ML19260F775: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19260F775
| number = ML19260F775
| issue date = 09/17/2019
| issue date = 09/17/2019
| title = Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Administrative Amendments to Revise TS 3.0.5, SR Applicability
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Administrative Amendments to Revise TS 3.0.5, SR Applicability
| author name = Mahoney M
| author name = Mahoney M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1

Latest revision as of 06:57, 1 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Administrative Amendments to Revise TS 3.0.5, SR Applicability
ML19260F775
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/17/2019
From: Michael Mahoney
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Vaughan J
Duke Energy Carolinas
References
L-2019-LLA-0191
Download: ML19260F775 (2)


Text

NRR-DRMAPEm Resource From: Mahoney, Michael Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 9:27 AM To: Vaughan, Jordan L Cc: 'Art Zaremba'

Subject:

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Administrative Amendments to Revise TS 3.0.5, SR Applicability

Jordan, By letter dated September 4, 2019, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (Catawba). The LAR proposes to revise Catawbas Technical Specifications (TS) to correct an editorial error in TS 3.0.5, SR [Surveillance Requirement] Applicability.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 120 hours0.00139 days <br />0.0333 hours <br />1.984127e-4 weeks <br />4.566e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 9 months, which is June, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks Mike Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 202 Mail Envelope Properties (SN6PR09MB30409AE5C1D6BD184A1A5B43E58F0)

Subject:

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Administrative Amendments to Revise TS 3.0.5, SR Applicability Sent Date: 9/17/2019 9:26:42 AM Received Date: 9/17/2019 9:26:44 AM From: Mahoney, Michael Created By: Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Art Zaremba'" <Arthur.Zaremba@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Vaughan, Jordan L" <Jordan.Vaughan@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: SN6PR09MB3040.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2794 9/17/2019 9:26:44 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: