ML14083A681: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML14083A681
| number = ML14083A681
| issue date = 03/21/2014
| issue date = 03/21/2014
| title = 2014/03/21 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results Regarding Pilgrim 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC No. MF3558)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results Regarding Pilgrim 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair
| author name = Morgan N
| author name = Morgan N
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Morgan, Nadiyah Sent:Friday, March 21, 2014 5:08 PM To:'Lobo, Walter' Cc:'Lynch, Joseph R'
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Morgan, Nadiyah Sent:                       Friday, March 21, 2014 5:08 PM To:                         'Lobo, Walter' Cc:                         'Lynch, Joseph R'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results Regarding PILGRIM 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC NO. MF3558)
Acceptance Review Results Regarding PILGRIM 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC NO. MF3558)
Walt, By letter dated March 5, 2014, Entergy Operations, Inc., the licensee, submitted Relief Request PRR-25 for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory  
: Walt, By letter dated March 5, 2014, Entergy Operations, Inc., the licensee, submitted Relief Request PRR-25 for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of PRR-25. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of PRR-25. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
The NRC staff review timeframe for relief requests is typically one year. The licensee requested a shorten review schedule for PRR-25. Since the licensee is not performing an immediate repair or modification, the NRC staff will schedule to complete its review of PRR-25 within a year.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in  
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that  
 
impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
The NRC staff review timeframe for relief requests is typically one year. The licensee requested a shorten review schedule for PRR-25. Since the licensee is not performing an immediate repair or modification, the NRC staff will schedule to complete its review of PRR-25 within a year.  
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Thanks, Dee  
: Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S Morgan Calvert Cliffs and Pilgrim Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301.415.1016 1
 
Nadiyah S Morgan Calvert Cliffs and Pilgrim Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301.415.1016  


Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1184   Mail Envelope Properties   (Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov20140321170800)
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           1184 Mail Envelope Properties     (Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov20140321170800)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results Regarding PILGRIM 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC NO. MF3558) Sent Date:   3/21/2014 5:08:29 PM Received Date: 3/21/2014 5:08:00 PM From:   Morgan, Nadiyah Created By:   Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'Lynch, Joseph R'" <jlynch4@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None
Acceptance Review Results Regarding PILGRIM 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC NO. MF3558)
"'Lobo, Walter'" <wlobo@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1993     3/21/2014 5:08:00 PM
Sent Date:               3/21/2014 5:08:29 PM Received Date:           3/21/2014 5:08:00 PM From:                   Morgan, Nadiyah Created By:             Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"'Lynch, Joseph R'" <jlynch4@entergy.com>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None
"'Lobo, Walter'" <wlobo@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         1993                   3/21/2014 5:08:00 PM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 08:14, 5 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results Regarding Pilgrim 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair
ML14083A681
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 03/21/2014
From: Nadiyah Morgan
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Lobo W
Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
MF3558
Download: ML14083A681 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Morgan, Nadiyah Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 5:08 PM To: 'Lobo, Walter' Cc: 'Lynch, Joseph R'

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results Regarding PILGRIM 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC NO. MF3558)

Walt, By letter dated March 5, 2014, Entergy Operations, Inc., the licensee, submitted Relief Request PRR-25 for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of PRR-25. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

The NRC staff review timeframe for relief requests is typically one year. The licensee requested a shorten review schedule for PRR-25. Since the licensee is not performing an immediate repair or modification, the NRC staff will schedule to complete its review of PRR-25 within a year.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S Morgan Calvert Cliffs and Pilgrim Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301.415.1016 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1184 Mail Envelope Properties (Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov20140321170800)

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results Regarding PILGRIM 1 - PRR-25, Salt Water Service System Pipe Flaw Repair (TAC NO. MF3558)

Sent Date: 3/21/2014 5:08:29 PM Received Date: 3/21/2014 5:08:00 PM From: Morgan, Nadiyah Created By: Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Lynch, Joseph R'" <jlynch4@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Lobo, Walter'" <wlobo@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1993 3/21/2014 5:08:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: