1 to L-97-280 ST. LUCIE UNIT 2, CYCLE 10 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 0 Page 1 of 14

+DDi060iVX 97<RRq PDR ADDCK 00000250

'PDR

0

~1 tl P

Table of Contents Des ri ti n ~P'R cd 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Core Operating Limits 2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 2.2 CEA Position - Misalignment > 15 inches 2.3 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits 4" 2.4 Linear Heat Rate 2.5 TOTAL PLANAR RADIALPEAKING FACTORS 2.6 TOTAL INTEGRATED RADIALPEAKING FACTOR 2.7 DNB Parameters - AXIALSHAPE INDEX 2.8 Refueling Operations - Boron Concentration 3.0 'ist of Approved Methods 12 List of Figures Ficlure ~Titl ~Pa e 3.1-1a Allowable Time To Realign CEA vs. Initial F,T 3.1-2 CEA Insertion Limits vs. THERMAL POWER 3.2-1 Allowable Peak Linear Heat Rate vs. Burnup 3.2-2 AXIALSHAPE INDEX vs. Maximum Allowable Power Level 3.2-3 Allowable Combinations of THERMAL POWER and F,T, F~ 10 3.2-4 AXIALSHAPE INDEX Operating Limits vs. THERMAL POWER 11 St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 2 of 14

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) describes the cycle-specific parameter limits for operation of St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10. It contains the limits for the following as provided in Section 2.

Moderator Temperature Coefficient CEA Position - Misalignment > 15 Inches Regulating CEA Insertion Limits Linear Heat Rate TOTAL PLANAR RADIAL PEAKING FACTORS - F TOTAL INTEGRATED RADIALPEAKING FACTOR - F, DNB Parameter - AXIALSHAPE INDEX Refueling Operations - Boron Concentration This report also contains the necessary figures which give the limits for the above listed parameters.

Terms appearing in capitalized type are DEFINED TERMS as defined in Section 1.0 of the Technical Specifications.

This report is prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.11.

St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR, Rev 0 Page 3 of 14

2.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS 2.1 Moderator Tem erature oefficien (TS 3.1.1.4)

The moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) shall be less negative than -30 pcml'F at RATED THERMAL POWER.

2.2 EA Position - Misali nmen > 1 I ches (TS 3.1.3.1)

The time constraints for full power operation with one full-length CEA misaligned from any other CEA in its group by more than 15 inches are shown in Figure 3.1-1a.

2.3 Re ulatin EA I sertion Limits (TS 3.1.3.6)

The regulating CEA groups shall be limited to the withdrawal sequence and to'the insertion limits shown on Figure 3.1-2, with CEA insertion between the Long Term Steady State Insertion Limits and the Power Dependent Insertion Limits restricted to:

a. Less than or equal to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> per 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> interval,
b. Less than or equal to 5 Effective Full Power Days per 30 Effective Full Power Days, and
c. Less than or equal to 14 Effective Full Power Days per calendar year.

2.4 ~DN 2 tTS 2.2.14 The linear heat rate shall not exceed the limits shown on Figure 3.2-1.

The AXIALSHAPE INDEX power dependent control limits are shown on Figure 3.2-2.

During operation, with the linear heat rate being monitored by the E core Detector

~Mi I t,th AXIANSNAPE INDEX h Ilh I t I d ttht th of Figure 3.2-2.

During operation, with the linear heat rate being monitored by the Incore Detector

~M>> t,th 2 IP D Ity I thtt hilt dt tdt less than or equal to the limits shown on Figure 3.2-1.

St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rey 0 Page 4 of 14

2.5 T TAL PLANAR RADIAL PEAKIN F TOR -F T (TS 3.2.2)

The calculated value of F~T shall be limited to < 1.75.

The power dependent F T limits are shown on Figure 3.2-3.

2.6 T L INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKIN FA TOR - F (TS 3.2.3)

The calculated value of F,T shall be limited to < 1.70.

The power dependent F, limits are shown on Figure 3.2-3.

2.7 DNB Parameters - AXIAL HAPE INDE (TS 3.2.5)

The AXIALSHAPE INDEX shall be maintained within the limits specified in Figure 3.2-4.

2.8 . efuelin 0 erations - Boron onc n ra io (TS 3.9.1)

With the reactor vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed, the boron concentration of all filled portions of the Reactor Coolant System and the refueling canal shall be maintained uniform and sufficient to ensure that the more restrictive of the following reactivity conditions is met:

a. Either a K,<<of 0.95 or less, or
b. A boron concentration of greater than or equal to 1720 ppm.

St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 5 of 14

0 I1 1~

0

1.72 I.7 1.68 1.66

~ 1.64 1.62 0

1.6 1.58 1.56 3 '164 1.54 1.52 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Time at Full Power to Realign CEA, Minutes FIGURE 3.1-1 a Allowable Time to Realign CEA vs. Initial F,T St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 6 of 14

C C

@ 0 c

~ 0 EEE P

a 0 a P C o c 0 8 2 C5 g g og Qg

(.8 TEE a

Q, fg~ N I o a (LL, g

I Q O I jQ 5 111 i~~ 0.80 D cl 0

g a C

G) j g 0 0 O 0.70 o 6 2 I

'- c Ill I c g oea ni I g

Q I- .:I 8 O m 0.60 QL I- 9 I-y' a 040 P ,I Q

Ig G)

C) -I

0) z C) 0.30 I al

+ lQ I-I zill 020 ILONG TEAM"~ -AIIOA'E TEAM 33 sTEAOY srEAnv STATE SIATE INSEAT ION .

0. Io INSEA I)ON llMlr I

U llMI2 0

33 OAOOI S ~l 0 20 40 (1)6)(108.8)(81.6)

IE 60 (5l.l) 80 (27.2) 100 (0) 0 20 40 M 80 (I)6) (108.8) (41. &) (5l. l ) (27.2) 100 (0) 0 20 40 (1)6) (108.8)(81.6) 60 (5l.l )

80 (27.2) 100 (0) 4 2 o 2o co en IN loo 0 20 co eo so Ioa (l)6)(IOS.S)(81.6) (5l.l) (27.2) (0) (1)6)(108.8)(81.6) (5l.l) (27.2) (0) 5 CEA INSE IITIAN (INCIIES CEA WIIIIDIIAWN)

~ ~

~ 14 6)

UNACCEPTRBL'E OPERATION CC 13 CL ~

r 0)

.ACCEPTABLE OPERATION.

32

~ ~ ~

BOL CYCLE LIFE EOL (Fuel + Clad + Moderator)

FIGURE 3.2-1 Allowable Peak Linear Heat Rate vs. Burnup St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 8 of 14

1.1 0 1 UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION REGION L

o 0.9

(-0.10,0.88) (0.15,0.88)

~ 0.8 E ACCEPTABLE 0.7 OPERATION X REGION o 0.6 (-0.50,0.60) (0.50,0.60) 0 0.5 0.4

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Peripheral AXIALSHAPE INDEX (Not Applicable Below 40% Power)

FIGURE 3.2-2 AXIAL'SHAPE INDEX vs, Maximum Allowable Power Level St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle )0 COLR Rev 0 Page 9 of 14

M 1.2 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I ~

I O K ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

e Uj

~ ~

I I I ~

I tO 0CL 1.j I UNACCEPTABLE OPER ATION'R ECION-I--

I I O O ~

I I

I O I 0 0 Q (1.7, 1.0); I (1 75,:1 0)

I LIMITC(JR VE CC C) O IJI 1 O '

O 2  :

0I I . I I D I I I Zl Q Cl "0 ill I I I vl Tl I- 0.9 ~ ~

- (1.7],.o.bO).'-- ~ 1 ~ - I- - -:-

O C) CL I I I Zl gC33 0 I (<.8' 0:85)'

O C gmm C I ~

I C) 33 ~ 0 (1.77, 0.80 QM O 0.8 I

lU I I 0 LL Fr LIMIT'CURVE I 0 I I I

I I

I Zl 6$

0.7 C CEP7ABLE.OPERATION. REGION.

~ ~ ~

..I . I.

Q 0 I I I CL I I ill D :n I I Ql Q

0.6 C) 0 1.6 1.7 1.75 Measured F'

'.8

e'a g

~=

(-0.08,1.00) (0.15,1.00)

UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE.

0 OPERATION OPERATION 0.9 REGION REGION ~

ACCEPTABLE OPERATION

~ 0.8 REGION I-CI I- 0.7 CC

(-0.50,0.65) (0.50,0.65) 0 o 06 0.5 0.4

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Peripheral AXIALSHAPE INDEX (Y1)

(Not Applicable Below 40% Power)

FIGURE 3.2-4 AXIALSHAPE INDEX Oper'ating Limits vs. THERMAL POWER (Four Reactor Coolant Pumps Operating)

St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 11 of 14

"i

  • ~

i~g

~-

3.0 LIST OF APPROVED METHODS The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits are those previously approved by the NRC, and are listed below.

WCAP-11596-P-A, "Qualification of the PHOENIX-P/ANC Nuclear Design System for Pressurized Water Reactor Cores," June 1988 (Westinghouse Proprietary)

2. NF-TR-95-01, "Nuclear Physics Methodology for Reload Design of Turkey Point 8 St. Lucie Nuclear Plants," Florida Power & Light Company, January 1995 (NRC SER dated June 9, 1995), 8 Supplement 1, August 1997
3. CENPD-199-P, Rev. 1-P-A, "C-E Setpoint Methodology: CE Local Power Density and DNB LSSS and LCO Setpoint Methodology for Analog Protection Systems,"

January 1986 4.. CENPD-266-P-A, "The ROCS and DIT Computer Code for Nuclear Design," April 1983

5. CENPD-275-P-A, "C-E Methodology for Core Designs Containing Gadolinia-Urania Burnable Absorbers," May 1988
6. CENPD-188-A, "HERMITE: A Multi-Dimensional Space - Time Kinetics Code for PWR Transients,: July 1976
7. CENPD-153-P, Rev. 1-P-A, "Evaluation of Uncertainty in the Nuclear Power Peaking Measured by the Self-Powered, Fixed Incore Detector System," May 1980
8. CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Methodology Part 1: C-E Calculated Local Power Density and Thermal Margin/Low Pressure LSSS for Calvert Cliffs Units I and II," December 1979
9. CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Methodology Part 2:

Combination of System Parameter Uncertainties in Thermal Margin Analyses for Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2," January 1980

10. CEN-123(F)-P, "Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Methodology Part 3: C-E Calculated Departure from Nucleate Boiling and Linear Heat Rate Limiting Conditions for Operation for Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2," February 1980 CEN-191(B)-P, "CETOP-D Code Structure and Modeling Methods for Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2," December 1981
12. Letter, J. W. Miller (NRC) to J. R. Williams, Jr. (FPL), Docket No. 50-389, Regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 12 of 14

C Unit 2 Cycle 2 License Approval (Amendment No. 8 to NPF-16 and SER),

November 9, 1984 (Approval of CEN-123(F)-P (three parts) and CEN-191(B)-P)

13. CEN-371(F)-P, "Extended Statistical Combination of Uncertainties,".July 1989
14. Letter, J. A. Norris (NRC) to J. H. Goldberg (FPL), Docket No. 50-389, "St. Lucie Unit 2- Change to Technical Specification Bases Sections '2.1.1 Reactor Core'nd

'3/4.2.5 DNB Parameters'TAC No. M87722)," March 14, 1994 (Approval of CEN-371(F)-P)

15. CENPD-161-P-A, "TORC Code, A Computer Code for Determining the Thermal Margin of a Reactor Core," April 1986
16. CENPD-162-P-A, "Critical Heat Flux Correlation for C-E Fuel Assemblies with Standard Spacer Grids Part 1, Uniform Axial Power Distribution," April 1975
17. CENPD-207-P-A, "Critical Heat Flux Correlation for C-E Fuel Assemblies with Standard Spacer Grids Part 2, Non-uniform Axial Power Distribution," December 1984
18. CENPD-206-P-A, "TORC Code, Verification and Simplified Modeling Methods,"

June 1981

19. CENPD-225-P-A, "Fuel and Poison Rod Bowing," June 1983
20. CENPD-139-P-A, "C-E Fuel Evaluation Model Topical Report," July 1974
21. CEN-161(B)-P-A, "Improvements to Fuel Evaluation Model," August 1989
22. CEN-161(B)-P, Supplement 1-P-A, "Improvements to Fuel Evaluation Model,"

January 1992

23. CENPD-132, Supplement 3-P-A, "Calculative Methods for the C-E Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model for the Analysis of C-E and W Designed NSSS," June 1985
24. CENPD-133, Supplement 5-A, "CEFLASH-4A, A FORTRAN77 Digital Computer Program for Reactor Blowdown Analysis," June 1985
25. CENPD-134, Supplement 2-A, "COMPERC-II, a Program for Emergency Refill-Reflood of the Core," June 1985
26. CENPD-135-P, Supplement 5, "STRIKIN-II,A Cylindrical Geometry Fuel Rod Heat Transfer Program," April 1977
27. Letter, R. L. Baer (NRC) to A. E. Scherer (CE), "Evaluation of Topical Report St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 13 of 14

i.r 4i 0

CENPD-135, Supplement ¹5," September 6, 1978

28. CENPD-137, Supplement 1-P, "Calculative Methods for the C-E Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model," January 1977
29. CENPD-133, Supplement 3-P, "CEFLASH-4AS, A Computer Program for the Reactor Blowdown Analysis of the Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident," January 1977
30. Letter, K. Kniel (NRC) to A. E. Scherer (CE), "Evaluation of Topical Reports CENPD-133, Supplement 3-P and CENPD-137, Supplement 1-P," September 27, 1977
31. CENPD-138, Supplement 2-P, "PARCH, A FORTRAN-IV Digital Program to Evaluate Pool Boiling, Axial Rod and Coolant Heatup," January 1977
32. Letter, C. Aniel (NRC) to A. E. Scherer (CE), "Evaluation of Topical Report CENPD-138, Supplement 2-P," April 10, 1978
33. Letter, W. H. Bohlke (FPL) to Document Control Desk (NRC), "St. Lucie Unit 2, Docket No. 50-389, Proposed License Amendment, T han e f om - c o

+/erg," L-91-325, December 17, 1991

34. Letter, J. A.Plorris (NRC) to J. H. Goldberg (FPL), "St. Lucie Unit 2 - Issuance of Amendment Re: Moderator Temperature Coefficient (TAC No. M82517)," July 15, 1992 35.

8 8 t ~ .88-888, 8 8 June 4, 1984 d tt 8 d t, ~td,"

Letter, J. W. Williams, Jr. (FPL) to D. G. Eisenhut (NRC), "St. Lucie Unit No. 2, I=84-448.

36. Letter, J. R. Miller (NRC) to J. W. Williams, Jr. (FPL), Docket No. 50-389, Regarding

'Unit 2 Cycle 2 License Approval (Amendment No. 8 to NPF-16 and SER),

November 9, 1984 (Approval of Methodology contained in L-84-148)

37. Letter, A. E. Scherer Enclosure 1-P to LD-82-001, "CESEC-Digital Simulation of a Combustion Engineering Nuclear Steam Supply System," December 1981 38.. Safety Evaluation Report, "CESEC Digital Simulation of a Combustion Engineering Steam Supply System (TAC No.: 01142)," October 27, 1983
39. CENPD-282-P-A, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, Supplement 1-P, "Technical Manual for the CENTS Code," March 1994 St. Lucie Unit 2 Cycle 10 COLR Rev 0 Page 14 of 14