ML060860172: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-401 Millstone Point Unit 2 Retake Written Examination Feb 06 Form ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-401                                     Millstone Point Unit 2 Retake Written Examination Feb 06                                           Form ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet NOTE 1: All NRC examiner comments on the draft questions have been resolvedAncorporated.
: 5. Other NOTE 1: All NRC examiner comments on the draft questions have been resolvedAncorporated.
Note 2: The following questions and/or correct answers were changed after NRC review of draft questions based on feedback from licensee validators: 8, 10,20,29,35,36, 48,49,50,51,58, 61, 63. These questions were graded E pending receipt of applicable references. These questions received a second technical review by the NRC examiner(s)
: 6. 7. Note 2: The following questions and/or correct answers were changed after NRC review of draft questions based on feedback from licensee validators:
)# 1 26KI L:i v.         -  ~          ~-
8, 10,20,29,35,36, 48,49,50,51,58, 61, 63. These questions were graded "E'' pending receipt of applicable references.
Psychometric Flaws         4. Job Content Flaws I          -5. Other 6.
These questions received a second technical review by the NRC examiner(s)
I 7.
Q= KIA Y - ~ ~- )# 1 26K I L:i v. Psychometric Flaws (F/H) (1-5) Stem Focus v 4. Job Content Flaws SRO U/US Explanation Only N E W'not credible with given stem conditions. Stem dioes not specify any CEA position issues Charlge first part of stern to 'The plant was being shutdown per AOP- 2575 "Rapid Downpower" when the CRS directed a Manual Trip." (GAJ) . - "E" replaced, other chanqes made as recommended y+ H Y* N S
y+
* WA 'match considered acceptable since the question is related to flow out of PORV YNS #I Back- inits I ward 4H3 5H3 6H2 7F2 8H2 - I YINIS I Need to validate correct answer against reference@) Validated with new reverences
(F/H) (1-5) Stem                                         #I Back- Q= SRO U/US                                     Explanation Focus                                        inits ward KIA Only v                                                                        Y    N E   Wnot credible with given stem conditions. Stem dioes not specify any CEA position issues Charlge first part of stern to The plant was being shutdown per AOP-2575 Rapid Downpower when the CRS directed a Manual Trip. (GAJ)
: 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other YN YN YN YN NN YN YN YN Y* N YN YN YN YN 7. Explanation E Need to validate correct answer against reference(s) Validated with new reverences S - U ~~ - minor format DV-10 (GAJ) Fixed on final version WA'mismatch. Question is about environmental impact, not battery Note: Very similar WA to question 50 WA match resolved >,j>. capacity(GAJ) , !: -.
                                                                                              -
* r: E t :: Ensure reference supports correct answer (GAJ) Validated with new reverences S S S *Note: Lack of radiation alarm is a needed cue for question (GAJ) E add "femporary"in front of procedure change in  
                                                                                            . Ereplaced, other chanqes made as recommended Y*     N S
'B" "C and "D to completely match WA (GAJ) Changes made Need to validate correct answer against reference(s)
* WA match considered acceptable since the question is related to flow out of PORV H                                                                  Y    N  S 4    H    3 5    H    3 6    H    2 7    F    2 Y I N I SI 8    H    2                                                                                  Need to validate correct answer against reference@)
Validated with new reverences SI Need to validate correct answer against reference($) Validated with new reverences C 0 m C m Cl ._ c - 3 r-: >- > N N N L n N - - N D 
Validated with new reverences
: 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other                                         7.
Explanation Y    N Y    N  E           Need to validate correct answer against reference(s)
Validated with new reverences Y    N  S
                                                                                    ~~               -
Y    N                            minor format DV-10 (GAJ)
Fixed on final version
                                                    -
N    N  U    WAmismatch. Question is about environmentalimpact, not battery
                                                          >,j>.                   capacity(GAJ)
                                                          , !:         Note: Very similar WA to question 50 WA match resolved
                                                          -.* r:
Y    N  E       t :: Ensure reference supports correct answer (GAJ)
Validated with new reverences Y    N  S Y    N  S Y*    N  S   *Note: Lack of radiation alarm is a needed cue for question (GAJ)
Y    N  E     add femporaryin front of procedure change in B C and D to completely match WA (GAJ)
Changes made Need to validate correct answer against reference(s)
Validated with new reverences Y    N  S I Y    N              Need to validate correct answer against reference($)
Validated with new reverences Y    N


I T 0 m 8 m w ._ c - :: r-: w w w i z - t z - i Z J + +$ 0 (D (D F H - 3. Psychometric Flaws
C
: 4. Job Content Flaws Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia  
    ._
#/ Back- Focus Dist.
c 0
Link units ward
m r-: -
: 5. Other 6. 7. Explanation Q= SRO U/US yz WA Only YINIE I Do not use "should" (RJC)
C m
Changed "should" to "Will" YNS YNE Should be lower order LOK (RJC) Changed to "F"; still >50% "H" YNS ~ -~ ~- Instructions 3efer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
Cl 3
: 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
        >- >
: 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
N  N N L
: 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information). The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
n
        -
N  D N
 
I T
0
    ._
c m
r-: 8
    -
m
::
w i
w     w   w z    z     Z
      -   -
t   i J
              +
          +$
0 (D   (D
: 3. Psychometric Flaws               4. Job Content Flaws           5. Other    6.                                      7.
Stem Cues         T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/US                         yz                         Explanation Focus                    Dist.          Link            units ward WA Only Y I N I EI                                Do not use should (RJC)
Changed should to Will Y    N      S Y    N      E                        Should be lower order LOK (RJC)
Changed to F; still >50% H
    -  F                                                                                      Y    N      S H
                                                                                                          ~             -~                                             ~-
Instructions 3efer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
: 1.       Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamentalor (H)igher cognitive level.
: 2.                                                                                   -
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
: 3.       Check the appropriate box if a psychometricflaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficientfocus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
One or more tkEnteftedistractors is not credible.
One or more tkEnteftedistractorsis not credible.
One or more distractors Is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). The question is not linked to the job requirements (Le., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).
One or more distractors Is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that IS too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory). The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons). The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
: 4.        Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
: 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (Le., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).
: 5. 6. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved WA and those that are desianated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable). Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?  
The question requires the recall of knowledge that IS too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory).
-_ .- - -. 7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). NUREG-1021, Revision 9}}
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or applicationcompared to the job requirements.
: 5.       Check questions that are sampled for conformancewith the approved WA and those that are desianated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
: 6.        Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable(requiring repair or replacement),
                                                                                                                          .- in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
                                                                                                                      --_-.
: 7.       At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
NUREG-1021, Revision 9}}

Revision as of 21:45, 23 November 2019

NRC Comments on Draft Licensee-Developed Written Exam (Folder 2)
ML060860172
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/24/2005
From: Jane Spence
Dominion Resources
To: Johnson G
Operations Branch I
Conte R
References
Download: ML060860172 (6)


Text

ES-401 Millstone Point Unit 2 Retake Written Examination Feb 06 Form ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet NOTE 1: All NRC examiner comments on the draft questions have been resolvedAncorporated.

Note 2: The following questions and/or correct answers were changed after NRC review of draft questions based on feedback from licensee validators: 8, 10,20,29,35,36, 48,49,50,51,58, 61, 63. These questions were graded E pending receipt of applicable references. These questions received a second technical review by the NRC examiner(s)

)# 1 26KI L:i v. - ~ ~-

Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws I -5. Other 6.

I 7.

y+

(F/H) (1-5) Stem #I Back- Q= SRO U/US Explanation Focus inits ward KIA Only v Y N E Wnot credible with given stem conditions. Stem dioes not specify any CEA position issues Charlge first part of stern to The plant was being shutdown per AOP-2575 Rapid Downpower when the CRS directed a Manual Trip. (GAJ)

-

. Ereplaced, other chanqes made as recommended Y* N S

  • WA match considered acceptable since the question is related to flow out of PORV H Y N S 4 H 3 5 H 3 6 H 2 7 F 2 Y I N I SI 8 H 2 Need to validate correct answer against reference@)

Validated with new reverences

3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 7.

Explanation Y N Y N E Need to validate correct answer against reference(s)

Validated with new reverences Y N S

~~ -

Y N minor format DV-10 (GAJ)

Fixed on final version

-

N N U WAmismatch. Question is about environmentalimpact, not battery

>,j>. capacity(GAJ)

, !: Note: Very similar WA to question 50 WA match resolved

-.* r:

Y N E t :: Ensure reference supports correct answer (GAJ)

Validated with new reverences Y N S Y N S Y* N S *Note: Lack of radiation alarm is a needed cue for question (GAJ)

Y N E add femporaryin front of procedure change in B C and D to completely match WA (GAJ)

Changes made Need to validate correct answer against reference(s)

Validated with new reverences Y N S I Y N Need to validate correct answer against reference($)

Validated with new reverences Y N

C

._

c 0

m r-: -

C m

Cl 3

>- >

N N N L

n

-

N D N

I T

0

._

c m

r-: 8

-

m

w i

w w w z z Z

- -

t i J

+

+$

0 (D (D

3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/US yz Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward WA Only Y I N I EI Do not use should (RJC)

Changed should to Will Y N S Y N E Should be lower order LOK (RJC)

Changed to F; still >50% H

- F Y N S H

~ -~ ~-

Instructions 3efer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamentalor (H)igher cognitive level.
2. -

Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).

3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometricflaw is identified:

The stem lacks sufficientfocus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

One or more tkEnteftedistractorsis not credible.

One or more distractors Is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (Le., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that IS too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or applicationcompared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformancewith the approved WA and those that are desianated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable(requiring repair or replacement),

.- in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

--_-.

7. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

NUREG-1021, Revision 9