ML18219D856: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:~ll DISTRIBUTION AFTER ISSUANCE L PERATING LICENSE NRC FORM 196 Iz 7S)UM NUCLEAA REGULATORY COMMISSI DOCXET NUMBER-ZIS TO>>Mr.Edson G.Case FROM: Indiana 8 Michigan Power Co.F.N.Bien NRC OISTRIBUTION FDA PART 60 DOCKET MATERIAL FILE NUMBER DATE OF DOCUMENT 12/30 77 DATE RECEIVED 01 04 78~LETTER ABORIGINAL CICOPY GNOTORIZED
{{#Wiki_filter:~ ll DISTRIBUTION AFTER ISSUANCE L         PERATING LICENSE NRC FORM 196                                           UM NUCLEAA REGULATORY COMMISSI DOCXET NUMBER Iz 7S)                                                                                            - ZIS FILE NUMBER NRC OISTRIBUTION FDA PART 60 DOCKET MATERIAL TO>>                                             FROM:                                  DATE OF DOCUMENT Mr. Edson G. Case           Indiana 8 Michigan Power     Co.     12/30  77 F. N. Bien                           DATE RECEIVED 01 04 78
~NCLASSIPIED PROP INPUT FORM NUMBER OP COPIPS RECEIVED i<IC aW DESCRIPTION Response to NRCIs 09/02/77 ltr.regarding the prevention of feedwater line water hammer by maintaining the f eedwater piping sparger ri,ng sufficiently filled.Notorized 12/30/77.....
  ~LETTER                     GNOTORIZED         PROP                 INPUT FORM       NUMBER OP COPIPS RECEIVED ABORIGINAL              ~NCLASSIPIED CICOPY                                                                                    i<IC   aW DESCRIPTION                                                   ENCL,OSU AE Response to NRCIs 09/02/77 ltr. regarding the prevention of feedwater line water hammer by maintaining the feedwater piping nd sparger ri,ng sufficiently filled.
ENCL,OSU AE nd 2p COOK UNIT 0 1 jcm 01/05/78 BRANCH CHIEF: 7 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION IRZG F INTERNAL 0 ISTRI BUTION I z I I STD I/JA 0 I g.8'aI I I=.EPDR: ZIC NSIC fiCRS 16 CYS SENT CATEGPR BXTERNAL OISTRI BUTION CONTROL NUM BBR 0
Notorized 12/30/77.....
)EUMt'm7 Dpi(IT p;g>>INDIANA II MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY P.O.BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N.Y.10004 December 30, 1977 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit, No.1 Docket.No.50-315 DPR.No.58 Mr.Edson G.Case, Acting Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555~.g.'i~P5 Qgegf,q'8~
2p COOK     UNIT 0 1 jcm 01/05/78 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION BRANCH   CHIEF:     7 INTERNAL 0 ISTRI BUTION IRZG F I     z I
I STD I       /JA 0 I   g. 8'aI I   I=.
BXTERNAL OISTRI BUTION                                CONTROL NUMBBR EPDR:
ZIC NSIC fiCRS 16 CYS SENT CATEGPR


==Dear Mr.Case:==
0
This letter is in response to Mr.Don K.Davis'eptember 2, 1977 letter regarding the prevention of feedwater line water hammer by maintaining the feedwater piping and sparger ring sufficiently filled.We have in progress detailed analyses of the behavior of the feedwater system both with and without top discharge spargers.This analysis is described in our response for Unit 2 to Question 010.2 part (c), Amendment 78.At this time, we believe that the results of these analyses will show that, with the present feedwater system design and plant operating procedures, any transient conditions will not damage the piping system.Purther, we do not believe that any potential improvements from top discharge would justify the radiation exposure to the workmen involved in the installation.
                                      )EUMt'm7 Dpi(IT      p; g>>
The results of the analyses will be available for NRC staff review prior to the start of the Cycle 3 refueling outage for Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit No.l.To cover the possibility that the analysis will not substantiate our belief, we are proceeding to procure material and will be prepared to install top discharge spargers (J-tubes)in Unit 1 during the refueling outage.In the event the extended NRC staff review shows"J" tubes to be required for Unit 1, provision will be made to install these tubes during the Cycle 4 refueling outage.
INDIANA II MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY P. O. BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 December 30, 1977 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit, No. 1                                        ~.g.'i~ P5 Docket. No. 50-315                                    Qgegf,q DPR. No. 58 Mr. Edson G. Case, Acting      Director      '8~
i:s",)k:llJJ)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
I f I 1 I Mr.Edison G.Cas V,'P.~4 December 30, 1977 Testing of the top discharge configuration will be carried out on Unit 2 as described in our response to Question 010.1 part.(c), Amendment.
 
78.Any future reports of water hammer events will be made in the form of Enclosure 2 to Mr.Davis'etter.
==Dear Mr. Case:==
Very truly yours, FNB:dp F..Bien Vice President Sworn and subscribed to before me on this/~ay of December, 1977 in New York County New York Notary ubl c.rsvp>D.Sa.l!:O:1:
 
Notary Public, SL~',o ol H.o Ycrlc/Ho.31-~3341<8 Qualified ln Wovr York Count/Commission Expires Marcr 30, 19.ZM.CC G.Charnoff R.J.Vollen R.C.Callen P.W.Steketee R.Walsh R.W.Jurgensen D.V.Shaller-Bridgman  
This   letter is in   response to Mr. Don K. Davis'eptember 2, 1977 letter regarding       the prevention of feedwater line water hammer by maintaining       the feedwater piping and sparger ring sufficiently filled.
~~RFC~>IYFA 00CUl<EHT PiiC~;=:SSl,"~3 UVi t9'i3 JAt)5 Phl.2 52}}
We have in progress detailed analyses of the behavior of the feedwater system both with and without top discharge spargers.
This analysis is described in our response for Unit 2 to Question 010.2 part (c), Amendment 78.
At this time,   we   believe that the results of these analyses will show that, with       the present feedwater system design and plant operating procedures, any transient conditions will not damage the piping system.         Purther, we do not believe that potential improvements from top discharge would justify the any radiation exposure to the workmen involved in the installation.
The results of the analyses will be available for NRC staff review prior to the start of the Cycle 3 refueling outage for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit No. l. To cover the possibility that the analysis will not substantiate our belief, we are proceeding to procure material and will be prepared to install top discharge spargers (J-tubes) in Unit 1 during the refueling outage.
In the event the extended NRC staff review shows "J" tubes to be required for Unit 1, provision will be made to install these tubes during the Cycle 4 refueling outage.
 
i: s",)k:llJJ)
I f
I 1
I
 
Mr. Edison G. Cas V,
December 30, 1977 P.   ~4 Testing of the top discharge configuration will be carried out on Unit 2 as described in our response to Question 010.1 part. (c), Amendment. 78.
Any future reports of water hammer events                   will be made in the form of Enclosure       2 to Mr. Davis'etter.
Very truly yours, F. . Bien Vice President FNB:dp Sworn and subscribed         to before me on   this/~ay   of   December,               1977 in New     York County   New       York Notary     ubl c               .rsvp> D. Sa.l!:O:1:
Notary Public, SL~',o ol H. o Ycrlc
                              /           Ho. 31-~3341<8 Qualified ln Wovr York Count/
CC      G. Charnoff  Commission Expires Marcr 30, 19.ZM.
R.J. Vollen R.C. Callen P.W. Steketee R. Walsh R.W. Jurgensen D.V. Shaller     Bridgman
 
                                ~~
RFC~>IYFA 00CUl<EHT PiiC~;=:SSl,"~3 UVi t9'i3 JAt)     5     Phl .2 52}}

Latest revision as of 19:11, 2 February 2020

12/30/1977 Letter Prevention of Feedwater Line Water Hammer by Maintaining Feedwater Piping and Sparger Ring Sufficiently Filled
ML18219D856
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 12/30/1977
From: Bien F
Indiana Michigan Power Co, (Formerly Indiana & Michigan Power Co)
To: Case E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18219D856 (6)


Text

~ ll DISTRIBUTION AFTER ISSUANCE L PERATING LICENSE NRC FORM 196 UM NUCLEAA REGULATORY COMMISSI DOCXET NUMBER Iz 7S) - ZIS FILE NUMBER NRC OISTRIBUTION FDA PART 60 DOCKET MATERIAL TO>> FROM: DATE OF DOCUMENT Mr. Edson G. Case Indiana 8 Michigan Power Co. 12/30 77 F. N. Bien DATE RECEIVED 01 04 78

~LETTER GNOTORIZED PROP INPUT FORM NUMBER OP COPIPS RECEIVED ABORIGINAL ~NCLASSIPIED CICOPY i<IC aW DESCRIPTION ENCL,OSU AE Response to NRCIs 09/02/77 ltr. regarding the prevention of feedwater line water hammer by maintaining the feedwater piping nd sparger ri,ng sufficiently filled.

Notorized 12/30/77.....

2p COOK UNIT 0 1 jcm 01/05/78 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION BRANCH CHIEF: 7 INTERNAL 0 ISTRI BUTION IRZG F I z I

I STD I /JA 0 I g. 8'aI I I=.

BXTERNAL OISTRI BUTION CONTROL NUMBBR EPDR:

ZIC NSIC fiCRS 16 CYS SENT CATEGPR

0

)EUMt'm7 Dpi(IT p; g>>

INDIANA II MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY P. O. BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 December 30, 1977 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit, No. 1 ~.g.'i~ P5 Docket. No. 50-315 Qgegf,q DPR. No. 58 Mr. Edson G. Case, Acting Director '8~

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Case:

This letter is in response to Mr. Don K. Davis'eptember 2, 1977 letter regarding the prevention of feedwater line water hammer by maintaining the feedwater piping and sparger ring sufficiently filled.

We have in progress detailed analyses of the behavior of the feedwater system both with and without top discharge spargers.

This analysis is described in our response for Unit 2 to Question 010.2 part (c), Amendment 78.

At this time, we believe that the results of these analyses will show that, with the present feedwater system design and plant operating procedures, any transient conditions will not damage the piping system. Purther, we do not believe that potential improvements from top discharge would justify the any radiation exposure to the workmen involved in the installation.

The results of the analyses will be available for NRC staff review prior to the start of the Cycle 3 refueling outage for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit No. l. To cover the possibility that the analysis will not substantiate our belief, we are proceeding to procure material and will be prepared to install top discharge spargers (J-tubes) in Unit 1 during the refueling outage.

In the event the extended NRC staff review shows "J" tubes to be required for Unit 1, provision will be made to install these tubes during the Cycle 4 refueling outage.

i: s",)k:llJJ)

I f

I 1

I

Mr. Edison G. Cas V,

December 30, 1977 P. ~4 Testing of the top discharge configuration will be carried out on Unit 2 as described in our response to Question 010.1 part. (c), Amendment. 78.

Any future reports of water hammer events will be made in the form of Enclosure 2 to Mr. Davis'etter.

Very truly yours, F. . Bien Vice President FNB:dp Sworn and subscribed to before me on this/~ay of December, 1977 in New York County New York Notary ubl c .rsvp> D. Sa.l!:O:1:

Notary Public, SL~',o ol H. o Ycrlc

/ Ho. 31-~3341<8 Qualified ln Wovr York Count/

CC G. Charnoff Commission Expires Marcr 30, 19.ZM.

R.J. Vollen R.C. Callen P.W. Steketee R. Walsh R.W. Jurgensen D.V. Shaller Bridgman

~~

RFC~>IYFA 00CUl<EHT PiiC~;=:SSl,"~3 UVi t9'i3 JAt) 5 Phl .2 52