ML18102A342: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/22/1996
| issue date = 08/22/1996
| title = LER 96-019-00:on 960729,misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves Noted.Caused by Flawed Engineering Evaluation. Review of Other Salem Piping Penetrations Performed. W/960822 Ltr
| title = LER 96-019-00:on 960729,misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves Noted.Caused by Flawed Engineering Evaluation. Review of Other Salem Piping Penetrations Performed. W/960822 Ltr
| author name = GARCHOW D F, HASSLER D V
| author name = Garchow D, Hassler D
| author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY
| author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:e Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit AUG 2 2 1996 LR-N96270 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:
{{#Wiki_filter:e t:JPS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit AUG 2 2 1996 LR-N96270 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:
LER 272/96-019-00 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 This Licensee Event Report entitled "Misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves" is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50. 73 (a) (2) (ii) (A). Attachment SORC Mtg. 96-114 JMO/tcp c Distribution LER File 3.7 9608300088 960822 PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR Sincerely, General Manager -Salem Operations
LER 272/96-019-00 SALEM GENERATING STATION - UNIT 1 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 This Licensee Event Report entitled "Misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves" is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50. 73 (a) (2) (ii) (A).
/ \, \ 95-2168 REV. 6194 Document Control Desk LR-N96270 Attachment A The following represents the commitments that Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G) made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) relative to this LER (272/96-019-00).
Sincerely,
The commitments are as follows: 1. A review of other Salem piping penetrations was performed by the Inservice Inspection Group and did not identify any similar occurrences of misclassification of valves. 2. The seismic Category II tubing will be upgraded to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J Type C testing will be reinstated prior to mode 4. 3. Procedure NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0905 (Z) rev, 10 (dated May 13 1996) Engineering Support Personnel Training Program is now in place to ensure that qualified personnel are preparing and reviewing work.
                                            ~lG~
* NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (4-95) EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER} THE LICENSING PROCESS ANO FED BACK TD INDUSTRY.
General Manager -
FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T-6 FJJ), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, (See reverse for required number of WASHINGTON, DC 20503. digits/characters for each block) FACILITY NAME (11 DOCKET NUMBER 121 PAGE (31 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 1 OF 3 TITLE !41 Misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8) I I FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER Salem Unit 2 05000311 07 29 96 96 019 00 08 22 96 FACILITY rJAME DOCKET NUMBER --OPERATING N THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: !Check one or more) (11) MODE(9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
Salem Operations Attachment SORC Mtg. 96-114 JMO/tcp c       Distribution LER File 3.7
POWER 000 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) x 50.73(a)(2)(ii)
                                                                                        /
: 50. 73(a)(2)(x)
9608300088 960822 PDR ADOCK 05000272 S                         PDR
LEVEL (10) 20.2203(a)(2J(i) 20.2203(a)(3J(iiJ 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 -20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4)
                                                                                            \,\
: 50. 73(a)(2)(iv)
95-2168 REV. 6194
OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iiiJ 50.36(c)(1J 50.73(a)(2)(v)
 
Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
Document Control Desk LR-N96270 Attachment A The following represents the commitments that Public Service Electric
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Aroa Code) Dennis v. Hassler, LER Coordinator 609-339-1989 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR IYES x INO SUBMISSION (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). DATE (15) ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e .. approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16) On July 2 9' 1996, while performing a review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves, four valves were identified in the Steam Generator Sample Blow Down Sample System lines that were not being leak rate tested. These isolation valves 11-14SS93, 21-24SS93, 11-14SS94 and 21-24SS94 were not included in the Technical Specifications.
& Gas (PSE&G) made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) relative to this LER (272/96-019-00). The commitments are as follows:
In November 1985, PSE&G submitted a license change request (LCR) to remove these valves from Table 3.6."1. The LCR was approved and thus the valves were removed from testing programs.
: 1. A review of other Salem piping penetrations was performed by the Inservice Inspection Group and did not identify any similar occurrences of misclassification of valves.
An engineering review being performed as a cormnitment to LER 272/96-004-00 determined that the previous removal of these valves from the testing program was inappropriate because the seismic qualification of the sample line tubing was not adequate to support the design requirements for a closed system. This event was caused by a flawed engineering evaluation.
: 2. The seismic Category II tubing will be upgraded to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J Type C testing will be reinstated prior to mode 4.
The requirements for a closed. system were listed in the design basis but an incorrect conclusion identified the piping boundary as a closed loop. Corrective actions include upgrading by analysis or modifying the seismic Category II tubing to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J type c testing will be reinstated.
: 3. Procedure NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0905 (Z) rev, 10 (dated May 13 1996)
Engineering Support Personnel Training Program is now in place to ensure that qualified personnel are preparing and reviewing work.
 
NRC FORM 366 (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER}
* U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                       APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS ANO FED BACK TD INDUSTRY. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T-6 FJJ),
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, (See reverse for required number of                                         WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
digits/characters for each block)
FACILITY NAME (11                                                                                               DOCKET NUMBER 121                                             PAGE (31 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1                                                                                 05000272                                                   1 OF 3 TITLE !41 Misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves EVENT DATE (5)                       LER NUMBER (6)                           REPORT DATE (7)                                 OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
FACILITY NAME                                     DOCKET NUMBER MONTH         DAY       YEAR     YEAR         SEQUENTIAL         REVISION     MONTH             YEAR I                      I DAY NUMBER           NUMBER                                   Salem Unit 2                                       05000311 FACILITY rJAME                                    DOCKET NUMBER 07           29       96       96     -      019         -    00           08         22     96 OPERATING               N     THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: !Check one or more) (11)
MODE(9)                         20.2201(b)                               20.2203(a)(2)(v)                         50.73(a)(2)(i)                             50.73(a)(2)(viii)
POWER             000           20.2203(a)(1)                             20.2203(a)(3)(i)                     x   50.73(a)(2)(ii)                           50. 73(a)(2)(x)
LEVEL (10)                         20.2203(a)(2J(i)                         20.2203(a)(3J(iiJ                         50.73(a)(2)(iii)                           73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)                         20.2203(a)(4)                             50. 73(a)(2)(iv)                           OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iiiJ                       50.36(c)(1J                               50.73(a)(2)(v)                       Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)                         50.36(c)(2)                               50.73(a)(2)(vii)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME                                                                                                                   TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Aroa Code)
Dennis             v. Hassler, LER Coordinator                                                                     609-339-1989 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE             SYSTEM         COMPONENT           MANUFACTURER         REPORTABLE                 CAUSE           SYSTEM           COMPONENT     MANUFACTURER           REPORTABLE TO NPRDS                                                                                             TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)                                                               EXPECTED                 MONTH         DAY           YEAR SUBMISSION IYES (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
x    INO DATE (15)
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e.. approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On July 2 9' 1996, while performing a review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves, four valves were identified in the Steam Generator Sample Blow Down Sample System lines that were not being leak rate tested.                               These isolation valves 11-14SS93, 21-24SS93, 11-14SS94 and 21-24SS94 were not included in the Technical Specifications.                                                                     In November 1985, PSE&G submitted a license change request (LCR) to remove these valves from Table 3.6."1. The LCR was approved and thus the valves were removed from testing programs. An engineering review being performed as a cormnitment to LER 272/96-004-00 determined that the previous removal of these valves from the testing program was inappropriate because the seismic qualification of the sample line tubing was not adequate to support the design requirements for a closed system.                                           This event was caused by a flawed engineering evaluation.                 The requirements for a closed. system were listed in the design basis but an incorrect conclusion identified the piping boundary as a closed loop.
Corrective actions include upgrading by analysis or modifying the seismic Category I I tubing to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J type c testing will be reinstated.
This event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (A), any condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition.
This event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (A), any condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition.
NRC FORM 366 (4-95)
NRC FORM 366 (4-95)
NRC FORM 366A (4-95) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17) PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Westinghouse-Pressurized Water Reactor Main Steam System/Isolation Valve {SB/ISV}*
 
LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUllllER 2 OF 96 -019 00 *Energy Industry Identification (EIIS) codes and component function identifier codes appear as (SS/CCC).
NRC FORM 366A                                                                                                     U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)                                   DOCKET NUMBER (2)       LER NUMBER (6)              PAGE (3) 05000272        YEAR I  SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUllllER 2    OF    3 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 96 -      019          00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Westinghouse-Pressurized Water Reactor Main Steam System/Isolation Valve {SB/ISV}*
  *Energy Industry Identification (EIIS) codes and component function identifier codes appear as (SS/CCC).
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE At the time of identification, Salem Units 1 and 2 were shutdown and defueled.
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE At the time of identification, Salem Units 1 and 2 were shutdown and defueled.
DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION On July 29, 1996 while performing a review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves as a commitment made in LER 272/96-004-00, four valves were identified in the Steam Generator Sample Blow Down Sample System lines that were not being tested. These isolation valves ll-14SS93, 21-24SS93, ll-14SS94 and 21-24SS94 were not included in the Technical Specifications.
DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION On July 29, 1996 while performing a review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves as a commitment made in LER 272/96-004-00, four valves were identified in the Steam Generator Sample Blow Down Sample System lines that were not being tested.
In November 1985, PSE&G submitted a License Change Request (LCR) for Salem Units 1 and 2 to make modifications to the containment isolation valve table (Table 3.6-1) of the Technical Specifications.
These isolation valves ll-14SS93, 21-24SS93, ll-14SS94 and 21-24SS94 were not included in the Technical Specifications.
One aspect of the LCR dealt with the steam generator blow down sample line isolation valves (ll-14SS93, 21-24SS93, ll-14SS94, and 21-24SS94).
In November 1985, PSE&G submitted a License Change Request (LCR) for Salem Units 1 and 2 to make modifications to the containment isolation valve table (Table 3.6-1) of the Technical Specifications. One aspect of the LCR dealt with the steam generator blow down sample line isolation valves (ll-14SS93, 21-24SS93, ll-14SS94, and 21-24SS94). One item requested removal of the SS93 valves from the table since the valves were part of a closed system inside containment and were therefore not required to function as active isolation valves. A second item removed the 10CFR50 Appendix J, type C local leak rate testing of the SS94 valves based on the fact that they were connected to the secondary side of the steam generator and were therefore not exposed to the containment atmosphere during a loss of coolant accident. These changes were approved by License Amendments No. 92 and 67 dated April 24, 1989 for Salem Units 1 and 2 respectively.
One item requested removal of the SS93 valves from the table since the valves were part of a closed system inside containment and were therefore not required to function as active isolation valves. A second item removed the 10CFR50 Appendix J, type C local leak rate testing of the SS94 valves based on the fact that they were connected to the secondary side of the steam generator and were therefore not exposed to the containment atmosphere during a loss of coolant accident.
The review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves determined that the basis for removal of the valves from the Technical Specification was in error. The pressure boundary does not qualify as a closed loop system inside containment as defined in the design basis because a portion of the boundary is comprised of seismic Category II tubing. A closed system inside containment is required to be seismic Category I.
These changes were approved by License Amendments No. 92 and 67 dated April 24, 1989 for Salem Units 1 and 2 respectively.
CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE This event was caused by a flawed engineering evaluation. The requirements for a closed system were listed in the design basis but the analysis did not address the seismic qualifications of the sample lines.
The review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves determined that the basis for removal of the valves from the Technical Specification was in error. The pressure boundary does not qualify as a closed loop system inside containment as defined in the design basis because a portion of the boundary is comprised of seismic Category II tubing. A closed system inside containment is required to be seismic Category I. CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE This event was caused by a flawed engineering evaluation.
NRC FORM 366A (4-95)
The requirements for a closed system were listed in the design basis but the analysis did not address the seismic qualifications of the sample lines. NRC FORM 366A (4-95) 3 NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-96) " FACILITY NAME (1) LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 0 5 0 0 0 2 7 2 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 3 OF 3 96 -019 -00 TEXT (tf more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17) PRIOR SIMILAR OCCURRENCES A review of LERs for the past two years did not reveal any reportable occurrences of misclassification of valves or occurr*;nces where the Technical Specifications were incorrectly revised. SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS Salem Units 1 and 2 are shutdown and defueled and therefore the current situation presents no risk of an uncontrolled release. Both the SS94 and SS93 valves are maintained open during operations, with SS93 providing isolation inside the containment and SS94 providing isolation outside of the containment.
 
Both valves are air operated, fail close designs. The SS94 valve receives a Phase A isolation signal during accidents while the SS93 valve is operated from the Control Room. Isolation of the steam generator blowdown sampling is maintained with a normally closed valve at the main sample station. Therefore, a potential release path would require the failure to close of the SS94 valve coupled with a rupture of the seismic category II sample tubing and the opening of the sample valve at the main sample station. Given that SS93 could provide isolation and the normally closed main sample station valve, the risk of uncontrolled release for past operations was minimal. Thus, there was no impact on the health and safety of the public. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 1. A review of other Salem piping penetrations was performed by the Inservice Inspection Group and did not identify any similar occurrences of misclassification of valves. 2. The seismic Category II tubing will be upgraded to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J Type C testing will be reinstated prior to mode 4. Procedure NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0905 (Z) rev, 10 (dated May 13 1996) Engineering
NRC FORM 366A                                                                           U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-96)     "
: 3. Support Personnel Training Program is now in place to ensure that qualified personnel are preparing and reviewing work. NRC FORM 366A (4-95)}}
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)                            DOCKET NUMBER (2)     LER NUMBER (6)             PAGE (3) 050002 72      YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER IREVISION NUMBER 3   OF     3 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 96 -     019     -     00 TEXT (tf more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
PRIOR       SIMILAR OCCURRENCES A review of LERs for the past two years did not reveal any reportable occurrences of misclassification of valves or occurr*;nces where the Technical Specifications were incorrectly revised.
SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS Salem Units 1 and 2 are shutdown and defueled and therefore the current situation presents no risk of an uncontrolled release.                                   Both the SS94 and SS93 valves are maintained open during operations, with SS93 providing isolation inside the containment and SS94 providing isolation outside of the containment.
Both valves are air operated, fail close designs. The SS94 valve receives a Phase A isolation signal during accidents while the SS93 valve is operated from the Control Room.               Isolation of the steam generator blowdown sampling is maintained with a normally closed valve at the main sample station.
Therefore, a potential release path would require the failure to close of the SS94 valve coupled with a rupture of the seismic category II sample tubing and the opening of the sample valve at the main sample station.                                       Given that SS93 could provide isolation and the normally closed main sample station valve, the risk of uncontrolled release for past operations was minimal.                                       Thus, there was no impact on the health and safety of the public.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
: 1. A review of other Salem piping penetrations was performed by the Inservice Inspection Group and did not identify any similar occurrences of misclassification of valves.
: 2. The seismic Category II tubing will be upgraded to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J Type C testing will be reinstated prior to mode 4.
: 3. Procedure NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0905 (Z) rev, 10 (dated May 13 1996) Engineering Support Personnel Training Program is now in place to ensure that qualified personnel are preparing and reviewing work.
NRC FORM 366A (4-95)}}

Latest revision as of 05:28, 3 February 2020

LER 96-019-00:on 960729,misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves Noted.Caused by Flawed Engineering Evaluation. Review of Other Salem Piping Penetrations Performed. W/960822 Ltr
ML18102A342
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/1996
From: Garchow D, Hassler D
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-96-019-01, LER-96-19-1, LR-N96270, NUDOCS 9608300088
Download: ML18102A342 (5)
v • d • e


Text

e t:JPS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit AUG 2 2 1996 LR-N96270 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

LER 272/96-019-00 SALEM GENERATING STATION - UNIT 1 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 This Licensee Event Report entitled "Misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves" is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50. 73 (a) (2) (ii) (A).

Sincerely,

~lG~

General Manager -

Salem Operations Attachment SORC Mtg.96-114 JMO/tcp c Distribution LER File 3.7

/

9608300088 960822 PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR

\,\

95-2168 REV. 6194

Document Control Desk LR-N96270 Attachment A The following represents the commitments that Public Service Electric

& Gas (PSE&G) made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) relative to this LER (272/96-019-00). The commitments are as follows:

1. A review of other Salem piping penetrations was performed by the Inservice Inspection Group and did not identify any similar occurrences of misclassification of valves.
2. The seismic Category II tubing will be upgraded to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J Type C testing will be reinstated prior to mode 4.
3. Procedure NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0905 (Z) rev, 10 (dated May 13 1996)

Engineering Support Personnel Training Program is now in place to ensure that qualified personnel are preparing and reviewing work.

NRC FORM 366 (4-95)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER}

  • U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS ANO FED BACK TD INDUSTRY. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T-6 FJJ),

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, (See reverse for required number of WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

digits/characters for each block)

FACILITY NAME (11 DOCKET NUMBER 121 PAGE (31 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 1 OF 3 TITLE !41 Misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH YEAR I I DAY NUMBER NUMBER Salem Unit 2 05000311 FACILITY rJAME DOCKET NUMBER 07 29 96 96 - 019 - 00 08 22 96 OPERATING N THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: !Check one or more) (11)

MODE(9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)

POWER 000 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) x 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50. 73(a)(2)(x)

LEVEL (10) 20.2203(a)(2J(i) 20.2203(a)(3J(iiJ 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50. 73(a)(2)(iv) OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iiiJ 50.36(c)(1J 50.73(a)(2)(v) Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Aroa Code)

Dennis v. Hassler, LER Coordinator 609-339-1989 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSION IYES (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).

x INO DATE (15)

ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e.. approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)

On July 2 9' 1996, while performing a review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves, four valves were identified in the Steam Generator Sample Blow Down Sample System lines that were not being leak rate tested. These isolation valves11-14SS93,21-24SS93,11-14SS94 and 21-24SS94 were not included in the Technical Specifications. In November 1985, PSE&G submitted a license change request (LCR) to remove these valves from Table 3.6."1. The LCR was approved and thus the valves were removed from testing programs. An engineering review being performed as a cormnitment to LER 272/96-004-00 determined that the previous removal of these valves from the testing program was inappropriate because the seismic qualification of the sample line tubing was not adequate to support the design requirements for a closed system. This event was caused by a flawed engineering evaluation. The requirements for a closed. system were listed in the design basis but an incorrect conclusion identified the piping boundary as a closed loop.

Corrective actions include upgrading by analysis or modifying the seismic Category I I tubing to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J type c testing will be reinstated.

This event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (A), any condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition.

NRC FORM 366 (4-95)

NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) 05000272 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUllllER 2 OF 3 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 96 - 019 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Westinghouse-Pressurized Water Reactor Main Steam System/Isolation Valve {SB/ISV}*

  • Energy Industry Identification (EIIS) codes and component function identifier codes appear as (SS/CCC).

CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE At the time of identification, Salem Units 1 and 2 were shutdown and defueled.

DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION On July 29, 1996 while performing a review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves as a commitment made in LER 272/96-004-00, four valves were identified in the Steam Generator Sample Blow Down Sample System lines that were not being tested.

These isolation valves ll-14SS93,21-24SS93, ll-14SS94 and 21-24SS94 were not included in the Technical Specifications.

In November 1985, PSE&G submitted a License Change Request (LCR) for Salem Units 1 and 2 to make modifications to the containment isolation valve table (Table 3.6-1) of the Technical Specifications. One aspect of the LCR dealt with the steam generator blow down sample line isolation valves (ll-14SS93,21-24SS93, ll-14SS94, and 21-24SS94). One item requested removal of the SS93 valves from the table since the valves were part of a closed system inside containment and were therefore not required to function as active isolation valves. A second item removed the 10CFR50 Appendix J, type C local leak rate testing of the SS94 valves based on the fact that they were connected to the secondary side of the steam generator and were therefore not exposed to the containment atmosphere during a loss of coolant accident. These changes were approved by License Amendments No. 92 and 67 dated April 24, 1989 for Salem Units 1 and 2 respectively.

The review of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J valves determined that the basis for removal of the valves from the Technical Specification was in error. The pressure boundary does not qualify as a closed loop system inside containment as defined in the design basis because a portion of the boundary is comprised of seismic Category II tubing. A closed system inside containment is required to be seismic Category I.

CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE This event was caused by a flawed engineering evaluation. The requirements for a closed system were listed in the design basis but the analysis did not address the seismic qualifications of the sample lines.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-96) "

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) 050002 72 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER IREVISION NUMBER 3 OF 3 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 96 - 019 - 00 TEXT (tf more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

PRIOR SIMILAR OCCURRENCES A review of LERs for the past two years did not reveal any reportable occurrences of misclassification of valves or occurr*;nces where the Technical Specifications were incorrectly revised.

SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS Salem Units 1 and 2 are shutdown and defueled and therefore the current situation presents no risk of an uncontrolled release. Both the SS94 and SS93 valves are maintained open during operations, with SS93 providing isolation inside the containment and SS94 providing isolation outside of the containment.

Both valves are air operated, fail close designs. The SS94 valve receives a Phase A isolation signal during accidents while the SS93 valve is operated from the Control Room. Isolation of the steam generator blowdown sampling is maintained with a normally closed valve at the main sample station.

Therefore, a potential release path would require the failure to close of the SS94 valve coupled with a rupture of the seismic category II sample tubing and the opening of the sample valve at the main sample station. Given that SS93 could provide isolation and the normally closed main sample station valve, the risk of uncontrolled release for past operations was minimal. Thus, there was no impact on the health and safety of the public.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

1. A review of other Salem piping penetrations was performed by the Inservice Inspection Group and did not identify any similar occurrences of misclassification of valves.
2. The seismic Category II tubing will be upgraded to Seismic Category I requirements, or compliance with Appendix J Type C testing will be reinstated prior to mode 4.
3. Procedure NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0905 (Z) rev, 10 (dated May 13 1996) Engineering Support Personnel Training Program is now in place to ensure that qualified personnel are preparing and reviewing work.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18102A342&oldid=2407976"