ML15217A037: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15217A037
| number = ML15217A037
| issue date = 08/04/2015
| issue date = 08/04/2015
| title = 2015/08/04 NRR E-mail Capture - PRB Initial Recommendation for Sace 2.206 Petition Regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - PRB Initial Recommendation for Sace 2.206 Petition Regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement
| author name = Saba F E
| author name = Saba F
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| addressee name = Curran D J
| addressee name = Curran D
| addressee affiliation = Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP
| addressee affiliation = Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP
| docket = 05000389
| docket = 05000389
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Tuesday, August 04, 2015 11:43 AMTo:'dcurran@harmoncurran.com'Cc:Galvin, Dennis; Helton, Shana; Banic, Merrilee; Mensah, Tanya; Monteith, Emily; Chereskin, Alexander
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Saba, Farideh Sent:                       Tuesday, August 04, 2015 11:43 AM To:                         'dcurran@harmoncurran.com' Cc:                         Galvin, Dennis; Helton, Shana; Banic, Merrilee; Mensah, Tanya; Monteith, Emily; Chereskin, Alexander


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PRB Initial Recommendation for SACE 2.206 Petition regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator ReplacementImportance:HighMs. Diane Curran Harmon Curran Spielberg &Eisenberg LLP Counsel for SACE  
PRB Initial Recommendation for SACE 2.206 Petition regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement Importance:                 High Ms. Diane Curran Harmon Curran Spielberg &Eisenberg LLP Counsel for SACE


==Dear Ms. Curran,==
==Dear Ms. Curran,==


This is a follow up to my voice mail that I left for you today, in reference to the petition you submitted on behalf of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) on March 10, 2014, regarding St. Lucie plant, Unit 2 steam generators replacement. You initially filed the petition as a request for a hearing. However, the Commission, by a Memorandum and Order (CLI-14-11) dated December 19, 2014, referred your request to the Executive Director for Operations for disposition under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206.  
This is a follow up to my voice mail that I left for you today, in reference to the petition you submitted on behalf of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) on March 10, 2014, regarding St. Lucie plant, Unit 2 steam generators replacement. You initially filed the petition as a request for a hearing. However, the Commission, by a Memorandum and Order (CLI-14-11) dated December 19, 2014, referred your request to the Executive Director for Operations for disposition under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206.
The NRC has established a Petition Review Board (PRB) to review your petition. The PRB met internally on March 25, April 29, and May 20, 2015, to discuss your petition with respect to the criteria for review and rejection described in Management Directive (MD) 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions. Based upon that review, the PRB initially recommended that your request partially meets the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206.
The parts of the petition that met the criteria for rejection per MD 8.11 rejection criterion 2 are the concerns related to the inspection of the replacement Steam Generators (SGs), as well as the concerns regarding the effects of the extended power uprate on SG tube inservice inspection and flow-induced effects on the SG internals. These items do not meet the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206 since they have already been reviewed and evaluated by the NRC staff. However, the PRB determined that part of your petition that addresses SACEs concerns regarding the licensees application of the 50.59 process with respect to the change in a methodology as described in the Updated Final Safety Evaluation Report meets the criteria for acceptance of a petition under 10 CFR 2.206. The NRC staff is currently reviewing the licensees 50.59 evaluation of SG replacements.
Per MD 8.11, we are offering you another opportunity to address the PRB, if you have additional information in support of your petition for the PRB to consider. Please notify me by August 7, 2015, with your availability, if you wish to address the PRB in a public meeting or via a recorded conference call. If I have not heard from you by August 7th, the PRB's recommendation will become the final recommendation and we will proceed with processing your request as recommended by the PRB. Further details regarding the PRB's final recommendation and the NRCs future actions will be provided to you in an acknowledgement letter.
I also would like to inform you that Mr. Dennis Galvin will be assigned as the petition manager for the SACE petition in September. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Galvin, if you have any questions or comments.
: Regards, Farideh 1


The NRC has established a Petition Review Board (PRB) to review your petition. The PRB met internally on March 25, April 29, and May 20, 2015, to discuss your petition with respect to the criteria for review and rejection described in Management Directive (MD) 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions." Based upon that review, the PRB initially recommended that your request partially meets the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206.
Farideh E. Saba, P.E.
The parts of the petition that met the criteria for rejection per MD 8.11 rejection criterion 2 are the concerns related to the inspection of the replacement Steam Generators (SGs), as well as the concerns regarding the effects of the extended power uprate on SG tube inservice inspection and flow-induced effects on the SG internals. These items do not meet the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206 since they have already been reviewed and evaluated by the NRC staff. However, the PRB determined that part of your petition that addresses SACE's concerns regarding the licensee's application of the 50.59 process with respect to the change in a methodology as described in the Updated Final Safety Evaluation Report meets the criteria for acceptance of a petition under 10 CFR 2.206. The NRC staff is currently reviewing the licensee's 50.59 evaluation of SG replacements.
Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV Dennis Galvin Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-6356 Dennis.Galvin@NRC.GOV Tracking:
2


Per MD 8.11, we are offering you another opportunity to address the PRB, if you have additional information in support of your petition for the PRB to consider. Please notify me by August 7, 2015, with your availability, if you wish to address the PRB in a public meeting or via a recorded conference call. If I have not heard from you by August 7th, the PRB's recommendation will become the final recommendation and we will proceed with processing your request as recommended by the PRB. Further details regarding the PRB's final recommendation and the NRC's future actions will be provided to you in an acknowledgement letter. I also would like to inform you that Mr. Dennis Galvin will be assigned as the petition manager for the SACE petition in September. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Galvin, if you have any questions or comments.
Recipient                    Read
'dcurran@harmoncurran.com' Galvin, Dennis              Read: 8/4/2015 12:30 PM Helton, Shana Banic, Merrilee Mensah, Tanya                Read: 8/4/2015 11:53 AM Monteith, Emily Chereskin, Alexander        Read: 8/4/2015 11:55 AM 3


Regards,  Farideh 2 Farideh E. Saba, P.E.
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2272 Mail Envelope Properties     (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20150804114300)
Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV Dennis Galvin Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-6356 Dennis.Galvin@NRC.GOV  Tracking:
3RecipientRead'dcurran@harmoncurran.com'Galvin, DennisRead: 8/4/2015 12:30 PM Helton, Shana Banic, Merrilee Mensah, TanyaRead: 8/4/2015 11:53 AM Monteith, Emily Chereskin, AlexanderRead: 8/4/2015 11:55 AM Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2272   Mail Envelope Properties   (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20150804114300)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PRB Initial Recommendation for SACE 2.206 Petition regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement Sent Date:   8/4/2015 11:43:25 AM Received Date: 8/4/2015 11:43:00 AM From:   Saba, Farideh Created By:   Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Galvin, Dennis" <Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov> Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 12:30:00 PM "Helton, Shana" <Shana.Helton@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Banic, Merrilee" <Merrilee.Banic@nrc.gov>
PRB Initial Recommendation for SACE 2.206 Petition regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement Sent Date:               8/4/2015 11:43:25 AM Received Date:           8/4/2015 11:43:00 AM From:                   Saba, Farideh Created By:             Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "Mensah, Tanya" <Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov> Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 11:53:00 AM "Monteith, Emily" <Emily.Monteith@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Chereskin, Alexander" <Alexander.Chereskin@nrc.gov> Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 11:55:00 AM "'dcurran@harmoncurran.com'" <dcurran@harmoncurran.com> Tracking Status: None  
"Galvin, Dennis" <Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov>
 
Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 12:30:00 PM "Helton, Shana" <Shana.Helton@nrc.gov>
Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   3126     8/4/2015 11:43:00 AM Options Priority:     High   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   Yes   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Banic, Merrilee" <Merrilee.Banic@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Mensah, Tanya" <Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 11:53:00 AM "Monteith, Emily" <Emily.Monteith@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Chereskin, Alexander" <Alexander.Chereskin@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 11:55:00 AM
"'dcurran@harmoncurran.com'" <dcurran@harmoncurran.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         3126                   8/4/2015 11:43:00 AM Options Priority:                       High Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 Yes Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 23:12, 4 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - PRB Initial Recommendation for Sace 2.206 Petition Regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement
ML15217A037
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/04/2015
From: Farideh Saba
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Curran D
Harmon, Curran, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP
References
Download: ML15217A037 (4)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Saba, Farideh Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 11:43 AM To: 'dcurran@harmoncurran.com' Cc: Galvin, Dennis; Helton, Shana; Banic, Merrilee; Mensah, Tanya; Monteith, Emily; Chereskin, Alexander

Subject:

PRB Initial Recommendation for SACE 2.206 Petition regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement Importance: High Ms. Diane Curran Harmon Curran Spielberg &Eisenberg LLP Counsel for SACE

Dear Ms. Curran,

This is a follow up to my voice mail that I left for you today, in reference to the petition you submitted on behalf of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) on March 10, 2014, regarding St. Lucie plant, Unit 2 steam generators replacement. You initially filed the petition as a request for a hearing. However, the Commission, by a Memorandum and Order (CLI-14-11) dated December 19, 2014, referred your request to the Executive Director for Operations for disposition under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206.

The NRC has established a Petition Review Board (PRB) to review your petition. The PRB met internally on March 25, April 29, and May 20, 2015, to discuss your petition with respect to the criteria for review and rejection described in Management Directive (MD) 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions. Based upon that review, the PRB initially recommended that your request partially meets the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206.

The parts of the petition that met the criteria for rejection per MD 8.11 rejection criterion 2 are the concerns related to the inspection of the replacement Steam Generators (SGs), as well as the concerns regarding the effects of the extended power uprate on SG tube inservice inspection and flow-induced effects on the SG internals. These items do not meet the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206 since they have already been reviewed and evaluated by the NRC staff. However, the PRB determined that part of your petition that addresses SACEs concerns regarding the licensees application of the 50.59 process with respect to the change in a methodology as described in the Updated Final Safety Evaluation Report meets the criteria for acceptance of a petition under 10 CFR 2.206. The NRC staff is currently reviewing the licensees 50.59 evaluation of SG replacements.

Per MD 8.11, we are offering you another opportunity to address the PRB, if you have additional information in support of your petition for the PRB to consider. Please notify me by August 7, 2015, with your availability, if you wish to address the PRB in a public meeting or via a recorded conference call. If I have not heard from you by August 7th, the PRB's recommendation will become the final recommendation and we will proceed with processing your request as recommended by the PRB. Further details regarding the PRB's final recommendation and the NRCs future actions will be provided to you in an acknowledgement letter.

I also would like to inform you that Mr. Dennis Galvin will be assigned as the petition manager for the SACE petition in September. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Galvin, if you have any questions or comments.

Regards, Farideh 1

Farideh E. Saba, P.E.

Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV Dennis Galvin Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-6356 Dennis.Galvin@NRC.GOV Tracking:

2

Recipient Read

'dcurran@harmoncurran.com' Galvin, Dennis Read: 8/4/2015 12:30 PM Helton, Shana Banic, Merrilee Mensah, Tanya Read: 8/4/2015 11:53 AM Monteith, Emily Chereskin, Alexander Read: 8/4/2015 11:55 AM 3

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2272 Mail Envelope Properties (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20150804114300)

Subject:

PRB Initial Recommendation for SACE 2.206 Petition regarding St. Lucie Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement Sent Date: 8/4/2015 11:43:25 AM Received Date: 8/4/2015 11:43:00 AM From: Saba, Farideh Created By: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Galvin, Dennis" <Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 12:30:00 PM "Helton, Shana" <Shana.Helton@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Banic, Merrilee" <Merrilee.Banic@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Mensah, Tanya" <Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 11:53:00 AM "Monteith, Emily" <Emily.Monteith@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Chereskin, Alexander" <Alexander.Chereskin@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status:: Response: Read : 8/4/2015 11:55:00 AM

"'dcurran@harmoncurran.com'" <dcurran@harmoncurran.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3126 8/4/2015 11:43:00 AM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15217A037&oldid=2232453"